Hi,
> Signed off datasketches.
Thanks for that.
Justin
Signed off datasketches.
Kenn
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:32 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve submitted the incubator board report for this month.
>
> These podling reports are still missing sign off:
> - BatchEE
> - DataSketches
> - DLab
>
> They will be asked to report next month if they
Hi,
I’ve removed the repeated information, other than the sign off of Spot and a
comment from it’s mentor there was no difference between the 3 versions.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I should also add that it seems odd to me that the report field is just a
string and not and not a container of other fields since reports generally have
structure to them.
Ralph
> On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:25 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 13, 2019, at 4:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>
> On Apr 13, 2019, at 4:27 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:54 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>> Moving to a data format that makes a stronger distinction between content
>> and envelope might be nice. JSON would work if content is actually quoted
>> (don't bet on it). A
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 4:59 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> ...Within Infra at least, we use the philosophy of "Whimsy is great, but we
> must be able to perform our work without it."...
big +1 to that, many things have been fixed quickly by being able to
just do things directly on the agenda text file.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 6:27 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>...
> In this case, the text format predated the agenda tool. To date, a
> design constraint has been to continue to allow the text format be
> edited directly (and many of us still find that to be convenient at
> times).
>
One data point: yes,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 5:54 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Moving to a data format that makes a stronger distinction between content
> and envelope might be nice. JSON would work if content is actually quoted
> (don't bet on it). A directory would probably be better because the content
> of a file
Moving to a data format that makes a stronger distinction between content
and envelope might be nice. JSON would work if content is actually quoted
(don't bet on it). A directory would probably be better because the content
of a file can't break the meta-data in the directory. Something like a
> On Apr 13, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
>>
>> Sam Ruby wrote on 4/12/19 9:48 PM:
>>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
report,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 7:29 AM Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> Sam Ruby wrote on 4/12/19 9:48 PM:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> >>
> >> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> >> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
Sam Ruby wrote on 4/12/19 9:48 PM:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
>> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
>> row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
>
> Here is the
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
> row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
Here is the regular expression in question:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:19 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> > report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
> > row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
>
> It’s a bug in whimsey that cause the
Hi,
> 3) Somebody uses the whimsy board agenda tool to update the incubator
> report, and it dutifully strips out the previous report (up to said
> row of dashes) an inserts a new report.
It’s a bug in whimsey that cause the reports to be doubled I’ll check today and
fix in SVN if needed but
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:12 PM Myrle Krantz wrote:
>
> Hey incubator,
>
> It looks like part of the incubator report was "doubled". I've deleted the
> duplication, but I'd appreciate it if you'd check me to be sure I didn't
> accidentally delete something that belonged.
I still see
The Drill group just produced a report that I posted and signed off.
Is this too late to include?
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
I am going to post my Drill Shepherd review to the June2014 page in a
moment,
but I wanted to reflect here that Drill
I'll leave it to others to weigh in, but I'm fine with adding an
approved Drill report at this point in time.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
The Drill group just produced a report that I posted and signed off.
Is this too late to include?
On Sun,
yup. lets just go ahead and add it.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll leave it to others to weigh in, but I'm fine with adding an
approved Drill report at this point in time.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
I've gotten the DeviceMap Community to generate the following report. Sorry
for the delay.
Bertrand and I have been pretty busy. If any spare mentor-energy is
available, I'm sure we'd welcome the help with the community... We need to
move the community forward or consider the alternatives...
Are you going to enter this report on the wiki?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've gotten the DeviceMap Community to generate the following report. Sorry
for the delay.
Bertrand and I have been pretty busy. If any spare mentor-energy is
available,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:11 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you going to enter this report on the wiki?
I've taken the liberty of adding it.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Interesting, looks like I got to shepherd a graduated project ;) Henry, let me
know if you need any help with clearing out the situation.
Regards,
Cos
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:36AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Hi John,
Tajo already graduated to TLP.
Does the project miss some post graduation
I am going to post my Drill Shepherd review to the June2014 page in a moment,
but I wanted to reflect here that Drill project didn't reported after I have
nudged them on the dev@ list and Ted Dunning forwarded the reminder from the
board.
Cos
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:50AM, John D. Ament wrote:
Thanks Henry! In the meanwhile I have removed the project from june2014 wiki
report page.
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 02:56PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Cos, I will follow up with the post graduation steps that Tajo missed
On Sunday, June 8, 2014, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Cos, I will follow up with the post graduation steps that Tajo missed
On Sunday, June 8, 2014, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Interesting, looks like I got to shepherd a graduated project ;) Henry,
let me
know if you need any help with clearing out the situation.
Regards,
Cos
Hi,
Kalmut also didn't report after I emailed their dev list. Looks like they may
be in a bit of trouble, commit and mail list activity is very low level and RC3
of their last release (way back in October 2013) looks like it been left
hanging when it didn't get any votes by the IPMC. [1]
The
Henry,
After you do the graduation stuff, please check clutch at [1] (you may
need to rerun it)
John
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Cos, I will follow up with the post graduation steps that Tajo missed
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Kalmut also didn't report after I emailed their dev list. Looks like they
may be in a bit of trouble, commit and mail list activity is very low level
and RC3 of their last release (way back in October 2013) looks like
The Sentry report is in now. In fact, it was ready yesterday but the PPMC
member writing it did not have edit access. We will remedy that going
forward.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 7:50 AM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all
Don't forget, board reports
Hi John,
Tajo already graduated to TLP.
Does the project miss some post graduation task to be removed from
reporting schedule?
Thanks,
Henry
On Saturday, June 7, 2014, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Don't forget, board reports were due on June 04. Shepherd reports are
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Tajo already graduated to TLP.
Does the project miss some post graduation task to be removed from
reporting schedule?
Yes, it appears that podlings.xml still reflects Tajo as an active
podling. You must
On 4/22/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a reminder. The Board report will be going to the Board tomorrow. I
have read through them, although haven't yet marked them.
IMHO the iPMC needs to report on the heraldry reboot
- robert
IMHO the iPMC needs to report on the heraldry reboot
It would be best if it came from the Mentors, but I agree that something
needs to be there.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the review updates on the board reports.
Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time?
If an IPMC member has made a comment about your project and you have a
response, it would be best if you make your response below the comment,
On 16/02/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the review updates on the board reports.
Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time?
If an IPMC member has made a comment about your project and you have a
response, it would be best if
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 16/02/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the review updates on the board reports.
Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time?
If an IPMC member has made a comment about your project and you have a
Hi,
From the current month
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2007), take a look at
stdcxx, qpid, and nmaven.
Yoav
On 2/15/07, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what is the board report format. Justin left a remark that we did not follow
the template for Ivy.
Jim,
Finally, I have noted my intention to step down as PMC Chair, [...]
For what it is worth I though the light touch on Incubator was working
well. Our biggest problems have been those of expectations of applying
groups. The problem was one that affected general@ before us, so almost
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:39 PM
smoothly as anticipated. Nevertheless, the following projects
are being incubated as we speak:
[...]
o Tapestry:
A complete framework offering an alternative to JSP Velocity
scripting
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 03:47 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:39 PM
smoothly as anticipated. Nevertheless, the following projects
are being incubated as we speak:
[...]
o Tapestry:
A complete framework
On 7/15/03 3:39 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have suggested Nicola
as replacement.
As a member of Apache +1 to Nicola Ken chairing...
As his friend: -1
-Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
42 matches
Mail list logo
