+1 -C
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> I understand the concern, so let me try to offer some facts and see if we can
> make progress from there.
>
> Omid has been around for some time now, and its initial design appeared in a
> couple of research papers that I actual
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal
> and the feedback so far seems to be positive.
>
> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dai wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Omid as
> a new Incubator project.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Omid into the Incubator
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Omid
> [ ] -1 Do not accept Omid because ...
>
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
> DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accep
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a
> VOTE on accepting Hivemall into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Hivemall into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Hivemall into the A
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> Dear All,
>I would like to call a vote for accepting "Ratis" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available at this wiki link.
>https://wiki.apache.org/incub
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum/signature; LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER look good. -C
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Bolke de Bruin wrote:
> Hello Incubator PMC’ers,
>
> The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release
> Apache Airflow 1.8.0 (incubating) based on 1.8.0
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Suma Shivaprasad wrote:
> Dear Incubator members,
>
> Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from
> incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting thread within
> the incubator
> community. Apache Atlas enter
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on the discussion on the incubator mailing list[1] I would like to
> call a vote to add Heron to the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available on the Apache
> Incubator wiki
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 2:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> Apache Storm has been incubating since September 2014. Since then we have
> added 3 additional committers (with another 2 approved and pending account
> creation), and performed two releases. The Storm community recently
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Would it be too much to ask to have YAML report *in addition*
> with the regular wiki?
Let's stick with one report. When the new format is ready, we can ask
podlings to learn it.
> We should be absolutely clear that it is auxiliary, but I
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Sorry but it's -1 (binding) from me. Everything is good except that the
> jQuery has had an Apache license header added to it. (in
> ./html5-ui/js/jquery-1.11.0.min.js) If other incubator members think this
> isn't a blocker I'll change
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
wrote:
> Have generated a new release candidate for Apache Falcon 0.5 post feedback
> from IPMC (Refer:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201409.mbox/%3CBLU179-W4635CB0EDA7F8C86C013E9A4CB0%40phx.gbl
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Sharad Agarwal wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread
> https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45208.html
> I would like to call a Vote for accepting Lens as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is availab
I haven't tracked Drill during its incubation, so I read through some
of the dev list, poked through the review board and JIRA, read from
the wiki, and brought up the sample through its 10 minute tutorial.
Drill seems to be a very approachable project. It has good docs
(particularly for developmen
t, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> This vote to graduate Apache Drill to a top-level project has passed
>>>with 9
>>> binding +1s and no -1s.
>>>
>>> Ted Dunning
>>> Jake Farrell
>>>
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Falcon dev list in which the community
> expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project.
>
> The vote has passed with:
> 13 binding +1 votes
> 8 non-binding +1 v
+1 -C
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NiFiProposal has elicited a cheerful and
> positive conversation, so I offer this vote.
>
> Vote will be open for the usual 72 hours ...
>
> Here is my [+1]
+1 (binding)
Verified signature and checksum, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE look
good (specifically, checked licensing for deps: jquery, bootstrap,
glyphicons, and fontawesome). Minor nits:
- the gradlew script and wrapper jar are missing from the top level
(referenced in docs; not sure whether
jie, Martin, Roman, Garry, Chris Douglas
> Non-binding +1s x 7: Claudio, TJ, Robert, Roger, Danny, Jon, Yi
>
> Links to votes and discussions:
> http://s.apache.org/samzaGradResult
> http://s.apache.org/samzaGradDiscuss
>
> Samza has been incubating for a bit more than a
+1 for Chris's proposal.
Without diminishing the creativity applied to solving problems with
the incubator, perhaps the better solution is to trade those problems
for tractable ones. -C
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> And how could the below proposal return wi
+1
Checksum and signature match, RAT OK, source tarball builds cleanly.
LICENSE/NOTICE lgtm, and I agree with Marvin w.r.t. the missing
DISCLAIMER (can be fixed in subsequent releases). -C
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
> The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache R
I agree with Andrew. Creating a sub-board of the most vocal members of
the IPMC distills its dysfunction.
But this doesn't require consensus. The proposals focus on identifying
the "true" members of the IPMC; clearly, the authors believe
themselves to be among the elect. So make a list of the IPMC
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote:
> How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by
> removing inactive members?
Doing *that* would be straightforward. Take the set of mentors on currently
incubating projects, add the other ha
annual ritual is disruptive to that goal. -C
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 20
+1; this is a pragmatic proposal. -C
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think it would be fair to say that in the
> past month or so we've had a healthy amount
> of discussion around where to go next with
> IPMC/Incubator/Metors reform. A diverse
> set of view p
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally
> suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this community,
> but after some discussions with the existing community of
> Asterix
+1 (binding) -C
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
> After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a
> new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the
> Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days.
>
+1 (binding, reiterated from dev@lens) -C
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official
> Apache Lens 2.0.1-beta-incubating release. This is our first release.
>
> Apache Lens provides
+1 -C
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/Oxt
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubato
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Amareshwari Sriramdasu
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is the call for vote for the following RC to be released as official
> ApacheLens 2.1.0-beta-incubating release. This is our second release.
>
> Apache Lens provides an Unified Analytics inte
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE. Verified the
build (on Linux).
I also read through the dev@reef list to get a sense of the journey to
RC8. Kudos to the REEF community for taking such care with their
releases. -C
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Julia Wang (Q
+1 (binding)
Checksum, signature OK, DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE look OK, compile
from source works but the package target broke for me. -C
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Venkatesh Seetharam
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.5 incubating release.
>
> A vot
+1 (binding)
Verified checksum, signature on src/bin. Built package target from
source. NOTICE/LICENSE/DISCLAIMER present, but I only did a cursory
check of the dependencies.
The DEPENDENCIES file at the top level of the source tarball is empty. -C
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Jaideep Dhok
David-
In another conversation, you mentioned Crucible [1] as another tool
for code reviews. Is that a viable option?
Has anyone on the list had any experience using it? -C
[1] https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/overview/
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> As long as there's a human being in the loop reviewing what's going into the
> repo I don't think I've got any issues with the process.
The ASF needs to establish provenance. It can't do that if a committer
pushes code that was posted to
Daniel-
This has been discussed recently in graduations for Tez [1], Drill
[2], and other projects whose continued incubation serves no purpose.
They've completed a curriculum that clears their IP and introduces
them to the ASF's infrastructure, procedures, and culture. The project
must be open, a
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> If by this you mean the Incubator has taught the podling what it needs
> to know, and the podling is following the best practices of the Apache
> Way, then we are in full agreement. I don't see the need to single me
> out here, I am not disagr
Falcon and Tez reported in April. -C
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> its reporting time and at the wiki are a lot of them missing!
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2013
>
> Ambari
> Blur
> DeltaSpike (hasn't it graduated?)
> Droids
> Falcon
> Hadoop De
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> My guess is that since the wiki was down these slipped.
>
> I know that I plan on producing reports by end of week and getting them
> up there ASAP for my podlings.
Ah, right; those were added after the report was generated. I copi
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>
> So far I've heard +1s from the following folks, so no need for the
Subversion Directory
>
> Git is the preferred source control system: git://git.apache.org/samza
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> JIRA Samza (SAMZA)
>
> Other Resources
>
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson
> instance to run them whenever a n
+1 (binding) -C
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Incubator-
>
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DataFuProposal, and is also include
+1 -C
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
> (vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
> http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
>
> I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this ha
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> If not part of the initial proposal, then
> at least making a good case as a criteria for graduation, and writing up
> related work and how the new project differentiates could be an initial
> task done on JIRA after acceptance along the line
efforts - overriding my concerns or objections - then I'd be
> inclined to not view Apache as a particularly good steward of my community
> development. The devil is in the details, which takes me back to the point
> made in the above paragraph.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On
+1 -C
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Based on the results of the discussion thread (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201404.mbox/%3CCA%2BFBdFQA4TghLRdh9GgDKaMtKLQHxE_QZV%3DoZ7HfiDSA_jyqwg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> ), I would like to call a vo
Tez is ready to graduate. Cos, if you can help us manage that process,
it'd certainly be appreciated. -C
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I share the sentiment with NPanday - doesn't seem like anything is happening
> there really.
>
> If it of an interest to the incub
I'll detail why I think Tez is ready to graduate.
Nobody is concerned about its activity, relevance, or ability to
produce releases. So I won't belabor those points. Let's focus on
whether the Tez project is approachable as a project and as a
community.
Posting project plans and discussing them o
were 5 IPMC votes from our mentors:
> - Alan Gates
> - Arun C. Murthy
> - Chris Mattman
> - Chris Douglas
> - Jakob Homan
>
> Now, I would like to ask the IPMC to vote for the graduation of Apache Tez.
>
> Please VOTE to indicat
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
> about a situation of no releases here. Presumably those
> users who are comfortable building from the repo would
> just keep doing so. And since there was no release,
> what else i
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps
> it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I
> have
> raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't think it ever be
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Chris, I know you are pretty overloaded at the moment with podlings, but
> would
> you be willing to be a mentor for Argus?
I don't have many cycles for this, but if it's a blocker for
incubation then I'll make time. -C
>> Initial committer
+1 -C
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a
> new Incubator project.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included
> below.
>
> Vote is
t; * Yingda Chen
> * Tony Majestro
> * Beysim Sezgin
> * Boris Shulman
> * Russell Sears
> * Jung Ryong Lee
> * You Sun Jung
> * Dong Joon Hyun
> * Josh Rosen
> * Tyson Condie
> * Brandon Myers
> * Yunseong Lee
> * Taegeon Um
> * Youngseok Yang
>
I agree with the analysis from Jerome and Greg. All three of Chukwa's
current committers are its original contributors. An important- and
often difficult- part of Apache community is growing and managing the
developers working on the project. Some experience adding people in
the Incubator would be
> I meant, purely in terms of Hadoop putting forward the TLP motion to the
> board, with incubator's endorsement. But let's let options play out and
> find out what incubator recommends first. I wasn't suggesting that Hadoop
> would have some additional responsibilities here, in terms of mentorin
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
[snip]
Fair point.
The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
the mailing lists, right? Conducting the vote with this variable has
become more arduous than all the INFRA and site work it implies; let's
drop it. E
Did these dependencies change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.1? -C
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
>> Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
>>
>>
update and is Apache License
> 2.0 http://code.google.com/p/snappy-java/
> 2) ZooKeeper client jar upgraded from 3.3.3 to 3.3.4
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
>> Did these dependencies change between 0.7.0 and 0.7.1? -C
>>
>> On We
ou believe that
Kafka should go further, but the release violates no policy. -C
On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
> > Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the
> > reasoning of
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal
> requirement. Fairness is immaterial.
>
> If you bundle the bits, you must deal with the licensing and you must get it
> right.
Sure, but that's not an issue here.
gt;>>> Snappy is on Apache License 2.0. So, our licenses should be covered.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On T
much time do you think is reasonable to obtain
clarification? -C
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
>> Kevan-
>
> Hi Chris,
> Thanks for elaborating.
>
>>
>> Please appreciate that th
+1 -C
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> This is a duplicated attempt at sending this message, please ignore the
> previous message if it eventually arrives. There appears to be a hangup
> sending email from my apache email address via gmail.
>
> Abstract
>
> Drill is
+1 -C
(sorry, wrong thread)
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion
> over the last few days has been quite positive.
>
> Please cast your vote
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
> two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
>
that the persons listed immediately below be and
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>Apache Oozie Project:
>
> * Alan Gatesga...@apache.org
> * Alejandro Abdelnurt...@apache.org
> * Andreas Neuman
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Kafka Incubator has passed the vote for 0.7.2 RC5
> http://www.mail-archive.com/kafka-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04980.html
>
> I would like to call a vote now from the IPMC.
>
> This is the fifth candidate for the thi
+1 (binding) -C
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:37 AM, kishore g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring Helix into Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care eit
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This seems like it might be more at home at apache-extras.
That may ultimately be its fate, but building a community around these
tools is worthy of an attempt. This also shares many goals with
MRUnit. Collaboration or even merging with that
+1 -C
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This is a call for a vote to graduate the Kafka podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Kafka entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added three new
> committers, encouraged a number of new contributors, and made two signif
The vote (http://s.apache.org/Rgw) started on 2012-10-26 has ended.
Results:
+1 Jakob Homan (IPMC)
+1 Alan Cabrera (IPMC)
+1 Chris Douglas (IPMC)
+1 Jukka Zitting (IPMC)
+1 Bertrand Delacretazn (IPMC)
With five +1 votes and no other votes, the motion passes.
The IPMC has approved this proposal
Members of the Apache Board-
The Apache Incubator IPMC has determined that the Kafka Project is
ready for graduation and requests its establishment as a TLP. Please
consider the following draft resolution at your next meeting.
Home: https://incubator.apache.org/kafka/
Vote by project: http://s.ap
+1; this matches my understanding. -C
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> My understanding of mentor sign off is that all active mentors sign off,
> not just one. Lack of sign off means the mentor has been busy elsewhere for
> that quarter and feels unqualified to signoff.
>
> S
r Resources ===
> * Jenkins/Hudson for builds and test running.
>
> == Initial Committers ==
> * Adam Berry (amberry at yahoo-inc dot com)
> * Jeffrey Zemerick (jeffrrey at mtnfog dot com)
> * Evert Lammert
Infra asks for a "heads up" for large artifacts:
http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be
worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external
data, so they can't be regenerated? Are they packaged here for
convenience, or is this the primary mechanism
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models
> for which the training data cannot be shared with the community?
My guess would be no, but it sounds like the OpenNLP community studied
this in detail; have you
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We just
> came to the conclusion
> that its not worth spending time on these issues, when we can instead
> produce our own training
> data which is compatible with the Apache l
: general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
>> [mailto:general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org]
>> On Behalf Of Chris Douglas
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: ctak
t; codebase.
> * Active relationships and possible cooperation with related projects and
> communities, including end user and scientific communities, CORDEX,
> NARCCAP, US NCA, IPCC, ESG, etc.
> * Active relationships and possible cooperation with existing Apache
> communities,
-0 on graduation into Hive.
>From the [DISCUSS] thread: http://s.apache.org/as9 , this sounds like
a compromise with members of the Hive PMC who see HCatalog as "a set
of wrapper APIs that make Hive's metastore and serdes accessible to
Pig and MR", so they question whether members of that communit
Checksum and signature match, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER look in order.
+1 (binding), aside from a quick check: there are a few jars included
in the source tarball:
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-assertion/lib/med-facts-i2b2-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-a
project and has been classified Export
> Commodity Control Number (ECCN) 5D002.C.1. More information on the
> Apache Shiro classification can be found at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/shiro/trunk/README
>
> Required Resources
>
> Mailing lists
>
> knox-dev AT incubator
mmunity. We believe
> that Tez's extensible architecture will further encourage community
> participation.
> Also, related Apache projects (eg, Pig, Hive) have very large and active
> communities, and we expect that over time Tez will also attract a large
> community.
&g
+1 (binding) -C
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator.
> The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST).
>
> [] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator
> [] +0 Don't care.
> [] -1 Don't accept
AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Shwetha GS (shwetha.gs AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Shaik Idris (shaik.idris AT inmobi DOT com)
> * Venkatesh Seetharam (Venkatesh AT apache DOT org)
> * Sanjay Radia (sanjay AT apache DOT org)
> * Sharad Agarwal (sharad AT apache DOT org)
> * Amareshwa
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Your position is that the IPMC fails to supervise. The consensus of the
> IPMC is that this is not true. Otherwise, someone would be reading the
> monthly report and objecting to the failure to report 'failure' to the
> board.
"If your st
/repos/asf/incubator/kafka]
>
> === Issue Tracking ===
> JIRA Kafka (KAFKA)
>
> === Other Resources ===
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson instance
> to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added after
> project creation.
>
&
+1 (binding) -C
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be found
irectory
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hms
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> JIRA HMS
>
> Initial Committers
>
> • Devaraj Das (ddas AT apache DOT org)
> • Vitthal Suhas Gogate (gogate AT apache DOT org)
&g
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a
Updated Chukwa description. -C
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> None of them has a useful description on this page:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
>
> Podling mentors, have at it, please! People (even ones not me) really do
> look at this page and wonder what t
Thanks Sebb and Kevan. This is helpful.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> 1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
> LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of
> these jar files.
> 2) Why are these jars being stored
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:58 PM, sebb wrote:
> The sponsoring entity is normally the Incubator, sometimes another PMC.
> According to podlings.xml the sponsor is the Incubator, so please fix the
> site.
Woah, I hadn't seen that; fixed. Also fixed a reference to Apache
Flume (incubating), though
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Yeah, I'm not sure the vote can be shortened. I could be wrong. If it can
> then I totally agree with the inclination to get goin' with this release.
> I'm sorry it's had so many first and starts.
As long as the only modifications bro
and
>> we really appreciate that. We could use more suggestions like that.
>>
>> 4. Not enough flexibility in applying the rules.
>> Some of the rules don't make common sense. For example, if we publish a new
>> RC that simply fixes a few lines in NOTICE/LICENS
up, in a whine-free way, and collaborate with each other.
>
> Are you game?
Sure, I'll offer to help with drafting. Where is a good place to
coordinate that? -C
> - Original Message -
>> From: Chris Douglas
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: kafka-.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> I think you missed a very important part of what I said, let me quote
> the para you refer to:
[snip]
> My point is we can't expect the mentors to type everything over and
> over again for every podling, that's why we have docs. We can (and
>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> In which case, I suggest you post a clean message requesting feedback,
> as this thread does not appear to be the right place for this now.
The link was to the last RC. -C
-
To unsu
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
