George Aroush wrote:
Hi Roy,
I crated http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html and I am
waiting for the mailing list to be setup before I can finalize it and make
it publicly available via a link from the parent page.
I am new to this whole incubation process so I was
David N. Welton wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board
must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way.
That is a misconception. For projects
Gav wrote:
The website mentions updating the 'source html' files in site-author (
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html) which
I have done for this Issue and also INCUBATOR-11, is this the preferred way
here or maybe us the source .xml files
where one exists ?
That is
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-11?page=all ]
David Crossley closed INCUBATOR-11:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks.
'exitting' on Incubation_Policy.html
Key: INCUBATOR-11
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-12?page=comments#action_12362703
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-12:
-
Thanks anyway, Gavin. However that is not the correct patch. The Learn area
is a special part of the Incubator website
The source html documents for the Incubator website have paragraphs
that are one long line. This makes it virtually impossible to
read the diffs (see example below).
Of course this is not the concern of Forrest.
We need to use some sort of html tidy program to fix the
whole of the site-author/
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-12?page=comments#action_12362707
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-12:
-
Still not happy with it, but svn r368950 improves the discovery of relevant
mailing lists. The document was referring
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
I was going to do the /project docs (as they seem to be critical).
At that point, I think all is there, and we could go forward. I
What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
-David
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I realize that many might have checked-out of this thread about 200
messages ago... if there's any interest or comment...
(Note, this is just an
Geir's experiment was incomplete and he reported
difficulty with some docs. Perhaps the following
will help, or perhaps you already have a better
solution.
There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
xml output ...
0)
Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Torsten Curdt wrote:
As long as everyone has to have a tool locally to build and commit a
site in order to change *content*, people *will* find the tool annoying.
A smaller tool maybe less ...but it's *is* an additional step that
should not be required. Period!
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
Whoa! so the workflow is tied to David watching for commits?
When someone said that at apachecon, I thought it was a joke - I'm
beginning to understand more and more of why people are annoyed.
Why? The man has
Ross Gardler wrote:
Mads Toftum wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
The fact that we have to rely on a human being means to me (and probably
where Mads is coming from) that the entire workflow is broken. -- justin
Exactly! Depending on a 3rd party as part of the process is what really
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see any point in having this conversation every year.
Whoever is willing to fix the content on incubator, please feel
free to remove the entire site (except the project status files)
and start over with whatever tool you deem suitable.
Leo Simons wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
My guess about the stumbling block for some people is the
need to check the final result into svn. Also the need to
copy files from build/site into site-publish and then do
svn add or svn remove files. I think that we can get
Cocoon
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What shall we do then in incubator? Any idea for a productive outcome?
Switch the incubator to anakia. =)
FWIW, Brett claims that Maven 2 gives up all of the goofy workflow problems
with Maven 1, but I'm not familiar with it. I'd go
Leo Simons wrote:
OK ok ok ok. Enough already. Done and done. The incubator has more pressing
things
to worry about right now besides site generation tools. Please drop this
thread or
take it elsewhere (I suggested site-dev@ before).
I too see no need to squash such threads. Sure, take
the
Ross Gardler wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Forrest is much more than the simple site generation tool that the
subject says is wanted here, I recognise that Forrest may not be the
right tool for this job. I happen to disagree, but I recognise the
possibility.
Well, if you believe
Torsten Curdt wrote:
Sorry, don't get it...
At work we are running continuum watching svn commits and
then automatically rebuilding our site with forrest.
Noone has to care about html nor forrest. Just check out
the xdocs and commit them - done.
My 2 cents
Fantastic to hear.
Some
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
What's wrong with the xdoc/Anakia approach?
Nothing, necessarily. David Crossley tried to put together a constructive
discourse regarding site construction almost two months ago, and got almost
no feedback
Greg Stein wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
...
If people have issues with Forrest, then please take them
to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. It is totally unfair
to a new project to just criticise it from afar. We get
very few emails to the user mailing list about any issues
Leo Simons wrote:
Thomas Dudziak wrote:
since I'm rather new to this, I don't have a deep understanding of the
problems you're trying to solve.
None is needed, the problem is very simple.
The problems are not simple, or they would have been solved
years ago. Follow the site-dev
I am not trying to defend Forrest. We already acknowledge
that there are some inadequacies for the situation where
people do not want to learn and enhance the tool, and rather
they just want to use it to generate some quick doco.
Forrest is overkill for that. Why are people using it
and then
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Example: last apachecon, Geir was trying to update geronimo.html, it
took 30+ mins before asking for help. It took me 15+ minutes to figure
out that geronimo.html was not being linked from any page in the web
site. So we lost close to an hour of hackathon time trying
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
IMHO it would be better to ask pmc'er to vote not for a passive sponsorship
but an active promise to commit resources to provide oversight for the
podling.
When asked to vote for a new podling on the WS PMC, I never understood a
+1 to
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
That's why this talk about limiting growth is so dangerous. The foundation
should go where our PMCs and our members want. -- justin
I reckon that the way to handle it is to document our
processes properly. If each new podling got involved
in fine-tuning the content
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Yes, but we can't think of incubation failure as failure - that's
actually a successful outcome for the incubator, as it's doing its
job in that case. Not everyone will want to work our way, not every
project will catch a diverse community interest, etc. I'd
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
I only committed changes to the one source file I changed.
The instructions at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Using+a+local+Forrest+installation
are excellent and worked well, but svn status showed many diffs on the
built side, which didn't make
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Changing a mailing list is stil painful further downstream.
Eg with the MARC archive or mail-archive.com or gmane or
whatever.
We don't support any of those. We provide the raw and mod_mbox archives,
and those are what
This is a topic that i often hear, not only at new projects.
People are not sure what needs to be stored in svn and why.
A while ago, Noel raised the issue on the infra@ list. [1]
Unfortunately not much follow-up. So i wonder if we can
resolve it here and then document the outcome.
I see at
Martin Sebor wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Dec 18, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
[...]
Here's a starting checklist based on one I started last summer when
Derby graduated:
[ ] Move svn repo
[ ] Request svn repository/karma move from incubator to new
location.
Noel Bergman wrote:
Please vote on the following:
New mailing lists should be created under the
@incubator.apache.org domain, just as all of
the other project resources, e.g., the web
site and SVN subtree.
+1 from me.
-David
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
[ ] Request redirect from old incubator URL to new
*** Post this request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Edit the file at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess
-David
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jean Anderson and Eddie O'Neil have volunteered to help redact our collected
wisdom into a coherent guide. Cliff Schmidt will contribute on the legal/IP
side. Henri Yandell has volunteered to review as a guinea pig.
Anyone who wishes to volunteer is welcomed. We'll
You need to also add an entry to the table at
site-author/projects/index.html
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: geirm
Date: Sun Dec 11 10:54:16 2005
New Revision: 355992
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=355992view=rev
Log:
It's really not obvious why I need a @()@#!@ terabyte commit
for changing one file, but Forrest knows best.
Geir, it appears to me that you are using the wrong
The table is supposed to continue to point to the project's
incubation status file. Each status file for incubated
projects should say that is is finished, and link to its
real website.
-David
Author: geirm
Date: Sun Dec 11 08:07:17 2005
New Revision: 355962
URL:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to fix the incubator website for geronimo related stuff.
There's a file projects/geronimo.cwiki that I want to add info to
point it to the main project site.
I'm using forrest 0.7.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
Need svn
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry. I downloaded and installed the 0.7 released version.
When can we used the released software?
You need to use release branch ... forrest_07_branch
We needed to make some fixes after its release.
-David
Henri Yandell wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Sergey Vladimirov wrote:
Good day!
What will happen with project, for example, FTPServer, if nobody of
commiters is available or have time to neither apply patches nor fix bugs?
What can other people - not commiters - can do in
Author: ekoneil
Date: Fri Dec 2 17:07:17 2005
New Revision: 351863
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=351863view=rev
Log:
Update the project index page to move Beehive from the currently to
successfully incubated project list.
Note, ran the Forrest build to ensure that the site
Tim Ellison wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
We decided that IP Clearance stuff will go at
site-author/ip-clearance/
Don't link it into the table until ready to publish.
Instructions are here and in the head of the template.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
The 'template
We decided that IP Clearance stuff will go at
site-author/ip-clearance/
Don't link it into the table until ready to publish.
Instructions are here and in the head of the template.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
-David
Author: geirm
Date: Fri Nov 25 12:21:46 2005
New Revision:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-7?page=comments#action_12358446
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-7:
Thanks Martin, i clarified those requirements for the project status files.
Not quite the same as your suggested patch
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-5?page=comments#action_12358447
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-5:
There was a comment from Noel in one of those threads to say that there is only
one status file for each project
Martin Sebor wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan
2005) $]
It has been pointed out a couple of times in the past (see
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We have been directed that anytime an external codebase is imported into the
ASF, that we must document it. Hence:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/proje
cts/incubation-status-template.html?view=markup
So, yes, the PMC should
that the main question is, does it need to
end up on the Incubator website. If so then we we need to
create a space in the site-author directory and links to
each document. If not, then we need some other space in SVN.
-David
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
So, yes, the PMC should
-author area is really only for material
that is destined for the website.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
The clearance template is what I documented in my other email.
How does this need to be officially recorded?
Not sure. Geir asked the same question a couple of days
Henri Yandell wrote:
I did a bit of Incubator generation a week or so ago.
Forrest was a problem, but only in that it was a bump I had to get
over and so I put it off for a week. When I actually attacked the
problem with momentum, the Forrest part was quite enjoyable. Only
problem is that
While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo
Status report in its Project website section refers to an
old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/
I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo
incubation. These days incubating projects have their
I would like to try again to make it easier to build the
Incubator website.
Next week i will ugrade the configuration to use the current
release of Forrest (Incubator is one behind). Along with
creating a better procedure document, might make it easier.
I also want to have a discussion about why
still have the
local copy of your cwiki file and could generate an html version.
Would that help?
-David
regards,
Martin
On 10/28/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh, please don't use the wiki format:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html
http://incubator.apache.org
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Well, if you could do this, it would be great!
But don't if it causes too much work.
in short: if you need to do it manually, I'll do it myself.
Forrest has a plain html output method.
Argh, please don't use the wiki format:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Edit+the+content
Your project page is broken, and prevents and
prevents the Incubator site from being built.
-David
Author: mmarinschek
Date: Thu Oct 27
. Please go
ahead .
Thanks,
Rana Bhattacharyya
--- David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rana Bhattacharyya wrote:
Thanks! I have modified the link and it is working
perfectly. Now I shall update the ftpserver site
pages
and update the status page.
BTW, can I change
Rana Bhattacharyya wrote:
Thanks! I have modified the link and it is working
perfectly. Now I shall update the ftpserver site pages
and update the status page.
BTW, can I change the cwiki file to the HTML file?
Most of the new projects use html and besides that I
am not very familiar of
Rana Bhattacharyya wrote:
I am terribly sorry and thank you all for helping
me out. Now I am trying to write what I have
understood so that I won't mess-up again. Please do
write your comments.
Thanks Rana. I will add some of your notes to the
Incubator docs, already done some today:
/project
s/stdcxx.html?rev=315083view=log
So long as you update that file, which you have been so far, the site will
be published from it. Our personal ForrestBot, better known as David
Crossley, publishes the site regularly.
Yep this was done a while ago. See my other message yesterday
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Yep this was done a while ago. See my other message yesterday
Someone from ftpserver is holding up the last phase of the
publishing process, we cannot do 'svn up' on the server.
The general rule is that if it breaks the build, exclude
Trying to do:
ssh people.apache.org
cd /www/incubator.apache.org
svn update
...
svn: Working copy 'projects/ftpserver/images' is missing or not locked
It seems that that directory is missing its .svn directory.
Perhaps it has been manually removed and replaced.
I see that there are more files
Please follow the advice at
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
and
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/pmc.html at item 2.
It is strongly suggested there to use html as the source format.
The JSPWiki parser in Forrest is not very good.
There are various emails in
Would all committers please configure their SVN client
properly:
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn
Rana, i noticed this with your recent commits for ftpserver.
The PDF files should have a different SVN property, shown
in the abovementioned config. We don't need to see the
(Hopefully this is the correct list for this topic.
The second paragraph on the Incubator website seems
to indicate so.)
One thing that is bothering at the ASF is not having a
clear definition of the various roles.
We seem to be having endless discussions at some
projects about what it means to
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Show where to send the completed form.
It should be filed in SVN, along with the rest of them. It is a record, not
a signed CLA or Software Grant.
Ah, and where are the rest of them filed.
I can see only one in the Incubator SVN:
Leo Simons wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I have a few questions about PPMCs that I can't find answers to
in the documentation. Could someone help me with the answers?
1. Where do I get the member list for a given PPMC (such as stdcxx)?
There is a facility for that kind of info that Ken
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I suggest that we go further and make it a requirement
of graduation from the Incubator that the project
already has some people helping at infra@
That can only apply if there are ASF Members willing to do it, because we
don't give apmail
Henri Yandell wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
as they are not members.
This has been my impression as well.
infra@ is begging for help, but seems to have problem with;
a. only
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Several people on WS-PMC offered to help infra. They were turned down
as they are not members.
I find that surprising. We are actively encouraging
*committers* to be involved.
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-volunteer.html
There is plenty that they can do. I am not
Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, I didn't read the text as saying that *only* ASF members can
view the file but rather that PMC members should be able to view it
and if not, then an ASF member will definitely be able to. Since I
am a PPMC member (but not a PMC one), I was unclear about whether
I
Martin Sebor wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
I'm trying to request a user account for [...] one our
committers who only recently faxed in his CLA (on 8/24 to be
exact). The instructions on the page below say to monitor the
file iclas.txt in the foundation/officers repository to see
whether
Dims, there are major things wrong with your commit ...
*) Need to use forrest-0.6
*) There seems to be old content that is being committed
in site-publish - perhaps remnants from a very old version
of Forrest, e.g. site-publish/skin/images/search-right.gif
*) You need to make changes in
David Crossley wrote:
Dims, there are major things wrong with your commit ...
*) Need to use forrest-0.6
I see that you used 0.7 instead.
We need to stick with an agreed version, because
there are potentially many people wanting to
generate the site.
http://incubator.apache.org
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Sanjiva did changes to site-author and i did use forrest 0.7. Please
do whatever you think is necessary.
Done, i reverted your changes and published again.
But i think that you might still need to do
'forrest clean' in your top-level incubator directory
to get rid of
Jim, i generated and published that.
However, you also need to add an entry to
the index table site-author/projects/index.html
-David
Author: jim
Date: Mon Aug 15 07:08:51 2005
New Revision: 232816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=232816view=rev
Log:
Initial preload of mod_ftp
Henri Yandell wrote:
Thinking on this further, I may have poorly described this.
A code donation has been offered to Jakarta (Commons). From what I
understand, this has to go via the Incubator to ensure it is above
board etc as it is from a company and not ASF committers, but does it
Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, I am subscribed to the incubator mailing list and have read
some (although obviously not all) of the past posts. I have been
using http://mail-archives.apache.org/ as the interface to browse
the archives. I don't see any way to search through them, though.
Is
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Could somebody redirect http://incubator.apache.org/derby to
http://db.apache.org/derby ? Once that redirect is in place, I'll remove
the files from /www/incubator.apache.org/derby .
Noel recently did that.
I completed these two steps below and they should be
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Please remove the entries for Hermes, Muse and Apollo. they have
graduated. (or may be we should add a line saying that they have
graduated...either is ok)
So Dims can you please finish off the project pages at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
... they indicate
Heidi Buelow wrote:
The Incubator PMC mailing list is for sensitive private discussion only.
You should be using the general@incubator.apache.org mailing list.
I think you actually received an answer there from David...
I tried general first but the project page didn't get published yet.
Heidi Buelow wrote:
I read somewhere that the site-publish is generated every two hours but I
can't find that now. ...
After it is generated and committed (see below) then
it is automatically moved into production. Various
steps are involved, some automated, some manual.
I did find the note
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Hello stdcxx committers,
Welcome to the stdcxx project, currently under incubation within the
Apache Incubator. You are responsible for maintaining a status
file at
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html
If you don't have one yet, your first task
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Does the vote need to happen in view of the general public
for that to be considered a legal decision of the project PMC?
Of course not, nor have I seen anything that would inspire such a question.
Great, glad that is resolved. I could see
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
[snip]... What the vote does is three things:
1) it provides a legally binding, public decision of the project;
I am confused by that statement. We conduct our committer votes on
the project's private mailing
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
I don't like the idea of discussions about people's merit (or the people
themselves, for that matter) happening in public right in their faces.
For one thing, people have a tendency to be less candid; for another
there's no anonymity to the vote; and finally
Hi Dims, the checkin of those images, etc. shows there is
something amiss with your SVN working copy. I notice that
you are using the correct version of Forrest (0.6).
However, i wonder if you have some old images left over
from the old version 0.5 of Forrest.
I will clean up.
Also you seem to
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
There is no need to Cc this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This stuff is a concern of the project.
OK, I'm sorry for that, just learning the correct procedures...
No need to be sorry -- David is confused. Incubator is the project
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I
would give it a go.
I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday.
With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use?
I am confused about this too. In the
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I believe a 'svn up' needs to be run by someone on minutaur (perhaps in
/www/incubator.apache.org?), then you need to wait for the sync job to
copy the results over to the current web server (ajax?).
Thanks for clarifying. I just did that 'svn up' so now we need to
Ceki G?lc? wrote:
Although many ASF members are represented in the incubator, it is not
representative of the ASF because it is more coercive than the rest of
the foundation. Some of the coercion is unavoidable, e.g. IP issues,
some of it mildly irritating, e.g. forrest, and then
Henri Yandell wrote:
Ceki G?lc? wrote:
Although many ASF members are represented in the incubator, it is not
representative of the ASF because it is more coercive than the rest of
the foundation. Some of the coercion is unavoidable, e.g. IP issues,
some of it mildly irritating,
(I am on the list, no need to Cc.)
Henri Yandell wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
[snip some other stuff for brevity]
No need to assume ... the documentation says so explicitly.
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Project+Website+Howto
quote
Each project can use whatever
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Status Report is still not published. I sent a note to this
list a couple of days ago about your recent changes breaking the
documentation build.
David, what do we need to get this fixed and going? If it is a simple
syntax fix, do you have time to do it?
Yes,
David Crossley wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
The Status Report is still not published. I sent a note to this
list a couple of days ago about your recent changes breaking the
documentation build.
David, what do we need to get this fixed and going? If it is a simple
syntax fix, do
Author: ceki
Date: Thu Mar 10 02:26:43 2005
New Revision: 156932
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=156932
Log:
Updated section about 3rd party libraraies and other miscellanea
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/log4net.cwiki
Forrest reports a
While doing another task, i discovered that some projects are
not listed in the table at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
nor on the side-panel menu.
jlibtool
sandesha
wss4j
They have probably not been added to both
incubator/site-author/projects/index.html
incubator/site-author/site.xml
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
2) Add the status page and update website:
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify
the acceptance then i will add it.
Okay, i have done
Oh, i hate to see stuff go unanswered - i don't know the procedure either
but will try my best. With the outcome of this we should create a
very simple Guidelines document to show the steps.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update the
website, let
Clinton Begin wrote:
Next question, how do we administrate our mailing lists? Who has
karma for that? How do we kick people?
Thanks for the help.
Clinton
Ask your PMC - they will know who are your moderators.
For other mail FAQs see:
Girisha Neeraje wrote:
I am interested in contributing to Agila project
(http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/index.html).
Can you please let me know the procedure. I can take-up some tasks and work
on them too.
Join the project mailing lists is the first step.
See
501 - 600 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
