Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I withdraw my -1.
Ditto. -- justin
Heh - we had no -1 to withdraw, I agreed with you Justin that lazy
concensus is wrong, but we hadn't put a -1 to the actual release.
That's why I replied to your note and
On 11/16/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve this release binary
[X] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 4.1.0
[ ] -1 Veto the release
On 11/16/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe the doxygen file was autogenerated - not sure how doxygen likes
comments :)
good enough for me :-)
i'm now +1
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 11/16/06, Nathan Mittler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I've submitted a KEYS file to svn and have created the sig
http://people.apache.org/~tabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip.aschttp://people.apache.org/%7Etabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip.asc
looks ok to me
- robert
there's been some discussion and confusion recently about the
graduation process. i committed a very early draft last night. it's
now sync'd to http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html.
anyone who want to work on content should dive in :-)
- robert
+1
On 11/16/06, Patrick Linskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
___
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its
+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future.
-Brian
On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
with a
total of 6 +1's.
The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
On 11/16/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/15/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve this release binary
[X] +1 Release
what's the url for the artifacts to be released?
As mentioned in the vote proposal, the release candidate is at:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/
openjpa/openjpa-project/0.9.6-incubating/openjpa-project-0.9.6-
incubating-binary.zip
The GPG signature
On 11/16/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what's the url for the artifacts to be released?
As mentioned in the vote proposal,
true
but this is a binding VOTE thread so it's good to have the information
noted here also for the record
- robert
On 11/15/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
since all committers at Apache are on the committers email list, all
pmcs on pmc list,... , why not adding all committers on an incubation
project to the general @ incubator list ?
Would make sense to me, since most of those
On 11/16/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OpenJPA incubator community voted on and has approved a proposal
to release OpenJPA 0.9.6-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section
of the Incubation Policy (http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/
Incubation_Policy.html#Releases )
Hi Jason,
On Nov 15, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 15 Nov 06, at 8:34 PM 15 Nov 06, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hate to quibble, but incubating is a gerund used as an adjective. ;-)
I also think of alpha and beta as adjectives also, as in the
alpha version, alpha being an
On Nov 15, 2006, at 11:01 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
since all committers at Apache are on the committers email list, all
pmcs on pmc list,... , why not adding all committers on an incubation
project to the general @ incubator list ?
Would make sense to me, since most of those
Hi,
Does anyone else have any showstopping concerns? It'd be good to know
about them now, so that we can fix all of them and then re-run the
three-day vote on the OpenJPA list.
Thanks,
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
Craig L Russell wrote:
[...]
I think it makes sense to automatically subscribe new committers in
incubation projects to the general mailing list. They can unsubscribe
if they are uninterested. This task might be one of the items done by
the initial setup by the PPMC.
Out of curiosity,
Well,
I personally think it is important to also get an idea of other
podlings and their problems/issues or questions. That puts a more
*human* touch to all these podlings.
Like look they asked that, so why can't we ask this
I'd like to see something like this as a mandatory thing for each
From my experience on the incubator list, this is probably the most
complete critique that we will get. So I think we're done once Robert
is happy.
Craig
On Nov 16, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone else have any showstopping concerns? It'd be good to know
about
Hi Robert,
On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:14 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 11/16/06, Marc Prud'hommeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OpenJPA incubator community voted on and has approved a proposal
to release OpenJPA 0.9.6-incubating. Pursuant to the Releases section
of the Incubation Policy
On Robert's point about IP clearance, I'd marked that as TODO
because I didn't see an obvious place where the code grant for OpenJPA
had been recorded from BEA.
Geir, do you know where this might be? I did check grants.txt but
might have missed it.
Thanks.
Eddie
On 11/16/06, Craig L
FYI, I have implemented that for xbean-spring (the uber jar source jar).
See the pom at:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-spring/pom.xml?view=markup
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Actually there are no sources for that jar. It's an uber jar thats'
build using other jars. I
Robert-
We'll correct these issues asap. Once corrected artifacts are
uploaded, I assume it will necessary to re-start the vote on the open-
jpa-dev list before re-starting the vote here. Please correct me if I
am wrong.
Responses to specific points are inline below...
On Nov 16, 2006,
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
We'll correct these issues asap. Once corrected artifacts are
uploaded, I assume it will necessary to re-start the vote on the
open-jpa-dev list before re-starting the vote here. Please correct
me if I am wrong.
That is correct --
Roy-
On Nov 16, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 16, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
We'll correct these issues asap. Once corrected artifacts are
uploaded, I assume it will necessary to re-start the vote on the
open-jpa-dev list before re-starting the vote
On Nov 16, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
BTW, why distribute a zip package? Wouldn't it be more sensible to
distribute as a jar? Just curious.
The zip contains documentation, examples, and the dependency jars
required to run the examples.
Yes, I know that -- the point was
Roy-
I think people use the .zip extensions because that is what most
desktop managers will map to the decompression application. Also,
recent version of Windows allow exploring of .zip file from within
explorer.exe as if they were directory structures.
To my knowledge, no OS is smart
Hi,
The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The full proposal is attached below, and can be viewed here also:
http://maven.apache.org/proposals/incubator/nmaven.html
I'm posting this here for any feedback or objections from the
27 matches
Mail list logo
