+1 (binding)
Regards,
Alan
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> The discussion of the Gearpump proposal has concluded. Please vote to
> accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator. I will leave this vote open for
> at least the next 72 hours and will aim to clo
+1
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 19, 2015, at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 10:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>
> OK all, discussion has died down, we have 3 mentors, I think it’s
> time to proceed to a VOTE.
>
> I am calling a VOTE now to accept the Climate Model Diagnostic
> Analyzer (CMDA) into the Apache In
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
> vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
> a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
>
> Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF for
> the
I am very much in favor for provisional TLP's and direct-to-TLP's here at the
Apache Software Foundation.
With that said I am very much against the noise here on our incubator lists and
wiki. We should really create a list in the wiki for this kind of endeavor. It
really it should take place o
+1
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
> http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
>https://wiki.a
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
>> wrote:
>> ...Isn’t it obvious what the above and IncubatorV2 proposal are about?
>> Consolidating
>> like minded individuals into a new IPMC and shutting out the other
>> in
nteers they are entitled to do) and the IPMC doesn't
> notice.
>
> Ross
>
> Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
> A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Alan Cabrera [mailto:l...@toolazydogs.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2015 4:
This statement confuses the lack of active mentors with the sheer size of the
IPMC. The problem is not the size of the IPMC. The problem is that mentors are
not doing their jobs
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 5, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
> wrote:
>
> Yep and let all from that
A champion is merely a mentor who has publicly committed to being an active
mentor, in some significant capacity, of a podling.
The creation of such a role is symptomatic of a dysfunctional organization
where responsibility and accountability has been diluted so much it's not at
all clear who
On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>>
>>> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ...
>
> IIUC the main difference (besides subtle naming changes) is that
Imnsho, that is a poor practice.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> I know many projects (TLP) which discuss/draft the report in private and only
> later make it public.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>&g
Board reports are always public, as are a project's/podling's discussions about
what should go in their report.
It's the mentors job to clear up any confusion there may be for a podling
writing its first report.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi al
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
> have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals.
>
> Having the proposals, at least after acceptance, in one place should be
> beneficial to everyone, so how abou
On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Svante Schubert
>>> Can somebody please give me (user svanteschubert) access to the Wiki
>>
>> Anyone?
>
> Karma granted.
>
> (I guess everyone else was like me and off on
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress
> towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards
> graduation[2] with 27 +1s.
> Of the 27, the
Awesome! Thanks!!
We need just one more vote!
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 25, 2014, at 1:12 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - vote looks good
> - incubating in artefact name
> - signatures and hashes all good
> - DISCLAIMER good
> - NOTICE and LICENSE correct
> - al
On Jun 22, 2014, at 10:30 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> If I counted correctly, this release has one from the earlier vote plus mine.
> I think it needs one more IPMC member's vote.
NM, I just read Marvin's email about the new release process that I was unaware
of. :)
Regards,
Alan
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since entering Incubation in November 2010, the Celix podling been working
> towards graduation. The community has grown, releases have been made and
> new committers have been added.
> Over the las
needs one more IPMC member's vote.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 22, 2014, at 1:47 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Alan,
>
> That was the result of the PPMC vote on the dev@ list. Arvind is a mentor.
>
> -Taylor
>
>> On Jun 22, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
There are some Thrift generated files that don't seem to have the AL prepended.
I'm not sure if that's important since the files were automatically generated;
imo, it's not.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:37 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to release
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:54 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote:
> Hello,
> This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.2 incubating.
> Apache MRQL is a query processing and optimization system for
> large-scale, distributed data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop,
> Apac
I'm looking at the release vote result and I'm seeing only one binding vote
from a IPMC member. Am I comparing the vote results against the wrong IPMC
roster?
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
Regards,
Alan
P.S. Apologies if this is a duplicate email.
