Sorry about that. Fixed. Thanks for reviewing the output!
- Sam Ruby
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Adina Crainiceanu wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm a committer and PPMC member for Rya
>
> Adina
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
Alright, we'll have to look, I was hoping it was something obvious but
everything about your setup looks correct. And I should have known which
podling you were on - I think we even met at ACNA.
John
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:31 PM Adina Crainiceanu wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm a
John,
I'm a committer and PPMC member for Rya
Adina
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Adina,
>
> What podling are you on?
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:50 AM Adina Crainiceanu wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to mention that
Adina,
What podling are you on?
John
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 10:50 AM Adina Crainiceanu wrote:
> I just wanted to mention that in the "Incubator committers that are not on
> the IPMC and are not listed as a committer of any podling" I noticed
> multiple names (myself included
I just wanted to mention that in the "Incubator committers that are not on
the IPMC and are not listed as a committer of any podling" I noticed
multiple names (myself included - Adina Crainiceanu), who are committers on
active podlings and are still included in the list. For example, I am a
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 7:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb wrote:
>
>> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby
>> wrote:
On 11 June 2017 at 12:58, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb wrote:
>
>> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby
>> wrote:
>> >>
>>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb wrote:
> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby
> wrote:
> >>
> >> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all
>
On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
>> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
>
> Existing
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
Existing records that violate one or more assumptions:
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>>> Adding a new committer, PPMC member, or mentors should be a
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Gitbox has been updated, our ponymail installation has been updated, our
>> svn server will be updated soon. Other services will be updated
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> TL;DR: podling membership lists are being consolidated to LDAP, podling
> mentor lists remain in podlings.xml; the whimsy roster tool is being
> updated to become a one-stop-shop that can be used to update everything.
>
>
+1
> On May 26, 2017, at 3:17 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
> +100 to the following simplification:
> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
>
> - Carlos Santana
> @csantanapr
>
+100 to the following simplification:
For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors
are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers.
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On May 26, 2017, at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> For that reason,
TL;DR: podling membership lists are being consolidated to LDAP, podling
mentor lists remain in podlings.xml; the whimsy roster tool is being
updated to become a one-stop-shop that can be used to update everything.
For the impatient, a link:
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/trafodion
16 matches
Mail list logo