Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

2019-04-09 Thread Ate Douma
ial members of the Apache NetBeans Project: * Anton Epple * Antonio Vieiro * Aristides Villarreal * Arunava Sinha * Ate Douma * Attila Kelemen * Bertrand Delacretaz * Bruno Flávio * Bruno Souza * Christian Lenz * Constantin Drabo * David Heffelfinger * Daniel Gruno * Dusan Balek * Ei

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view, it was time to g

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 13.58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel... I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for mentors to catch issues in the first one without both

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

2019-02-19 Thread Ate Douma
-1 (binding) because the Maven groupId is using org.netbeans as prefix instead of org.apache.netbeans, and there is no need to keep using org.netbeans for this *new* artifact. I've already raised and discussed this on the Netbeans dev@ list were we agreed that it is better to cancel the vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2018-11-20 Thread Ate Douma
Now provided sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby changing my vote back to +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 19/11/2018 15.40, Ate Douma wrote: Sorry about overlooking this before, but as Henk P. Penning indicated release artifacts now MUST be accompanied by a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

2018-11-20 Thread Ate Douma
Thanks, Laszlo. sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby reconfirming my previous +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 20/11/2018 19.56, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from this staging area, but wont move them over to the final release a

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2018-11-19 Thread Ate Douma
-256 checksum file is added. (see also the vote thread for Netbeans 10.0 and Bertrand's likewise comment and temporary change of vote). Ate On 18/11/2018 22.29, Ate Douma wrote: +1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired) - LICENSE and NOTICE files co

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2018-11-18 Thread Ate Douma
+1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired) - LICENSE and NOTICE files correct - source dist contents matches with contents of git release-1.6 tag Regards, Ate On 18/11/2018 05.47, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: Hi. The NetBeans incubating community has just app

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3] (2nd attempt)

2018-11-18 Thread Ate Douma
+1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (both source and bin distribution) - LICENSE and NOTICE files look fine (both source and bin distribution) - source dist contents matches with content of git 10.0-vc3 tag (except LICENSE/NOTICE files, as documented) - binary starts up OK (no further

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

2018-11-18 Thread Ate Douma
On 18/11/2018 18.01, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I believe it is at least 5 days (or an X number, not sure what the X should be officially) and with three +1 votes. Release Votes SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours: http://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval There is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

2018-08-28 Thread Ate Douma
+1 binding Regards, Ate On 2018-08-27 05:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote: After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text form as well. This vote will run at least 72 hours. P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

2018-05-23 Thread Ate Douma
also don't see how it serves any purpose and only will trigger unnecessary warnings or worries by users or checker tools. My recommendation is to get rid of those GPL license files. Regards, Ate --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma wrote: I'm i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

2018-05-21 Thread Ate Douma
I'm inclined to vote positive on this RC1, overall looks great! - verified the MD5 and SHA1, and PGP signatures with the ASC files. - executed rat check (ant rat) and verified the report. - build and run the source (using JDK8), and all seems fine. However I still have two questions: a) nbbuild

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

2018-02-19 Thread Ate Douma
+1 Regards, Ate On 2018-02-19 11:45, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, The FreeMarker community has discussed [1] and voted [2] positively on graduating to a top level project (TLP). The resolution for the graduation has been proposed and discussed in this list [3]. Information about FreeMarker

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

2018-01-22 Thread Ate Douma
On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote: I'm inclined to vote -1 at this point as well.. I want confirm that the list of issues Justin raised have been entered in your backlog. To me, the minimum amount of work that has to be done to convert to a +1 is: - Remove the binary zip files from t

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Alpha [RC2]

2017-11-21 Thread Ate Douma
+1, carrying over my mentor and binding vote from the netbeans dev list vote thread Ate On 2017-11-21 14:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: The release hash is: 1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75 ... https://dist.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-11-17 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 2017-11-14 20:47, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 (binding) over here as well again. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 10:47:50 GMT+1, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: ...I'd like to ask you to hold the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

2017-10-22 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) One improvement to consider for the next release is appending the license for Knockout (MIT) to the embedded LICENSE in the build ko4j jar artifact, as is required for distributing this artifact. And another is maybe generating a more explicit artifact name for ko4j. Thanks, Ate O

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

2017-07-10 Thread Ate Douma
sponsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Streams Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Streams Project: * Stephen D Blackmon *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

2016-11-10 Thread Ate Douma
Steve, I have a few additional notes below. As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings? Sometimes your replies (like below) are not using any, which makes it very difficult to distinguish your reply from the original message. Thanks, Ate On 2016-11-10 21:27, sblack

