Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> Additional concern, it does not appear that the mentors are planning to >> be on the PMC. Why not? > > Why is this a concern? Mentors volunteer to do mentoring to ensure the > project is viable and understands the Apache way, not necessari

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

Hi Niall, Niall Pemberton wrote: Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave with 3. When the proposal was written, Ahmed Mohombe was a committer of the project at SourceForge, however he never ac

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

3 is the minimal number that is needed for a formal acceptance. So I see no problem with it. Click has been a successful open source project done the Apache way before entering Apache, so I think it is definitely ready to graduate now. While a possibility of a vote deadlock exists, it does

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

Additional concern, it does not appear that the mentors are planning to be on the PMC. Why not? Why is this a concern? Mentors volunteer to do mentoring to ensure the project is viable and understands the Apache way, not necessarily to develop code. If you trace the existing Apache project

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 23:25 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems > that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave > with 3. > > IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you can't > get the t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave with 3. IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you can't get the three votes required to do anything. Niall On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

Thanks for the reversal of the -1. But I still need a +1 ? Shanti sebb wrote: On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: sebb wrote: On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote: On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote: On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

+1 regards, Karl On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, wrote: > +1 > (non binding vote) > > francesco > > > > On 4/19/2009, "Karl Pauls" wrote: > >>Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache >>Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message >>and as a wi

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept Apache Ace into the Incubator

Time to call the vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation. * +1 votes from (* indicates binding votes) Carsten Ziegeler*, Niclas Hedhman*, Richard S. Hall, Niall Pemberton*, Robert Burrell Donkin*, Bertrand Delacretaz*, Felix Meschberger, Francesco Furfari, and Karl Pauls. * No other votes. T

[PROPOSAL] Apache Click graduation

Hi all, The Apache Click PPMC would like to have feedback on the following graduation proposal before asking for a vote. The Click community already votes in favor of graduation which is recorded here: http://www.mail-archive.com/click-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00574.html Click status page

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb wrote: On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: sebb wrote: But seriously, without these files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at install time - uploading files is a big p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

Another +1 from me, too. SocialSite needs to live on and Apache could be a good home for it. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Jamey Wood > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Cc: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart ; rovagn...@gmail.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

+1 from our companies side. An essential building block for future Web applications that deserves the support from Apache ! Best Raphael Volz Innovation GmbH Kirchhaldenweg 10, 76597 Loffenau, Germany Tel: +49 18 03 55 18 51 075 Mail: r...@ra

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

+1 And I am willing to contribute to SocialSite project in my own time. Regards -Ramesh - Original Message From: Bobby Bissett To: Dave ; general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart ; rovagn...@gmail.com; Jamey Wood ; leandro.milma...@globant.com; rodr...@globant.com;

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

+1 from me. I want to see the project continue, and I think it will have a better chance with a fresh start at Apache. Cheers, Bobby On Apr 8, 2009, at 9:41 PM, Dave wrote: Greetings to all, It's my pleasure to present to you a proposal for a new project Apache SocialSite, a social networki

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

+1 from a shindig ppmc, social site is an awesome product that fills various needs (from being a demo of how to use shindig, to use in large scale projects). And as it depends on shindig, having it become an Apache project Just-Makes-Sense(Tm). -- Chris On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jamey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> But seriously, without these >> files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at >> install time - uploading files is a big part of a web2.0 workload these days >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache SocialSite

I'm very much +1 on this. I appreciate Sun's willingness to contribute the existing SocialSite code, and I hope that we'll have the opportunity to evolve it under the Incubator's established governance model and level playing field. --Jamey On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Dave wrote: > Greetin

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Remaining IBM CLAs have been signed and faxed in. I've updated the wiki as well. -Nick Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development nlgal...@us.ibm.com Phone: 512-838-1182 Building: 901 / 5G-016

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

Niclas, We will try the best to make the community dynamics happen. When we get around to looking at the source, you will see the existing cxf code packages and classes as-is. So theoretically we will be able to get some value out of it in terms of contributing back to cxf. On a related note,

Re: Apache Wink Proposal

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Greg Truty wrote: > Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for > Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a > client runtime and test cases (as well as other items). I hear Dan's concerns, but *I* don't think t

Re: how do you find a Champion?

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Upayavira wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:04 -0500, Thomas Anderson wrote: >> According to >> , >> "a Champion should be found before the proposal is formally >> submitted."  My question is...  

Re: Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:39 , Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: IMHO this means using JIRA to record and track these documents and the associated workflow. the easiest way to do this would be by finding a way to allow contributors to submit an iCLA via JIRA. AIUI the requirement for submission by fax, e

Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.

Just want to confirm my interest in response. My apache id is "grobmeier" - feel free to add me to the log4php project :-) Cheers Christian On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Gavin wrote: > Hi All, > > Well things seem to be dying down here, ApacheCon well and truly over, board > meeting is done a

RE: PPMC Member list

> AFAICT we udpdate the poddling status page with the PPMC members. Yes, every project has a STATUS page, and we really should consoldate to there, and stop having redundant meta-data spewed all over the place. Frankly, I'd like to see the reporting schedule added to the STATUS file, too, or pe

Re: Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

I just posted the question to legal-discuss. Let's see what they say. D. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Upayavira wrote: > I personally would just ask the secretary what he thinks - mail > secret...@. > > He's responsible for managing this stuff, and it might be easy for him > to automate sen

Re: Suggestion regarding improvement of iCLA submission process

I personally would just ask the secretary what he thinks - mail secret...@. He's responsible for managing this stuff, and it might be easy for him to automate sending mails. Dunno. Upayavira On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 08:56 +0200, Richard Hirsch wrote: > I like the idea of using JIRA to track the iCL