Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This surely looks like overkill, I doubt there are 4 in a row like: > > .../standard/standard/standard/standard/... There aren't and the descriptor doesn't say that either (the first one is a , not a

Re: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why is Gumpy considering this below as a build failure? Note that the properties jstl.jar and standard.jar get set to the relative paths of the jars, relative to jstl-jsps-12's home. Note also, that the jar names for the things def

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> The reason of the error is that the jstl jar cannot be found. This jar > is defined as a dependent jar in the GOM descriptor. Shouldn't Gumpy > verify if the dependent jars can be found? Good question. This surely looks like overkill, I doubt there are 4 in a row like:

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

Hello, Why is Gumpy considering this below as a build failure? The reason of the error is that the jstl jar cannot be found. This jar is defined as a dependent jar in the GOM descriptor. Shouldn't Gumpy verify if the dependent jars can be found? It may have to do with the fact that I moved yest

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 16:29 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > > > I've used the build log: > > > > > >

Re: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> > I've used the build log: > > > > > cactus/gump_work/build_jakarta-cactus_jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > > 13.html> > > arg. Yes, it's very clear in there. I wonder why the link in the Gump > email does not point to this file instead of the gene

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 10:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had looked at the web site but I could not find this > information. I looked at > http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample- > servlet-13.html. Is there another place to look at? I've used the build lo

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 09:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have an idea what the error below is about? Yes, look at the website. Several of the JSTL tag implementation classes haven't been found and in fact they are not inside jstl.jar which is on the CLASSPATH. They are in sta

[repost] FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

Hi, Does anyone have an idea what the error below is about? It seems like an Ant bug to me but I'm not sure. In any case it works fine on my local build on 2 different machines. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2004 06

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

Hi, Does anyone have an idea what the error below is about? It seems like an Ant bug to me but I'm not sure. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2004 06:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cac