Re: Redirecting retired podling websites

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 3:38 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 22:28, sebb wrote: >> >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 17:48, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sebb, >>> >>> I noticed you did a lot of updates to .htaccess [1] - I have so

Re: Redirecting retired podling websites

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 4:49 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 at 23:43, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Apr 3, 2021, at 3:38 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 22:28, sebb wrote: >>>> >>&

[INCUBATOR-129] Clarify whether incubator release announcement should include an incubation disclaimer

Hi - For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-129 changes should be made on https://incubator.apache.org/guides/publicity.html I think using Disclaimers should either be a clause in section 2, or a whole new section about announcing releases. Please help by submitting a PR for http

Re: [DISCUSS] YunionCloud Proposal

This looks like an interesting project. My concern is that the donation comes from https://www.yunion.cn which has a similar name to the podling and that might cause trademark confusion. Regards, Dave > On Apr 11, 2021, at 9:40 PM, Jian Qiu wrote: > > Dear all, > > We would like to propose

Re: [DISCUSS] YunionCloud Proposal

>> >>>>>>>> As you suggested, we would like to consider UnioneCloud as the >>>>> project >>>>>>> name. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you consider UnioneCloud an appropriate project name?

Re: [MENTORS] Old releases in release area

The clutch analysis for each podling provides a list of each valid release in the distribution area. eg. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch/doris Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2021, at 10:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > A few projects need to clean up their release

Re: [MENTORS] Old releases in release area

Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 28, 2021, at 4:58 AM, ling miao wrote: > > I read [1] carefully. > My understanding is that our old version has been archived in [2]. > So even if we delete the package in [3] , the old release will not > disappear from [2]. Is that right? Yes > > So I just nee

Re: IP clearance protocol for solo external project developed by a project committer

Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2021, at 8:31 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > IP clearance should be required per this line. > > *This form is not for new projects.* > > This is for projects and PMCs that have already been created and are > receiving a code donation into an existing codebase.

Re: [VOTE] Retirement of Weex

+1 (binding) Thanks for carrying this forward. All the Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 9, 2021, at 3:06 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi, > > According to the retirement guide[1] of incubator, we started the > public discussion in the weex dev mailing list and got the > conclusion[2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5

FYI - This release did receive 3 binding IPMC mentor votes on the dev list. In this case I think that the IPMC ought to explicitly contemplate using LAZY CONSENSUS Votes. Requirements are already met. What purpose other than reviewing the mentors does more than a notification serve? All the b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft (incubating) 0.7.5

FYI - This release did receive 3 binding IPMC votes on the dev list. In this case I think that the IPMC ought to contemplate using LAZY CONSENSUS Votes. Requirements are already met Sent from my iPhone > On May 13, 2021, at 10:42 AM, Aaron Radzinski wrote: >  Hello all, > This is a call for

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report submitted

I notice that Spot only has one mentor. I think that the IPMC needs to find two more volunteers to mentor Spot. All The Best, Dave > On May 13, 2021, at 11:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > The report has been submitted. > > The Sedona and Spot reports do not have sign-off by mentors,

Re: How to understand cut a release

Sent from my iPhone > On May 19, 2021, at 7:45 PM, Zhang Yonglun wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Actually, I followed this guide [1] and created a pull request [2] to the > incubator repo [3] yesterday. Could you help to review? > > Besides, are there any relevant step

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

> On May 22, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> PPMC vote has already provided a required majority approval and hence this >> vote is a lazy consensus vote open for 72 hours. > > > Was this vote open 72 hours? If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find. Justin many people have asked you not to cut so much context in your replies. Do you understand why Justin? Sent from my iPhone > On May 22, 2021, at 4:51 PM, Daniel

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

Sent from my iPhone > On May 22, 2021, at 6:30 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Justin was oblique and cut context. My iPhone and Apple Mail have been >> junking emails that I have to unjunk. Some I never find. > > Contest was which list it was sent to I’m sure your email client show

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

Sent from my iPhone > On May 22, 2021, at 6:24 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >>> Was this vote open 72 hours? >> >> If you mean on dev@nlpcraft? Then the answer is yes. It started on May 13. > > It needs to be 72 hours on the incubator list as well. I think that IPMC votes of Mentor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NLPCraft - Java Client (incubating) 0.7.5

> On May 22, 2021, at 8:44 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means the >> VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.)) > > IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to

Re: [MENTORS] June podling reports now due / June timeline

Justin, You have not updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/June2021 Regards, Dave > On Jun 2, 2021, at 9:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Timeline for June is: >Wed June 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day >Sun June 06 -- Shepherd reviews due by end

Re: Retirement info does not mention LDAP

Sebb, Please feel free to submit a PR, or suggested fix. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 3, 2021, at 7:40 AM, sebb wrote: > > Also, I think the bit about the .htaccess file is no longer accurate. > > There's a new way to do this; not sure where (or if) it is documented. > >> On

Turn on GitHub Issues on apache/incubator

Unless there is an objection I will turn on GitHub Issues on https://github.com/apache/incubator next Monday. I’ll also set notifications so that PRs and issues are sent to general@i.a.o See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features This will make it easier to t

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

Adding trademarks@ See https://prestodb.io/docs/current/connector.html There are 11 Apache products with trademark issues. This issue is extensive enough that a coordinated response is required. these can take long enough that this issue should not delay graduation. > > The Presto documentat

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

Hi - This IPMC member is finding this whole discussion circular. I’m including this link [1] from the discussion on legal-discuss@ which did include replies from other contributors. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9d0eab51653bfa6ead4b61e2ea0a7b435c0d3195ff1ed2ae3fdeb8f0%40%3Clegal-d

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

+1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 22, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Mayank Shrivastava wrote: > > Dear Incubator Community, > > We have discussed Apache Pinot Podling graduation in the general@incubator > DISCUSS thread [1], and addressed all the questions and concerns brought up

Re: Unable to access Incubator's web page

Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 21, 2021, at 1:36 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:17 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: >> ...There's currently an issue with the web site Jenkins job, in that it >> relies on a jbake that isn't available any longer... > > For Sing

Re: [MENTORS] Report timeline for August

Hi Justin, Pinot graduated so it seems you will need to remove it from the report. No one has updated podlings.xml to indicate the graduation. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content podlings.xml: Pinot is a distributed columnar storage engine that can ing

[WEBSITE] More Fully Move to Git

Hi - See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-268 I plan to complete the move of many of the files that are maintained by projects into an ASF-Pelican workflow like I recently completed for www.apache.org and other websites including httpd.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Liminal (incubating) 0.0.3rc4-INCUBATING

IMO regardless of whether or not you recreate rc4 or create rc5 all previous votes evaluated a prior package. I think you it's best to restart the VOTE on your dev list. Sorry, I know it’s not fun. The point is that everyone has voted on the exact same artifacts. Voting on GitHub tags is a prob

Re: [WEBSITE] More Fully Move to Git

> On Aug 5, 2021, at 5:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:32 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> ...I plan to complete the move of many of the files that are maintained by >> projects >> into an ASF-Pelican wo

Re: [WEBSITE] More Fully Move to Git

Hi - > On Aug 6, 2021, at 6:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:43 PM Greg Stein wrote: >> >> Branches for a purpose are appropriate... > > Absolutely agreed! Ditto. Better one repository than 100s in most cases. (I understand why Sling is special ;-) ) > > B

Re: Incubator home page not updated

I’m away from the computer and cannot look yet. I’ll have a look in about 15 hours. If someone else solves it first that would be great. Best Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 7, 2021, at 6:20 PM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Did someone notice that the incubator home

Re: Incubator home page not updated

Well - I went to my computer and it was a simple fix. Kick me for not realizing we need to have a simple .asf.yaml file in all git hosted asf-site branches due to recent Apache Infra changes. .asf.yaml: publish: whoami: asf-site Regards, Dave > On Aug 7, 2021, at 6:50 PM, Dave Fis

Re: Dependabot solutions for ASF projects

You should ask this question on bui...@apache.org > On Aug 27, 2021, at 8:56 AM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: > > Hi general@, > I understand that we cannot use automated tooling, specifically Dependbot ( > https://dependabot.com/) because it requests write access to the ASF > project source code

