There is some obvious compromises opportunity here. On releases, the iPMC
could decide, by internal convention, to let the involved three mentors
(when there are three involved members) be the relevant voice. iPMC members
could pledge to defer to the involved mentors unless they feel that there is
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On committers there is a legal / procedural clarification called for.
Perhaps I'm just dense, but I got the strong impression from the recent
email at members@ that there was much more flexibility possible
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
As a Member, and mentor, I take offense at being called a hawk,
lunatic, drive-by-shooter, process-obstructor, etc.
As a very freshly printed member of this PMC, there are, of course, some
limits on what
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Over on the Clerezza project I've been asked some advice about a legal
situation that I'm not 100% sure about, I'm pretty sure it's a
I'm sure I read the rules for this on some ASF web page only a week or
so ago ...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you just
add it to NOTICES
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Bruno Harbulot
bruno.harbu...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
On 18/08/2010 14:23, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 18/08/2010 13:59, Benson Margulies wrote:
My understanding is that for a 'category A' license like BSD you
I'm signing up to mentor. Do I edit the status page, or does a PPMC
member edit it?
Has anyone noticed that 'to mentor' and 'tormentor' are only one character off?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm signing up to mentor. Do I edit the status page, or does a PPMC
member edit it?
I normally need to that myself in the past.
Ah, so
What's the protocol when a committer leaves? Just edit them out of the
template? The mentor procedure talks about adds (but does not mention
the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template)
but does not mention deletes.
for graduation, based on my experience
back on CXF, I'm thinking that it would be good to trim the committer
list by at least removing people who actively aren't interested.
--benson
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Benson
passes as follows (* marks an IPMC vote):
+1 Benson Margulies *
+1 Jukka Zitting *
+1 Peter Firmstone
+1 Tom Hobbs
Thanks for voting! We still need one more IPMC vote to ratify this
decision. Benson promised to follow up on this with the IPMC.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
who
answered positively to an email on the subject. If everyone else
agrees with Luciano and Niclas I'll sit down.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Luciano,
A River committer
Noel,
Adding me to the PMC didn't add me to the ldap group so that I could
update the web site. I opened a ticket, but sebb points out that this
was an act of lese majesty, and the request needs to come from you.
Could you please comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2948 to make
The PMC chair is responsible for updating the permissions file - and
has the karma to do so.
Details are in the file header comments.
OK, I didn't know that.
Could you please comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2948 to make them happy?
--benson
Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Should have been s/general@/private@/?
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 17:16:24 -0400:
We are short one IPMC vote for a new River committer. She's been an
enthusiastic contributor.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jukka Zitting
I don't see anything explicit in here about relicensing from GPL to
ASL. Perhaps that was hashed out before I joined the PMC?
I'm +0 tending toward -1 without an explicit statement that the
copyright owners are known and on board with the license change.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Urs
+1, binding.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote:
Hi Dan,
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote:
I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache
Isis. If accepted, Isis
in the proposal.
Do you think that ain't enough?
Best
Urs
Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2010, 12:17 -0400 schrieb Benson Margulies:
I don't see anything explicit in here about relicensing from GPL to
ASL. Perhaps that was hashed out before I joined the PMC?
I'm +0 tending toward -1 without an explicit
There's a very satisfying buzz of activity at River these days. My
fellow mentors would like to see more actual commits, but I'm an
optimist.
This leads me to open this thread, more as a general exploration of
the PMC's view of the exit process than anything else.
Before I joined the incubator
Um, Well, maven still uses Codehaus JIRA that lacks the 'grant to
Apache' checkbox. Perhaps they separately negotiate iclas.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tim...
It seems to me that the pivotal problem here is the word connector. On
the one hand, it could mean almost anything to almost anyone. On the
other hand, it has a specific denotation in the vicinity of httpd.
Everything at Apache is in the vicinity of httpd.
I'd offer the following 'made-up'
ok, I fell off the main sequence.
On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, helium is the output product of a sun-like star, not the fuel. That
would be hydrogen.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
It seems
(+1 binding)
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
+1, binding
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new
mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be
Jukka's template for email to new committers tell them that they are
'already subscribed' to river-private. How do I do that? I would have
expected the new person to send in a subscription request and have the
moderator add them.
Could you please take care of 'pats' for me in that case this time?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jukka's template for email to new committers tell them
root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
karma to grant karma?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks, sorry about the out-of-order email responses.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
Done.
Craig
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
karma to grant karma
:
Generally the mentors will do this for their respective podlings.
On 02/09/2010, at 9:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with
karma to grant karma
with enough access (whatever their visibility) are not
terribly numerous. So I thought a message to general was the most
efficient way to put a lit-up bat in the sky to attract someone.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/09/2010, at 11:37 AM, Benson Margulies
There's this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html#Edit+your+project+status+report
.
And then the River folks got a reminder email with other instructions, as
per this message from Tom Hobbs.
No, that's not what I did. I followed the Confluence link in the Your
report is due email
I just created the first JIRA for ISIS infrastructure, but I have this
sinking feeling that I've gotten ahead of myself.
Should I have waited for Noel to formally announce the vote results, or does
Dan's email do the job?
be good to give us a
chance to do some of these things
On Sep 7, 2010 7:49 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I just created the first JIRA for ISIS infrastructure, but I have this
sinking feeling that I've gotten ahead of myself.
Should I have waited for Noel to formally announce
If any kind souls in the intersection of infra and incubator would care to
create some mailing lists (INFRA-2971) or set up a JIRA project (an internal
incubator matter according to the web page), I would be most grateful.
I'm hoping to start using the lists really soon to help the mentors
. If this is
not making people happy I'll retreat and retrench.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
If any kind souls in the intersection of infra and incubator would care
to
create
, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
If any kind souls in the intersection of infra and incubator would care
to
create some mailing lists (INFRA-2971) or set up a JIRA project (an
internal
incubator matter according to the web page), I would be most grateful.
I'm hoping to start
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 8:07 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS housewarming
Well, hmm. My
Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 8:14 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ISIS housewarming
Also, the mentor page specifically tells us to get assistance inside
of
the
incubator for JIRA
Well, we could neglect to tell anyone about the user list until we need it.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
Isis mentors:
Given we're in the same situation and are still being bootstrapped, should
we follow this advice, ie start off with a combined
It looks to me as if I asked Infra to list me as a mod under my apache email
alias, but of the actual 'from' that shows up is my gmail.
What do others do? Just list their working from, instead?
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox checked.
Only if they are large do you then have to contemplate asking for a CLA and
going through the clearance process. Or so I understand it.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:55 PM, David Lutterkort lut...@redhat.com wrote:
What is
much less effort for them than filing
a JIRA. And imposing less work on patch submitters is Good.
Benson Margulies wrote on Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 20:58:06 -0400:
All patches should be attached to JIRAs with the 'grant' checkbox
checked.
Only if they are large do you then have
a community more of less from scratch.
In other words, this message was doubly not intended to be interpreted
relative to the svn project, which is no longer a podling and was never
being bootstrapped from scratch in the incubator.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul
More Infra-Capable incubator PMC members, help?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patricia Shanahan p...@acm.org
Date: Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: Help with SVN access to River
To: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
Here's an example. Maybe there is something else
if the request is valid) to update the asf-authorization-template
file.
See:
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess
On 14 September 2010 14:48, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
More Infra-Capable incubator PMC members, help?
-- Forwarded message --
From
Does he have to be a commuter? Perhaps it's a non-abelian project?
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Andrew,
Great! Please add yourself to the wiki page as a commuter and we'd love a
helping hand!
Cheers,
Chris
Sent from
This seems a very workable approach - going through Jira for everything
is too much work on the part of the contributer.
On the one hand, I want to stand off and let any community make its own way
within the light constraints of the license policy. On the other hand, I am
honestly mystified
+1
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
All,
this vote will fail in three hours because nobody responds to it. Are
there any objections against this proposal? Or why is this vote
ignored?
Best regards,
Christian
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:06
+1. It's hypocrisy to tell podlings that chat is entirely intolerable
when plenty of running projects have them.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Glen Daniels g...@thoughtcraft.com wrote:
On 9/17/2010 9:41 AM, Urs Lerch wrote:
To cut a long story short: ALOIS is _not_ about a chat channel, it's
Here's a pretty silly question. Do podlings maintain a distinction
between PMC and committers, or is a podling PMC in fact the set of
people with commit access?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Folks,
Contrary to the doc on the incubator site, there's really no reason to
ask new people for three proposed user names. All you have to do is to
look at the global committer list and see if their first choice is
available, and then go around only in case of collision. Root does not
mind
Rafal,
Your message doesn't make sense to me. 'blind'? All the PPMC members
of the project should be on the hise-private mailing list, and should
be involved in the discussion about a proposed new committer. Once the
PPMC decides that they want to add a committer, a vote then has to run
on the
wrote:
On 25 September 2010 18:47, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Rafal,
Your message doesn't make sense to me. 'blind'? All the PPMC members
of the project should be on the hise-private mailing list, and should
be involved in the discussion about a proposed new committer. Once
community needs to grow
On 25 September 2010 18:47, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Rafal,
Your message doesn't make sense to me. 'blind'? All the PPMC members
of the project should be on the hise-private mailing list, and should
be involved in the discussion about
, do we need another
vote to fix this, or can someone just repair?
- Original Message
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, September 25, 2010 10:20:23 PM
Subject: Re: HISE community needs to grow
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:06 PM
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
+1
To more or less quote Joe S on this subject ...
The purpose of the incubation process is to support and supervise the
podling *behaving like a PMC*.
end more or less quote/
Even though PPMC actions are
Well, the last time I had to know, ASF SVN was not 1.6, and the only
merge technology was svnmerge.py, and make sure there's no Chinese in
your log comments :-)
It works. It doesn't work nearly so well as git for merging. CXF
developers routinely use git-svn for feature branches.
For all I know,
How do I fix the isis-dev mailing list so that message from JIRA don't
get moderated?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
River imported packages of code from the original Sun grant under the
name 'com.sun.whatever'.
How important is it to change that?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
employed by downstream developers. I think all new code should go elsewhere
if possible, but changing the existing com.sun.jini packages would be hard on
existing users.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010
I sense an iPhone at work here.
Would that be Omar Sharif?
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
For me this proposal means we should be aware of possibilities. There is no
intention of forcing collaboration on incubating projects. Each project
should
I use Jena at my day-job, so if there's a mentor shortage you can draft me.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to
accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the
CyberNeko is at least class B, since Tika uses it.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people
prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces.
Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
On 11/12/2010 5:47 PM, Benson Margulies
The author of Saxon is in a public feud with Maven. He likes to claim
that Maven publication violates his license.
If you go the route you quote, you have to publish it under your own
groupId, and not his, and not Apache's.
However, Someone published:
dependency
groupIdnet.sf.saxon/groupId
The resolver comes from here at Apache. No need to list it.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Paolo Castagna
castagna.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
I think this comes down to saxon as the issue
is this helpful?
It's resolved as far as I am concerned, I'm just answering questions.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
All,
Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance
process
It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator
I signed off.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've updated the report [1] for Isis. It still needs to be reviewed by our
mentors (Mark Struberg did so last time) .
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2010
On 15/11/2010 20:03, Noel J.
+1 to the proposal.
What makes me uneasy about this is that, notwithstanding the one
mentor vote, we are basically saying that the bar for ASF
committership can now be defined solely by a group of people who might
have no knowledge, as yet, of the Apache way in general and the way
Carroll
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Ross Gardler (rgardler .at. apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Bertrand Delacretaz (bdelacretaz .at. apache.org)
* Leo Simons (leosimons .at. apache.org)
* Dave Johnson (snoopdave .at. gmail.com)
* Benson Margulies (bimargulies .at. gmail.com
Simons (leosimons .at. apache.org)
* Dave Johnson (snoopdave .at. gmail.com)
* Benson Margulies (bimargulies .at. gmail.com)
=== Sponsoring Entity ===
Incubator PMC
--
rgard...@apache.org
@rgardler
-
To unsubscribe
+1 binding
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Andreas Kuckartz a.kucka...@ping.de wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
lets vote on the acceptance of the OpenNLP Project for incubation
at the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenNLPProposal
and a copy is
As a mentor of ISIS, I'd like to ask everyone to give them a little
breathing room on this subject.
Many TLP's in good standing have active IRC channels. These have very
closely related risks to open communities. Many TLPs in good standing
hold in-person meetups from time to time.
This is not to
community - isn't shuffled under the rug. IMO,
we should be messaging about how to do it well if it's desired, not whether
or not to do it at all.
Thanks,
--Glen
On 11/22/2010 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
As a mentor of ISIS, I'd like to ask everyone to give them a little
breathing room
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I am nothing if not chronically disingenuous.
My first concern in responding here is a process concern. As far as I
can tell
Instead of continuing this thread, I'd invite any of you to start
watching the isis dev list, and report in if you see evidence of a
failure to respect the core values that underly this argument.
Isis has several mentors. I am only one. The mentors, in general, felt
that the project had a strong
Some reading the thread on the ISIS podling's use of Skype may feel
that I am dismissing their opinions or disregarding an established
policy.
To do penance for any perceived slight, and to make it perfectly clear
that it is my intention to respect established policy, I am starting
this thread
I find myself, for the first time, in the position of being the go-to
mentor for a new launch. Last time around, the other mentors were so
enthusiastic that I didn't have to do anything except type up the
first three INFRA JIRAs.
I'm trying to get my head wrapped around the IP clearance process.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
The premise of this discussion is that running Apache projects are
*permitted* to engage in real-time communications, so long as they
take due care to avoid community problems of exclusion and closed
decision making.
I can't find anything in [1] that states any conditions in which a
CCLA won't do and an SGA is required instead.
The Jena podling has asked me. Their situation is that an HP copyright
is thought to cover all the 'corporate' code, and they wonder if there
is any reason for them to chase an SGA on
the software grant
plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on
Apache projects, whether on their own time or company time.
So, if a CCLA is filed naming the software, a separate SGA is *not*
necessary.
Craig
On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote
Well, this is going to depend on how the copyrights work, I guess. If
it's clear that HP owns the copyright (all the HP people were working
for hire), then a CCLA from HP will cover it. However, IANTL.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I made an edit to the incubator site. What do you think of it?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
If you really feel that there
It would be very much appreciated if we could at least get the mailing
lists going for OpenNLP.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3233
--benson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I agree with Joe.
a) I've been involved in a number of such releases.
b) A podling can be evaluated for license compatibility like any
external dependency -- but I don't see how a podling has any business
making any releases before their IP clearance is pretty darn clear.
--benson
On Wed, Dec
Just about the most important thing a podling does is release. We
shouldn't need mechanisms to ease the use of unreleased podling code.
In my opinion.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think
that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've
delivered to podlings is not right.
I'd like to float my logic here and see how it gets shot at.
As Leo pointed out, the CCLA has a specific section for granting
Sometimes I know that the very busy root@ batches up account requests.
My OpenNLP pod-people wonder when they might get their accounts. I've
counselled patience.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
is not covered by an ICLA. A grant
is needed.
Craig
On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I've been thinking about Leo's email of the other day, and I think
that my edit to the mentor page is not right and some guidance I've
delivered to podlings is not right.
I'd like
I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial
status page going?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org wrote:
Yay!! Thank you. I've been absolutely rammed with only phone access for the
vast majority of time. Thank you for taking the job on (I
To my pleasant surprise, Sam replied on legal-discuss that an icla is
just fine -- though it's better if the person signing it actually
reads it first. I plan to make some more tweaks to the web site to
places that seem to say the opposite.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Benson Margulies
The River podling is cleaning up the list in preparation for (I hope)
a graduation soon.
Do they need to maintain 'emeritus' status across the graduation
boundary? They'd rather not. They have a long list of long-gone
people.
-
Empire has a mentor shortage, and River is about done with me. So I
guess I'll insert myself there.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
conventional cross-post, or that the incubator PMC wants
to see the draft board resolution. If so, just let me know, and I'll
make the necessary repairs.
Otherwise, I invite your votes.
--benson margulies
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Benson,
Not sure that it's a strict rule, but seeing the board resolution is what I'd
like to see as an IPMC member if I'm VOTE'ing on something.
Cheers,
Chris
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC,
The River
It seems like we've run out of voters for River, and all of them are
+1. How does this get formalized?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Looks like the answer is 9 +1 votes and nothing else.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
+1 to graduation and congrats!
Minor typo below...
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...maintenance
, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems like we've run out of voters for River, and all of them are
+1. How does this get formalized?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
non-binding, assuming that http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
is up to date.
BInding +1:
Benson Margulies (Mentor)
Chris Mattmann
Mohammed Nour El-Din
Bertrand Delacretaz
Jukka Zitting (Mentor)
Niclas Hedhman (Mentor)
Alan D
Did I misread the web page or is it out of date?
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Eight binding +1 votes, no 0 or -1 vote, and one decorative
non-binding, assuming that http
I'm sure that it isn't a policy. It's a good practice avoiding
Subversion bloat. There are certainly Apache projects who still have a
trunk-load of checked-in jars.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Please point me at a URL where it says this is Apache policy.
1 - 100 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
