On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
enabling an enterprise OSGi application programming model. This
includes
Title says all ;-)
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
The Aries project is delivering a set of pluggable Java components
enabling an
On 5/11/2010 7:14 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elderant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hugheshugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted on its first release. From the Aries home page:
The Aries project is
Ok thanks I see them now.
Looks good to me, +1
...ant
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
On 11 May 2010 07:19, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
The Aries community has voted
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the
process indicated here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote
The Maven staging area
I should have mentioned this,
Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from:
Davanum Srinivas
Kevan Miller
Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass.
Thanks.
mike
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
IPMCers,
Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the
process indicated here:
The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's second milestone
release (PhotArk M2-Incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval
to publish the release.
Please review and vote on approving the M2-incubating release
artifacts of PhotArk.
The artifacts are available for review at:
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
-Donald
On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
-Donald
On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
Just tried building the source archive using mvn install.
This reports a lot of warnings from the license:check goal.
Seems unnecessary to include a license check in every build; it should
probably be run as part of the site generation - if it is run
automatically at all.
Also, I got a test
Thanks Sebb for your review,
I'll try to address each of your concerns:
1) AL headers are missing from...
These files list implementation classes like other standard
META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write code
that reads these files in the next release but I
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks Sebb for your review,
I'll try to address each of your concerns:
1) AL headers are missing from...
These files list implementation classes like other standard
META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
wink-common/src/main/
On May 11, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote:
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
wink-common/src/main/
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:42 +0530, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
I would like to contribute. Please add me as an initial committer.
(shankar AT apache DOT org) .
Welcome. Added you to the proposal.
David
-
To
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:34 +0530, Chintana Wilamuna wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:11 AM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
[snip]
As Sanjiva mentioned we've been involved with a similar kind of effort
as well. May be we can consolidate our efforts. I would also like to
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in
On 12/05/2010, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer r...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files,
the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just
confirmed it again in my build;
20 matches
Mail list logo