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4.0 incubating

2016-11-02 Thread Ate Douma
Thanks for catching this Justin! I just checked and this same issue was also present in the Streams 0.3-incubating release, so we overlooked it the previous time as well. We'll fix these and then come back with a new release candidate. Ate On 2016-11-02 04:21, jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:

Streams podling back to monthly reporting schedule [Was: Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor]

2016-10-04 Thread Ate Douma
yet [1] Regards, Ate [1] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal

Re: NetBeans next steps

2016-10-03 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-10-03 19:22, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Heve sameone requested the ML at infra? I didn't find a issue for it. Bertrand already did, directly (see this thread first email from Bertrand). As I understand it, it doesn't require a JIRA issue. FYI: I'm busy otherwise until tomorrow. The

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Sorry, Bertrand, not Ate, though I feel they're in sync. In this case, you felt right :-) Syncing with the mentors would have been appreciated, but I also see no harm done in Roman's trying to help out. Thanks Roman! Ate Gj On Wednesday, Sep

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
p, we need to all be comfortable with cutting bait on it. I agree, and I think it is a good suggestion to switch back to a 3 monthly reporting schedule to keep the IPMC in the loop on progress (or lack thereof). Ate John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-25 12:25

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed before I make this so? Without further feedback I'm going to assume lazy consensus and wil

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows [] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ... +1 (binding) Ate - To unsubscr

[VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
Pielage (Payara Services) 4. Gui Chulin (translation) 5. Yi Zhao (translation) 6. Liyuan Li (translation) 7. CunHui Lin (translation) 8. Lei Cao (translation) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Bertrand Delacretaz === Mentors === * Bertrand Delacretaz * Emmanuel Lécharny * Ate Doum

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
documented in the incubator guidelines yet. Ate LieGrue, strub On Monday, 26 September 2016, 22:09, Ate Douma wrote: Hi Mark, On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of playing with GIT. It is used e.g. in the

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-27 18:12, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...I think for a lot of (NetBeans) folks lurking in these threads, it will be useful to know what voting means, who can vote, what 'binding votes' are, etc etc... Ok we can add that info

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

2016-09-27 Thread Ate Douma
+1 Ate On 2016-09-27 14:23, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 14:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to wait longer before starting a vote?.. I'm +1 f

Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

2016-09-26 Thread Ate Douma
Hi Mark, On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of playing with GIT. It is used e.g. in the following TLPs: TomEE DeltaSpike Johnzon CouchDB Maven and many, many more! It also got discussed on members, infra and even

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

2016-09-26 Thread Ate Douma
erning the process for assigning Suneel as mentor, can we assume lazy consensus and just 'make it so' in a few days, if nobody objects? Thanks, Ate On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ate Douma wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can&#

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

2016-09-25 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-25 17:45, Ross Gardler wrote: You seem to have taken my comment as an indication that I have concerns one way or the other. That is not the case. What I'm saying is that to make a case for extra budget there needs to be solid justification that a move to ASF will help the community

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-25 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-25 17:20, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ate Douma wrote: and not all committers are required to commit :-) That is interesting. Can you explain more about that? What I meant to say is that at the ASF we also value and honour merit based on things

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-25 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-25 12:15, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list. Hi GeertJan, I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

2016-09-25 Thread Ate Douma
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed before I make this so? Ate On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Marthi wrote: -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-25 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list. Hi GeertJan, I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO there really isn't so much contradictory advic

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-23 Thread Ate Douma
, Ate On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote: As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below). The most notable difference i

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-23 Thread Ate Douma
ms 2.0 community has happened. Thanks! Benjamin -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung *From: *apache <mailto:sblack...@apache.org> *Sent: *Friday, September 23, 2016 4:15 PM *To: *Ate Douma <mailto:a...@douma.nu>; d...@streams.incubator.apache.org <mailt

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-22 Thread Ate Douma
read for the release candidate on d...@streams.incubator.apache.org Kind regards, Ate Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org On September 19, 2016 at 10:25:16 AM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu <mailto:a...@douma.nu>) wrote: On 2016-09-19 17:09, Suneel Marthi wrote: > I am sorry to be reading t

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-19 Thread Ate Douma
7;d be happy to postpone/cancel the retirement VOTE for now. I suggest to head over to d...@streams.incubator.apache.org, let us know what you can and will do for the project, and see how that works out. Regards, Ate On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Do

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-19 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote: Ate, Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html Right. Thanks for pointing this out John. I've never before had t

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-19 Thread Ate Douma
eneral@ Ate John On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 AM Ate Douma wrote: FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first initiated a [discuss] thread more than a week ago, which resulted in zero feedback. Ate (Streams mentor) Forwarded Message Subj

