Cool thanks. I'm not around to send it out but can tomorrow.
On Aug 13, 2016 15:44, "Josh Elser" wrote:
> Devaraj has signed off.
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>
>> Makes sense to me. I should be able to reach one of the mentors in
>> private channels (which I'll do in a moment), but am OK with having
Devaraj has signed off.
Josh Elser wrote:
Makes sense to me. I should be able to reach one of the mentors in
private channels (which I'll do in a moment), but am OK with having
Slider report next month (even one mentor sign-off isn't ideal, obviously).
John D. Ament wrote:
Thanks Eric. We're s
Makes sense to me. I should be able to reach one of the mentors in
private channels (which I'll do in a moment), but am OK with having
Slider report next month (even one mentor sign-off isn't ideal, obviously).
John D. Ament wrote:
Thanks Eric. We're still missing sign off on Slider. Billie
Thanks Eric. We're still missing sign off on Slider. Billie has pinged
the dev list a couple of times for mentors to sign off. i don't want to
wait too long. I think if we don't get sign off by tomorrow we should
submit the report, removing slider.
Thoughts?
John
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:11
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> We're still missing sign off from Slider and TrafficControl.
> TrafficControl's MLs don't seem to work yet, as a result this email includes
> the mentors directly.
>
Reviewed & signed off in the wiki just now.
https://wiki.apache.org/incuba
We're still missing sign off from Slider and TrafficControl.
TrafficControl's MLs don't seem to work yet, as a result this email
includes the mentors directly.
John
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Below is the current draft of the IPMC board report.
>
> We're sti
All,
Below is the current draft of the IPMC board report.
We're still missing sign off from: slider, systemml, toree, trafficcontrol
(added them to the to to help get sign off)
Please see below
Incubator PMC report for August 2016
The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projec
An internal/asf EE umbrella rather.
BatchEE got more exposure than most G shared projects so not super
motivating from my point of view.
What is the real issue staying self contained? Why should a project get 500
commits and 500 mails a month once stable - or what is the evaluation there?
Le 8 a
Given that Geronimo is nowadays more a kind of „EE commons“, it might fit in
there.
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 08.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
> Le 8 août 2016 21:04, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" a écrit :
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I've probably missed your ping. That's right that last mo
Le 8 août 2016 21:04, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" a écrit :
>
> Hi John,
>
> I've probably missed your ping. That's right that last month I didn't
sign for two reasons:
> 1. the report was empty
> 2. I don't see lot of activity on the BatchEE project:
> 2.1. There are some commits (
https://github.com/
Hi John,
I've probably missed your ping. That's right that last month I didn't
sign for two reasons:
1. the report was empty
2. I don't see lot of activity on the BatchEE project:
2.1. There are some commits
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-batchee/commits/master) but not
super active
2.
2016-08-08 17:57 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
> Romain,
>
> I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time. IMHO
> there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys.
>
>
Ok so this shouldn't be understood as a blocker to graduate.
> I'm pointing out the issue, as last mont
Romain,
I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time. IMHO
there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys.
I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off due to
lack of content in your report. The current report doesn't seem to be much
better.
Hi John,
Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions in
general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are issues with
the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining why and
what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you point
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg
wrote:
> John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments I did
> today.
>
>
Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and paste).
> The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also sending
> a m
John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments I did today.
The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also sending a
mail to the respective podling if you have feedback.
That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much easier.
txs and LieGrue,
st
All,
Below please find the board report.
One question I have - looking at past requests, there was a request for
comment on the Incubator's need for ECCN classification. I believe the
answer is "no, the IPMC have not raised the ECCN issues to VP Legal" but if
someone could confirm (Stain? Ted?)
Below is the current draft of the incubator board report. There's still a
few podlings who haven't reported.
Incubator PMC report for August 2016
The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
< narrative >
* C
18 matches
Mail list logo
