Bertrand
Great feedback. I think we should keep a clear statement in the SVN
and distros that identifies which parts of the project use which
dependencies. I also think we should structure the build so that each
different framework implementation of each application is a separate
build target. We
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under monthly at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, but you're right,
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided
the 4 first monthly reports
It's still listed under monthly at
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 9:05:55 am Alex Boisvert wrote:
Hi Paul,
I cross-checked all the votes with this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt
(r15883)
And did not see Daniel Kulp's name listed under the Incubator PMC. Did I
miss something?
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Please add your reports at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month
schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info
which is a good trigger for updating said info ;-)
-Bertrand
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three
month schedule.
This reminder was generated from out-of-date info.
The info has been updated since then.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
Hi Paul,
I cross-checked all the votes with this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt
(r15883)
And did not see Daniel Kulp's name listed under the Incubator PMC. Did I
miss something?
alex
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL
+1
-Original Message-
From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 12:22 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Stonehenge
Bertrand
Great feedback. I think we should keep a clear statement in the SVN
and distros that identifies
Thanks for the help, Craig. I was able to commit the updates and the website
appears to have synced as well.
- Michael
-Original Message-
From: David Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:28 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: any Incubator
Hi All
As per the IP Clearance template, POI has received a software grant for
OpenXML4J, and we'd like to get the OK for this. The template in svn is
filled out as openxml4j.xml, and the source bundle is available from
http://people.apache.org/~nick/OpenXML4J-Grant/ . An appropriate software
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008#head-0e5d39e727acbdf47dc06f1dbb0fd2b00e109b86
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev
list that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC
felt that the
Qpid project should increase its diversity. Over the intervening months
Qpid has
added more independents to the project
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
that the
Qpid project should increase its
My +1 (mentor/IPMC)
Paul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
...ant
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My +1 (mentor/IPMC)
I never know if we need to vote again ;) My +1 as well, with both
mentor and IPMC hats.
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
pre-populate) instead. So much more accessible, flexible and accurate.
Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work
together and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate.
+1
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our
dev list that Qpid
would like
Good job on the community work !!!
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the past several months, I've watched the qpid community work together
and I'm persuaded that the project is ready to graduate.
+1
Craig
On Nov 12, 2008, at
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
The STATUS template says;
quote
Ask infrastructure to create source repository modules and grant the
committers karma.
/quote
But I have also been told on lists that the PMC Chair is responsible
for Authorization.
So what is it?
Missing punctuation,
+1 binding
Dan
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 3:51:31 pm Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev
list that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC
felt that the
Qpid project should increase its diversity.
On Nov 8, 2008, at 15:17 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your
support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I am now calling a vote:
[ ] Yes, CouchDB is ready to become a top
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:43 AM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
incubator.
Is there any official process or do we just update the documentation?
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
incubator.
Is there any official process or do we just update the documentation?
Depends on what take it out of the incubator means:
- graduation to TLP
- graduation to sub project
- stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
Graduation is covered in the graduation guide [1], stopping (aka
failing) is not covered in a guide (yet). I assume a formal vote on
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
pre-populate)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Jason Van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4 IPMC
members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of the
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the wiki with the PhotArk report [1]
[1]
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Depends on what take it out of the incubator means:
- graduation to TLP
- graduation to sub project
- stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
Graduation is covered in the graduation guide [1], stopping (aka
failing) is not covered in a guide
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:20 PM, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clutch gets some information from
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
and some more from
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
Then it gets hints from each project's status page
regarding
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule, Hama
seems be on December.
I just removed;
* Hama (June - Aug)
from the Monthly section.
Mentors: You need to get better at this!
Cheers
Niclas
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Attached is the graduation resolution, Please consider your vote for our
graduation...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
35 matches
Mail list logo
