Open source projects typically solve a problem not addressed by
commercial vendors, even if the problem is just the price being charged
for the commercial solution. Yet we already have a very popular,
open-source J2EE container in JBoss.
Why must people's egos get in the way of common sense in
Quoting Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think there is strength in diversity - there are lots of models out
there and people can try them all.
True - to a certain degree. As almost everything in life. :-)
The history of the attempts, failures and otherwise is spread over many
public and
Open source projects typically solve a problem not addressed by
commercial vendors, even if the problem is just the price being charged
for the commercial solution. Yet we already have a very popular,
open-source J2EE container in JBoss.
Why must people's egos get in the way of common sense in
Jochen, you wrote:
Quoting Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, open process is at least as important as open software.
True. Apache has a totally open development process.
Agreed. But the ASF has just given a bad example on this (IMO).
Following the discussions on Geronimo in the last
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Quoting Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, open process is at least as important as open software.
Agreed. But the ASF has just given a bad example on this (IMO).
Following the discussions on Geronimo in the last days, my
impression is that a lot of decisions (in
Jack Frosch wrote:
How about swallowing your pride, giving up your aspirations of
controlling every popular, open-source, significant project, and just
embrace JBoss with support, MBean development, etc.?
I have spent the last two years embracing JBoss. It is a great
J2EE container and I
Hmmm...this type of reasoning always amuses me. Perhaps everyone should just
give up and join Microsoft.
Jack Frosch wrote:
Open source projects typically solve a problem not addressed by
commercial vendors, even if the problem is just the price being charged
for the commercial solution. Yet
Jochen, you wrote:
Quoting Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, open process is at least as important as open software.
Agreed. But the ASF has just given a bad example on this (IMO).
Following the discussions on Geronimo in the last days, my
impression is that a lot of decisions
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 10:08 AM, Jack Frosch wrote:
Open source projects typically solve a problem not addressed by
commercial vendors, even if the problem is just the price being
charged for the commercial solution. Yet we already have a very
popular, open-source J2EE container in
On Friday, Aug 8, 2003, at 04:29 Europe/Rome, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
I am happy to say that Brian Behlendorf's reply to Marc Fleury is
definitely what I wished here. I suggest to add this to the FAQ,
at least the words on we are still open.
Our of curiosity: where did you get the impression that
10 matches
Mail list logo
