Hi,
> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
> IPMC thinks we should not release.”
Has anyone voted -1? Nope. And even if they did a -1 vote is not a veto.
> How about "make the release, and fix that next time” ?
The podlings previous release put up for IPMC
Hi,
> Which would be a reasonable assumption give:
> a) That only IPMC votes are binding on releases.
> b) It listed as a TLP in Whimsy
> c) The resolution that formed it uses the same language as a TLP and talks
> abut forming a PMC and assigning a VP [1]
>
> Does anyone know the history
Hi Folks,
Another friendly reminder: please VOTE on the ReRelease of Apache Flagon
UserAle.js (Incubating) 1.0.0.
Our ReRelease was mandated by IPMC due to build artifacts that lacked
“incubating” markings.
At this point we have +6 votes from our community and +2 Binding. We need one
more
It looks like we have got result[1] from Legal VP, I will bring it here now
1. It's fine if Weex only could include header files under 2-clause BSD
license from Webkit at compiling time and has a dynamic link to Webkit.so
at runtime.
2. It's recommended that excluding Webkit.so from
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:03 AM Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Hi all,
> The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and we would now like to request the permission of the Incubator
> PMC
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 9:35 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>...
> This sort of language is not helpful. Nor do I think it is accurate. Can
> you please take more care with your words.
>
I feel it is accurate. And it is not directed at anybody. Only at this
process. It is descriptive, and my carefully
Hi,
> Insanity.
This sort of language is not helpful. Nor do I think it is accurate. Can you
please take more care with your words.
> Just let Tuweni make a release, already. Stuff like this will get fixed
> eventually.
No-one is stopping them from making a release.
Thanks,
Justin
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 1:15 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> This comment by Craig is the most important one in the discussion.
>
> When the first words that people pick when disagreeing are essentially
> personal insults, what is going on is better described as mud wrestling
> rather than discussion.
>
Hi all,
The vote to release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 passed with five +1
binding votes:
Julian Hyde
Jun Rao
Justin Mclean
P. Taylor Goetz
Furkan KAMACI
Vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg68917.html
Thank you to the above IPMC members for taking
+1 Binding
26 Haz 2019 Çar, saat 21:24 tarihinde P. Taylor Goetz
şunu yazdı:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:38 PM, Jihoon Son wrote:
> >
> > Hi IPMC,
> >
> > The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
> > Apache Druid (incubating)
+1 (binding)
-Taylor
> On Jun 19, 2019, at 10:38 PM, Jihoon Son wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
>
> The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.0 (rc2).
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator
This comment by Craig is the most important one in the discussion.
When the first words that people pick when disagreeing are essentially
personal insults, what is going on is better described as mud wrestling
rather than discussion.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 5:01 AM Craig Russell wrote:
> ...
>
Insanity.
Just let Tuweni make a release, already. Stuff like this will get fixed
eventually.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:46 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote
> thread. See
>
Hi,
> It may not be clear to you, but it was discussed in the earlier vote thread.
> See
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b5fed22493e954937405cfd2553d06c00e5bee3b76be06b18b74862@%3Cdev.tuweni.apache.org%3E
> for my noticing the jar still being present.
Noting its present and clearly
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 6:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
>> graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
>> podling release.
>
> And I was not stating that, nor
It wasn't clear to me whether you were waiting for infra before issuing a
-1 - sorry to have read too much into that.
AFAIK - this is indeed still a first Apache release for Tuweni - not the
first attempt but I don't believe that 0.7.0 was successfully voted to
release.
The change of the release
Hi,
> Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
> graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
> podling release.
And I was not stating that, nor has anyone voted -1 on this release. I was just
pointing out that this doesn’t seem to have
Going only by past experiences in the incubator, my understanding is that a
graduation blocking issue is not something that necessarily blocks a
podling release.
It would be something that should be noted and fixed in follow up releases
for sure.
Perhaps the letter of the law change or the level
18 matches
Mail list logo
