Hi all guys,
I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
originally developed by Tirasa, an Italian IT company, to be an Apache
Incubator project.
The goal for Syncope is to become the reference
On 1/31/12 3:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I missed antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html
As such, the vote passes with:
4 +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder, Brock Noland
0 -1
Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder are all members
On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://shiro.apache.org/
- Original Message -
From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel
On 31/01/2012 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Hi Mark,
first of all, thanks.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
[1] http://shiro.apache.org/
Apache Shiro is a powerful and easy-to-use Java security framework
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually, Syncope *could* use
Shiro.
I have a Q : Can't it be a bit
Hi Francesco and Simo,
it looks interesting.
As an Identity Manager, I wonder if we can't extend it to OSGi, in
addition of JEE.
Regards
JB
On 01/31/2012 11:17 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 31/01/2012 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Hi
On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually, Syncope
Salut Jean-Baptiste,
why not? :) Feel free to add yourself in the proposal if you like it!!! :)
A trés bientot,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:34 AM,
On 31/01/2012 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Francesco and Simo,
it looks interesting.
As an Identity Manager, I wonder if we can't extend it to OSGi, in
addition of JEE.
Hi,
I must admit that I am not very deep in OSGi stuff, but there shouldn't
be nothing against making Syncope
On 1/31/12 11:44 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
LICENSE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
bin/
On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another
Hi Guys,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Oh, so you want a supermajority in terms of those who have voted, not in
terms of the membership of the IPMC? Not unreasonable. Let's see what
others think.
I would easily +1 a proposal with a 3/4 majority of the *voters*.
On 01/30/2012 11:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
information of all the projects scheduled
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
votes are by
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any other rational opinions?
I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion
about hypothetical votes and a lot of hot air.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:58, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Guys,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Oh, so you want a supermajority in terms of those who have voted, not in
terms of the membership of the IPMC? Not unreasonable. Let's
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Forget about my last mail. I missed the rename to Callback...
No worries, the project has been quick to change names. :-) Hopefully
Cordova will stand the test of time.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
There are currently 29 outstanding no votes made on
a discussion thread merely for the fact that those
candidates names were listed. Are you not reading
private@incubator?
There is currently a -1 on a current vote thread there
as well.
- Original Message -
From: Jukka Zitting
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:18, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any other rational opinions?
I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4.
-
Resolution: Fixed
There is little evidence that Creadur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The consensus reached is that though
On 1/31/2012 11:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Plainly wrong: It has been repeatedly established (even by the Chair)
that policy decisions here are not subject to veto. This is one of those
times.
Furthermore the documentation [1] clearly points out that procedural issues
are to be decided
On 1/31/2012 11:12 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
I'm a little unclear on wrowe's original message talking about
supermajority and whether that was for *addition* or for *removal*.
I'm assuming that it was only about addition because I've never seen
any PMC-based ejection of a PMC member. The Board
Instead, since you are including dep1 and dep2 inside
giraph-bin.tar.gz, they should be covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE pair
of the tarball.
This is the case for Giraph (and Kafka and other projects that bring
in transitive dependencies into the tar.gz via maven), so the
jackrabbit approach won't
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/31/2012
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
Sure, but there isn't even a February page at the wiki :
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any other rational opinions?
I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:12:50 -0500:
In that light, we're talking about what kinds of voting results
should be forwarded by the Chair? If the Chair sends a request to the
Board to add somebody and reports 5 +1 votes, 2 -1 votes... would
that be sufficient? 2/3rds or 3/4ths
Hi Luciano,
The February page is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Best,
Daniel
On 31 January 2012 19:17, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit
On 31 Jan 2012, at 18:17, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
Sure, but there
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:20, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:12:50 -0500:
In that light, we're talking about what kinds of voting results
should be forwarded by the Chair? If the Chair sends a request to the
Board to add somebody and
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
There are currently 29 outstanding no votes made on
a discussion thread merely for the fact that those
candidates names were listed.
I count those as votes once I see them in an actual VOTE thread. We've
had
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in the past, you should have veto so you're
not forced to work with
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
otherwise). People have said in the past, you should
Proposal looks good.
Niall
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
originally developed by Tirasa,
On 1/31/2012 3:28 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Having said that, I should note that the context of Incubator is
significantly different than a normal PMC. If incubator wants to structure
itself more like a board and less like a project, I really don't have
much to say against that. Note that
Hi Roy,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate
On 1/31/2012 5:05 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
In replacement, I propose the following concrete actions:
1. Move the Incubator process/policy/documentation, etc., to ComDev - I
agree with gstein on this. I think it could be maintained by the ASF community
folks there, and updated
May I suggest bumping thoughts of cashiering the incubator to its own
thread? It seems a much bigger question than whether to prevent
vetoes on PPMC membership votes.
Don
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
On 1/31/2012 5:05 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011?action=diffrev1=55rev2=56
Or is someone just confused?
For comparison: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bluesky.html
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
They're not the same as some have pointed out yet even if they were there's
nothing wrong with
Dear Proposed Syncope mentors:
Please post messages on this thread indicating your prior experience
as mentors, if any, and your willing to remain in place as active
mentors for at least a year.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011?action=diffrev1=55rev2=56
Or is someone just confused?
It's me who's confused. We're in 2012 already... :-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On 31 January 2012 18:15, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead, since you are including dep1 and dep2 inside
giraph-bin.tar.gz, they should be covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE pair
of the tarball.
This is the case for Giraph (and Kafka and other projects that bring
in transitive
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Did I miss the reminder? Or is it not working?
I suppose the reminder will go out tomorrow on the first day of the
month. I guess that's not too helpful given that the deadline is also
tomorrow.
Droids
Any
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012?action=diffrev1=17rev2=18
Perhaps a bit verbose to some tastes, but this contains all the
information an external observer needs to get a good picture of the
project status. Great level of introspection combined with ability
identify concrete
55 matches
Mail list logo
