:
* a REST API using JSON for data transport,
* a JavaScript view engine based on Mozilla Spidermonkey,
* a GNU Autotools build system supporting most POSIX systems
* a built-in administration interface
* experimental fulltext search with Lucene
snip/
cheers!
Leo Simons
On Feb 2, 2008, at 1:20 AM, David Reiss wrote:
J Aaron Farr wrote:
git could be an issue.
Can you explain what the issue is with Git?
Probably not very well :-). Basically, we know how to do the apache-
style open source process using centralized version control, we don't
quite know how
On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
this isn't exactly some court
Exactly.
Now, if I look through
http://apache.markmail.org/search/?q=pluto#query:pluto+page:1
+state:facets
pluto does not seem a problematic code dump project, and it also
definitely isn't a single
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Maybe no-one has responded yet because no-one wants to ask the hard
questions!
Nah, it's mostly because the mail threading on this thingie was
broken a few times. It makes things hard to follow. Simon -- please
use that reply-to button in
On Jan 30, 2008, at 4:45 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone have feedback? If no objections are voiced, when would it be
appropriate for us to move forward with a VOTE thread on this?
Sorry for not responding. I flagged the email when I first saw it but
didn't
On Dec 29, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i'm a little worried about oversight of dist/incubator. incubator is a
big group and there are lots of podlings.
Yeah, I share the concern. I think we have 25 incubating projects at
the moment. We *have* to fundamentally change how
On Dec 18, 2007, at 11:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I disagree. I agree with the statement that All releases should
be built
from a tag. Worst case, you should make the tag by copying from
the right
version.
That'd be a different rule; it's a tiny bit less
On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:37 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So it is a new requirement and I don't think we should be
making up policy
during a release vote
+1, that's even part of the policy! It is just *so* annoying that
this
On Dec 16, 2007, at 5:24 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top
directory
of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize
this also
needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't
know
On Dec 18, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I guess, from the Incubator release management guide, the requirement
is that the release can be built from a tag, in a later point in
time...
While that's a good (and standard) practice, it's not quite a
requirement. There can be good
yay! Looks good.
On Nov 9, 2007, at 7:03 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The initial core developers are all Ning employees. We hope to
expand this very quickly.
Given how new this area is, and how much buzz OpenSocial seems to be
gathering atm, you can probably count on quite a bit of
have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache
committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already
familiar with projects here.
[ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http
On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
After over two years in the incubator, two releases under our belt
(one snapshot and one official release) and a third one coming,
the stdcxx community with the support of our mentors feel that we
are ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to
lists
-- examples INFRA-1377, INFRA-1378, INFRA-1379, INFRA-1380
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://www.leosimons.com/blog/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that starts at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-triplesoup-dev/
200709.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What else do we have to do now? It seems we don't have a guide for
how to go dormant. Does someone have or can produce a checklist of
how we've done this before?
cheers,
Leo Simons
consider forming a podling
according to
the proposal.
...
Pig is a platform for analyzing large data sets.
+1, looks cool!
...seems like your biggest challenge here is attracting a diverse
developer community, and hopefully the apache incubation process will
help you there...
cheers,
Leo
a vote about just that (on the private
mailing list) at the moment.
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://www.leosimons.com/blog/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
connection to those remote services. JRS is currently a
community source, internal project at American Express. This proposal
is to develop the JRS code and community at the ASF.
...
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://www.leosimons.com/blog
On Jun 25, 2007, at 4:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I just finished
a sweep through our sources and updated those that still needed
it. The record of the changes is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-457
So, does this mean that there's files in any of the tarballs
On Jun 23, 2007, at 10:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I also believe/hope the status file might need an update or
perhaps two:
In progress
Check and make sure that the files that have been donated have
been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright.
I'd hope
On Jun 24, 2007, at 8:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
This is a proposal to develop a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool.
Interesting proposal. Seems useful.
Documentation
-
Documentation is available on request. See below.
Initial source
-
On Jun 20, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
We just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
Wicket as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported Wicket during the incubation for their guidance, effort and
time.
THANK
On Jun 22, 2007, at 9:55 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think the community, as-is, can manage itself for now.
...
I believe stdcxx is a nice, small,
healthy little community doing what the committers are interested in -
producing a world-class STL implementation under the ALv2 with our
On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:37 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
opinions?
improvements?
alternatives?
Somehow I missed this t-shirt/apparel effort so far. I think all of
them are acceptable, I liked both of the logos I saw, and its just in
general really really really cool we're doing this! Go
On Jun 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
This is due to board@ with PMC oversight/feedback 12 hours from now.
Oversight implies at least three reviewers of each report.
According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule and
already recorded in
On Jun 4, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
I've deleted the file from SVN. Please remove the crontab that sends
these emails.
You don't feel that it had any value if updated?
When it comes to status, I believe unknown is better than
outdated which is better than
I've deleted the file from SVN. Please remove the crontab that sends
these emails.
Thanks!
- Leo
On May 31, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-
indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun,
On Jun 2, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'm working on the graduation guide, and noticed quite some text
regarding community building. I think this contains enough material
and is important enough to warrant a separate guide.
Basically I want the next text [1] migrated from the
On Jun 1, 2007, at 11:15 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
This is a vote to move the Heraldry project from active incubation to
'retired' status.
+1
I want to thank all the committers and mentors
+1 (and other contributors, too)
- Leo
Thanks Craig. Some suggestions/comments:
On May 31, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Voting in a new committer
If a developer has contributed a significant number of high-quality
patches, is interested in continuing the contribution, and has
demonstrated the ability to work well
On May 28, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The graduation guide is a bit vague and incomplete on one point:
sending the resolution to the board.
It is mentioned in the process description to send a message to the
board (to board@), but there are of course no example messages to be
On May 24, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The Wicket podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending
the attached draft board resolution.
+1.
- Leo
On May 21, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
In more general terms: is it considered good practise to CC both
parties with 'official' communication between the private@ and the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, I'd say that it might be
On May 21, 2007, at 8:26 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Just an FYI - I haven't followed the jira flow terribly well,
mostly because
it takes an order of magnitude longer in time to parse a Jira
incident rather
than approve a patch posted to the list. If you could at least
attach the
On May 15, 2007, at 12:26 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Quick question (I hope). I was thinking about what will happen if the
NMaven podling would like to add a committer, make a release, etc.
Would votes by Maven PMC members (As the sponsoring project) be
considered binding in this case, or should
On May 6, 2007, at 1:57 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
incubator distributions need to be stored under /www/www.apache.org/
dist
AFACT there are two reasonable options: either create repositories
under /www.apache.org/dist/incubator or use the standard maven ones
I don't understand the
On May 3, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I am in the process of going through the graduation guide
(graduation.xml in the guides directory of the incubator website),
wow, that's pretty detailed. It's also not linked from the main menu.
and I came across a TODO: section and didn't
Jo!
The whole jira-patch-commit workflow for the documentation seems
annoying. At least it annoys me -- in particular the patches don't
show up in my email so I have to visit jira which I try and avoid as
much as possible :-).
Suggestions:
1) create
On May 5, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Michael Wechner wrote:
what about a CMS with a workflow, which would sit on top SVN
accessing both branches (staging resp. draft and live) and hence
would allow devs still accessing it through other SVN clients and
also allow updating the live site as static SVN
+1 looks good to me. Grats!
- Leo
Two minor things (not big enough to hold up the release I think):
NOTICE file says
This product includes software developed at
Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
which should be
This product includes software developed at
On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 11:55, Patrick Linskey wrote:
* OpenJPA includes software developed by the SERP project
Copyright (c) 2002-2006, A. Abram White. All rights reserved.
The All rights reserved. means that it has not been
properly
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jukka Zitting wrote:
...
PS. The TripleSoup and UIMA reports are missing the incubating
since
information.
I have added this information for UIMA.
I added for TripleSoup and provided the specific date for UIMA.
/LSD
On Apr 10, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
I'm confused.
I can imagine. I think everyone is confused. That's what you get when
you try and write these process descriptions so formally, since the
actual process is not as formal. The A mentor is... a permanent
member of the [ASF]
On Apr 4, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 4/4/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there have been changes since the release was cut, a new release
must IMHO be created, so that people can vote (on the wicket lists
first, and then come back here) on the correct one.
Oi!
On Mar 21, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
So I'm bringing this back to the Incubator PMC for discussion and
ultimately, a vote.
I would really appreciate it if we could all try to keep [VOTE] tags
in subject lines restricted to things that actually need a vote (e.g.
yes/no/+1/-1)
On Mar 16, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Two parts to the vote:
ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus
mirrors).
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
[X] think decision should be made together with infrastructure team
TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
[ ] +1
On Mar 14, 2007, at 2:22 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This month's ASF Board reports should be written up on the wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2007
River and Woden are not nearly detailed enough. We need status,
issues
required for
On Feb 25, 2007, at 7:30 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
...
I vetoed the codedump for two main reasons. The first is that
the IP
clearance process is not being followed: there is no record of
the code
here
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
and there
On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:08 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
One thing that seems to have been forgotten is that an approved
release must be in the form of SOURCE CODE and must be placed
in the associated PMC's public distribution area under
http://www.apache.org/dist/
The second must there in that
Can whomever edited /www/incubator.apache.org live without changing
the SVN contents please fix that up? Thanks!
- Leo
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] svn diff projects/synapse.html
Index: projects/synapse.html
===
--- projects/synapse.html
On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
And because naming and shaming works:
...
XAP
...
Only projects that are current on their board reports should be
allowed to
release.
Now that's a big stick! :-)
- Leo
On Feb 14, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
There is no reasonable expectation of log4php satisfying the exit
criteria.
snip/
Here is my +1
+1.
Thanks Curt! Sorting this out is never fun...
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe,
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:15 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
The log4net-dev community appears healthy and I believes warrants
graduation from the incubator and has my +1 as mentor and incubator
PMC member.
+1
- Leo
-
To
On Feb 15, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
for IP clearance, i don't see how the IPMC is able to do anything
other than just check the documentation: a pure paper exercise. we
have no choice to trust that the PMC has read,
Hey Curt,
On Feb 12, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Curt Arnold wrote:
The recent discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bylaw paragraph in TLP
resolution, 2007-02-07), the comments in the Graduate OFBiz
Podling thread (http://www.mail-archive.com/
general@incubator.apache.org/msg11758.html) and log4net
On Feb 11, 2007, at 4:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Votes to graduate mod_ftp from the incubator?
+1 from me. Go, go, go!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
with that
database, and a REST [4] web interface to talk to that database using
SPARQL [5], implemented as an apache webserver module.
{{{
Target:TLP
Sponsor: Incubator PMC
Champion: Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mentors: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Hyde [EMAIL
On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I wonder if anyone other than me is reading everything before or
even after
it is submitted.
I tend to read all board reports, and read the ones for which I'm on
a PMC, or previously was a (formal or not) mentor for, completely. I
On Jan 30, 2007, at 12:52 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would avoid creating a -user list until it's actually proven
necessary. In the beginning keeping user questions on the dev list
makes sense to me.
Me too. One less mailing list to deal with is
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
If there's significant XML processing involved
there'll have to be some eventually! Can't do RDF without RDF/
XML...and can't do SPARQL without sparql result sets...
For now I guess we sort-of plan on just using redland whenever we do
Hey Ted,
Bottom line: there's some issues with the heraldry community to fix,
it's their responsibility to fix it, looks like you guys did a good
job of that so far to me, we should give heraldry some more time to
try and fix things.
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
Paul and
with that
database, and a REST [4] web interface to talk to that database using
SPARQL [5], implemented as an apache webserver module.
{{{
Target:TLP
Sponsor: Incubator PMC
Champion: Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mentors: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ben Hyde [EMAIL
On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Will it do anything
with either Derby, ApacheDS or JackRabbit, in terms of potential
collaboration?
Sounds like it's all C
Yep, that's the plan for now at least.
In java land, there's two sizeable platforms for doing
On Jan 26, 2007, at 2:26 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 1/25/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Only votes cast by (P)PMC members are binding. If the vote is
positive, the contributor formally becomes an Apache committer.
So to confirm I have this right...
A PPMC can vote
On Jan 25, 2007, at 8:07 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/25/07, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so what do you propose?
please go ahead and create a patch :-)
yay! We always need more (capable!) people to maintain these docs :)
The apache website is maintained in xdoc form using
On Jan 15, 2007, at 5:35 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
The purpose of the other project is to be a sort of
impromptu venue for collaboration of things related to
the ASF project. The ASF project in question (The
Apache Open for Business Project - OFBiz), has a
history of being relatively stable in SVN.
On Jan 6, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Chris Howe wrote:
I am currently in the process of setting up a project
that will hopefully complement the Apache Open for
Business Project and help get some community newbies
down the learning curve a bit faster than is currently
possible with the tools available
On Dec 1, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I am asking for a vote of the Incubator PMC on graduation of
Cayenne that is conditional on the board's approval of a TLP for
that purpose. Please cast your votes.
+1.
Good luck!
- Leo
On Dec 1, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 01/12/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
What Jim pointed out was docs/release_notes.txt -- it should
probably include the
On Nov 21, 2006, at 10:52 PM, Patrick Linskey wrote:
However, I *would* like clear guidance about what to do.
Do what makes most sense for your developers and your users. It
sounds like you know what that is.
Is this going
to cause problems with incubator approval of the 0.9.6 vote that's
On Nov 14, 2006, at 5:12 AM, David E Jones wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Graduate OFBiz Podling
[ ] +0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Do not Graduate OFBiz Podling
I think this time I'll ignore all procedural thingies and just
enthousiastically vote
+1
great work, peeps!
Do let me know if I
On Nov 9, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Allow me to make this clear. snip/
Lol. Wow, that's a lot of opinions in one paragraph.
Heh.
Well, this was
where the problem was then: we thought confluence was going to be
supported, but was kind of in the beta phase.
Anyone use gmail?
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:05 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
(On a side note: To be perfectly frank, it makes me cringe
to see this horribly effort-intensive and error-prone process
being used by the ASF. IMHO, all this stuff should be
regularised and normalised and maintained via Web forms. If
(in order of votes cast) :
snip/
+1 Leo Simons(Incubator PMC/mentor)
snip/
Please send in your +1/0/-1 to approve/abstain/disapprove.
+1.
LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Change the subject line when you change the subject...done.
Don't top post...failed!
Keep it short...failed!
Oh well...as for the rest...going by example...
The preface
---
On Oct 21, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 21, 2006, at 3:24 AM, Leo Simons wrote
On Oct 23, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Xavier Hanin wrote:
After several weeks of discussion with our user community [1] and with
several Apache members, I am proud to present a proposal [2] for
the open
source project Ivy to join the Apache Incubator.
Cool. Ivy is cool. Actually, it's not *that*
This is *not* an actual vote. The vote is on harmony-dev; see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/
200610.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail is only for archival purposes (Geir's first note about
this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is part of a long thread).
cheers,
Leo
On Oct 20, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On 10/19/06, Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
...
I'd like to ask that those who have asked for a release to assuage
concerns about community health and capability to please read
IANAL. I believe we still don't have definitive templates for these
files :(
On Oct 20, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ofbiz/trunk/LICENSE
I think this looks good.
and NOTICE
On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
snip/
Look. You guys are freakin' nuts.
snip/
sarcasm
Assuming this refers to me, given the choice, I think I like the
qualification silly better.
/sarcasm
Sheesh. Get over it already.
snip/
+1, and you too! Let's all go do some actually
On Oct 17, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I don't have a binding vote, but my thought is Harmony has the
same issue as Felix: namely they haven't done a release or provided
even a test release to the IPMC so the IPMC can be sure the podling
knows the proper way to do a release and
On Oct 18, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
A snapshot doesn't require any thought. I'd be happy with a
vote on a release plan, myself, or even just a trial run.
Something to indicate that folks understand what it is that
a PMC is supposed to do in real life (i.e., make releases while
On Oct 18, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:10:37PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
On the surface everything appears fine to the point of graduating
minus
the proving that you can do a release. But given past experiences
with
graduating large projects too fast,
On Oct 18, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Don Brown wrote:
Agreed. I don't think it is fair to be making up graduation
requirements right when a project is about to graduate.
The graduation requirement is that a majority of the PMC members
agree that
On Oct 18, 2006, at 10:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 10/18/06, Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's
On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
You said that you have run Tomcat on top of Harmony. Why can't you
produce a release such that I can throw the Tomcat jar at it, too?
Sure, it is a developer release, but it let's non-Harmony folks play
with your project.
Is there a specific
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Adam Lally wrote:
We've been trying to think up a more fun, non-acronym name for UIMA
that fits in better with the spirit of the ASF.
Note UIMA is a fine name for an apache project. We have projects like
APR and BSF and the like, too. But +1 on fun :)
1)
On Oct 12, 2006, at 6:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I
hope is
an agreeable solution:
I have never liked this explicit champion role, and I don't like
adding responsibilities to it, making things even more explicitly
On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Can we agree that regardless of which style one might prefer the
packaging,
there are multiple valid approaches, and that this level of difference
should not be a release criteria for the Incubator?
ASF release processes work because people
Hi Eric,
From the ASF point of view, it is your responsibility to ensure you
can contribute the thing you're contributing (under CLA and/or CCLA).
From your employer's point of view, this is probably a good question
to ask your lawyer / legal people. Basically you need to make sure
there
Hey Martijn,
do keep sending these e-mails. Less replies doesn't mean that its
less valuable.
On Oct 3, 2006, at 9:38 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Just to pose an outsider view, being new to the ASF and not to hijack
the discussion on the CFX/CeltiXFire, I would like to share my views
on the
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Mark Little wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006, at 14:54, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Mark Little wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 23:20, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
You will, of course, infer and interpret events as you choose.
It's pretty obvious to me, a complete outsider, that
On Oct 6, 2006, at 7:10 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
2) The mentors for CXF (well, until recently) have accumulated
loads of merit. Enough to be allowed to be mentors, and then some.
The guy you're disagreeing with has accumulated so much merit he
has difficulty passing through airport security
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:17 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
issues addressed in this release:
1. updated proposal included
2. The first paragraph explains it to a layperson
3. OASIS issue addressed
Thanks Ian.
+1,
Leo
[ ] +1 Accept UIMA as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this
On Sep 29, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Mark Little wrote:
Redhat were one of the supporters of the Celtixfire incubator
project and discussed with the proposers to add Kevin Conner and
myself to the list of initial commiters. As part of this, our names
were included in the proposal. Both Kevin and I
Hmpf.
On Oct 1, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Taken from the Problem with commit rights on Celtixfire thread:
- The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC
- The PPMC (Mentors) elects additional PPMC members
- The PPMC elects Committers
I would say this is
On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
My question is, should all these [source] files get the ASL headers?
All source files should have appropriate headers. If its apache-owned,
ASL-licensed source, it should have the ASL header.
This would
be a hard hit for the embedded
On Sep 27, 2006, at 3:10 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snips throughout/
it is very rare for a non-committer to act as release manager.
Yeah, I can't really remember ever seeing that. Of course, it happens
quite often that downstream repackagers aren't committers.
if the CXF community
Yes! Actual Feedback! Whoohooh!
On Sep 25, 2006, at 9:24 AM, David E Jones wrote:
The OFBiz podling (PPMC and community) has reached a consensus
internally approving the 4.0.0 TS3 test snapshot release. We are
now requesting a vote for review and approval from the general
Incubator group
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:13 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html is currently a
draft document. i think that it's strong enough to push towards
promoting it (and putting it in the indexes).
+1. Good work.
but in particular please reply with feedback
101 - 200 of 405 matches
Mail list logo
