On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>>> Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE
>>> that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE.
>
> That’s what I was objecting to. LICENSE is for licenses. If
On 3/7/16, 2:38 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote:
>>>Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE
>>> that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE.
>
>That’s what I was objecting to. LICENSE is for licenses. If notice is
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Steve Varnau <steve.var...@esgyn.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF
>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 2:10 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF
>
> HI,
>
> Current recommendation is not to include it [1] but i
HI,
Current recommendation is not to include it [1] but it’s not an error to do so.
Justin
1.http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF
>
> On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> >As I und
On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" wrote:
>As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is
>required, the NOTICE file is used.
Sorry, I should have been more clear. When I said "consider NOTICE" I
meant that any NOTICE for the non-ASF AL
As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is
required, the NOTICE file is used.
If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the same
Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file already contains
the appropriate license.
Section
On 3/7/16, 11:21 AM, "Steve Varnau" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>I’m compiling information for LICENSE file for a binary distribution. We
>(Trafodion) have a bundled dependency that is Apache-2.0 license, but not
>part of ASF. Do we need to call these out in the license file, or
Hi,
I’m compiling information for LICENSE file for a binary distribution. We
(Trafodion) have a bundled dependency that is Apache-2.0 license, but not
part of ASF. Do we need to call these out in the license file, or only
call out the things that are non-Apache-2.0?
Thanks,
--Steve
10 matches
Mail list logo