Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > +1 > > good luck, guys! > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > > > > Hi! > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 good luck, guys! On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > > and at the IPMC level: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 11/06/2016 09:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! after a very positive discussion in the Geode community and at the IPMC level: http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. Please vote on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source > release > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi, > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source release > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal requirements > mandated by Apache. Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Ah, I didnt know ASF infra is ok to let Github as main source repo for a podling. I stand corrected. - Henry On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > I second John, about Github

Please grant wiki write access for me

My incubator wiki user name is "BonoLv" . Please grant write access permission for me . Thx.

Request to join Incubator PMC

Hi, I (apache ID "niclas") would like to rejoin the Incubator PMC. Thanks -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 6:24 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM Luciano Resende > wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > The release artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/ > > Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here,

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi, > The release artifacts can be found at : > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 11.0-incubating-rc5/ Again it a little confusing what is actually being released here, why are jars included here? [1] Remember maven is not the primary release area [2] What

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. > > Please vote

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 ~/William > On Nov 6, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Niall > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community >> and at the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding) Niall On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 binding Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: >http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Sunday, November 6, 2016, Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > Anthony > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > > and at the IPMC level: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 Anthony On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub > On Sunday, 6 November 2016, 21:59, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >> Hi! >> >> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community >> and at the IPMC

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. > > Please

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Hi! after a very positive discussion in the Geode community and at the IPMC level: http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate Apache Geode from the incubator to top level

RE: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Luke Han [mailto:luke...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 4:46 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal > > > My feeling reading RocketMQ is that its done in a "this is why > > RocketMQ is

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi John, That make sense, I agree the proposal should refine to less competitive but more focus on it's own design and architecture. Would love to see that section to be updated before vote:-) Thanks Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, Please find the current board report below. As usual I've done my best to categorize podlings, but please feel free to edit the report and make changes as fit. I added two new categories for it this month - podlings that seem to have become stagnant, and podlings that seem to have

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Luke, Von, thanks for the responses. Some more comments in line. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:48 AM vongosling wrote: > Hi, john: > > Thank you providing AsterixDB proposal, so as to help our complement our > proposal. Or to say, give us some advice for RocketMQ community

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, john: Thank you providing AsterixDB proposal, so as to help our complement our proposal. Or to say, give us some advice for RocketMQ community development roadmap~ Next, let me clarify some question we have talked about. 1. About ONS and RocketMQ relationship~ ONS is our Cloud Messaging

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

> My feeling reading RocketMQ is that its done in a "this > is why RocketMQ is better than" approach instead of "this is why RocketMQ > differs from them" approach. > - How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to > build cross platform clients? > - How can RocketMQ

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >... > I'm still a bit leary about the "relationship with other apache products" > section still. I'm not interested in seeing how a podling competes with > other projects Apache projects don't "compete" with

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > I second John, about Github uses. > > The statement "As a community we would like to keep the master repository > as well as issue tracking on GitHub > " at currently stand