On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens. The reality is that all the real
incubating happens on the PPMC private and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actually is
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anything that
would keep them from voting +1 they would have raised
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative.
Indeed. It is rather rare to see such from me, wouldn't you say?
Perhaps I feel rather strongly about the current state of this ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens. The reality is that all the real
incubating happens on the PPMC private and dev lists.
We can
I did notice that other pages had changed, but I figured that it had
happened as part of the site generation process.
I followed the procedure outlined:
Updated my copy of the repository.
Changed the single source file I was asked to update.
Generated the site using build.bat.
Ran build.bat fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
What the flying moose ears is wrong with people today?
Everyone
On Friday November 10 2006 11:06 am, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anything that
would keep them from voting +1 they would have
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
Personally, when I'm voting with my Incubator PMC
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
The
Sam Ruby wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some issues raised and comments to
On 11/10/06, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday November 10 2006 11:06 am, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anything
Hi,
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, when I'm voting with my Incubator PMC hat on, I'm voting
based on the fact that the project has followed the ASF guidelines for
how to prepare and vote on a release, and that we've legally speaking
got all our ducks in a row
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 11/10/06, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
On the incubator site, we mention the How, Who, and When of
incubation. I thought we might also want to discuss the Why.
Toward that end, here's my own short list of reason why projects
should, or should not, apply for incubation.
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A
On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens. The
reality is that all the real incubating happens on the PPMC private
and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actually
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A development community shares our core values of collaboration,
transparency, and responsiblity.
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or sometimes even better imo, as they don't have to cope with
On 11/10/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A development community shares our core values of collaboration,
transparency, and responsiblity.
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or
The vote for the OFBiz podling Test Snapshot Release 4.0.0 TS5 has
passed:
+1: 3: Robert Burrell Donkin, Yoav Shapira, David Welton
+0: 0
-1: 0
Being a Test Snapshot release we don't plan to market this
publicly, so we plan to end the process for this release with the
result of this
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
I just spent a considerable amount of time going through
all the podling status pages, and there's a certain..
lack
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Abdera:
Mentors:Garrett Rooney, Paul Querna
Started:July 2006
Incomplete: Identification, Interim Responsibility, Copyright
Diversity: Unknown
Releases: Unknown
FWIW, when Ken pointed out to me
So, I'm trying to finish off the job of removing lucene4c from the web
site, since it's been retired it shouldn't be showing up in the list
of podlings and what not, and when I'm generating the site I can't
help but notice lots of changes in there that are totally unrelated to
what I just
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
18. Lucene4c:
Mentors:Erik Hatcher
Started:Unknown
Incomplete: All
Diversity: Unknown
Releases: Unknown
Also FWIW, this one has been retired, I just hadn't updated its status
page to note that fact.
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we go the first route, then we should treat this list as an
announcements list. Results of votes for releases and graduation are
posted here, and incubator PMC members will be given 72 hours to raise
an issue.
I've been advising podlings with
On Nov 10, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
So, I'm trying to finish off the job of removing lucene4c from the web
site, since it's been retired it shouldn't be showing up in the list
of podlings and what not, and when I'm generating the site I can't
help but notice lots of changes in
I made a change this morning and also noticed that a lot of files I had
not touched were listed as modified. In looking at them the content was
unchanged.
I did have to run build -fix to get my checkins to work. There is an
issue with building the site from a windows platform that causes the
eols
On Friday November 10 2006 7:24 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Similarly, I'm seeing a number of files that show up with every
single line changed, when AFAICT all that should change is the
removal of a single line from the list of projects. What's up with
that?
Do you really want to hear
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
I just spent a considerable amount of time going
On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
6. Cayenne:
Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney
Started:March 2006
Incomplete: Nothing
Diverity: Unknown
Releases: 1
All eight
31 matches
Mail list logo
