Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-13 Thread Brian Fox
: incorrect terminology: lead developers We don't have a notion of fixed leadership at Apache.  Leadership is always welcome but it is determined by the will of the group in question at a given point in time, not based on one's official status.  We try to avoid status symbols in order to retain

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-12 Thread J Aaron Farr
On Tue 11 Aug 2009 11:28, Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com wrote: Thanks, Niclas. Very appropriate material. This very clearly draws a distinction between the terms leader (as I have been attempting to use it) and manager (by which I would never describe myself). IMO, successful projects

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-11 Thread Leo Simons
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Greg Browngkbr...@mac.com wrote: If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept* of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I am wrong). Correct! You missed the rationale in the summary, though :-) *

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-11 Thread David Crossley
Leo Simons wrote: Greg Brown wrote: If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept* of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I am wrong). Correct! You missed the rationale in the summary, though :-) * There is a goal that

incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread David Crossley
This is a general comment to everyone. It is finally triggered by this month's report from Pivot. There is no such concept at the ASF as leading developer. Yes i know that the Jira issue tracker is misleading, as it has an incorrect label on its interface: Project Lead

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
Apologies. I'm fired up about another discussion on the pivot-dev list and I'm letting it bleed over here. My assertion stands, though. I don't think that it is realistic to think that any non-trivial project can be effectively guided without some concept of leadership. Do others on this

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message From: Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:38:16 PM Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers Apologies. I'm fired up about another discussion on the pivot-dev list and I'm letting it bleed

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
We don't have a notion of fixed leadership at Apache. Leadership is always welcome but it is determined by the will of the group in question at a given point in time, not based on one's official status. We try to avoid status symbols in order to retain the fair balance of individual

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message From: Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:12:36 PM Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers We don't have a notion of fixed leadership at Apache. Leadership is always welcome

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
Schaefer wrote: - Original Message From: Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:12:36 PM Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers We don't have a notion of fixed leadership at Apache. Leadership is always welcome

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I have had a long chat with Greg, and I think I can somewhat understand his angle. Taken from Wikipedia; * Management involves power by position. * Leadership involves power by influence. * Managers administer; leaders innovate. * Managers ask how and when; leaders ask what and

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
Thanks, Niclas. Very appropriate material. This very clearly draws a distinction between the terms leader (as I have been attempting to use it) and manager (by which I would never describe myself). IMO, successful projects (including those at ASF) need leadership, not management. So

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Joe Schaefer
is little more than a glorified secretary in a smoothly operating Apache project. - Original Message From: Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:23:12 PM Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers OK, then I'll try

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
Traditionally the leadership comes from the membership of the Project Management Committee. People tend to take on a variety of roles within a project, some being more leader-follower type roles and others revolving around a small team that shares collective control over direction of the

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Greg Brown
If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept* of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I am wrong). In Pivot's status report, we were attempting to capture the concept, not the title. However, since it is a loaded term, it makes

Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers

2009-08-10 Thread Joe Schaefer
- Original Message From: Greg Brown gkbr...@mac.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:34:35 PM Subject: Re: incorrect terminology: lead developers Traditionally the leadership comes from the membership of the Project Management Committee