There's probably a designer who can make this into a feather or a
octofeather...
http://tholman.com/github-corners/
Martijn
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:05 PM Harbs wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> If there’s agreement on this, I’d suggest someone come up with some CSS
> which can be popped into
fect your project: it might be that in a couple
of weeks the discussion *will* affect your project.
So interacting with the IPMC will invariably train you for life beyond
the incubator. Make the best effort and you will thrive once
graduated.
Martijn Dashorst
-
Late to the party, but having a long think about this is sometimes beneficial.
+1 to drop the -incubator/-incubating version attachment for any
artifacts (not just Maven).
My reasoning is the following:
Source code lives longer than any community. Long after a podling has
gone through the incuba
open mind
and don't look only for the bits that support your position, but try
to understand the other side as well.
Martijn
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
&
You are trying to fix the wrong thing. The whole idea of the
-incubating moniker is to communicate to end users that the project is
inside the incubator, and can fail incubation. The only and best way
to get rid of the -incubating scheme is to *graduate*.
Don't remain in the incubator hiding in yo
And here as well, with the precise specification of at a minimum 3
independent committers:
> The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at
> least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or
> entity that is vital to the success of the project
For Wicket I've crafted a release script that not only creates the
artifacts to vote on, but also generates the messages needed for
voting and announcing, and scripts to either promote or rollback a
release.
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/release.sh
It uses the aforementioned settin
It has to do with intent: is your intention to release outside of the
Incubator and the ASF because you don't want to do the work to make
them compliant, or are you releasing for the benefit of your existing
user base so they don't have to rewrite their code (package rename?),
or get some security/
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 12:02 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Committership is the right to do work on the project. PMC membership is the
>> right to participate in governance. People left in the nebulous state
>> between
>> committership and PMC membership fo
> PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
> which is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
> should be. It's about trust. If you trust someone to work the gears on a
> release,
> that has considerable impact on the well-being of a proj
-1 on requiring all projects to do this exercise. It is not policy,
and frankly as a volunteer organization we can let the communities
themselves determine whether this is something they want to spend
their time on.
I thought we were a community for/over code, not a bureaucracy for/over code.
If/
The biggest issue with mentor disengagement IMO is that when
incubation starts to take longer than 9 months it is hard to maintain
focus and engagement if you are not a user/member of the incubating
community (and its code).
So while we can start measuring AWOL mentors and try to fix that by
addin
Would the discussion on the dev@groovy list be enough 'evidence' for
the intent of the community to move to Apache?
Then it would possible be sufficient to archive those messages for
posterity (but I'm no lawyer)
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> So ultimately
Great initiative!
Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
possible trademark in the proposal. Does Pivotal have any claims to
the name groovy, and if so are those claims transferred to the ASF?
Martijn
---
In my opinion it is always a failure of a podling when they can't get
a release out of the door, or are unable to vote in new committers.
"The future is not something we enter. The future is something we
create." --Leonard I. Sweet
As a podling is waiting for its release to be approved, I sure ho
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> +1 to Marvin's "I hope that most projects won't bother" although there
> needs to be something a little more than a blank piece of paper.
>
> The best approach, IMHO, is to simply make it official that the project
> adopts the same byelaws as p
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Plus, since the ASF did not watch how Usergrid
> was handled when it was external, we (the ASF) has no idea
> how "meritocratic" it was...
I have no idea how that is important for *entering* the incubator. One
of the core tenets of incubatin
passed by lazy consensus after 72 hours as stipulated
by the IP clearance policy.
Many thanks for checking.
Martijn Dashorst
VP Apache Wicket
Because 150+ people tasked with oversight, documentation of processes and
procedures of podlings, TLPs and themselves, discussing different views of
the past, present and future might not be able to agree to anything, but a
small team tasked with just documenting process might get the job done
with
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Give me a URL where this policy is and I'll edit it.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
F
[X] +1 Graduate Apache Etch podling from Apache Incubator
(binding)
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I took these notes yesterday, so please excuse me if some of these
> have been fixed.
>
> etch: no signoffs
Just did my signoff and added a personal observation:
The processes in this podling are really like trying to pour molasses thro
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> The Chukwa community has voted to retire the project.
>
> -1 The community vote [1] was far from unanimous. I'd expect the
> community being retired to have greater consensus (or, as is
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Which is why we link to the .md5, .sha, .asc, and KEYS files on our severs.
> Unless you're assuming a MITM along the request/response path to apache.org,
> in which case all bets are off anyway. No?
Which is why I have my release vote messag
I don't think a report for Etch is coming this month. Please
reschedule for next month.
Martijn
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please report ASAP so there's enough time for review.
>
> If you won't have the report ready by tomorrow, let us know so we can
> postpo
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
wrote:
> The AWF community has voted to retire the project.
> Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to
> vote on confirming this decision. (Will be open for 72 hours).
As a drive-by interested party in the incubator (w
I figured I'd sign off on my Etch podling's report, but the report is
either set to read only, or I lost my mojo to modify the wiki.
Martijn
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping to complete the Incubator report by tomorrow evening (US
> time). It would be gr
ve. If so, I'll
start the preparations for graduating Etch.
Martijn Dashorst
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Citrix is pursuing patents based on prior CloudStack work and expects to
> continue to do
> so in the future. Citrix is getting these patents to protect the CloudStack
> user community.
> Consider the case where some other entity states that
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Given the situation, I wonder how much more value the Incubator can
> give to Etch. It sounds like all the currently active people already
> understand the Apache Way and our policies, and that the only problem
> is that there aren't enough o
of the 5th International Conference on
Communication System Software and Middleware
[1]
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2016563&dl=ACM&coll=DL&CFID=89538345&CFTOKEN=83544989
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jukka Zitting
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> More generally, looking over the last quarter in Etch I see ongoing
>> technical work mostly by Michael Fitzner and Martin Veith but only
>> occasional input from others and not much f
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 for Jukka and +1000 thanks to Noel.
Martijn
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> +1
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands
+1, retire (I don't have a better opinion to throw at the problem than
the owning community :)
Martijn
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier and now shown below, the HISE community has voted
> to retire the project. Following the retirement guide [1]
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
>> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
>> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
>> PMC. T
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> But I guess it does meet the minimum size. If 3 is not enough, what
> number is? If it does become a problem, there's an attic process.
The project is already in the process of adding another committer. I
have every intention to put him on the
"incubating" is hampering its attractiveness. It will
> become a swim or sink challenge as TLP, but doubt the forecast is any
> better of staying here.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:39 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
>>
Just an FYI: I have posted a status update on Etch on general@, hoping
it doesn't fall on deaf ears with all the discussions going on:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201201.mbox/%3ccab63y-dsjkbkeljkhuvkbdlmsjwvfvixo0fnxexofhq1v4m...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Martijn
On Sun, J
Just as an aside: I intend on staying with the PMC to provide
oversight as a Member (and being a familiar Mentor), provided the Etch
community wants me to tag along.
Martijn
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independ
Etch is a cross-platform, language- and transport-independent
framework for building and consuming network services. The Etch
toolset includes a network service description language, a compiler,
and binding libraries for a variety of programming languages. It
currently supports C, C# and Java. Supp
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> This specifically says that a majority is NOT required.
> This does seem odd.
This does mean that a release (for example due to a security issue)
cannot be held back by any entity or block of committers.
Martijn
of which 3 were also IPMC members
> (Benson Margulies, Martijn Dashorst and Thomas Fox).
>
> I would like to ask the IPMC to approve the graduation.
>
> [ ] +1 - I approve of the Empire-db graduation
> [ ] +0 - I have no opinion
> [ ] -1 - There's an issue with graduation a
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Michael Kelleher wrote:
> Is there a plan for promoting this project to top level status? If so, is
> there a projected timeline?
Unless you specify which project you aim to graduate, I can only
assume it is the incubator itself, which is already top level.
> Do
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> It's a technical minimum, I agree, but I wouldn't accept graduating a
> project with only 3 PMC members.
>
> 5 looks like a more realistic minimum to make sure the project can
> actually get 3 votes when needed.
Depends on what is expe
+1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote
> round so we need one more +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> -
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:24 AM, wrote:
> Can you please clarify what our responsibilities in fact are, as far as you
> understand it? If we are once again expected to report every month, we'd
> appreciate receiving appropriate notification to that effect.
The expectations are that you report
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Thats exactly what I mean with a mess. Hope it clarifies a bit, b/c I
>> thought about it a pretty long time.
>
> I agree that the LHS menu is confusing and messy, but for me, the RHS
> list is simple and useful.
For me the RHS list is not useful at
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> Do PPMCs have chairs?
>>> If not, then maybe the Champion fulfils that role until eventual
>>> graduation; otherwise they fulfil the role until the PPMC elects a
>>> chair.
>>
>> I really thought PPMCs have chairs! Otherwise how does the Incubator
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> champion |ˈCHampēən| noun
>> 1 a person who has defeated or surpassed all rivals in a competition,
>> esp. in sports:
>> 2 a person who fights or argues for a cause or on behalf of someone else:
>>
>> The correct usage is of course de
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Why must the name be "Champion" and not just "Mentor"?
Because Champion is an aptly name for the role.
> champion is just another term for the first potential mentor who steps up.
It is the correct name for that role:
champion |ˈCH
IMO the champion helps clarify the incubator process up to acceptance
of the podling into the incubator. For example the champion for Wicket
was not a singular person, but both Alex Karasulu and Upayavira were
both very instrumental in smoothing our transition into the incubator.
general@ can be v
+1
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the Commons Community and the OGNL Community (which is overlapping
> heavily) would like to see OGNL graduated.
> We don't see any risks in graduating OGNL. Most of the OGNL committers
> are already ASF committers, or
I just forwarded a grep of iclas.txt for these accounts to private@.
cclas.txt didn't have any mention of the account names, and grants.txt
listed a svn entry for etch.
Martijn
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Michael Fitzner
wrote:
> I kindly request the current receipts of ICLAs, CCLAs and SGA
+1
Martijn
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:49 AM, berndf wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
>
> 3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
> becoming an Apache project. Dev is still done behind closed doors, and
> developers are changi
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> What is preventing Etch from graduating?
A diverse, active, growing community and building releases.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apac
I typically use markmail archives of the commit mailing list. Shows
nice graphs of the most active committers. You can filter on a
particular committer as wel.
Another option would be to use the github mirrors of our repositories
(I used that recently to see how active wicket committers were), and
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
> Hi, I've agreed to champion an incubator submission. It's my first time
> doing this. I have a few questions.
>
> 1) The project has been open sourced under ALv2 for a while and has had a
> number of releases. When it comes to the incubato
+1
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 for moving to the new CMS. Having written some docs for the
Incubator, I find it quite cumbersome to do that in XML and I rather
prefer the markdown syntax.
Martijn
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote on Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:26:38 -0700:
>> If there ar
I was under the impression that *any* mentor is an IPMC member, has a
binding +1 vote for releases and could therefore approve of releases
without having to go through general@
While I find it very helpful and valuable for first time releases (and
first time release managers) to go to general@ the
+1
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.0.7-incubating
> release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the
> release. *As we only have two mentors left we will need at least one
> extra vote.
+1
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
> commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduate to
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> added one para about bylaws/particiption). Where did you copy your original
> from
> before search/replace? I'd like to fix that source material.
AFAIK, the bylaws paragraph was scrapped from the template because it
was deemed no longer necess
+1
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
> All,
>
> Thrift has been humming along nicely lately. We'd made several releases and
> added several committers. The Thrift community thinks now is a good time to
> consider graduation.
>
> Please let me know if this resolution is insuffi
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks wrote:
>>...
>
>> *Mailing Lists*
>>
>> kitty-dev
>> kitty-commits
>> kitty-user
>>
>
> Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
> community across dev/user does not make sens
+1
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
> The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new
> mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on.
>
> The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text
> is also copied below.
>
>
I fully second this sentiment. +1 and godspeed as a TLP!
Martijn
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> +1
>
> You have worked hard to get to this point, having survived the release
> process, two name changes, and community building exercises.
>
> I have no reservations about
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Stuart Monteith wrote:
> If I am to offer a suggestion, I would suggest that there be a clear release
> process documented in a single location, with the rational for each of its
> steps
> included.
Is this what you'd want?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/re
As a Member, and mentor, I take offense at being called a hawk,
lunatic, drive-by-shooter, process-obstructor, etc.
There is absolutely no reason to conflate changing the dynamics of the
Incubator by adding this kind of bile to the discussion.
I feel disempowered and insulted by the consistent bi
I'm +1 for TLP. No need to start creating more umbrella projects. If
finding a chair is troublesome, I'd be more than willing to fill that
gap (although I'm not on the RAT ppmc, nor have written a single line
of code for it). As a mentor and user I love the utility, so keeping
it around and making
Congrats!
Martijn
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> The vote passes as follows:
>
> +1 Martijn Dashorst
> +1 Ant Elder
> +1 Craig L Russell
> +1 Thomas Fischer
>
> Thanks for all your support and reviews! I'll push the release ou
+1 (again).
Could someone from the IPMC take a look at the release? The team is
eager to release it, but lacks 2 +1 binding votes.
Martijn
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Rainer
>
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubat
is infra issue? How do you see
> this IPMC vetting?
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>
>>> As several podlings have issues publicizing themselves and finding
>>> venues for
As several podlings have issues publicizing themselves and finding
venues for publicity, would it be a good idea to have an incubator
blog at http://blogs.apache.org where we allow podlings to publicize
themselves? The content should of course be vetted by the IPMC, but
IMO it would be a nice outle
+1
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> The Portals PMC as Sponsor of the WSRP4J podling as well as the project
> community itself has voted [1,2] positive [3] to terminate the podling due
> to lack of interest to continue the project.
>
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to
+1 Congrats!
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[x] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation
Good luck!
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I received mine, apparently minotaur's short day off caused the delay...
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> Didn't get that.
>
> Still not? The e-mail should be flowing now. You ARE on the roster, and
> were on the e-mail.
>
>
Didn't receive one.
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote:
> Can someone please add me (tfischer) to the incubator group so I can update
> the incubator's webste from svn ? I am member of the incubator PMC.
You are already in the incubator group, I'm not sure what goes wrong.
Martijn
--
+0.9
I agree that the site update process is cumbersome, but it also gives
podling folks an incentive to log on to p.a.o and learn to use that
system to their advantage. Moving to svnpubsub would take that away.
That said, I think that most committers never have to go to p.a.o in
any case so perh
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> can I as a new mod see what messages are still in the mod queue?
I don't know the command and if it is possible. I do know that the
marvin messages have expired already (they do so after a week iirc).
You can read more about ezml h
AFAIK those were added after 1 januari (6 januari iirc), which is when
the notice was sent out.
Martijn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Gav... wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:martijn.dasho...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 19 Ja
The notification was sent but got stuck in moderation with no
moderator for the dev@ list.
Martijn
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> As far as I know we (empire-db) also did not receive a notification.
>
> Cheers,
> Francis
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Hyrum
+1
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the positive feedback on the proposal to graduate Shindig
> as a TLP [1].
>
> I would like to start an official vote to recommend the graduation of
> Apache Shindig as a Top Level Project to the Board.
> To that end
Even though Apache Click has graduated from the incubator (and still
hasn't landed on http://click.apache.org), they are still in our
reporting schedule. I've removed them from the 2009 report wiki. Is
there something else that needs to be taken care off?
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn
+1
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> After over one years in the incubator with providing three
> releases
> OpenWebBeans community with the support of our mentors feel that we
> are
> ready to propose to the Incubator PMC to graduate
+1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
>> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
>
> +1 from me!
>
> cheers,
>
> Leo
>
>
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Actually, the vote was kind of withdrawn to update it to new descriptors.
> Thus, its not available yet. In anycase, no need to spam all the PMCs,
> especially those not using Maven. Just keep an eye on the annou...@maven
> list. When av
As long as the community is not divided on the issue whether to
practice RTC vs CTR, I see no blocker for graduation.
That is: as long as RTC was not installed to mitigate problems inside
the community. If that is the case, the community may still be broken,
with the underlying issue mopped under
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> LOL
>
> Well... the problem is that an "svn mv" from /incubator/subversion/ to
> /subversion/ introduces an artificial breakage in the history. It is
> actually quite disruptive for tracking history (which is very
> important to us).
Sounds lik
I like the proposal of 3 steps prior to releasing... In Greg's words:
it teaches instead of hinders. It divides the arduous process of
cutting a release in more manageable steps and would make passing the
actual release easier/faster.
Martijn
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> We certainly have no intent to bring Bad Code into the ASF!
I am sure you do. However that is not the issue I'm going against:
when Good Code is brought into the ASF in a Bad Way or in a Good Way
with Bad Reasoning.
I actually like the way you
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> This is where I think the Incubator has gone awry: the claim that you
> are an IPMC member implies that you have merit on a project (in the
> form of a binding vote) is false.
Not sure if I am looking at the same incubator as you are. I a
Yes, *AND* ensuring legal dots are put on the i's and j's. This is
done through checking the release and ensuring that it is in adherence
to our policies which you and others have crafted. *All* podlings have
to ensure they have the correct licensing headers, notices and other
bits in place before
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> To be clear, it's on the mentors to decide what is applicable and
> necessary for graduation - not the IPMC as a whole.
Nope... The whole IPMC has been tasked with oversight. The mentors are
proxies for the whole IPMC.
> The IPMC as a
>
+1, congrats and good luck!
Martijn
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Bob Schellink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Click community has voted to request graduation from the
> Incubator as a new TLP [1][2].
>
> I would like to start a vote to recommend the graduation of Apache Click as
> a Top Lev
+1
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM, George Aroush wrote:
>
> [x] +1 Graduate Lucene.Net as a sub-project under Apache Lucene.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
>
> I live
1 - 100 of 397 matches
Mail list logo
