Re: GitHub workflows?

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:34 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >... > So, the questions I would ask are, are all those comments making it to the > list? And are the podling participants showing through their actions that > they understand inclusiveness, by ensuring that dev

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CarbonData podling graduation

> Actually, the Maturity Model can be a very nice framework to organize > incubation around. If you're talking about a platonic MM, then I agree. If you are talking about the MM at https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html, I think it needs to be much more

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CarbonData podling graduation

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> ...To prepare this discussion, I prepared a self-assessment against the >> Maturity Model: >>

Re: GitHub workflows?

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed > it. > > So, then the question should have been; > > Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue > tracker? > > Are we

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.2 release RC0

+1 binding 1. Checked License Notice Disclaimer in Source Tar ball 2. Ran RAT check 3. Checked the hashes and signatures 4. Ran complete build and unit tests > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Jakob Homan > Date: Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:23 PM > Subject: Re:

Re: Log4jcxx2 status

OK. Before we hold a vote on general I think we should hold a vote in logging service, although I really don’t know what would happen if it didn’t pass. Unfortunately, the board isn’t going to be happy since the only sane place to have that vote is on the private list. Most of the PMC members

Re: Wiki Karma

You're an admin now. John On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:26 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Yes on both accounts. > > Thanks > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > I added Jinjiang Zhao, guessing at a username. Is that the actua >

Re: Wiki Karma

Yes on both accounts. Thanks On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I added Jinjiang Zhao, guessing at a username. Is that the actua username? > Also, is your username "niclas"? > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:02 AM Niclas Hedhman

Re: Log4jcxx2 status

Apologies for falling down as a member of the reboot team. Thank you to Thorsten for trying so hard for so long. Glad to see the code survive. - Rhys On Mar 6, 2017 5:04 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: > Ralph, > > Sounds fair to me. Based on what we did for CommonsRDF, I'd

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu 1.3.2 release RC0

+1 (binding) * Built jar, ran tests, checked MD5, checked N/L/D files, spot checked for headers -Jakob On 5 March 2017 at 19:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Matthew Hayes wrote: >> The Apache DataFu community has voted

Re: Log4jcxx2 status

Ralph, Sounds fair to me. Based on what we did for CommonsRDF, I'd recommend that we hold a vote on the general@incubator list indicating the intent to transfer log4cxx from Incubator to Logging. The steps are pretty close on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject John

TSU NOTIFICATION - Encryption

SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU SUBMITTED BY: Ted Dunning= SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation FAX: +1-919-573-9199 <(919)%20573-9199> MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation PRODUCT

Log4jcxx2 status

The attempt to reboot Log4cxx has not had the hoped for results. Under normal circumstances the project would probably be terminated at Apache. However, this project came to the incubator from the Logging Services project in hopes that it would be able to generate more activity since there were

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board report - March 2017

Pierre, Anyone who has edit access can change. I did not enter Trafodion's report, hzeller did. John On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:40 AM Pierre Smits wrote: > Hi John, > > I suggest that you change the setting regarding the maturity question in > the Trafodion report >

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board report - March 2017

Hi John, I suggest that you change the setting regarding the maturity question in the Trafodion report from: Community building to: Nearing graduation The discussion on dev@trafodion.i.a.o. shows that the majority of reactions provided, on the question whether the podling is ready to

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board report - March 2017

All, Below is the current draft of our board report. As of writing, 5 podlings are missing, and many more need some sign offs. Incubator PMC report for March 2017 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.

Re: Wiki Karma

I added Jinjiang Zhao, guessing at a username. Is that the actua username? Also, is your username "niclas"? On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:02 AM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > can I have karma to add users to the https://wiki.apache.org/incubator ? > > If I already do, then I

Re: GitHub workflows?

On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:29:54 +0100, "Raphael Bircher" wrote: > As long as all goes to the list, it's probably ok, but I would prefer ASF > Tools over third party tools. Thy are under the Foundation control. Even > GH is really strong at the moment, you don't know

Re: GitHub workflows?

Hi Nicolas, * Am .03.2017, 05:53 Uhr, schrieb Niclas Hedhman : Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed it. So, then the question should have been; Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue tracker? Are we ok

Re: GitHub workflows?

Hi Niclas, let me take the Beam example: - Issues are on Apache Jira (not GitHub issues) - We have a pull request. If a discussion happens on the mailing list cover than specific to the pull request, then, we start the discussion on the mailing list. - We don't consider pull request comments