On Jun
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per recent discussions on general@[1] and s4-dev@ [2], I went ahead and
> called for a VOTE on the S4 dev@ mailing list [3] about retiring the
> podling. That VOTE has passed with no -1s and 4 (binding
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 9, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Optiq into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Stratosphere
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Optiq because ...
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 1, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top Level
> Project. The board resolution is included below.
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
> [ ] +0 Don't care.
> [ ] -1 Don't gradu
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acc
P Apache Olingo)
>
>
>
>
> On 17.03.14 10:27, "Florian Müller" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The vote has passed with three binding +1 votes, no +0, and no -1
>> votes.
>>
>> +1 votes:
>>
>> * Dave Fisher
>&g
All the binding votes made at Onlingo’s original graduation vote carry over to
this one but I’ll still add my
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian Müller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Olingo community has VOTEd to graduate from the incubator [1][2].
>
> Apache
On Feb 11, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>>> One thing I think we could use is a tool which parses mbox archives in
>>> people.apache.org:/home/apmail/ and generates statistics:
>>>
>
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 10, 2014, at 8:27 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is a new VOTE to decide if Apache Spark should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please VOTE on the resolution pasted below
> the ballot. I'll leave this VOTE open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Tha
On Feb 10, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
>> files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
>> licensing
On Feb 8, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>>> WDYT?
>>
>> Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
>> the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
>> NOTICE file itself.
>>
>
>
> Actually
:
On Feb 8, 2014, at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
>> files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
>> licensing information and t
n 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these
>> files? It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
>> licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc.
&g
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files?
It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for licensing
information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc. files.
If this is a good idea, what files should we generate? Currently,
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 31, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion
> thread:http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I’m now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this happen
There was a question on a podling as to whether developers on podlings could
submit proposals about their project. Can they or can’t they?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 24, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>> ApacheCon Denver will take place April 7-9, 2014. The call-for-p
Is there enough interest to generate an active community for this? Would it
make more sense to do this work under Geronimo or TomEE?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> As you probably know JavaEE 7 proposes a new spec called JBatch (aka JSR
> 352)
On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>> ...Bertrand was skeptical about an ASF-wide ombud, but didn't raise any
>> objection
>> to an Incubator-specific position.
>>http://s.apache.org/NAa
> ...
>
> Just lazin
Sorry. :)
I was looking for the document that Joe created but I cannot seem to find it.
Can someone point out where it is?
I was thinking that it might be a good idea to keep things simple and have
Marvin simply appoint the Ombudsman for an indeterminate term.
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 17, 2013
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 26, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Incubator-
>
> Following the discussion earlier this week, I'm calling a vote to accept
> Samza as a new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SamzaProposal,
>
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 1, 2013, at 3:38 AM, Florian Müller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Olingo into the Apache incubator.
>
> The proposal is pasted at the bottom on this email.
> The corresponding wiki page is:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Ol
On Jun 30, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that things have settled down a bit,
> I'd like to talk about some of the things
> I'm looking for out of the ombudsman post.
>
> 1) proactively solicits opinions of exiting podlings
>about their experiences in the form of interviews
>
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a vote for the release of Apache Curator, version 2.1.0-incubating.
>
> This has been voted on via the d...@curator.incubator.apache.org mailing
> list and now requires a vote on @general.
>
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Florian Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About two weeks ago, Stephan presented the Apache Olingo (OData) proposal [1].
> There has been a bit of a discussion about the name and the diversity of the
> initial committers. The name has been changed from OData to Olingo and on
I would prefer to use well known names for well known roles. Ombudsman is a
roll that's been around for quite a while and the person filling that role for
the ASF will be doing roughly the same thing as ombudsman in other
organizations.
With that said, I will agree that if everything is runnin
On Jun 17, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> A paradox:
>
> The VP is not supposed to exercise authority in normal circumstances.
> Projects are supposed to have mentors that advocate for them. If a
> project comes 'to the ombudsman', whether that's the VP or not, what
> can this per
ing we recently
> discussed in relation to the recent chair vote.
