Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread sebb
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: The SVN tag https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh in

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: For the java code we could set it to native.  We just never felt the need.  Since we need to be careful with our test files, we don't follow the automatic eol-style client setup as recommended.  AFAIK, all UIMA developers use Eclipse for their

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: The SVN tag https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh in

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: For the java code we could set it to native. We just never felt the need. Since we need to be careful with our test files, we don't follow the automatic eol-style client setup as

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Indeed, but see also: http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of Commons. Yes, and they don't work for us, as I pointed out earlier. There are also

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Thilo Goetz
Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Indeed, but see also: http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of Commons. Yes, and they don't work for us, as I pointed out earlier. There

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread sebb
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sebb wrote: The SVN tag https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 has lots of missing SVN

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread sebb
On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Indeed, but see also: http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] True. We try to avoid that ;-). Although most of us work on windows, we use unix style eol chars for all source code. That probably annoys the Mac Users... We have Mac users (and developers), and they haven't

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
Actually, there is a reverse issue It also makes it quite difficult for people to help with UIMA if they are also contributors to other projects that DO use the normal svn settings, Eclipse or not. For example, lets pretend for a moment that I'm a Windows user that uses eclipse and

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Indeed, but see also: http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config These conventions are generally used by Java projects, e.g. all of

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Thilo Goetz
Daniel Kulp wrote: Actually, there is a reverse issue It also makes it quite difficult for people to help with UIMA if they are also contributors to other projects that DO use the normal svn settings, Eclipse or not. For example, lets pretend for a moment that I'm a Windows user that

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: sebb wrote: On 11/04/2008, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Kulp wrote: On Friday 11 April 2008, Thilo Goetz wrote: Indeed, but see also: http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config These conventions are

UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-10 Thread sebb
The SVN tag https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh in http://people.apache.org/~sebb/SVNfixes/ This should probably be applied to trunk as well ...

Re: UIMA release - lots of missing SVN eol-style property settings

2008-04-10 Thread Thilo Goetz
sebb wrote: The SVN tag https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.2.2/uimaj-2.2.2-05 has lots of missing SVN eol-style settings. See the file uimaj-2.2.2-05.sh in http://people.apache.org/~sebb/SVNfixes/ This should probably be applied to trunk as well ...