Fwd: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-19 Thread Ate Douma
27:11 +0200 From: Ate Douma To: d...@streams.incubator.apache.org As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic. The process is described at http://attic.apache.org/process.html [ ] +1 Move Streams to the Attic [

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-15 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi Incubator PMC, On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ... At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't been addressed so far and would prevent us

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-14 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-14 21:49, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I can't wait for that to happen! In the meantime, can we call NetBeans by its real name: NetBeans, with an uppercase N and an uppercase B? Shall we all start maintaining that, i.e., using the correct name, which is NetBeans or, better yet, Apache NetB

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-14 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-14 21:43, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate any code from

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-14 Thread Ate Douma
On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate any code from anywhere on plugins.netbeans.org to anyone el

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate AsterixDB from the Incubator

2016-04-11 Thread Ate Douma
piaro (2016-01-16), and Michael Blow (2016-03-28) have been added as committers and PPMC members AsterixDB's community passed a supporting vote with 26 +1 votes (3 of those were from the podling's mentors Chris Mattmann, Henry Saputra, and Ate Douma) and no 0 or -1 votes [2]. The proposed b

Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

2016-02-06 Thread Ate Douma
I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with bundled binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that: For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and copyright year statement, to be compliant with ASL 2.0, section 4.d [1] However Justin (se

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

2015-11-10 Thread Ate Douma
On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

2015-11-10 Thread Ate Douma
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I think it shouldn't be listed as such. Ate (AsterixDB mentor)

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

2015-09-22 Thread Ate Douma
l-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-asterixdb-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccan_yf5xzo8qv_yk-p41m+tppv_y2dynehc_keujwxpem_1l...@mail.gmail.com%3E with result Binding +1s: Murtadha Hubail Till Westmann (IPMC) Yingyi Bu Abdullah Alamoudi Ate Douma (IPMC) Mike Carey Chris A. Mattmann (IPMC) Ian Maxon Non-bind

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

2015-06-19 Thread Ate Douma
On 2015-06-19 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next 7

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

2015-03-20 Thread Ate Douma
On 2015-03-19 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/KWE I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal and is also i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

2015-02-23 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Very interesting. And if you still like or need another mentor, I'd be willing to help out. Ate On 2015-02-20 06:38, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: Hi Everyone, OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating

2015-01-09 Thread Ate Douma
-1 (binding) Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I noticed: - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain the required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files I also encountered build test failures. For the next rele

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zeppelin into the Apache Incubator

2014-12-20 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) On 2014-12-19 06:29, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Following the discussion earlier: http://s.apache.org/kTp I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Zeppelin as a new Incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal and is a

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Flink

2014-12-10 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 2014-12-09 12:49, Kostas Tzoumas wrote: Hi everyone, The Flink community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed with 27 +1s (including 12 +1s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s. Here is the vote thread in the Dev list: http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive.10

Re: September report

2014-09-08 Thread Ate Douma
On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! it looks like September report is almost done, except the following podlings: * Streams [ ](streams) Matt Franklin [ ](streams) Ate Douma [ ](streams) Craig McClanahan If there's any chance the above mentor

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

2013-10-01 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote: I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling. The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

2013-06-15 Thread Ate Douma
On Jun 14, 2013 11:50 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote: > > I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1]. > > I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter > the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation > policy. The acceptance or othe

Re: Looking for a Champion

2013-06-05 Thread Ate Douma
On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: +1 @Marcel Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or not ? He is asking for help (Champion) to create such a draft :) On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans < marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

2013-05-24 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Dear ASF members, We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, follows below the proposal Open is open for at least 72h an

Re: Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

2013-03-05 Thread Ate Douma
On 03/05/2013 01:47 PM, David Crossley wrote: Ate Douma wrote: I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too. Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to trigger that, if even needed? After making source changes, then i just go to https://cms.

Re: Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

2013-03-05 Thread Ate Douma
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too. Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to trigger that, if even needed? Thanks, Ate On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote: Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ... Those projects would hav

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

2012-11-15 Thread Ate Douma
== Initial Committers == * Matt Franklin (mfranklin at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member * James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer * Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Ryan Baxter (rbaxter at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

2012-11-14 Thread Ate Douma
Franklin (mfranklin at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member * James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer * Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Ryan Baxter (rbaxter at apache dot org) - Apache C

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Wookie podling from the incubator

2012-10-26 Thread Ate Douma
the scope of responsibility of the Apache Wookie Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Wookie Project: * Scott Wilson * Ate Doum

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Airavata from the incubator

2012-09-10 Thread Ate Douma
of the Apache Airavata Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Airavata Project: Aleksander Slominski Ate Douma

Re: [VOTE] Apache Airavata 0.4-Incubating RC1

2012-08-01 Thread Ate Douma
Hi Suresh, I looked at the two issues raised and IMO these do not pose as blockers for this release, so +1 from me on this release candidate (binding and Mentor) More feedback below. Regards, Ate On 08/01/2012 03:46 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, The VOTE is called for a lazy consensus an

Re: [VOTE] Apache Airavata 0.3-Incubating RC3

2012-06-19 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding, as well as a late Airavata PPMC Mentor vote) Ate On 06/18/2012 12:27 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the following Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts. We are requesting at least one additional IPMC membe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allura Proposal

2012-06-19 Thread Ate Douma
Dave should mail his incubator wiki id here and request being added to the wiki ContributersGroup [1]. Once added to this page (by an incubator wiki admin) Dave can add/edit wiki pages himself. Ate [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup On 06/19/2012 11:28 AM, Ross Gardler wr

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airavata 0.2-Incubating RC5

2012-04-25 Thread Ate Douma
leaning this up a bit further. In addition, those samples modules also have additional NOTICE and LICENSE files in their src/main/resources folders, but AFAIK these are not or no longer used/bundled in the build artifact. Possibly outdated/leftover? IMO none of the above really are release blocke

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airavata 0.2-Incubating RC5

2012-04-24 Thread Ate Douma
I haven't seen anyone respond to this yet and I'm in a tight spot myself to make time for it. I'll try to free up some by tomorrow though, please accept my apologies for the delay. Ate On 04/22/2012 06:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Sorry to cross post here, but I think we need to get

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

2012-04-10 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 04/10/2012 03:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote: Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please vote with: +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator +0: don't care -1: do not accep

Re: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project

2012-03-11 Thread Ate Douma
On 03/11/2012 08:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: -8<--- [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below) [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling -- +

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

2012-03-01 Thread Ate Douma
After 72+ hours this vote has passed with the following tally of 13 votes in total, including +11 binding IPMC member votes: +1: Ross Gardler* Chris Mattmann* Arje Cahn Hadrian Zbarcea* Ate Douma* Alex Karasulu* Jukka Zitting* Alan D. Cabrera* Jean-Baptiste Onofré* Niall Pemberton* Henry

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-29 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/29/2012 03:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: ... They remain. Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is our det

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-29 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: ... They remain. Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is our determination, and is our Right. Sorry but I don't th

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

2012-02-28 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/28/2012 01:46 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi... 1st of all, and I speaking about myself here, I believe this is partially my fault cause I am one of the mentors of Sqoop and I should have spotted such thing before moving the vote to general@ I totally agree with Alex, more specifi

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

2012-02-28 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) On 02/27/2012 01:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote: Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011. Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC members, and shows a steady growth of community and

[VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

2012-02-27 Thread Ate Douma
y responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Rave Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Rave Project: *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

2012-02-16 Thread Ate Douma
eived 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev - VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G RESULT: http://s.apache.org/Fcv IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list: Ate Douma: +1 Ross Gardler: +1 Release notes: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.8-incubating/CHANGEL

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Ate Douma
Thanks many times Noel! This also makes (for me) voting for Jukka again a proper process. I'm therefore reconfirming my earlier retracted vote for Jukka, +1 Ate On 02/10/2012 03:31 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I'm ready to vote, but Chris said "it looks like the remaining f

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Well, if there's an election, the fair thing is to include all candidates and see who gets the majority. A vote on just one candidate

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/09/2012 05:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: ...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election, with all candidates be done... Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's just an assumption AFAICS

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread Ate Douma
+1 (binding) Ate On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Hi Folks, OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka Zi

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

2012-02-08 Thread Ate Douma
+1, good luck! Ate On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi... It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/06/2012 07:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote: On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, "sebb" wrote: ... Perhaps the answer to "Why is a licensing header necessary?" http://www.apache.org/legal/src-heade

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, [legal-discuss@?] On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them? Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream users have the right to di

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this page), but the release

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this page), but the release FAQ [1] makes it sound like you need the header, if you assume your templates are source:

Re: Earned autonomy

2012-02-05 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/06/2012 01:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:26:47PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: It might be worthwhile to require 3 ASF members on the initial release, 2 on the next, 1 on the following and then trust the committee to follow the established precedent. +1 In

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

2012-02-03 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/03/2012 08:35 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: -Original Message- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:13 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?) On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

2012-02-03 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/03/2012 06:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote: +1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions. +1 on that Ate Karl On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, [Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.] On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann, Chr

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

2012-01-30 Thread Ate Douma
On 01/30/2012 10:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: On 30 January 2012 09:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: ...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually), nominations are opened, including potentially the current chair, and a vot

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

2012-01-29 Thread Ate Douma
On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote: FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of this

  1   2   >