Cancelling RC5.
-Original Message-
From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:44 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 25/01/2013 Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
What about Apache OpenOffice?
I asked this question about Open Office, and I got, more or less, what
I typed in above.
On 25/01/2013 Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
What about Apache OpenOffice?
I asked this question about Open Office, and I got, more or less, what
I typed in above. I was puzzled, but there you have it. As I recall,
Roy made a remark like 'our
Hi Benson,
On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
Also,
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
On 1/24/13 7:23 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and
]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:52 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi
On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or future
podlings are aware of these fundamental items (since not everyone may
subscribe to legal-discuss).
Is this philosophy or policy also true for
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure that icons, gifs, jpgs are ok in both source and binary
dists. My mental model for source dists is whether the file can do any harm
and what the developer would do to verify its safety. For icons, gifs,
jpgs,
On 1/25/13 10:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
I am actually glad that it is discussed here so that other podlings or
future
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/25/13 10:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/25/13 8:28 AM, Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu wrote:
I am actually
Hi Guys,
On 1/25/13 10:29 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
[...snip...]
Sorry, that's really what I meant: to think about that file as to
whether it
can do any harm and how to determine its safety. I haven't looked at
the
file, but it sounds like you know it can do harm.
Chris et al,
I'm suffering from a mild crisis of responsibility here. I'm the VP of
the incubator. cTakes is planning to ship a release containing
something that, according to some lights, is inadmissible. If that
'something' is in *the (source) release*, I have serious qualms. If
it's merely in
or another ;-).
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Chris et al,
I'm suffering from a mild
Hey Benson,
I agree with Joe - not sure that your job as Incubator VP is to drop any
hammers.
The org is fine -- the ticket is opened as you said and no bits (binary or
source) have been shipped anywhere yet. Still discussing and talking. My
fear though is that the discussing and talking are
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks
-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
[mailto:general-return-39351-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
founders yell at us but we have no
On 25.01.2013 01:50, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the policy) and the much more
tangled question of models, which is what the JIRA is
@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We
just came to the conclusion
-
From: Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:16 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Cc: 'ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree:
The following jars, even
On 01/23/2013 09:24 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Masanz, James J.masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
Another question about the convenience binary -- can it include the models for
which the training data cannot be shared with the community?
My guess would be no, but it
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We just
came to the conclusion
that its not worth spending time on these issues, when we can instead
produce our own training
data which is compatible
@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:45 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com
wrote
: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, the OpenNLP did not have any discussion about it with legal. We
just came to the conclusion that its not worth spending time on these
issues, when we can
On 01/23/2013 05:20 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
As for the binaries, I am personally uncomfortable if you cannot even
create a private download of those sources accessible to community
members. However, I don't know how to translate my personal discomfort
into policy. I will endeavour to get
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
founders yell at us but we have no mechanism to channel those yells
into concise, unambiguous, documentation.
+1, I've felt that as well.
FWIW, I
On 01/22/2013 12:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Masanz, James J.masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly released. But
those*models* have been contributed to Apache cTAKES.
This is the primary mechanism for
] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On 01/22/2013 12:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Masanz, James J.masanz.ja...@mayo.edu
wrote:
Many of the models are derived from data that is not publicly
released. But those*models* have been contributed
-Original Message-
From: Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:16 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Cc: 'ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where is the source artifact? The artifact linked in the vote
thread appears to be your convenience binary release.
* There are compiled jars in the source tree. These need
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where is the source artifact? The artifact
@incubator.apache.org
[mailto:general-return-39326-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 9:51 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
The result of the VOTE
@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where is the source artifact? The artifact linked
21, 2013 9:51 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-
dev/201301.mbox/browser
The source artifact can
@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 9:51 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator
@incubator.apache.org
[mailto:general-return-39326-Masanz.James=
mayo@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 9:51 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
The result
21, 2013 7:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: ctakes-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
I have some issues with this release as it currently stands:
* Where is the result of the VOTE thread on the dev list?
* Where
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Masanz, James J.
masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
http://mail-archives.apache.org
, 2013 9:51 AM
To: 'general@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0-incubating on the dev list is at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-
dev/201301.mbox/browser
The source artifact can
:;]
On Behalf Of Matt Franklin
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:38 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Masanz, James J.
masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
The result of the VOTE for 3.0.0
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:47 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Masanz, James J.
masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
Regarding the comment about compiled jars in the source tree
Infra asks for a heads up for large artifacts:
http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be
worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external
data, so they can't be regenerated? Are they packaged here for
convenience, or is this the primary mechanism
Message-
From: general-return-39339-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org
[mailto:general-return-39339-Masanz.James=mayo@incubator.apache.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Douglas
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 4:36 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Infra asks for a heads up for large artifacts:
http://s.apache.org/5vz While these aren't over the limit, it might be
worth pinging them. To be clear, these models were trained on external
data, so they can't be regenerated
Hi, we just need one more Incubator PMC vote for cTAKES version 3.0.
Matt
---
From: Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu
Subject: Collecting IPMC votes
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
This will be our first release.
I will take a look before Monday at the latest.
On Friday, January 18, 2013, Coarr, Matt wrote:
Hi, we just need one more Incubator PMC vote for cTAKES version 3.0.
Matt
---
From: Chen, Pei pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu javascript:;
Subject: Collecting IPMC votes
Hi,
This is a call
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache cTAKES
3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
A vote is also held on the developer mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201301.mbox/browser
For more detailed
49 matches
Mail list logo
