Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator

2006-07-12 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 7/11/06, Danese Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I get a vote... not so: everyone gets a vote :-) anyone who has a opinion on any issue should definitely feel free to express it however, only some votes are binding on apache (in this case, AIUI votes from those currently on the

[pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread peter royal
I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, http://asyncweb.safehaus.org, an HTTP engine built upon MINA http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/, on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started a proposal at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Torsten Curdt
On 7/12/06, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, http://asyncweb.safehaus.org, an HTTP engine built upon MINA http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/, on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started a

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Peter, Can you please ping the Jakarta HttpComponents folks? see what they think? thanks, dims On 7/12/06, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, http://asyncweb.safehaus.org, an HTTP engine built upon MINA

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 7/12/06, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, http://asyncweb.safehaus.org, an HTTP engine built upon MINA http://directory.apache.org/subprojects/mina/, on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started a

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the point: I think he might be interested in this, at

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread peter royal
On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Dave Irving
Yoav Shapira-2 wrote: Hi, You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the point: I think he

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Thomas Dudziak
On 7/12/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread peter royal
On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote: On 7/12/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Thomas Dudziak
Sure! But do keep in mind, AsyncWeb is not a servlet container.. but I'm sure there's still bits to be shared, all the work the container does before having to dedicate a thread. exactly, and I'm sure that Greg would be interested, if not in the code, then at least in sharing info about NIO

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Davanum Srinivas
awesome! thanks. -- dims On 7/12/06, peter royal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Can you please ping the Jakarta HttpComponents folks? see what they think? done! (cc'd here as its a good place for common discussion) -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DOAP files for Podling

2006-07-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 11 Jul 06, at 5:20 PM 11 Jul 06, Daniel Kulp wrote: On Tuesday July 11 2006 6:41 am, Jason van Zyl wrote: If anyone who uses Maven is interested I can whip off a plugin to create a DOAP file from a POM so that they don't have to maintain both files. CoolGreat idea :-)

Re: DOAP files for Podling

2006-07-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
One thing at a time :-) I'll try to whip this off and check it in for people to look at. can you ping the list after it? -Matt Jason. Dan On Tuesday July 11 2006 6:41 am, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, If anyone who uses Maven is interested I can whip off a plugin to create a DOAP

Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

2006-07-12 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Jim, On Jul 5, 2006, at 5:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Dan, I have to agree that if an existing code base is migrated to Apache, it should not mean that all maintenance ceases on the existing code. There are good reasons for

Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an existing issue (

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Sam Ruby
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an existing issue (

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Erik Abele
On 12.07.2006, at 19:39, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an

RE: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: As an aside, I'm also a bit befuddled at why MINA lives in the Directory project - that just seems a bit odd. =) It is there because MINA was written to implement ApacheDS. It is the ... third, I believe ... generation I/O framework used in that project. And, yes,

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Martin van den Bemt
+1.. Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an existing

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I like the idea. so +1 (non-binding) but how should that really work? snip Each incubator project could have nominated two or three PMC members whose job is to pay attention to the project. /snip How does a podling know which to nominate etc? The need for that is there, of course. I try to

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Alex Karasulu
Erik Abele wrote: On 12.07.2006, at 19:39, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 7/12/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip (And I'll note now that I'm interested in participating, although can't commit the time to be a mentor right now.) this seems like a good opportunity to reintroduce an

RE: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

2006-07-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
robert burrell donkin wrote: i've been wondering whether the answer may be to have a chair for each ppmc analogous to the role of the pmc chair. I strongly disagree. Although history documents an unfortunately strong human tendency towards delegating to a hierarchical authority, the ASF

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier?

2006-07-12 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 13 July 2006 09:20, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Although history documents an unfortunately strong human tendency towards delegating to a hierarchical authority, the ASF philosophy is peer-based, not hierarchical.  The PMC Chair is a legal requirement, not a community one, and a

Clean up of WADI Incubator

2006-07-12 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I'm still receiving messages to moderate for the WADI Incubator. Since the podling never matured and I believe is now defunct what do we need to do to stop the moderate messages. I'm happy to do I'm just not sure how. Cheers, Matt

Use of Incubating Project Names without mentioning Incubator?

2006-07-12 Thread Dion Gillard
Are documents like https://www14.software.ibm.com/iwm/web/cc/earlyprograms/websphere/soawas61/ supposed to mention that a project is in the incubator? -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize - Muhammad Ali