Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Looking forward for vote soon:) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling wrote: > > Hi, Guys: > > > > I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to > focus > > our design attention about RocketMQ. Also,

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling wrote: > Hi, Guys: > > I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to focus > our design attention about RocketMQ. Also, we have removed some mistakenly > imported dependency. Thanks! Based on your answers and

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Justin, I have added your name to the proposal. Bruce On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the > project is willing to have me that is :-) > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Justin, It's great to have you join the mentor team. Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’d

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Welcome Justin, that's really great:) Thanks. luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:07 PM, vongosling wrote: > Justin: > > welcome you join our mentor list ~ > > Best Regards, > > Von Gosling > > 2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Justin: welcome you join our mentor list ~ Best Regards, Von Gosling 2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the > project is willing to have me that is :-) > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the project is willing to have me that is :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, Guys: I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to focus our design attention about RocketMQ. Also, we have removed some mistakenly imported dependency. IMO, we are ready to accept contributions from other Apache projects  Thanks every apacher's advice and help, We

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ > communities to > > build cross platform clients? > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to > build cross platform clients? > - How can RocketMQ look to leverage Cassandra, Geode, Derby as backend > persistence stores?... It

RE: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Luke Han [mailto:luke...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 4:46 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal > > > My feeling reading RocketMQ is that its done in a &

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi John, That make sense, I agree the proposal should refine to less competitive but more focus on it's own design and architecture. Would love to see that section to be updated before vote:-) Thanks Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Luke, Von, thanks for the responses. Some more comments in line. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:48 AM vongosling wrote: > Hi, john: > > Thank you providing AsterixDB proposal, so as to help our complement our > proposal. Or to say, give us some advice for RocketMQ community

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, john: Thank you providing AsterixDB proposal, so as to help our complement our proposal. Or to say, give us some advice for RocketMQ community development roadmap~ Next, let me clarify some question we have talked about. 1. About ONS and RocketMQ relationship~ ONS is our Cloud Messaging

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

> My feeling reading RocketMQ is that its done in a "this > is why RocketMQ is better than" approach instead of "this is why RocketMQ > differs from them" approach. > - How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to > build cross platform clients? > - How can RocketMQ

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >... > I'm still a bit leary about the "relationship with other apache products" > section still. I'm not interested in seeing how a podling competes with > other projects Apache projects don't "compete" with

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Bruce, On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM Bruce Snyder wrote: > Hi John, > > Proposals for new ASF projects are offered to this list for constructive > feedback. I am happy to help steer the RocketMQ proposal and project using > your suggestions. > > First, as explained

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

mentors the project can succeed. Bruce, thanks for stepping up to help. Ross --- Twitter: @rgardler From: Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 5, 2016 9:21:47 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Ro

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi John, Proposals for new ASF projects are offered to this list for constructive feedback. I am happy to help steer the RocketMQ proposal and project using your suggestions. First, as explained previously in this discussion thread by Von Gosling, there was some company IP that was mistakenly

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Roman, The question about the contributors is a valid concern, and one that I raised myself with Von. This concern is hardly any different than what has been raised with many other project proposals to the Incubator over the years. One reason RocketMQ is interested in The Apache Way is to grow

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

This project is great with production usage from big giant in China, and open sourced a while. But yes, they are not connected with entire open source world yet, but I think now it's good time and ASF is the right place:-) RocketMQ is good sample for people who are willing to contribute from a

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi，John，Roman: I am vongosling. The creator of RocketMQ. Please let me, on behalf of the RocketMQ project, to talk about a period of history. May be it can explain why we wrote "RocketMQ has open source since 2012". Actually, RocketMQ is the third generation Distributed MOM product within

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:43 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about: >https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors > > It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of > code over the

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about: https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of code over the wall. Given that the composition of initial committers is all from Alibaba I hope their

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

+1 ! On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Cool. > > +1 > > > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > > > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache > > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable,

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Cool. +1 > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to use > message-oriented middleware, especially for processing

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi，John: 1. Our mentor Luke and Willem will rectify IPMC membership later. Thank you for reminding~ 2. About another mentioned product ONS( is the abbreviation for Open Notification Service)，which is maintained by Alibaba. Custom-built product for enterprise and cloud application.It

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Bruce, While Willem and Luke are both foundation members, neither is on the IPMC. That's easy enough to rectify if you can get them to send appropriate emails out requesting membership. I'm assuming the mailing lists will all be in the new format of list@rocketmq.i.a.o The RocketMQ github site

[DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to use message-oriented middleware, especially for processing large amounts of streaming data. The draft proposal can be found in the wiki at the following