+1 (binding)
Regards,
Alan
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to
> accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for
> at least the next 72
+1
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/Oxt
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 18, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK all, discussion has died down, we have 3 mentors, I think it’s
time to proceed to a VOTE.
I am calling a VOTE now to accept the Climate Model Diagnostic
Analyzer
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF
I am very much in favor for provisional TLP's and direct-to-TLP's here at the
Apache Software Foundation.
With that said I am very much against the noise here on our incubator lists and
wiki. We should really create a list in the wiki for this kind of endeavor. It
really it should take place
+1
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/KWE
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
On Jan 20, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
...Isn’t it obvious what the above and IncubatorV2 proposal are about?
Consolidating
like minded individuals into a new IPMC and
This statement confuses the lack of active mentors with the sheer size of the
IPMC. The problem is not the size of the IPMC. The problem is that mentors are
not doing their jobs
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 5, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
A champion is merely a mentor who has publicly committed to being an active
mentor, in some significant capacity, of a podling.
The creation of such a role is symptomatic of a dysfunctional organization
where responsibility and accountability has been diluted so much it's not at
all clear
as volunteers they are entitled to do) and the IPMC doesn't
notice.
Ross
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 4:50 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Board reports are always public, as are a project's/podling's discussions about
what should go in their report.
It's the mentors job to clear up any confusion there may be for a podling
writing its first report.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:25 AM, John D. Ament
Imnsho, that is a poor practice.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 4, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private and only
later make it public.
LieGrue,
strub
On Sunday, 4 January 2015, 16:10, Alan
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals.
Having the proposals, at least after acceptance, in one place should be
beneficial to everyone, so
On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Nick Burch apa...@gagravarr.org wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Svante Schubert
Can somebody please give me (user svanteschubert) access to the Wiki
Anyone?
Karma granted.
(I guess everyone else was like me and
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks
Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress
towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards
graduation[2] with 27 +1s.
Of
Awesome! Thanks!!
We need just one more vote!
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 25, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- vote looks good
- incubating in artefact name
- signatures and hashes all good
- DISCLAIMER good
- NOTICE and LICENSE
I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong IPMC
roster?
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
Regards,
Alan
P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate email.
On Jun
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating.
Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for
large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of
There are some Thrift generated files that don't seem to have the AL prepended.
I'm not sure if that's important since the files were automatically generated;
imo, it's not.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
This is a call for
one more IPMC member's vote.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 22, 2014, at 1:47 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan,
That was the result of the PPMC vote on the dev@ list. Arvind is a mentor.
-Taylor
On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
I'm looking
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Since entering Incubation in November 2010, the Celix podling been working
towards graduation. The community has grown, releases have been made and
new committers have been
On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
I think it needs one more IPMC member's vote.
NM, I just read Marvin's email about the new release process that I was unaware
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Hi all,
Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 9, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan hashut...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Optiq into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Stratosphere
[ ] -1 Do not accept Optiq because ...
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 1, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level
Project. The board resolution is included below.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0
, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The vote has passed with three binding +1 votes, no +0, and no -1
votes.
+1 votes:
* Dave Fisher
* Alan Cabrera
* Florian Müller
I will ask the board to add the resolution to the agenda of the next
board meeting.
Thanks
All the binding votes made at Onlingo’s original graduation vote carry over to
this one but I’ll still add my
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Olingo community has VOTEd to graduate from the incubator
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice
:
On Feb 8, 2014, at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
licensing information
On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
WDYT?
Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
NOTICE file
On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72
On Feb 11, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
One thing I think we could use is a tool which parses mbox archives in
people.apache.org:/home/apmail/ and generates statistics:
* Total
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files?
It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for licensing
information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc. files.
If this is a good idea, what files should we generate? Currently,
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion
thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE
There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on podlings could
submit proposals about their project. Can they or can’t they?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
ApacheCon Denver will take place April 7-9,
Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would it
make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called
On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
...Bertrand was skeptical about an ASF-wide ombud, but didn't raise any
objection
to an Incubator-specific position.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email.
The corresponding wiki page is:
On Jun 30, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that things have settled down a bit,
I'd like to talk about some of the things
I'm looking for out of the ombudsman post.
1) proactively solicits opinions of exiting podlings
about their experiences in the form
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Florian Müller f...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData) proposal [1].
There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity of the
initial committers. The name has been changed from OData to
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version 2.1.0-incubating.
This has been voted on via the d...@curator.incubator.apache.org mailing
list and now requires a vote
I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a
roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role for
the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other
organizations.
With that said, I will agree that if everything is
On Jun 17, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
A paradox:
The VP is not supposed to exercise authority in normal circumstances.
Projects are supposed to have mentors that advocate for them. If a
project comes 'to the ombudsman', whether that's the VP or not,
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
This is a suggestion that has come up in the past, and the typical
counter-argument is that this is something the chair needs to provide
themselves.
Sent from my iPhone
The usual reason for an ombudsman is to
should limit themselves to the
incubator?
15.06.2013 19:53 пользователь Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com написал:
Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a problem.
Cause: we seem to collect/handle/organize problems in an ad hoc manner
and sometimes mentors
recently
discussed in relation to the recent chair vote.
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incubator Ombudsman
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the
On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so
long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings
playing the incubators against each other.
Can you provide detail on what you mean by
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would still set policy and provide
community best practice guidance. But then separate mailing lists/groups
would provide actual oversight of podlings (incoming, mentoring,
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
What we really need for podlings is a bill of
rights towards what they can expect of their
mentors, because too few of them actually are
willing to question the participation of the
people who signed up to mentor them
of disempowerment we too
often dish out.
From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe
Problem: we seem to have unclear and conflicting ideas as to what the areas of
improvement are for the Incubator.
Cause: we have no concrete, anonymized, information on what the podlings'
experiences were during incubation.
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as
On Jun 13, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
On 13 June 2013 04:56, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
So here's a thought...
...
I would therefore like to propose
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Incubator community,
I have tendered my resignation as VP, Incubator. The PMC has recommend
Marvin Humphrey as my successor in a motion submitted to the
Foundation board for consideration at the meeting next week.
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
So here's a thought...
There have been many discussions about different ways to incubate
projects. One of the most radical ideas is to dismantle the incubator
and replace the podling concept with probationary TLPs
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the
Incubator. I'll leave the VOTE open for the rest of the week and close it out
Monday, June 17th
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi All,
The Apache Mesos community is ready to graduate. They have added
committers and PPMC members while in the Incubator; have made a
few releases; are discussing their
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
So far I've heard +1s from the
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 6, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
incubator.
The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache
Mentors come and go. Is there an explicit rule that a podling needs three
mentors before it can start to be incubated?
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:37 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Paul, guys; I just noticed that HotdoG only has 2 mentors right now
rule (to my knowledge). The number 3 came about
because that's how many votes are needed for a release. With 3
mentors on the project it means the project needs to come to the IPMC
for additional votes. As we've seen this can become very messy.
Ross
On 5 June 2013 15:48, Alan Cabrera l
/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
Reply-To: general
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote:
Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor.
Benson,
One of my podling tools doesn't see that Greg is on the IPMC though he is an
ASF member. I think we need to update the LDAP entries if he's already been
ACK'd.
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin gred...@gmail.com wrote:
Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor.
Benson,
One of my
on mino and got back:
No LDAP groups found with cn=incubator-pmc!
So either I'm doing that wrong or don't have the karma.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright
in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain
in the files that you copied into our repos. It is impossible to tell
what is from
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
This when in doubt leave it out approach has gone a long way at
smoothing podling release
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:47 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 18:43, a...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adc
Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013
New Revision: 1489076
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076
Log:
Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in.
And
On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright
in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain
in the files
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...
Apache Incubator tools
Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt?rev=1488735r1=1488734r2=1488735view=diff
On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk
On Jun 2, 2013, at 7:45 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4
On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Apache Incubator tools
Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation
How many binding votes are there from the PPMC vote?
Regards,
Alan
On May 31, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
the first jclouds release at Apache.
The PPMC has approved the release
On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked dormant and nearly
30 marked retired. The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
and
On May 29, 2013, at 12:33 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to
sort out the incubator :-/
LOL, so did I!
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Do it! Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
On May 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki
[1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling?
I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation.
On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked dormant and nearly
30 marked retired. The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
on GitHub or
not.
Not enough for me to maintain two terms.
Just my 2 cents..
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
Yeah, I like the word dormant as well. Should we
Alan Cabrera created INCUBATOR-126:
--
Summary: Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name
Key: INCUBATOR-126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126
Project: Incubator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13667806#comment-13667806
]
Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126:
That's a good idea. I think we should
Looking at the podlings.xml and it's not clear to me what the difference is.
I'm sure I neglected to read some documentation bit.
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
is closed down, I think it has to be retired.
Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off.
Basically this is a larger version of don't be afraid to delete a
line of code; it's in version control.
Hen
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote
feasible for
the podlings to go, well, dormant.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want to retire? Does
anyone know?
Regards,
Alan
On May 27, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote
I think there's some good ideas here. You should capture them in
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013
Regards,
Alan
On May 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi -
I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is
On May 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Alan Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
well as mail list moderator tools.
The first thing that I'm writing is a command that will print out who is the
owner of an email alias
Welcome aboard!
Regards,
Alan
On May 13, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Dear community,
I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC.
Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe!
On behalf of the Incubator PMC,
--
NS
Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is:
-Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G
Am I doing something wrong?
Regards,
Alan
On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos
Sebb you are awesome and correct.
But I have to say, I think that when we make suggestions to podlings, we should
make it clear that we are making suggestions and are not pointing out some ASF
Incubator transgression. This is one such cases where Sebb us making a very
useful suggestion.
On May 11, 2013, at 7:26 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I also agree that there isn't consensus in the Incubator PMC to do
this, but I'm not sure we need it.
Lovely.
Regards,
Alan
On May 11, 2013, at 5:40 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
A real experiment with 'probationary projects' would have to model the
entire process of a new project launching with _no IPMC_ to
participate in any way.
Can you explain what problem launching new projects with _no
On May 11, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Violating my 24 hour rule just this one, and worse yet to repeat myself:
IMO, I think this is fine so long as it occurs on the weekend. :)
+1 Joe, Ross, etc.
I rather regret mentioning the direct launch
On May 11, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Frankly I find the notion that the board will do a better job of MENTORING
these projects than the IPMC to be batshit insane, but that's just me.
We need manpower, and there is plenty of that available amongst the
On May 11, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
It's often called a dead-man's switch. I think the term applied originally
to locomotive engineers and also metro car drivers. (I'm not sure what a
dead pilot switch could accomplish in an aircraft.)
I
On May 10, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
So, here we have:
Alan's idea of removing champions and shepherds and demanding mentor
recommitment, with the 'teeth' of putting podlings on ice if they
can't muster an adequate mentor squad.
My idea of asking
Lean startup approaches make sense when you do not know the problem that you're
solving. You perform experiments and pivot as you blindly search for a domain
whose problems you can solve and make money doing it.
Here, we know what our problems are.
This is not to say that we should not
I think that you should make it clear that the Marvin machinery broke down and
projects did not get their notifications.
Regards,
Alan
On May 10, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote some text at the front. I plan to fill in things like PMC
members coming
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo