[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-130) Nuvem in limbo

Sebb created INCUBATOR-130: -- Summary: Nuvem in limbo Key: INCUBATOR-130 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-130 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Sebb

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

On 13 March 2016 at 01:25, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:11 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >>> To close a loop on this: based on the cons

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

On 7 March 2016 at 01:46, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public > version of the tools under: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/ > > My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > a podling recently asked me why: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/ > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl > are only available to commiters. I see >

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

PING On 28 November 2015 at 22:59, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 November 2015 at 16:26, <lrese...@apache.org> wrote: >> Repository: apache-website-template >> Updated Branches: >> refs/heads/master b140c230c -> 9e881e247 >> >> >>

Re: apache-website-template git commit: Add LICENSE and NOTICE files

On 28 November 2015 at 16:26, wrote: > Repository: apache-website-template > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master b140c230c -> 9e881e247 > > > Add LICENSE and NOTICE files > > Properly document LICENSE for each component > included on this website, including necessary >

Re: Instructions for granting podling members karma

that information go? On 10 November 2015 at 14:51, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nah... Don't worry. It is a guideline... > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 3:18 PM,

Instructions for granting podling members karma

There have been several requests to Infra recently to grant karma for podling members. In most cases this can be dealt with by the PPMC/IPMC by editting the asf-auth file However I could not find any details in the Incubator guides about this. I added the following section to the PMC guide:

Re: Wave - download page links to nightly builds etc

On 5 November 2015 at 17:02, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Sebb, > > I have moved the nightly builds section to its own page only > accessible under the releases section on the getting involved page. > (It might be slightly too hidden for people to find it now). Th

Wave - download page links to nightly builds etc

The Wave download page http://incubator.apache.org/wave/downloads.html specifically says that there have been no releases However it links to automated builds and an RC in a home directory on minotaur. That does not seem right.

Re: Wave - download page links to nightly builds etc

On 3 November 2015 at 15:38, Ali Lown <a...@lown.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thanks for bringing this to my attention. > > I have updated the downloads page removing the link to the RC, and > clarifying the differences of the available download options: 1) no > off

Re: Access to Wiki

Done On 3 November 2015 at 06:26, Thomas Weise wrote: > I would like to update the status report for the Apex project. > > Can you please give access to the following user: ThomasWeise > > Thanks! - To

Re: What is the legal basis for enforcing release policies at ASF?

AFAIK a SNAPSHOT has not been voted on and is therefore not a formal ASF release. So for example this would cover CI builds that deploy jars to the ASF Maven SNAPSHOT repo. On 20 August 2015 at 23:33, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gavin McDonald

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of ConcertedProposal by AtriSharma

On 11 August 2015 at 10:46, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Incubator Wiki for change notification. The ConcertedProposal page has been changed by AtriSharma: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ConcertedProposal

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Trivial Update of CommonsRDF by SergioFernandez

On 5 February 2015 at 14:46, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Incubator Wiki for change notification. The CommonsRDF page has been changed by SergioFernandez:

Re: Binary Convenience Package Dependencies

On 6 January 2015 at 01:41, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would strongly recommend that you review with legal, in addition to the incubator on this type of question. If I look here: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html Please *don't* use that page. It says: This

Re: Votes for git repos - commit id vs tag

On 23 December 2014 at 09:27, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: ...Although many consider it best practice for release tarballs to be tied back to a specific version control identifier (including

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Samza from the Incubator

PING - I think the VOTE is invalid in its current form because it is ambiguous. Note also that the long paragraph starting RESOLVED, is normally presented as 3 paragraphs, each starting with RESOLVED See for example the recent Flink VOTE thread. On 12 December 2014 at 01:37, sebb seb

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Samza from the Incubator

On 12 December 2014 at 01:07, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed with 17 +1s and no -1s or +/-0s. Binding +1s x 10 : Jakob, Chinmay, Yan, Chris Riccomini, Sriram, Zhijie, Martin, Roman, Garry, Chris

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of December2014 by JosephWitt

May I suggest (to all updaters): In future, if updating a page for someone else, please document this in the comment, ideally with link to the request. On 6 December 2014 at 12:31, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for clarifying. On Dec 6, 2014 7:20 AM, Joe Witt

Re: [RESULTS][VOTE] Release Falcon version 0.6-incubating

I think the usual convention is to use [RESULT][VOTE] There is a bot that tries to keep track of ongoing votes; I don't know if it handles [CLOSED] On 3 December 2014 at 04:52, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote: Hi folks, Thanks for taking time to review and vote on this

Re: Mail command to allow marvin emails

On 26 November 2014 at 09:23, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: On 25/11/14 19:39, sebb wrote: On 25 November 2014 at 17:58, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote: On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: snip When

Re: Mail command to allow marvin emails

On 25 November 2014 at 17:58, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: On 25/11/14 14:59, John D. Ament wrote: On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:03 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: snip When you get the MODERATE mail you should replyAll and send the acknowledgement to the *-accept-* and

DeviceMap podling status page looks wrong

The DeviceMap podling status page [1] looks wrong to me. The News section is all but empty, and does not mention graduation. The entries under Incubation work items are all listed as having been completed on 2014-09-29. Is that really correct? [1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

Apart from the typo, I thought it was necessary for the VOTE thread to contain the full text of the proposal. This has been the case for (almost) all previous acceptance votes. I assume the text is required so the mail archives have a full record of what was actually voted on. The Wiki page

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lens into the Apache Incubator (earlier called Grill)

It looks like the version [1] of the Wiki page that was active at the time of the vote was: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LensProposal?rev=4 [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LensProposal?action=info For the record, the current contents of that version are appended below:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 17:15, Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si wrote: On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote: For many projects, especially library projects, the convenient binaries that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 15:30, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote: For many projects, especially library projects, the convenient binaries that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 14 October 2014 04:40, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: My search was on the key servers, by using pgp.mit.edu. The issue was that you, ironically, can't seem to search by key id. You need to prefix the (hex) id with 0x, for example:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 13 October 2014 17:11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: I suggest that the release manager and anyone else in the KEYS file should have added key fingerprints to their Apache profiles at https://id.apache.org/. This will have their PGP keys refreshed regularly under their

Re: svn commit: r1631099 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml

On 13 October 2014 03:28, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 12.10.2014 14:24, sebb wrote: On 11 October 2014 20:15, c...@apache.org wrote: Author: cos Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014 New Revision: 1631099 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099 Log: Updating Ignite website with initial

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 10:06, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: ...However votes on releases are more about the source release and binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On 12 October 2014 17:40, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think that's correct. Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this point we're debating interpretations on ALv2. A source distribution

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On 11 October 2014 19:30, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Netty's artifacts (its distribution) do not include a notice. Thus, They most

Re: svn commit: r1631099 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml

On 11 October 2014 20:15, c...@apache.org wrote: Author: cos Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014 New Revision: 1631099 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099 Log: Updating Ignite website with initial INFRA task dates Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 10 October 2014 18:59, Julian Hyde jh...@apache.org wrote: OK, let me clarify as sebb has asked so that the vote can proceed. Thanks very much, the new text is very good. The git commit to be voted upon: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-optiq/commit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 9 October 2014 20:51, Julian Hyde jh...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating). This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

/ Note: I also created https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/calcite which can be used for future release candidates. Julian On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:00 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 October 2014 20:51, Julian Hyde jh...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The Calcite community has voted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 10 October 2014 00:54, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:41 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 October 2014 21:14, Julian Hyde julianh...@gmail.com wrote: That information is all in the vote proposal: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-optiq

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.1-incubating release

On 28 September 2014 22:31, Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com wrote: So the project passed with 6 +1 votes (at least 3 of them binding from Romain Manni-Bucau, Justin Mclean and Daniel Kulp) and no -1 votes. See http://markmail.org/thread/2tnh43qokzj3hiwa and

Re: Code Donations and Committer Righs

On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex code bases written before my time): On

Re: svn commit: r1626885 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

On 22 September 2014 21:03, ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Author: ptgoetz Date: Mon Sep 22 20:03:55 2014 New Revision: 1626885 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626885 Log: set storm status to graduated Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1626888 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

On 22 September 2014 21:13, ptgo...@apache.org wrote: Author: ptgoetz Date: Mon Sep 22 20:13:24 2014 New Revision: 1626888 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626888 Log: set storm status to graduating Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml Modified:

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap Data 1.0.1 incubating

On 23 September 2014 17:11, Reza reza.nagh...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: This is the second device data release for DeviceMap. This release contains various new devices and generic device class additions: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP/fixforversion/12327454/ The project vote is

Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

On 23 September 2014 13:43, Stian Soiland-Reyes soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.uk wrote: I hereby present the Apache Incubator proposal for the project Taverna. Also available in rich text in the Taverna wiki (with more hyperlinks!):

Re: [PROPOSAL] Silk as new Incubator project

The user mailing list is not normally used for podlings. Only the developer and private lists are needed. On 19 September 2014 05:40, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote: I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new proposal is added to

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan srik...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE and NOTICE from IPMC. Special thanks to Sebb, Justin Mclean and Chris Douglas for helping us with this. A vote was held among

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 12:57, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 14 September 2014 13:39, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan srik...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE and NOTICE from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

is 5a9b96a74014718a3683c71875f2a020519eb587 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-falcon.git;a=commit;h=5a9b96a74014718a3683c71875f2a020519eb587 @Sebb, Thanks for pointing out the gap relating to vote expiry. What is the recommendation on this, I hope we can continue on the vote and keep it open as long

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan srik...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE and NOTICE from IPMC. Special thanks to Sebb, Justin Mclean and Chris Douglas for helping us with this. A vote was held among

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)

On 9 September 2014 23:47, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: Just a reminder... we have one more day for voting on Usergrid 1.0. The 72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum. A vote does not automatically fail it it takes longer than 72 hours. The vote can take as lng as it needs, though generally

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. Podling groups are defined in the asf-authorization file. I just

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 12 September 2014 00:12, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. That page

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Is the new process documented somewhere? On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau jacq...@apache.org wrote: As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves that release: Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the

Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION

On 3 September 2014 06:21, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote: On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote: Hi John I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any previous version up accidentally. This is

Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION

On 3 September 2014 16:26, Dave snoopd...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: So - just to confirm. If I look at apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the pom.xml files will read the version 1.0.0-rc5 and

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

On 11 August 2014 01:42, ti...@apache.org wrote: Author: tillw Date: Mon Aug 11 00:42:15 2014 New Revision: 1617185 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617185 Log: fix VXQuery incubation status page Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

On 11 August 2014 15:26, Till Westmann westm...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 Aug 2014, at 5:31, sebb wrote: On 11 August 2014 01:42, ti...@apache.org wrote: /section section id=Description titleDescription/title @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ section id=News titleNews/title ul

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

On 8 August 2014 18:12, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Hi Ted, On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know

Re: Reviewing license / notice and bundled software

On 17 July 2014 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: I guess it is about mvn dependency:tree analysis. No, that just shows the run-time dependencies. What's important is what is actually included (bundled) in the release archives (source and binary). The NOTICE and LICENSE

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

On 1 July 2014 05:16, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote: Hello folks Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards graduation[2] with 27 +1s. Of the 27, there were 5 IPMC votes from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Samza 0.7.0-incubating RC0

On 29 June 2014 01:02, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote: This is vote for Samza's 0.7.0 release. The PPMC vote passed 6x+1 6 (Martin, Jakob, Yan, Sriram, Zhijie, Garry): http://bit.ly/samza070releasevote The release candidate can be downloaded from here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP

On 16 June 2014 08:56, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-16 0:36 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net: On 06/13/2014 05:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Personally, I don't feel this is a big deal. The PMC size is appropriate given the overall project size. That

Re: [PROPOSAL] fleece as an incubator project

On 3 June 2014 22:19, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm think users@ can be used quickly. Is it really an issue? Incubation should be used to build up the developer community. Adding a user list may lead to fragmentation. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Falcon version 0.5-incubating

On 19 May 2014 22:09, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote: Hello folks, This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.5 incubating release. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's. Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/xtf Results thread: Apache mail is

Re: Incubator wiki access

Done On 11 May 2014 07:03, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I need write access to the incubator wiki to post the Twill report for the board. My username is GaryHelmling. My apologies if this message shows up twice. I originally sent a request during the mail outage, but

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

This reminds me: I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed board resolution will become the initial PMC? i.e. everyone listed in the resolution will become a PMC member (and committer). There was at least one recent graduation where this was not understood. They

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote: Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the graduation vote now. There was 1 issue: Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC Also I asked if the podling is aware that the initial

Re: Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?

