Broken link in Apache Incubator webpage
---
Key: INCUBATOR-114
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Components: site
Reporter:
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
... There is no sign-up for this service, it only shows sign-in. Also I
can see that you can sign-in with your google account. But is it
configured to sign-in with our Apache account ?...
Also, distinguish between 'press' activity and just trying to get more
devs on board.
You need to tell people about your project if you want it to grow, but
that is a different business to seeking 'publicity'.
Make sense?
Upayavira
On Tue, 31 May 2011 18:13 -0700, Joe Schaefer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042042#comment-13042042
]
Upayavira commented on INCUBATOR-114:
-
you don't say on which page this link
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042045#comment-13042045
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on INCUBATOR-114:
--
oh, it's a release#maven part :
Well I guess they are related to each other after all, but IMHO there
is a very slight difference between them. AFAIU the PRC regulations
that they are afraid of any misleading publicity or obligations that
might outcome from incorrect publicity activity more specifically if
this kind of publicity
I am going to fix it now
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Edward J. Yoon (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042045#comment-13042045
]
Edward J. Yoon
The 72 hours lazy consensus for the IPMC are up and we did get one
more +1 from Mohammad Nour El-Din** and no other votes.
The vote is successful and approved. I will make the artifacts available asap.
regards,
Karl
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042051#comment-13042051
]
Mohammad Nour commented on INCUBATOR-114:
-
- Fixed.
- But I don't have any
Yeah I know :), but I thought we will see more info. when signed in
:D. Stupid me :P.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
... There is no sign-up for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042058#comment-13042058
]
Edward J. Yoon commented on INCUBATOR-114:
--
yes sir.
Broken link in Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13042064#comment-13042064
]
Mohammad Nour commented on INCUBATOR-114:
-
Thank you sir :)
Broken link in
Then, this vote passes as follows:
+1 Stefan Seelmann*
+1 Eric Charles
+1 Tommaso Teofili*
+1 Steve Loughran*
Thanks for voting! I'll push the release out.
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I think you already have a 3rd binding vote
Cool, nice to see this project.
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
Howdy!
I would like to propose Flume to be an Apache Incubator project. Flume is a
distributed, reliable, and available system for efficiently collecting,
aggregating,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
Incubators:
I can't find an appropriate policy on the licensing requirements of
ancillary files like BUILD or CHANGES files that are commonly distributed
with releases. I'm specifically looking at the somewhat vague and
+1 on the proposal
Sound like a very good and project. Also I am interested to be a
mentor if you would like to have another one and if thats possible :).
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:40 PM, arv...@cloudera.com
The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate.
regards
luke
Apache OpenOffice.org proposal_june12011.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:57, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Luke,
don't know if OpenOffice is an exception, but usually Proposals are done
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
There is no requirement to use the Wiki. I've attached the text of the .ODT
file in the
Oops, the attachment was opened with LibreOffice here. Sorry, can't resist.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Luke Kowalski luke.kowal...@oracle.com wrote:
The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate.
regards
luke
don't know if OpenOffice is an exception, but usually Proposals are done
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
There is no requirement to use the Wiki. I've attached the text of the .ODT
file in the message below.
Thanks Greg.
...but it helps developing the proposal. Guess we can expect
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenOffice.org will be contributed to Apache Software Foundation by Oracle
Corporation in compliance with ASF licensing and governance.
Nice!
Community
OpenOffice.org. seeks to further encourage developer and user
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
It's going to be very hard for two committers to manage and maintain
this code.
The proposal states Both Oracle and ASF agree
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:12, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
don't know if OpenOffice is an exception, but usually Proposals are done
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
There is no requirement to use the Wiki. I've attached the text of the .ODT
file in the message below.
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and migration
from OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it, but why is
there not a statement that Oracle intend to continue development once the
transition is
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:21, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why only
two for such a large codebase?
Hopefully more will show up. As with other podlings, we're
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why only
two for such a large codebase?
Not only is it a very large code base, it was a weakly maintained and
documented code base for quite some time before the
Sun-Oracle-LO-Split/Splat process.
We generally expect Apache
Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 12:13:09 PM:
Community
OpenOffice.org. seeks to further encourage developer and user
communities
during incubation, beyond the existing developers currently working on
the
project.
Any thoughts on how (or if) the
On 01/06/2011 17:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and migration from
OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it, but why is there not a
statement that Oracle intend to
Hi Mohammad,
Thanks for your offer to step in as a mentor. I have added you to the list
of nominated mentors on the proposal.
Thanks and Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the proposal
Sound like a very good
On 01/06/2011 17:29, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:21, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why only
two for such a large codebase?
Hopefully more
Here you are ;) [1].
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:12, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
don't know if OpenOffice is an exception, but usually Proposals are
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and migration
from OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it, but why is
there not a
Thanks a lot Arvind
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:43 PM, arv...@cloudera.com arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Mohammad,
Thanks for your offer to step in as a mentor. I have added you to the list
of nominated mentors on the proposal.
Thanks and Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:34, Luke Kowalski luke.kowal...@oracle.com wrote:
we were instructed to send the proposal to an email address.
Should we go and hack at the wiki now? No issues, either way.
Thanks for the offer, but we're all good. The proposal came through just fine.
Cheers,
-g
On 06/01/2011 11:45 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 01/06/2011 17:29, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:21, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for this exciting proposal. I have a few questions.
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only
two for
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you are ;) [1].
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
hey I was just about to enter it - my phone prevented me to submit.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Greg Stein
On 01/06/2011 17:33, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 12:13:09 PM:
Community
OpenOffice.org. seeks to further encourage developer and user
communities
during incubation, beyond the existing developers currently working on
the
On 6/1/2011 11:33 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
That would be great. There is also another project (or set of projects)
that IBM and Sun/Oracle have worked on over the past few years, called the
:ODF Toolkit. For example, this component was just released today:
We're working on it (River, that is)!
Cheers,
Greg.
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:49, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the
Sorry :D
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you are ;) [1].
[1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
hey I was just about to enter it - my
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote:
We're working on it (River, that is)!
I know, and (having been one of the key mentors) I couldn't be happier
about that!
What I'm trying to bring up are lessons learned from the troubles that
River had to go through.
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 01/06/2011 17:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and
migration from OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it,
but
On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For sure, we need to add people. I expect that we will get
quite a bunch interested. After all, this was all kept
hush-hush. Now that the cat is out of the bag, we will for
sure see that list grow.
FWIW, I have contacted the 2 main people
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Luke Kowalski wrote:
The following project is being sent in as an incubator candidate.
As there are likely quite a few people new to Apache interested in and
coming with this proposal, I thought I should send a quick note pointing
out some community releated resources and
I view this proposal very critical. IMO, OpenOffice@Apache would be a dead end:
- There is an existing community over at LibreOffice. So what good
does it, to build a second community here?
- The afore mentioned community was built exactly, because the
initiators of the current proposal have been
On 6/1/2011 12:48 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
This would possibly warrant a seperate discussion though, especially if the
codebase were
to be destined for POI rather than a new TLP.
And note, this is a decision that can be made *during* incubation,
with POI folks participating on the incubating
To me the proof point whether this proposal will be successful or not
is whether Linux distributions having already dropped support for
OpenOffice and switched to LibreOffice instead would be willing to
reverse that decision and move back to OpenOffice again now that it is
in a process to be
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote on 06/01/2011 01:48:49 PM:
Speaking personally, I would be interested in seeing how ODF Toolkit
could
fit within the POI project. We already have a number of components, and
interfaces that try to smooth over the differences between the different
Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote on 06/01/2011 12:21:23 PM:
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list, developers
familiar with the code base via their
dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
To me the proof point whether this proposal will be successful or not
is whether Linux distributions having already dropped support for
OpenOffice and switched to LibreOffice instead would be willing to
reverse that decision
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list, developers
familiar with the code base via their work on Lotus Symphony (which is our
OpenOffice based project). But then we could have been criticized for the
On 6/1/2011 1:16 PM, dsh wrote:
To me the proof point whether this proposal will be successful or not
is whether Linux distributions having already dropped support for
OpenOffice and switched to LibreOffice instead would be willing to
reverse that decision and move back to OpenOffice again now
Hi,
First, apologies for the new thread, due to my late arrival on this
list.
As developer for OpenOffice.org since 2005, and having some knowledge
in OOo source code, I'm interested to contribute to the new
OpenOffice.org (as dev).
Where are the essential links to start ? e.g. I
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
Date: June 1, 2011 2:33:15 PM EDT
To: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
Cc: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org, Sam Ruby
ru...@apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice and the ASF
message-id:
FYI:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
Date: June 1, 2011 2:58:02 PM EDT
To: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
Cc: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com, Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:56, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list, developers
familiar with the code base via their work on Lotus Symphony (which is our
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:04, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
First, apologies for the new thread, due to my late arrival on this list.
As developer for OpenOffice.org since 2005, and having some knowledge in OOo
source code, I'm interested to contribute to the new OpenOffice.org (as
On Jun 1, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:04, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
First, apologies for the new thread, due to my late arrival on this list.
As developer for OpenOffice.org since 2005, and having some knowledge in OOo
source code, I'm
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Eric Sammer esam...@cloudera.com wrote:
Incubators:
I can't find an appropriate policy on the licensing requirements of
ancillary files like BUILD or CHANGES files that
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally held to be a criterion
for a podling to graduate or even initiate, that it first persuade all
Linux distros to include it
We don't care where it is
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally held to be a criterion
for a podling to graduate or even initiate, that it
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:20, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:16:58 PM:
...
And is it generally
Greg,
I'm happy to see more people throw tomatoes at the 'distro
requirement'. At the quote depth at the time, I though I was just
joining Ross in challenging that supposed requirement.
--benson
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:20,
Guys,
to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else.
And that opinion of course still stands unchanged. I never wrote
anything about requirements especially not in a sense of formal
requirements.
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Benson Margulies
On 01/06/2011 19:24, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote on 06/01/2011 12:21:23 PM:
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list,
On 01/06/2011 22:26, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:20, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/06/2011 19:51, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
dshdaniel.hais...@googlemail.comwrote on
Again,
to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else.
How could I be somebody defining the rules? I suspect the rules are
all documented anyway. So you did the interpretation of an opinion
expressed by somebody else and of course if you treat that opinion as
a requirement or a
Ease up... people just lost the to me in your message. And others
didn't see it in the quoted sections.
It happens
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 18:31, dsh daniel.hais...@googlemail.com wrote:
Again,
to me means to me as in it's my personal opinion and nothing else.
How could I be
More info re TDF and LOo
- Forwarded message from Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org -
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:16:53 +0200
From: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
Reply-To: italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
To: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
CC: Louis
[cc'ing Italo and Louis hopefully they have joined the incubator list
already, but just in case]
On 02/06/2011 01:01, Jim Jagielski wrote:
More info re TDF and LOo
- Forwarded message from Italo
Vignoliitalo.vign...@documentfoundation.org -
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:16:53 +0200
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
We've reached out to the OO and LO communities, and have
the call out to all current OO/LO developers to join up
if they want...
+1
- Sam Ruby
-
To
On 2011-06-01, at 20:18 , Ross Gardler wrote:
[cc'ing Italo and Louis hopefully they have joined the incubator list
already, but just in case]
Thanks. I actually have already joined it.
So, to the list: Wave of hand signifying hello!
And, again, delighted this is moving ahead
Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote on 06/01/2011 12:52:46 PM:
I think it would be really good to have this goal in the proposal
itself, it is something concrete to point to from a community
development point of view.
Thanks, Ross. I've updated the community section of the proposal
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. ge...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all -
I see that I'm listed as a sponsor. Can you please remove my name and
replace with someone else? I never agreed to sponsor this.
I've removed your name.
- Sam Ruby
Alexei Fedotov alexei.fedo...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 01:38:43 PM:
OpenOffice is used in our product [1] we want to submit to the
incubator. We promised to show that we can gradually clean up LGPL
from the code and were working on that [2]. We'd have one less
head-ache with OO under
sa3r...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 10:36:39 PM:
Hi all -
I see that I'm listed as a sponsor. Can you please remove my name
and replace with someone else? I never agreed to sponsor this.
I've removed your name.
What am I missing here?
According to the Incubation Policy [1]:
A
Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 02:56:10
PM:
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list,
developers
familiar with the code base via their work on Lotus Symphony (which is
our
OpenOffice based project). But then we could have been
+1 based on successfully starting a Cassandra cluster on EC2.
/Johan
On 30 maj 2011, at 22.23, Tom White wrote:
Please vote on the following release candidate for Apache Whirr,
version 0.5.0-incubating. We already received two binding IPMC +1
votes for the PPMC release vote on whirr-dev.
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote on 06/01/2011 03:01:50
PM:
What is a more serious question, how many bug fixes would go into
LibreOffice without being offered to the ASF under the AL? LO has no
copyright assignment, so the principals of LO don't have the flexibility
to offer
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 22:52, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
...
What am I missing here?
According to the Incubation Policy [1]:
A Sponsor SHALL be either:
* the Board of the Apache Software Foundation;
* a Top Level Project (TLP) within the Apache Software Foundation
(where the TLP
Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote on 06/01/2011 06:03:09 PM:
There are only two initial committers identified in the proposal. Why
only two for such a large codebase?
We could have put a much longer list of IBM names on this list,
developers
familiar with the code base via
Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 09:41:08
PM:
* Apache Foundation owns the trademark to OOo?
* We at OOo receive lots of requests to use it for mostly good
purposes. We grant these, with minimal fuss and have set up systems
to do that more efficiently. With
On 2011-06-02, at 01:02 , robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com wrote on 06/01/2011 09:41:08
PM:
* Apache Foundation owns the trademark to OOo?
* We at OOo receive lots of requests to use it for mostly good
purposes. We grant these, with minimal fuss
Dumb question. Are we obligated to converse like this, in a single email
thread, for the duration of the proposal review process? Is this an
organizing principle? Would I break anything if I created threads,
perhaps prefixed in a consistent way, like OpenOffice Proposal: Topic
Foo?
-Rob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edward J. Yoon resolved INCUBATOR-114.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This issue is fixed. Thanks!
Broken link in Apache Incubator
Multiple threads would be welcome.
Ralph
On Jun 1, 2011, at 10:25 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dumb question. Are we obligated to converse like this, in a single email
thread, for the duration of the proposal review process? Is this an
organizing principle? Would I break anything
86 matches
Mail list logo
