I like the idea of using JIRA to track the iCLA status. It is already
possible to submit attachments with Jira items, so that would deal with
submissions by email. For mailed and faxed submissions, I could imagine
volunteers scanning these items, adding them to Jira and then mailing the
submitter
I personally would just ask the secretary what he thinks - mail
secret...@.
He's responsible for managing this stuff, and it might be easy for him
to automate sending mails. Dunno.
Upayavira
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 08:56 +0200, Richard Hirsch wrote:
I like the idea of using JIRA to track the
I just posted the question to legal-discuss. Let's see what they say.
D.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I personally would just ask the secretary what he thinks - mail
secret...@.
He's responsible for managing this stuff, and it might be easy for him
to
AFAICT we udpdate the poddling status page with the PPMC members.
Yes, every project has a STATUS page, and we really should consoldate to there,
and stop having redundant meta-data spewed all over the place.
Frankly, I'd like to see the reporting schedule added to the STATUS file, too,
or
Just want to confirm my interest in response.
My apache id is grobmeier - feel free to add me to the log4php project :-)
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
Well things seem to be dying down here, ApacheCon well and truly over, board
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:39 , Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO this means using JIRA to record and track these documents and the
associated workflow. the easiest way to do this would be by finding a
way to allow contributors to submit an iCLA via JIRA. AIUI the
requirement for submission by fax,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:04 -0500, Thomas Anderson wrote:
According to
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-champion,
a Champion should be found before the proposal is formally
submitted. My question
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Greg Truty gtr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hello all, I would like to formally present the incubator proposal for
Apache Wink, stand-alone REST toolkit supporting JAX-RS (JSR 311), a
client runtime and test cases (as well as other items).
I hear Dan's concerns, but
Niclas,
We will try the best to make the community dynamics happen. When we get around to looking at the source, you will see
the existing cxf code packages and classes as-is. So theoretically we will be able to get some value out of it in terms
of contributing back to cxf.
On a related
Remaining IBM CLAs have been signed and faxed in. I've updated the wiki as
well.
-Nick
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST WebServices Development
nlgal...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-838-1182
Building: 901 / 5G-016
I'm very much +1 on this. I appreciate Sun's willingness to contribute the
existing SocialSite code, and I hope that we'll have the opportunity to
evolve it under the Incubator's established governance model and level
playing field.
--Jamey
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Dave
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
snip
But seriously, without these
files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at
install time - uploading files is a big
+1 from a shindig ppmc, social site is an awesome product that fills various
needs (from being a demo of how to use shindig, to use in large scale
projects).
And as it depends on shindig, having it become an Apache project
Just-Makes-Sense(Tm).
-- Chris
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jamey
Another +1 from me, too. SocialSite needs to live on and Apache could be a
good home for it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jamey Wood jamey.w...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
snip
But seriously, without these
files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf
Hi all,
The Apache Click PPMC would like to have feedback on the following
graduation proposal before asking for a vote. The Click community
already votes in favor of graduation which is recorded here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/click-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00574.html
Click status
Time to call the vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation.
* +1 votes from (* indicates binding votes) Carsten Ziegeler*, Niclas
Hedhman*, Richard S. Hall, Niall Pemberton*, Robert Burrell Donkin*,
Bertrand Delacretaz*, Felix Meschberger, Francesco Furfari, and Karl
Pauls.
* No other votes.
+1
regards,
Karl
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, francesco.furf...@isti.cnr.it wrote:
+1
(non binding vote)
francesco
On 4/19/2009, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache
Incubator. The full proposal is available at the
Thanks for the reversal of the -1. But I still need a +1 ?
Shanti
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam shanti.subraman...@sun.com wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE shanti.subraman...@sun.com
wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems
that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave
with 3.
IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you can't
get the three votes required to do anything.
Niall
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 23:25 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems
that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave
with 3.
IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you can't
get the three
21 matches
Mail list logo