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: Alan Cabrera
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Creation of the Incu
m solving superheroes should limit themselves to the
> incubator?
> 15.06.2013 19:53 пользователь "Alan Cabrera" написал:
>
>>
>> Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a problem.
>>
>> Cause: we seem to collect/handle/organize problems
On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> This is a suggestion that has come up in the past, and the typical
> counter-argument is that this is something the chair needs to provide
> themselves.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
The usual reason for an ombudsman is to have a safe third pa
Problem: podlings are confused on where to go when there's a problem.
Cause: we seem to collect/handle/organize problems in an ad hoc manner and
sometimes mentors are the problem.
Solution: we create an elected Incubator Ombudsman.
Regards,
Alan
---
Problem: we seem to have unclear and conflicting ideas as to what the areas of
improvement are for the Incubator.
Cause: we have no concrete, anonymized, information on what the podlings'
experiences were during incubation.
Solution: require all podlings to submit anonymous exit interviews as
of disempowerment we too
> often dish out.
>
> From: Alan Cabrera
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaef
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> What we really need for podlings is a "bill of
> rights" towards what they can expect of their
> mentors, because too few of them actually are
> willing to question the participation of the
> people who signed up to mentor them and that's
> not h
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would still set policy and provide
> community best practice guidance. But then separate mailing lists/groups
> would provide actual oversight of podlings (incoming, mentoring, graduating).
> These
On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so
> long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings
> playing the incubators against each other.
Can you provide detail on what you mean by "prospective po
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> p
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Incubator community,
>
> I have tendered my resignation as VP, Incubator. The PMC has recommend
> Marvin Humphrey as my successor in a motion submitted to the
> Foundation board for consideration at the meeting next week.
Thanks, Benson, f
On Jun 13, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 04:56, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> So here's a thought...
>
> ...
>
>>> I would therefore like to propose
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:03 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)"
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Mesos community is ready to graduate. They have added
> committers and PPMC members while in the Incubator; have made a
> few releases; are discussing their issues on list and in
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:22 AM, "Ramirez, Paul M (398J)"
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for the acceptance of Apache HotdoG into the
> Incubator. I'll leave the VOTE open for the rest of the week and close it out
> Monday, June 17th early am PT.
>
> [ ]
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> So here's a thought...
>
> There have been many discussions about different ways to incubate
> projects. One of the most radical ideas is to dismantle the incubator
> and replace the podling concept with "probationary TLPs" reporting to
> the b
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 6, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of MetaModel into the Apache
> incubator.
> The vote will close on June 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM (PST).
>
> [] +1 Accept MetaModel into the Apache incubator
> [] +0 Don
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:34 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)"
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following folks, so no
mmittee.pl on mino and got back:
>
> No LDAP groups found with cn=incubator-pmc!
>
> So either I'm doing that wrong or don't have the karma.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Cabrera
> Reply-To: "genera
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:37 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>>
>>> Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor.
>>
>> Benson,
>&
On Jun 5, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Added my name to the proposal. I'm willing to mentor.
Benson,
One of my podling tools doesn't see that Greg is on the IPMC though he is an
ASF member. I think we need to update the LDAP entries if he's already been
ACK'd.
Regards,
Alan
--
9 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++
t rule (to my knowledge). The number "3" came about
> because that's how many votes are needed for a release. With >3
> mentors on the project it means the project needs to come to the IPMC
> for additional votes. As we've seen this can become very messy.
>
> Ro
Mentors come and go. Is there an explicit rule that a podling needs three
mentors before it can start to be incubated?
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 5, 2013, at 7:37 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)"
wrote:
> Paul, guys; I just noticed that HotdoG only has 2 mentors right now
> (myself, and pramirez).
On Jun 4, 2013, at 6:34 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright
>> in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain
>> in the file
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 June 2013 18:43, wrote:
>> Author: adc
>> Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013
>> New Revision: 1489076
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076
>> Log:
>> Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in.