On 7 April 2014 15:43, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote: I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then authorization. However it now occurs

Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?

I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then authorization. However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under

Graduation resolution does not allow for committers != PMC

There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial PMC. I think there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.2.0-incubating [rc1]

On 3 April 2014 06:04, Terence Yim cht...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This is to call for a vote for releasing twill-0.2.0-incubating. This is the second release for Twill. Vote on twill-dev: http://s.apache.org/ZJP Result on vote on twill-dev: http://s.apache.org/ksD The source tarball,

Re: Apache Flex FlexUnit LICENSE and NOTICE files

On 2 April 2014 02:44, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: HI, While Apache Flex is not an incubating project I think this discussion may be useful for incubating projects in a similar situation. We just getting together the first release of Apache Flex FlexUnit4. In Apache Flex

Re: Apache Flex FlexUnit LICENSE and NOTICE files

On 2 April 2014 12:03, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote: Hi, What do you mean by correct? The have the correct copyright and licence header. ie the Adobe files have a BSD license and are copyright Adobe. The LICENSE file must include the text - or provide a pointer to a local

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 31 March 2014 02:51, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote: Sebb, Thanks for taking a look at the release. Will use a newline for the git/svn revision next time around. Generated the hashes using openssl dgst -sha512 fileName. I'll change the format on the next release. The jar files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 31 March 2014 20:55, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:31 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The jar files are also distributions and must therefore have embedded NOTICE and LICENSE files, e.g. in the META-INF directory. Does this warrant a new RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote: I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). GIT source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.4.0-incubating-rc0(commit hash

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 30 March 2014 12:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth ss...@apache.org wrote: I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). GIT source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

On 29 March 2014 04:08, Sravya Tirukkovalur sra...@cloudera.com wrote: I cherry-picked the above commit (Sentry-119) into the 1.3.0 local release branch. Now the size of the artifact is 335K and it also has the required files like DISCLAMIER. I can go ahead and push the change if thats ok.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 22:45, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Marvin - The one example in that email thread (airavata), has a bunch of copyright notices in there NOTICE file: https://github.com/apache/airavata/blob/master/modules/distribution/airavata-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE Is

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 19:59, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part). Would appreciate a review. Thanks, James * NOTICE

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a question about where copyright information should go for our binary distribution. It seems that there's quite a bit of variation, as all projects

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

On 27 March 2014 00:52, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Where does the copyright information go in our case? What copyright information? Where was it originally? On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor jamestay

Re: Rearrange the Project List into multiple pages?

On 25 March 2014 06:14, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 01:14 PM, sebb wrote: On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: sebb: Not always, for example OpenOffice.org = ooo The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Can you update your notice file? [1] Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file. See http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple (et seq.) - John [1]:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Hi everyone, This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

=025a07c64d8f4a68d1c13b3022fe7375bbacfbb4 On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:31 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote: Can you update your notice file? [1] Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file. See http://www.apache.org/dev

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: [...] The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: https

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

to the source code control system. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

The 4.0.0 release has the same problems as the 3.0.0 release. Spurious files in source bundle Incorrect NOTICE file in binary bundle Source bundle does not agree with Git tag even after allowing for the spurious RAT files - some other files have differences from the tag. There are also some files

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending your time going through this. Here's the list of TODOs for us: 1) In the binary bundle: a) Fix the copy/paste error for the URL to SQLLine

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

, James [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending your time going through

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 23:48, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead of listing these in our LICENSE file. Since all licenses are either Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: HBase is ASF code surely? So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some attributions that relate to what you are bundling Yes, HBase is ASF

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 00:39, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote: I think I was confused by the http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps

Flagging up retired podlings on the website

At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that podlings.xml has been updated. Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others (Awf) don't. Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the podling has been retired. As well as

Re: Flagging up retired podlings on the website

On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that podlings.xml has been updated. Some podlings may include a note on their status page

Re: Rearrange the Project List into multiple pages?

On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings past and present in a single rather long page. It might be better to have individual pages

Re: Rearrange the Project List into multiple pages?

On 25 March 2014 01:18, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote: On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The Project List [1] currently shows full

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >