On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want,
but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee
you are not open enough for the distribution to consider your work...
But that's doesn't make
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want,
but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee
you
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want,
but
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want,
but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee
you are
I want to come back to the question about the dependency of a source release on
third-party tooling to be built.
There is some sort of principle involved when it comes to how others can build
the source easily, even if only to confirm that it builds and operates.
I would not want to see
Visual Studio
projects.
It might also be desirable to use Visual Studio Community Edition 2015, which
is now released and available.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 12:04
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: third party tooling
to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule.
rgds
jan i.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 12:04
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: third party tooling.
Hi.
We have recently (again) on different list discussed third
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for
widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on
Windows, but
jan i wrote:
I want to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule.
Corinthia is not required to be compatible with any particular platform.
Consider why this is desirable: one might provide open source code which only
works with a proprietary compiler, and then someone else might take
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Roman Shaposhnik wrote in reply to jan i:
I'm not aware of any policy like that. That said, I'd say the rule in my book
is very close to Linux packaging guidelines. Open source software *must*
be bootsrappable from
10 matches
Mail list logo
