Re: Are MySQL driver and MySQL protocol allowed in distribution?

You can't distribute the MySQL driver, but as long as you don't distribute the driver, you are free to solve the problem any way you like. You can require that the user download the driver themselves, or you can develop your own driver -- all of those are fine. Karl On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:20

Re: JSON License and Apache Projects

The Apache ManifoldCF project got an official Legal ruling on the json license and accepted it many years ago. Thanks, Karl On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > And Apache Groovy also has some great JSON support as well, with a super > fast parser, and serializer as wel

Re: New challenges (Was: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

Congratulations, Jukka! You've done a fantastic job! Karl On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> Finally, if elected (and assuming the IPMC still exists), I'd serve >> for at most two years before calling for a

Re: DOAP file for Apache JSPWiki (incubating)

> @karl: didn't know about any files.txt, I came accross with one DOAP file > while looking for Apache CMS site examples, and began to dig backwards, > ending up at both > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xmland > http://projects.apache.org

Re: DOAP file for Apache JSPWiki (incubating)

e, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > The files.xml file lists 3 or 4 incubator projects and the doap site ( > http://projects.apache.org/index.html) doesn't specify anything about > incubating status :-? > > br, > juan pablo > > On Tue, Jun 12,

Re: DOAP file for Apache JSPWiki (incubating)

I don't think you get your own DOAP file until you are a graduated TLP. Karl On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez wrote: > Hi, > > can someone with enough commit rights add the DOAP file for JSPWiki > (incubating) to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-t

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate ManifoldCF as TLP

>From the connectors-dev thread we have three binding IPMC +1's. There were no -1's. 72 hours have elapsed. So it looks like the vote passes! What are the next steps in getting the resolution added to the board agenda for May? Karl On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Karl Wrigh

[VOTE] Graduate ManifoldCF as TLP

* Tommaso Teofili (tomm...@apache.org) * Simon Willnauer(sim...@apache.org) * Karl Wright (kwri...@apache.org) * Jukka Zitting (ju...@apache.org) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Karl Wright be appointed to the office of Vice President

Re: [WITHDRAW][VOTE] Graduate ManifoldCF as a top-level project

Hi Karl! > > Just in case (to spare you another round): please also make sure your > projects status page has been polished and all TODOs and CHECKs got resolved. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Karl Wright >> To: general

[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Graduate ManifoldCF as a top-level project

Thanks for the clarification. I will withdraw the vote and resubmit with a proper resolution. Thanks, Karl On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> Hearing no discussion, I'm opening

[VOTE] Graduate ManifoldCF as a top-level project

Hearing no discussion, I'm opening the official voting thread. Vote +1 to graduate ManifoldCF as a TLP. +1 from me (binding) Karl On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi, > > The ManifoldCF community as voted to approach the Incubator with a > proposal

[DISCUSS] Graduate ManifoldCF as a top-level project

Hi, The ManifoldCF community as voted to approach the Incubator with a proposal to graduate from Incubation. Graduation would be as a top-level project. The community vote was complete and unanimous, including all mentors and PPMC members, as well as some interested parties from the non-committe

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

caofyjnysuhk+g0rcppq2r4hbndo2hf6lxpo8xz12gg9rzh1...@mail.gmail.com Karl On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > On 4/12/12 3:35 PM, "Karl Wright" wrote: > >>I should also mention that Jukka voted +1 during the community voting >>on this RC, s

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

I should also mention that Jukka voted +1 during the community voting on this RC, so his vote should be binding here as well. Karl On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 (binding), > Tommaso > > 2012/4/12 Karl Wright > >> +1 from me (binding). >>

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6

+1 from me (binding). Karl On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Shinichiro Abe wrote: > Hi, > > Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC6. > This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection. > > You can download the release candidate from > http://people.

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

t/connectors directory, so sorry for the confusion. Karl On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > So you're saying that somehow the content/manifoldcf dir was wiped out. > Were any other podlings affected? > > Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 18:06:46 -0400:

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

TIME we will accommodate ANY > sitesthat aren't using at least svnpubsub. > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Karl Wright >> To: Daniel Shahaf >> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; infrastruct...@apache.org >> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2012 5:37

Re: What happened to all the podling sites?

ivs to write to. Karl On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Karl Wright wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:01:21 -0400: >> I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not >> actually update our podling site.  Publishing is done in accordance

What happened to all the podling sites?

I happened to notice that a site publish I'd done a week ago did not actually update our podling site. Publishing is done in accordance with [1]. The problem seems to be that someone has wiped out /www/incubator.apache.org/ except for the content directory, which is meant solely for the incubator

Question about standards for -lib and -bin packaging

Hi folks, Apache source zip/tar files always have a root folder named for the project and release, e.g. "apache-foo-0.1-incubating". Is there any convention for -lib and -bin releases? What is that convention? Thanks Karl Sent from my Windows Phone

Re: Question about downloading binaries

ess of putting it up for a formal vote in the incubator list. If you see any further legal/policy problems, please tell me now. ;-) You can download the artifacts from http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro. Thanks, Karl On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Ok, you can now brow

Re: Question about downloading binaries

- lib artifact https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk/dist-license/[README.txt,NOTICE.txt,LICENSE.txt] - binary artifact Please let me know what you think now. Karl On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>-Original Message----- >>From: Karl Wri

Re: Question about downloading binaries

the same root. Is that correct? Karl On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:24 PM >>To: general@incubator.apache.org >>Subject:

Re: Question about downloading binaries

Unfortunate that you god dog piled on but hopefully we're all better prepared > going forward. > > Matt Hogstrom > m...@hogstrom.org > > A Day Without Nuclear Fusion Is a Day Without Sunshine > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Karl Wright wrote:

Re: Question about downloading binaries

that helps... The question is, will Roy (or anyone else) be unwilling to vote for the first option? Karl On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:00 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, ant elder wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 3,

Re: Question about downloading binaries

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >>> Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which >>> contains the

Re: Question about downloading binaries

"Looking into ManifoldCF a bit, I think what you need is * buildable source release that contains all the source for ManifoldCF * source release that contains all the custom patches for the dependencies that need patches" Our mentor(s) are pushing strongly for a source release (which contains the

Re: Question about downloading binaries

012 at 6:59 PM, sebb wrote: > On 2 April 2012 22:45, Karl Wright wrote: >> I think the bigger picture here is that resolving differences of this >> kind requires time, and during the interim we need to be able to >> release software anyway.  I have no wish to maintain a forked

Re: Question about downloading binaries

to use the released versions of these libraries. I hope that we can all agree that pragmatism has a value; we're certainly not trying to step on people's toes, we're simply trying to solve a problem. Thanks, Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > "what

Re: Question about downloading binaries

"what's the use-case for non-well-formed XML?' This thread is probably not the best place to delve further in that direction." Simple use case: parsing malformed RSS feeds. I agree, though, we're getting into the weeds here; I'd love to have this discussion elsewhere, but the point does stand tha

Re: Question about downloading binaries

I've created CONNECTORS-443 to describe the current proposal. Karl On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Please see below. > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> > cliff.> >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:19 P

Re: Question about downloading binaries

Please see below. On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > cliff.> > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> "Since the 3rd-party material is consumed in source code form, I assume >> it must have a source-compatible license.&quo

Re: Question about downloading binaries

tool of choice for >> ManifoldCF? On the other hand from all of these, perhaps there is, or >> could be, a plugin for that build tool that could implement the >> 'patch' utility for you on Windows? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM,

Re: Question about downloading binaries

all of these, perhaps there is, or > could be, a plugin for that build tool that could implement the > 'patch' utility for you on Windows? > > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> Sorry about the list cc'ing - the gmail client is fighting

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

Please see below. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 27, 2012, at 2:15 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 26 March 2012 16:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

"Policy is that binaries are not endorsed by the ASF. " I don't think anyone said anything differently. There is a huge difference between endorsing a third-party binary and distributing it. But if I misunderstand and it is Apache's policy that we don't distribute any third-party binaries then w

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 26, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> Some clarifications: >> >> Hi Roy, >> >> (1) Our LICENSE.txt file currently contains references to all >> non-Apache jars that we redistribute

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

As I've said before, we're not doing things any differently than most other Apache projects. Please clarify your recommendations. Thanks, Karl On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at

[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

Withdrawing the release candidate from consideration in order to address sebb's blocking license/notice issues. Karl On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe wrote: >> Hello Incubator IPMC, >> >> Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0

Re: Simplifying podling infra

A big +1 from me. It's a royal pain in the rear to move so much stuff around just because of graduation. Karl On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Currently new podlings have most of their infrastructure (lists, web > site, svn, etc.) set up under incubator.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

Thanks for the review. Build with maven requires running "mvn-bootstrap" script first. Primary build is ant. This is described in the documentation. License notices have been released 4 previous times in this form and were based originally on Solr/Lucene, which included many of the same dependen

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

How's this for a diff to address the LICENSE.txt problem: Index: LICENSE.txt === --- LICENSE.txt (revision 1304322) +++ LICENSE.txt (working copy) @@ -230,15 +230,19 @@ This product includes a jaxb-impl.jar. License: Dual license c

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

+1 from me (binding). Karl On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Shinichiro Abe wrote: > Hello Incubator IPMC, > > Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0. > This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection. > You can find the artifact at > http://people.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

Thanks - I did not realize that the source LICENSE and the binary LICENSE were different. ;-) +1 from me (binding) Karl On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 02/16/2012 04:05 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> >> What is the license on ecj-3.7.jar (Eclipse JDT Java

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

What is the license on ecj-3.7.jar (Eclipse JDT Java compiler)? If you are going to redistribute it you should provide that info somewhere unless it's Apache licensed. Thanks, Karl On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > I'll have a look at it.  Stay tuned... >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

I'll have a look at it. Stay tuned... Karl On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > We still need one more IPMC member vote for the release.  Does anyone have > time to take a look? > > Thanks in advance, > -Matt > > On 2/12/12 9:29 PM, "Franklin, Matthew B." wrote: > >>Th

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

+1 (binding) Karl Wright On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> OK t

[VOTE][RESULT] Hitoshi Ozawa as committer

FYI -- Forwarded message -- From: Karl Wright Date: Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Hitoshi Ozawa as committer To: connectors-priv...@incubator.apache.org Oh, and I'm supposed to also tally which IPMC members voted in favor. There were three

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

+1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions. Karl On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > [Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.] > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/

Re: Incubator, or "Incubation"?

I don't think one approach precludes the other. Agreed that incubator needs to keep going in the interim. Perhaps we can spin off groups one at a time, starting with just one to get the bugs worked out? Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 12:52

Re: Incubator, or "Incubation"?

I like this general direction as well; seems much more manageable. +1. Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Leo Simons wrote: > Hey folks, > > I just wanted to chime in with a +1 for the general direction. I think > there's actually a lot of work to do to iron out how to reorganize > things. Bef

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

Three binding +1's, >72 hours, vote passes. Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > +1 from me (binding). > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down.  We need one more... >> &g

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Three binding +1's, >72 hours, vote passes. Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > +1 from me (binding). > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> With Tommaso's and Jukka's vote, that's 2 down.  We still

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Three binding +1's, >72 hours, vote passes. Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > +1 from me (binding). > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> We need one more binding IPMC vote for this sub-package.  Any takers

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating

Three binding +1's, >72 hours, vote passes. Karl On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Apparently, I'm now a member of the IPMC. > > +1 from me. ;-) > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> One more binding

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

+1 from me (binding). Karl On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down.  We need one more... > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Tommaso >>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

+1 from me (binding). Karl On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > With Tommaso's and Jukka's vote, that's 2 down.  We still need one > more binding IPMC vote for this subpackage. > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili > w

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

+1 from me (binding). Karl On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > We need one more binding IPMC vote for this sub-package.  Any takers? > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: >> +1 >> >> Tommaso >> >> 2

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating

Apparently, I'm now a member of the IPMC. +1 from me. ;-) Karl On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > One more binding vote needed for this subpackage.  Please somebody vote! > > Karl > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: >> +

Re: PPMC to IPMC

My opinion: It's one thing to try to involve yourself in the fortunes of one or two projects in addition to your own, and be willing to provide general opinions, and be willing to contribute content to the incubator's policy pages. But the incubator is so huge these days and so diverse that just k

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

t;from their podlings who would make good IPMC >>members and nominate them privately, just as >>podlings nominate members for their own PPMC. >> >> >> >> >>> >>> From: Karl Wright >>>To: general@incubator.

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 02:11:49PM -0500, Karl Wright wrote: >> Waiting for the last IPMC vote has become the longest and most >> uncertain part of the ManifoldCF release process.  Considering the >> amount of effort a

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

gt; what we did for Lucy! > > > > >> >> From: Marvin Humphrey >>To: general@incubator.apache.org >>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:33 PM >>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2 >> >>On

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

(We apologize; we really hate to bother you all, but those ARE the rules...) Respectfully, Karl On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down.  We need one more... &g

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating

One more binding vote needed for this subpackage. Please somebody vote! Karl On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > Tommaso > > 2011/12/29 Karl Wright > >> Hello incubator, >> >> We've decided to release some of the ManifoldC

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

We need one more binding IPMC vote for this sub-package. Any takers? Karl On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > Tommaso > > 2011/12/29 Karl Wright > >> Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at: >> http://people.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

With Tommaso's and Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We still need one more binding IPMC vote for this subpackage. Karl On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > Tommaso > > 2011/12/29 Karl Wright > >> Sorry - you can find t

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

With Jukka's vote, that's 2 down. We need one more... Karl On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 > > Tommaso > > 2012/1/4 Karl Wright > >> Hello Incubator IPMC, >> >> Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0

Fwd: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

I think Jukka meant to post this to general@i.a.o... Karl -- Forwarded message -- From: Jukka Zitting Date: Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:46 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2 To: Karl Wright Hi, +1 BR, Jukka Zitting

[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2

Hello Incubator IPMC, Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC2. This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection. You can find the artifact at http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, or in svn at https://svn.apache.org/repo

Re: Q. Forks without concensus?; A. anytime / depends / never without agreement

Any time a body of code is contributed from another source, it should go through the standard Apache procedures, including a license grant (if it's not open-source already). But this is very different from spinning off chunks of an existing incubator project. For example, ManifoldCF is currently

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating

Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hello incubator, > > We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target > system plugins with their own versioning and

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hello incubator, > > We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target > system plugins with their own versioning and

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Sorry - you can find the proposed release package at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hello incubator, > > We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target > system plugins with their own versioning and

[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Hello incubator, We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's the third one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released. We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors). Karl -

[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating

Hello incubator, We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's the second one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released. We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors). Karl

[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating

Hello incubator, We've decided to release some of the ManifoldCF server or target system plugins with their own versioning and release schedule. Here's the first one. Please vote +1 if you agree it should be released. We've got one vote already (from Jukka, one of our mentors). Karl -

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Dec 2011 ([ppmc])

To our mentors, The September 2011 report was not signed off. Could one of you review the current December report and sign off on it? Thanks! Karl On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Marvin wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubato

Re: Latest copyright sign-off status [Was: Podlings needing copyright sign-off]

The only software ever granted to ASF by MetaCarta was the code for ManifoldCF. It was not called ManifoldCF at that time, and was not imported into svn with any "manifoldcf" strings anywhere. But look for package names that include "com.metacarta.agents", "com.metacarta.crawler", "com.metacarta.

Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

ManifoldCF is also listed as March, June, September, and December on the referenced page. Karl On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Michael Fitzner wrote: > I think some projects are wrong scheduled for the „October 2011 > Incubator Board Report“ The current schedule plan > http://wiki.apache.org/in

Re: Projects failing to repoirt for October - appropriate actions?

ManifoldCF submitted a report in September. I'm not sure why this was not logged. Karl On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > On most months, I have to chase down missing reports. > > ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF > (also managed to

Mailing list membership counts

Hi folks, I'm trying to get a membership count for the ManifoldCF member lists. I'm a moderator for these, and at one point I was able to figure out how to do it, but the reference that the "committers" page sends you to ("the svn "committers" project, under /doc/resources.txt") doesn't seem to ex

[ANNOUNCE] Announcing general availability of Apache ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating!

Thanks to all who put time and effort into this release! The site and download mirrors should update in a day or so, but if you cannot wait, you can download the release in the interim from http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/manifoldcf. Karl

[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating?

Three binding +1's, >72 hours. Vote passes! A big "thanks" to all that voted too... ;-) Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating?

13, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> The ManifoldCF community has voted to release ManifoldCF >> 0.3-incubating RC1.  Now it is your turn to vote!  You can pick up the >> artifact at http://people.apache.org/~kwright, or if you want to look >> at the svn tag it&#x

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating?

+1 from me, of course, also (non-binding) Karl On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > +1 (binding) > Tommaso > > > > Il giorno 13/set/2011, alle ore 19:33, Karl Wright ha > scritto: > >> The ManifoldCF community has voted to release Manifold

[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating?

The ManifoldCF community has voted to release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating RC1. Now it is your turn to vote! You can pick up the artifact at http://people.apache.org/~kwright, or if you want to look at the svn tag it's at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.3-incubating-RC1

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Thanks - that's sufficient as far as I am concerned. ;-) Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs, > which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the > original ones, but I wou

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

onger necessary? If so, what caveats do I need to include in NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt, or should I just copy whatever Chemistry does? Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The Mani

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache >> Chemistry.  The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include >> activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to b

Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Hi all, The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I was told a while back that

ManifoldCF: Another mentor needed?

Hi, The ManifoldCF project just lost Grant Ingersoll as a mentor, who resigned last Tuesday. ManifoldCF has been incubating since January 2010 and basically provides a framework and connectors for synchronizing content from a set of repositories to a set of target search engines, with security.

[ANNOUNCE] ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating released!

Thanks to all that voted! Karl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

Vote: Three +1's, no -1's. Vote passes. Karl On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Vote has passed the PPMC for this release candidate. > > The RC2 of the ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating release is now up on > http://people.apache.org/~kwright.  The

Re: ManifoldCF mentors (was Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2)

has rather unique requirements as far as testing infrastructure is concerned, which could arguably lead to other spinoff Apache projects someday. Please contact me if you're interested! Karl On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Thanks for the information.  I can offer on

Re: ManifoldCF mentors (was Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2)

e list. Thanks! Karl On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Mon, 09 May 2011 05:19 -0400, "Karl Wright" > wrote: >> We effectively have only one active mentor.  There were others, of >> course, when the project entered incubation, but they hav

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

ManifoldCF, since this is probably limiting our chances of graduation at this point. Does this ever happen (that anyone is aware of)? Karl On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:44 AM, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > >> We've still received zero binding

Re: Erlend Garåsen, voted to be a committer for ManifoldCF, still waiting for an Apache account

---- >> From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, 27 April 2011 7:04 AM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Erlend Garåsen >> Subject: Erlend Garåsen, voted to be a committer for ManifoldCF, still > waiting >> for an Apache account >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

arvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote: >> Just to be clear, the ManifoldCF podling needs incubator consideration >> of the release candidate in order to do the release, and three binding >> +1 votes.  Any chance that this might ha

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

Grant Ingersoll granted his +1 to the release. There were 4 binding PPMC +1's in all. Karl On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:57:03PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote: >> Just to be clear, the ManifoldCF podling needs incubator considera

  1   2   >