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.2.0(-rc.1)

Hey - I’ve reviewed the VOTE thread and there have been 2 +1s from the 3 Podling Mentors. Since Xun Liu VOTED +1 and since August 14 is an IPMC member. I think this passes. > On Aug 26, 2021, at 7:12 PM, Xun Liu wrote: > > hi, Benjamin > > Maybe you need to invite the mentor of the Annotat

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ and for brpc - https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/brpc.html See https://incuba

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> The status of Podlings releases can be found in the clutch analysis. >> >> Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/ >> <htt

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

> On Sep 13, 2021, at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 16:45, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 12, 2021, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 23:49, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache brpc (incubating) 1.0.0-rc02

Once podlings report their download page something like this can be incorporated in clutch3 which will have svn log info from dist. Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > A while back I wrote a script to check podling download links and we

Re: Require websites to have standard download URL?

Hi - > On Sep 17, 2021, at 11:09 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Also: if anyone visits http://podling.apache.org/download > it MUST redirect to > https://podling.apache.org/download . > (Note ‘http’ in first ‘https’ in seco

Re: [MENTORS] Download page issues

> On Nov 4, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Sorry for the top post, but the issue of download pages has been raised at > the community and board level. The incubator is a great place to steer > projects in the direction of making it easier to verify that download pages > are con

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hop (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) > On Dec 2, 2021, at 2:19 PM, Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 3:42 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Good luck! >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:38 AM Bart Maertens >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Incubator Community, >>> >>> After a disc

Re: [VOTE] Accept SeaTunnel into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Dec 3, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either

Re: BlueMarlin project appears to be inactive

When we first discussed this Futurewei project a year before incubation I thought I made it clear that growing your community is an important part of the Incubation process. You must do that on the dev@ mailing list. When it’s time to discuss contributors who should become committers or PPMC me

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

No one has had time to review. I would like to hear from the AGE mentors. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 16, 2021, at 1:08 PM, Eya Badal wrote: > > I am closing this [DISCUSS] thread now and will start the VOTE shortly to > graduate Apache AGE (incubating) as a top level project. > > Best re

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

Four more concerns: (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list. (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute? (3) No one has been added to the PPMC. (4) Are all of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

ache.org/thread/7428n0p4hwf6lv4v3n9fldqt4wjp6omd It seems like they should be invited as a committer. > > > On 2021/12/17 18:28:51 Dave Fisher wrote: >> Four more concerns: >> >> (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list. &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Andrew Ko wrote: > > Hello John, > > The number 68 includes > > - > > 28 code contributors who submitted pull requests that were merged. > - > > 40+ who identified bugs, influenced the project with strong and informed > opinion, answered AGE users’

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Hi, Have you discussed the approach you outlined with the logging PMC? It seems to me the idea of a drop in jar that allows log4j 1 over log4j 2 is an ideal product for that PMC to support. All the best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 8:22 PM, 张铎 wrote: > > I'm the one who

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 3:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Vladimir, > I totally support this proposal. > > Which are actually the steps we need to cut a release of log4j 1.x ? > - establish an Apache project ? > - do the fix > - cut a release > > Can this be done inside

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2021, at 5:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Le mar. 21 déc. 2021 à 12:33, Enrico Olivelli a > écrit : > >> Vladimir, >> I totally support this proposal. >> >> Which are actually the steps we need to cut a release of log4j 1.x ? >> - establish an Apache

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Have the initial committers for this effort been identified? > On Dec 22, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov > wrote: > > Matt>Attaching patches to Jira is exactly how v1 was developed back in the > day. V2 did it for some time as well before migrating to git > > Matt, let us please refrain

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

A slight correction in line. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 29, 2021, at 6:32 AM, Juan Pan wrote: > > Hello, > > > After going through all the updates of this thread, here are some inputs from > me, > > > 1. PPMC voting, a NOTICE to board is needed. While incubating the NOTICE is to the IP

Re: clutch analysis part 1 failing: status pages not updating

Hi - This broke because clutch2.py needs to be updated to use lists.apache.org. # Currently prefer these, but consider switch to lists.apache.org MAIL_LIST_URL = "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/“ The code is here: https://sv

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of HugeGraph

Hi - Not every repository at GitHub.com/hugegraph is included in the proposal. What does the HugeGraph community intend to do with those repositories? Are any of those key to the project? Thanks, Dave > On Jan 4, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jermy Li wrote: > > Hi, I'm Jermy from HugeGraph team. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

Hi - Have a look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age and see that 4 PPMC members are not subscribed to private. Also there are two of your mentors who are not subscribed. Those two probably have not done anything for the AGE podling. > On Jan 6, 2022, at 2:30 PM, Felix Cheung wrote:

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

In this current form this discussion belongs either on dev@logging or board@. Several people here are perfectly capable of forming a proposal, but are choosing to have an unproductive discussion. At this point a new podling would be a hostile fork and those are not accepted. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.1.0

Carrying over my +1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 18, 2022, at 9:26 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hello all, > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Tuweni (incubating) version > 2.1.0. Apache Tuweni is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development > of

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 15, 2022, at 3:28 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on Hugegraph[1], I would like to call a > VOTE to accept Hugegraph into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring Hugegraph into th

Re: clutch analysis part 1 failing: status pages not updating

ms complicated enough to break things badly. > My python knowledge is limited, and I am not going to attempt to fix this for > you. > > Cheers, > Wilfred > >> On 5 Jan 2022, at 11:06, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> This broke because clutc

[VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve had multiple chances. [ ] +1 Retire BlueMarlin [ ] -1 Keep BlueMarlin and I’m willing to join to make it an Apache Community.

Re: [VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

Here is my +1. > On Feb 15, 2022, at 3:20 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress > as an Apache podling. There is no interest in developing a community. They’ve > had multiple chances. > > [ ] +1 Retire Blu

[RESULT][VOTE] Retire BlueMarlin

gt; >> >> --- >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:04 PM Atri Sharma wrote: >> >>> +1 to retire >>> >>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022, 14:10 Willem Jiang, wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to retired. >>>> >&g

Re: Question - are the confluence diffs readable for the Incubator report?

Here’s a future thought. Reach out to dev@community to see if the reporter tool can be adapted for podling reports. We would need to define our use cases as that tool is setup for TLP board reports Sent from my iPhone > On May 9, 2022, at 8:01 PM, Josh Fischer wrote: > > I agree that the di

Re: PMC is a committee

someone >>>>> stated >>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>> in my head. >>>>> I have used, without fully thinking about it, PMC as, "I am a >>>>> PMC" as well. >>>>

Re: PMC is a committee

t;>>> To be honest, I've never really paid much attention when someone >>>>>>> stated >>>>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>>>> in my head. >>>>>>> I have used,

Re: Bylaws != Guidelines

Top post, but if my memory serves me properly Guidelines was used because the ASF’s ByLaws - https://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - must not be overridden by project “bylaws”. Best, Dave > On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:35 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > In 2018, Justin McLean led an effort to

Re: [QUESTION] Can we use an AGPL components [minio] in OpenServerless?

HI - The first place to go is to check on license availability is the legal resolved page[1]. There you can learn the various classes of dependencies as well as resolved issues about licenses that have already discussed on legal-disc...@apache.org [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Liminal podling

+1 (binding) > On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1 (Binding) > > -Ayush > >> On 11 Jul 2024, at 6:50 PM, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> +1 binding. Good luck after retiring. >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 21:16, PJ Fanning wrote: >>> +1 binding - looks like the right decision bas

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi JB, An interesting project that looks pretty mature. I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the PPMC. Can you tell us why this is not the case with Polaris? Best, Dave > On Jul 30, 2

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

growing the PPMC and Committer base. Best, Dave > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:19 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi JB, >> >> An interesting project that looks pretty mature. >> >> I’m curious about the split between Initial PPM

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

> On Jul 31, 2024, at 6:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I understand your comment, and it's important to me. >> If it's a concern for you, I'm happy to rework the initial committer >> list with the team (also removing PPMC list to use the default layout) >> and grow the PPMC/committe

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi Justin, > In short, this seems to me (and I could be wrong) like a project mostly from > a single vendor, but the proposal has been made to make it look like more > people are involved. It may well be that these people will be involved, but > I’d prefer if the project was upfront about this

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

l is solid, the contributions (code and non >> code) are there, the community is small but eager to grow (and that's >> the purpose of the incubator). >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >&

Re: [VOTE] Accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Aug 2, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following the discussion about Polaris > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d), > and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like to > start the for

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

HI Craig, This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time. Where do you plan to document this prescription? Best, Dave > On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to dis

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-282) Modernize Clutch Analysis

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-282: - Summary: Modernize Clutch Analysis Key: INCUBATOR-282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-282 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16797692#comment-16797692 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- I pretty much have the projects i

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-199) Extend podlings.xml to include old names and TLP parent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798258#comment-16798258 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-199: --- As I rebuilt the project page to

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16798281#comment-16798281 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- Projects page has been updated. Sl

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16800940#comment-16800940 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- [~s...@apache.org] I've been

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16800945#comment-16800945 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- Regarding the history pages.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16800940#comment-16800940 ] Dave Fisher edited comment on INCUBATOR-231 at 3/25/19 6:0

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-233) Clean Up Retired Podling Repositories

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-233: - Summary: Clean Up Retired Podling Repositories Key: INCUBATOR-233 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-233 Project: Incubator Issue Type

[jira] [Resolved] (INCUBATOR-130) Nuvem in limbo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher resolved INCUBATOR-130. --- Resolution: Later INCUBATOR-233 will do a full evaluation of similar scenarios > Nu

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-219) The release of OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: OpenWhisk deploy kube

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-219. - Resolution: Not A Problem We don't open issues for release VOTE threads > The re

[jira] [Resolved] (INCUBATOR-232) The Release of OpenWhisk 3.19.0-incubating: OpenWhisk Client JS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher resolved INCUBATOR-232. --- Resolution: Not A Problem We don't open issues for VOTE threads > The Re

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-232) The Release of OpenWhisk 3.19.0-incubating: OpenWhisk Client JS

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-232. - > The Release of OpenWhisk 3.19.0-incubating: OpenWhisk Client

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16801070#comment-16801070 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-201: --- Hi - cvs@ is the equivalen

[jira] [Assigned] (INCUBATOR-202) Graduation steps guide enhancements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher reassigned INCUBATOR-202: - Assignee: Dave Fisher > Graduation steps guide enhanceme

[jira] [Assigned] (INCUBATOR-203) Rename Proposals to something else, add more how to get in information

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher reassigned INCUBATOR-203: - Assignee: Dave Fisher > Rename Proposals to something else, add more how to get

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-1) document copyright changes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-1. --- Resolution: Not A Problem This issue should be considered resolved. This is covered by an SGA which

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-27) Overhaul the "Check Trademark" process

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-27. Resolution: Fixed This is now more clearly handled by the Brand committee at trademarks AT

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-34) Clarify Role of Champion And Consolidate Policy [ALTERNATIVE]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-34?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-34. Resolution: Duplicate > Clarify Role of Champion And Consolidate Policy [ALTERNAT

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-54) Define roles and procedures for Incubator PPMC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16801171#comment-16801171 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-54: -- Craig, Is there a reason to keep

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-65) Branding Guide clarification

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-65. Resolution: Implemented I think that this is already in place - the PRC is no more and there

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-77) [IP-GRANT] Local Lucene/Solr Code Dump

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-77. Resolution: Fixed Finished long, long ago. > [IP-GRANT] Local Lucene/Solr Code D

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-99) Clarify how to submit a IP clearance template

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-99. Resolution: Unresolved The process is now clear and this issue is out of date. > Clarify how

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-100) document the process for a podling that has decided to go to dormant status

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-100. - Resolution: Fixed We now have a retirement process. The shortened game links here totally

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-116) XML Beans CXX project is in limbo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-116. - Resolution: Fixed > XML Beans CXX project is in li

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-122) Replace all "site-author" to "content" in content/guides/website.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-122. - Resolution: Not A Problem > Replace all "site-author" to "content&

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >