On Feb 3, 2008 9:11 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 7:47 PM, Filip at Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...Make it part of the graduation for the contributors in the podling to
> > decide if they want to continue or not. the folks who have made the
> > po
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Meeraj, Jeremy
Please read my note again. At no point did I say or imply that BEA led
anything. The only thing I said about BEA was:
"the two companies who couldn't agree to do it together in Tuscany".
Is there anything in
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> > The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member
> > votes are binding.
> But somehow I like the fact that in most cases the vote is much wider
> - and I think that this helps foster a community responsiblity.
Yes. But that's no different from e
ant elder wrote:
> > The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes
> > are binding.
> Now I'm confused. If it says "only PMC member votes are binding" does that
> mean Incubator PMC?
Yes. The PPMC has no legal standing, and is an Incubator artifact. We want
them to vo
It is that time again, i.e., the beginning of a new month. Time to start
preparing reports for the Board.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kelvin goodson wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
As Paul and Mattieu asked, since SDO is quite closely aligned with SCA, is
there any point or interest in working with, or joining, Tuscany?
--- Noel
> But it is not individuals that propose this particular project, as I
> understand it: it is IBM and BEA. And it was IBM that, in my view,
> dumped the JSR 168 RI and then fled - not any individuals as such.
And IBM is also a significant force behind Tuscany, and have definitely not
fled. The
On Jan 31, 2008 8:27 PM, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2008 9:20 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm looking for general feedback about the group's
> > > perception of incubated projects an
On Feb 1, 2008 6:00 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I don't see a conflict for incubating projects when members assume
> > multiple roles, including Champion, Mentor, and Committer. If a Champion
> > is not a Mentor or Committer, the
Thanks Robert, I filed a 'wish' for RAT that I've been wanting for a long
time but never expressed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT-1
Alex
On Feb 3, 2008 2:56 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT
>
> (i'm sure that anyone
On Jan 31, 2008 7:20 PM, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for general feedback about the group's
> perception of incubated projects and the number of
> roles that may be assumed by a foundation member in
> one. Can I view RAT as an example
i knew that this would come up sooner
On Feb 3, 2008 7:47 PM, Filip at Apache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> ...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
> >> extent it's appropriate, should happen befor
On Feb 3, 2008 7:53 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 18:49 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 2008 6:32 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
> > >
> > > I set that up for you two
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAT
(i'm sure that anyone whose podling has been subjected to RAT must
have plenty of gripes or requests for improvements so now you're
chance to criticise RAT for a change)
- robert
-
To un
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 19:23 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> should the IPMC/Mentors have karma for setting up issue tracking for a
> new podling or is the infrastructure team?
I'd say it is the infrastructure team that gives karma for both Jira and
Confluence. Anyone who has the karma can t
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 18:49 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2008 6:32 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
> >
> > I set that up for you two weeks ago, and added your initial committers
> > too.
>
> cheers :-)
>
>
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
graduation process?
The question is how, and it's something
should the IPMC/Mentors have karma for setting up issue tracking for a
new podling or is the infrastructure team?
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 16, 2008 3:48 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig Russell asked:
>
> >>> Creating the workspace in svn. This requires commit
> >>> access to the incubator svn repository. Podlings are given
> >>> their own subdirectory of the incubator svn repository.
> >> This should not
On Feb 3, 2008 6:32 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
>
> I set that up for you two weeks ago, and added your initial committers
> too.
cheers :-)
could you check that
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Reposit
Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
I set that up for you two weeks ago, and added your initial committers
too.
Regards, Upayavira
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:50 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
>
"Jukka Zitting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incubator PMC,
>
> Please vote on accepting the PDFBox project for incubation. The full
> PDFBox proposal is available at the end of this message and as a wiki
> page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to spo
David Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> J Aaron Farr wrote:
>> git could be an issue.
>
> Can you explain what the issue is with Git?
Leo already gave a decent explanation.
Basically, it comes down to two aspects:
1) infrastructure support
2) cultural bias
There's no "No git" rule that I
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Meeraj, Jeremy
Please read my note again. At no point did I say or imply that BEA led
anything. The only thing I said about BEA was:
"the two companies who couldn't agree to do it together in Tuscany".
Is there anything incorrect about that sta
> > ...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
> > extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
> > graduation process?
> >
> > The question is how, and it's something no established project has
> > ever figured out, nevermind our podlings :)...
>
> Henc
following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
doesn't work for me. i also tried:
$ svn mkdir https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat
svn: MKCOL of
'/repos/asf/!svn/wrk/a5890c71-85da-4dc7-93ba-ec3a93543b70/incubator/rat':
405 Method Not Allowed (https://svn.apac
Meeraj, Jeremy
Please read my note again. At no point did I say or imply that BEA led
anything. The only thing I said about BEA was:
"the two companies who couldn't agree to do it together in Tuscany".
Is there anything incorrect about that statement? I'm willing to be
corrected if I'm wrong.
Pa
On Jan 16, 2008 11:17 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wording in the Policy was deliberately non-procedural, as the
> Incubator PMC decided that policy belongs in the policy document and
> process belongs elsewhere. So as far as I'm concerned, this discussion
> is not supposed
On Jan 15, 2008 3:00 AM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The proposal should contain the rest of the information that needs
> > to be collected before the mailing lists can be set up. All mailing
> > lists for a project SHOULD use the project's host as the domain. In
> > particular,
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Disclosure... I work for IBM.
So do I.
> IBM'ers participate on projects as individuals and it's the actions of
> individuals that should be judged.
I think that is a bit oversimplified. IBM has strict rules about
open source participation. It is either "on private time",
On Jan 13, 2008 10:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > who's supposed to add a new podling to the reporting schedule and when
> > does this need to be done?
>
> Preferably by the Mentors doing the project setup.
added a step to http://incubator.ap
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> 1) http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-affiliations
> Replace the last paragraph "Only the affiliations...bootstrap has been
> completed" with this:
>
> ***
> As a general rule, podling committers and mentors are requested to
> disclose their comp
On Feb 3, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Paul,
The fork on Tuscany was not instigated by BEA. Of the three committers
who decided to leave Tuscany, due to technical differences and
otherwise, only Jim Marino was employed by BEA. Myself and Jeremy
Boynes were independent committers
Paul,
The fork on Tuscany was not instigated by BEA. Of the three committers
who decided to leave Tuscany, due to technical differences and
otherwise, only Jim Marino was employed by BEA. Myself and Jeremy
Boynes were independent committers, though, Jeremy was employed by IBM
and leading the devel
Hi, Ahmad,
I didn't put the source in CVS, I just put the source, bin, and demo files
in the download area[1]. You may visit that page and click download to
download page.
[1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/i18n4data
Thank you for your interest in it. Your comments is valuable to me.
Regards,
On Feb 1, 2008 4:00 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
hi simon
> The Tuscany project is now ready to distribute its Java SCA Release
> 1.1-incubating. Following up from Robert's recent post to the Tuscany dev
> list [1] I am posting here before proceeding to copy the artifacts up to
On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
> extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
> graduation process?
>
> The question is how, and it's something no established project
On Feb 2, 2008 2:48 PM, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:20 AM, David Reiss wrote:
> > J Aaron Farr wrote:
> >> git could be an issue.
> >
> > Can you explain what the issue is with Git?
>
> Probably not very well :-). Basically, we know how to do the apache-
> style ope
Neng Geng Huang wrote:
I reviewd commons-i18n. It is a different implementatoin with
different purpose.
I could not find any source at this address [1]
Could you show me the source, I think I don't get exactly what your
i18n4data does.
I am new here, but I think it would be better to merge wha
Leo
I am a mentor with Tuscany. I'm not concerned about where Tuscany is
now... I think its growing well and is progressing towards graduation.
However, Tuscany did have a significant fork a while back and this new
proposal has completely confused me: basically its a proposal for part
of what's al
On 2/3/08, Ahmad Khalifa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neng Geng Huang wrote:
> > The key of i18n4data is to i18n user's data, not interface message.
> > For example, if you are developing an e-shop web site to support two
> > languages (English and French), you might have a table to store your
> >
41 matches
Mail list logo