On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
something much simpler. I just documented the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
[citation needed]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
[citation needed]
I'm not will to cite out of context. Please read all the
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually),
nominations are opened, including potentially the current chair, and a
vote takes place...
+1 to this option.
-Bertrand
On 30 January 2012 09:11, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually),
nominations are opened, including potentially the current chair, and a
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On 01/30/2012 10:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 30 January 2012 09:11, Bertrand Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually),
nominations are opened,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
...I just realize something not clear from this proposal: are we *only*
talking
about the Incubator PMC Chair here, or is this a proposal for every PMC
Chair?
I presumed (and propose) the latter, but maybe that wasn't the
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 7:30 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
...I just realize
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Hey Robert,
Leo :-)
(Great to hear from you again)
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
A parting gift to the Incubator :-)
Robert
-
To
On 30 January 2012 13:00, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 7:30 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair
On Mon, Jan
On 30 January 2012 13:01, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
Hey Robert,
Leo :-)
(Great to hear from you again)
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
A parting gift to the Incubator
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com]
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:21 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair
On 30 January 2012 13:00, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
...I just realize something not clear from this proposal: are we *only*
talking
about the Incubator PMC Chair here, or is this a proposal for every
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can come up with a patch with edits along the lines
described above.
See [1] for a proposed patch, and [2] for the output.
My idea is to collect the points about the rationale of the guide up
into
Done. Thanks for catching this!
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Not sure that I understand your statement. The site was updated, no?
This page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
is generated from
Hi,
Some further followup on this.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
2008-08-19 PhotArk
S: Zero
Jukka Zitting wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 17:20:41 +0100:
Their next status report is due in March; looking forward
to a summary then.
They're free to send an out-of-cycle report in February if they
want to...
/reminder
-
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
(excluding new projects on
Jukka,
what you currently do in the incubator is just an amazing job. I would
have nominated you for serving as an incubator chair, but it seems
another project has already got you. As I can not nominate you, I need
to say that your work here is great. Thanks.
Cheers
Christian
On Mon, Jan 30,
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
VCL
What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
Brain freeze on my part. What issue are you speaking of?
How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
It's improving. A new committer was added a few weeks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
VCL
What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
Brain freeze on my part. What issue are you speaking of?
From the November report
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
what you currently do in the incubator is just an amazing job. I would
have nominated you for serving as an incubator chair, but it seems
another project has already got you. As I can not nominate you, I need
On 30/01/12 17:32, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Jena
When can I vote on your graduation?
Jena's report is already signed off on the wiki: [*]
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
The project is discussing graduation.
Plan:
* Graduation preparation
(checking, drafting the
The Apache Rave (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the Rave 0.7-INCUBATING Alpha release.
Apache Rave is a new web and social mashup engine. It will provide an
out-of-the-box, as well as extendible, lightweight Java platform to
host, serve and manage
I need to say that your [Jukka] work here is great. Thanks.
+1
one doesn't need to be a PMC chair to invest some time in podling review and
followup. :-)
:-)
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
votes are by straight majority consensus, iow no vetoes
+1 from me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC.
+1 -C
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 from me.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's
+1
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in the past, you should have veto so you're
not forced to work with somebody you dislike. I respond, grow up. we
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
votes are by
Lemme get this straight: a person who makes a class-action
veto against a whole swath of people should have those votes
upheld to protect that person from the tyranny of the majority?
This is getting sillier by the moment...
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters
On 1/30/2012 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lemme get this straight: a person who makes a class-action
veto against a whole swath of people should have those votes
upheld to protect that person from the tyranny of the majority?
No. Joe, take a break. Then come back, and reread both threads,
On 1/30/2012 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of
Jukka-
Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
LICENSE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
bin/
lib/
dep1.jar
dep2.jar
giraph.jar
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
Hello,
Release candidate 1 for Apache Lucy (incubating) version 0.3.0 can
be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~karpet/apache-lucy-incubating-0.3.0-rc1/
See the CHANGES file at the top level of the archive for information about the
content of this release.
This candidate was assembled
Peter Karman wrote on 1/30/12 8:51 PM:
Apache Lucy PPMC vote thread:
http://s.apache.org/uot
+1 Marvin Humphrey*+
+1 Peter Karman*
+1 Chris Mattmann*+
+1 Chris Hostetter*+
+1 David E. Wheeler*
+1 Dan Markham*
* indicates Lucy PPMC member
+
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
votes
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
This is getting sillier by the moment...
I don't care for these kinds of statements. Please try to keep the
conversation civil.
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:53, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on
50 matches
Mail list logo
