The least it could do is email you back the diff to patch your own copy
of cvs with, or to spam this list with :)
Scott
On Mar 12, 2004, at 9:30 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
man, it took me two months to have a single clean gump run for cocoon,
then I let go and it fell apart, so I do feel you
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2004 21:09
To: Gump code and data
Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?
Vincent Massol wrote:
The way I code is as follows:
1/ make a change on my local
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 March 2004 21:09
> To: Gump code and data
> Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>
> > The way I code is as fo
> I never though that people would have a problem modifying the metadata
> files for fear of breaking gump.
>
> But, I wonder, if your build is already broken, why are you afraid of
> breaking it?
I suspect folks are nervous of breaking other's builds via their mistakes. I
know I was, and only ti
Vincent Massol wrote:
The way I code is as follows:
1/ make a change on my local machine
2/ verify it works by running some kind of tests
If I don't do 2/ then there is a high chance it will break something and
I'll only know the following day.
To do 2, there are 2 solutions I can see:
1/ install
Hi Stefano,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 March 2004 15:31
> To: Gump code and data
> Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?
[snip]
> > Again the problem is the same. I don't have ac
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 March 2004 10:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cactus does n
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and I don't have access to the cactus descriptors ;-)
Ooops, in fact I have, sorry.
I'll make the change.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again the problem is the same. I don't have access to a gump machine
> and I don't want to make a CVS change if I can verify it still
> works...
and I don't have access to the cactus descriptors ;-)
> I think if you want to make Gu
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 March 2004 10:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cactus does not use directly commons-code. It may be used by a
> cactus dependency like Tomcat, Commons HttpClient or
> others.
I think it is httpclient.
> Wouldn't it be better to add this dependency to the project directly
> usin
11 matches
Mail list logo
