On May 15, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I
would like to release.
It is available at:
+1, downloaded, tried a few things on a one node cluster.
sanjay
On May 15, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
+1. Verified with HDFS and MR validation tests and on a single node cluster.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at:
+1 Downloaded the tarball and tested MapReduce and Distributed Shell
jobs on a single node cluster. Everything works fine.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It
+1 verified all signatures and message digests.
Tsz-Wo
From: Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:20 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop
@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: Arun C Murthy
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
+1 Downloaded and verified basic sanity.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Thomas Graves tgra...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
+1, src tarball contents look good, builds, and ran some jobs on a single
node cluster using both built
+1, Downloaded and verified HDFS tests and small MR job.. Thanks a lot Arun.
Thanks Regards,
Uma
From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:50 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
Regards,
Uma
From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:50 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
7:50 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
The maven artifacts are available
, May 16, 2012 7:50 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
The maven
and small MR job.. Thanks a lot
Arun.
Thanks Regards,
Uma
From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:50 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1
I've created
+1, src tarball contents look good, builds, and ran some jobs on a single
node cluster using both built from source and binary.
Thanks,
Tom
On 5/15/12 9:20 PM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Thomas Graves tgra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+1, src tarball contents look good, builds, and ran some jobs on a single
node cluster using both built from source and binary.
+1 based on the Bigtop 0.4.0-SNAPSHOT test results.
There were a couple of Mahout
+1 Downloaded and verified basic sanity.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Thomas Graves tgra...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
+1, src tarball contents look good, builds, and ran some jobs on a single
node cluster using both built from source and binary.
Thanks,
Tom
On 5/15/12 9:20 PM, Arun C
OK, the fixes to CHANGES.txt and JIRA are complete. Sorry for the mail bomb ;-)
-Todd
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Thanks for posting the new RC. Will take a look tomorrow. Meanwhile,
I'm going through CHANGES.txt and JIRA and moving things that didn't
On 15 May 2012 19:20, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would
like to release.
It is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
The maven artifacts are available via
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Hey Arun,
One more thing on the rc tarball: the source artifact
:
Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To:
general@hadoop.apache.org
Date:
05/14/2012 11:21 PM
Subject:
Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
--
Hey Arun,
One more thing on the rc tarball: the source artifact doesn't appear
to be an exact svn
:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Uma Maheswara Rao G mahesw...@huawei.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent
-
From: Tsz Wo Sze szets...@yahoo.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Uma
(without it,
2.0.0-alphaand 2.0.0 will be incompatible.)
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Tsz Wo Sze szets...@yahoo.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Uma Maheswara Rao G mahesw...@huawei.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:56 AM
Subject
I've created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like
to release.
It is available at: http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.0.0-alpha-rc1/
The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the
Thanks for posting the new RC. Will take a look tomorrow. Meanwhile,
I'm going through CHANGES.txt and JIRA and moving things that didn't
make the 2.0.0 cut to 2.0.1.
So, if folks commit things tomorrow, please check to put it in the
right spot in CHANGES.txt and in JIRA. I'll take care of
From: Arun C Murthy [a...@hortonworks.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:24 PM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Todd,
Please go ahead and merge changes into branch-2.0.0-alpha and I'll roll RC1.
thanks,
Arun
On May 12, 2012, at 10:05 PM, Todd Lipcon
10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
a) Revert HDFS-3157 and commit HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366 on
branch-2.0.0-alpha, so these are the only changes since rc0. Roll a
new rc1 from here.
I have merged HDFS-3157 revert.
Do you mind taking a look at HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366
Great! Thanks a lot Nicholas!
From: Tsz Wo Sze [szets...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:37 PM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original
(without it, 2.0.0-alphaand 2.0.0
will be incompatible.)
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Tsz Wo Sze szets...@yahoo.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge
hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message -
From: Uma Maheswara Rao G mahesw...@huawei.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:56 AM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release
Message -
From: Tsz Wo Sze szets...@yahoo.com
To: general@hadoop.apache.org general@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release hadoop-2.0.0-alpha
Let me merge HADOOP-8285 and HADOOP-8366. Thanks.
Tsz-Wo
- Original Message
Looking at the release tag vs the current state of branch-2, I have
two concerns from the point of view of HDFS:
1) We reverted HDFS-3157 in branch-2 because it sends deletions for
corrupt replicas without properly going through the corrupt block
path. We saw this cause data loss in
+1 I installed the build on a 6 node cluster and kicked the tires,
didn't find any blocking issues.
Btw in the future better to build from the svn repo so the revision is
an svn rev from the release branch. Eg 1336254 instead of 40e90d3c7
which is from the git mirror, this way we're consistent
Hi Todd,
Have you seen the new MiniMRClientCluster class? It's meant to be what
you describe - a minicluster which only exposes external APIs --
most importantly a way of getting at a JobClient to submit jobs. We
have it implemented in both 1.x and 2.x at this point, though I don't
recall if
Let's take one basic case, how does one find the address of the job
tracker in a version agnostic way?
Pardon, I should also have included the other half of that particular
problem: How does one set the address of the job tracker in a version
agnostic way?
Configuration conf =
Arun,
Awesome, thanks for working on this. I'll definitely kick the tires.
Noticed the mvn version is 2.0.0-alpha, should we make it 2.0.0-alpha1
in case we need to roll multiple alpha releases?
Thanks,
Eli
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created
-1 (nonbinding), we are currently facing a minicluster semantic change
of some kind, or more than one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5966
There are other HBase JIRAs related to 2.0.0-alpha that we are working
on, but I'd claim those are all our fault for breaking abstractions
+1 I downloaded it and run a few simple tests wordcount etc. on a single node
cluster with no security.
--Bobby Evans
On 5/9/12 11:58 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like to
release.
It is available at:
On May 9, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
Arun,
Awesome, thanks for working on this. I'll definitely kick the tires.
Noticed the mvn version is 2.0.0-alpha, should we make it 2.0.0-alpha1
in case we need to roll multiple alpha releases?
I was thinking 2.0.1-alpha, or
Sounds good Arun.
How should we consider the suitability and stability of MiniMRCluster
for downstream projects?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
No worries Andy. I can spin an rc1 once we can pin-point the bug.
thanks,
Arun
On May 9, 2012, at
For this reason, in HDFS, we change MiniDFSCluster to LimitedPrivate and
not treat it as such:
@InterfaceAudience.LimitedPrivate({HBase, HDFS, Hive, MapReduce,
Pig})
@InterfaceStability.Unstable
public class MiniDFSCluster { ...}
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Purtell
+1 (non-binding)
Downloaded the tarball and ran example mr jobs on a single node
cluster, also tried distributed shell jobs.
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've created a release candidate for hadoop-2.0.0-alpha that I would like to
Hi Suresh,
The unstable designation makes sense. As would one for MiniMRCluster.
I was over the top initially to surprise. I'm sure the MR minicluster seems a
minor detail.
Maybe it's worth thinking about the miniclusters differently? Please pardon if
I am rehashing an old discussion.
Hi Andrew,
Have you seen the new MiniMRClientCluster class? It's meant to be what
you describe - a minicluster which only exposes external APIs --
most importantly a way of getting at a JobClient to submit jobs. We
have it implemented in both 1.x and 2.x at this point, though I don't
recall if
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On May 9, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
Arun,
Awesome, thanks for working on this. I'll definitely kick the tires.
Noticed the mvn version is 2.0.0-alpha, should we make it 2.0.0-alpha1
in case we need to
45 matches
Mail list logo