>
> And perhaps add some com
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, "ant elder" wrote:
>>>
>>> This "when in doubt leave it out" approach has gone a long way at
>>> smoothing podling release reviews compared to the olden days.
>>
>
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright
> in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain
> in the files that you copied into our repos. It is impossible to tell
> what is from LinkedIn.
>
I'll a
On Jun 3, 2013, at 2:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Apache Incubator tools
>>> Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>
&
On Jun 2, 2013, at 8:51 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>> Apache Incubator tools
>> Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
>>
>> This product includes software developed at
>> The Apache Sof
On Jun 2, 2013, at 7:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 2, 201
On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>>> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/view
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt?rev=1488735&r1=1488734&r2=1488735&view=diff
>> ===
How many binding votes are there from the PPMC vote?
Regards,
Alan
On May 31, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating,
> the first jclouds release at Apache.
>
> The PPMC has approved the release at this poin
On May 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
>> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and look
Do it! Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
On May 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, sebb wrote:
> I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki
> [1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling?
>
> I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation.
> Anyone mind if I
On May 29, 2013, at 12:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
> From the subject line I thought this was going to be another attempt to
> sort out the incubator :-/
LOL, so did I!
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr.
On May 30, 2013, at 12:08 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly
> 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back
> in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process
> and people didn't
be revived too. It does not matter if there was something on GitHub or
> not.
>
> Not enough for me to maintain two terms.
>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents..
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On
it more feasible for
> the podlings to go, well, dormant.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> They kinda sound the same. Why didn't podlings want to retire? Does
>> anyone know?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
he PPMC is closed down, I think it has to be retired.
>
> Dormant implies a PPMC is taking some time off.
>
> Basically this is a larger version of "don't be afraid to delete a
> line of code; it's in version control".
>
> Hen"
>
>
>
&g
Looking at the podlings.xml and it's not clear to me what the difference is.
I'm sure I neglected to read some documentation bit.
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667806#comment-13667806
]
Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126:
That's a good idea. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13667778#comment-13667778
]
Alan Cabrera commented on INCUBATOR-126:
Yes, the VP of Branding *may* app
Alan Cabrera created INCUBATOR-126:
--
Summary: Sometimes its not clear that the who vets the podling name
Key: INCUBATOR-126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-126
Project: Incubator
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is
I think there's some good ideas here. You should capture them in
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013
Regards,
Alan
On May 15, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I've been incredibly busy, but to me the main thing wrong in the Incubator is
> focusing on what m
On May 10, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I'm currently writing some tooling to help with the incubation process as
> well as mail list moderator tools.
>
> The first thing that I'm writing is a command that will print out who is the
> owner of an email ali
Don't let me stop the vote but I'm getting
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
when I run the tests, mvn clean install. My MAVEN_OPTS is:
-Xms2G -Xmx2G -XX:PermSize=1G -XX:MaxPermSize=1G
Am I doing something wrong?
Regards,
Alan
On May 7, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodrí
Welcome aboard!
Regards,
Alan
On May 13, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am pleased to announce that Joe Brockmeier joins the Incubator PMC.
>
> Please join me in extending a warm welcome to Joe!
>
> On behalf of the Incubator PMC,
>
> --
> NS
--
Sebb you are awesome and correct.
But I have to say, I think that when we make suggestions to podlings, we should
make it clear that we are making suggestions and are not pointing out some ASF
Incubator transgression. This is one such cases where Sebb us making a very
useful suggestion.
Again
On May 11, 2013, at 11:03 AM, "Dennis E. Hamilton"
wrote:
> It's often called a dead-man's switch. I think the term applied originally
> to locomotive engineers and also metro car drivers. (I'm not sure what a
> dead pilot switch could accomplish in an aircraft.)
>
> I think having mentors
On May 11, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> Frankly I find the notion that the board will do a better job of MENTORING
> these projects than the IPMC to be batshit insane, but that's just me.
> We need manpower, and there is plenty of that available amongst the competent
> volunteers w
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
