Re: Oversight of non-mailinglist-ful podlings

2012-01-04 Thread sebb
On 4 January 2012 19:45, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 14:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Someone created >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/devicemap/site/trunk/?p=1227271 >> before the devicemap-commits@ list was created.  I expect no list >> received a commit mail about it.

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 1

2012-01-06 Thread sebb
On 6 January 2012 19:21, Eric Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.  This will be the first incubator > release for Chukwa. > > The source tarball artifact is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/ Agrees with the SVN tag, which is good. Sig and

Re: [VOTE] Recommend graduating Apache Bean-Validation (BVAL) as a TLP

2012-01-08 Thread sebb
On 8 January 2012 21:04, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Dear IPMC, dear Community! > > The Apache Bean-Validation project provides an ALv2 licensed implementation > of the JSR-303 Bean Validation Specification and would like to start a VOTE > on graduating as a TLP. > The podling is in the incubator

Re: Small but otherwise happy podlings

2012-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2012 04:41, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> This has been the subject of prior conversations, but I'm opening a >> thread in some hope of reaching a definitive resolution. >> Some of our non-graduating podlings have a common prob

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

2012-01-09 Thread sebb
age- >>From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfrank...@mitre.org] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM >>To: general@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating >> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: sebb [mail

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 2

2012-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2012 19:40, Eric Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.  This will be the first incubator > release for Chukwa. > > The source tarball artifact is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc2/ > > Documents are available at: > > http://peopl

Re: Podling rename, vote needed?

2012-01-09 Thread sebb
On 10 January 2012 02:29, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > [to: general@, cc: callback-dev@] > > As discussed during the Callback proposal phase [1], the podling > community wasn't too certain about the "Callback" name and thus after > some discussion they recently voted [2] on adopting the new name

Re: Podling rename, vote needed?

2012-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10 January 2012 10:13, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >> On a related matter, how is the rename being handled for the various >> incubator data files, web-pages, mailing lists etc.? > > We're still working on that

Re: [VOTE] Chukwa 0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

2012-01-10 Thread sebb
On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang wrote: > Hi all, > > Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release.  This will be the first incubator > release for Chukwa. > > The source tarball artifact is available at: > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/ > > Documents are available at: > > http://peop

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-10 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2012 23:52, Brock Noland wrote: > This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating. > > It fixes the following issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316359 > > *** Please download, test and vote by [3 work

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote: > +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine. > > It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here > (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for > other projects. Typically you want to have a

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine. >>> >>> It's a bit odd to me that there are t

Re: January 2012 Incubator Board Report

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > A number of substantive issues came up during the past month. > > First, and although it was raised on the private list and therefore details > won't be part of the public report, we advise the Board that there is > substantial discussion regardin

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 18:44, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb wrote: >>>> On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> In t

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +0000, sebb wrote: >> > How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then >> > manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is >> > better/easier? >> &

Re: Checking release archive against VCS tag (was [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating)

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 12:35, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +0000, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote: >> >> > How is this most easily accompl

Recent committers added to podlings were not added to incubator group

2012-01-16 Thread sebb
Entries in podling bloodhound not in incubator group: gmj,hwright Entries in podling giraph not in incubator group: ssc Entries in podling gora not in incubator group: ferdy Command to update incubator group: modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=ferdy,gmj,hwright,ssc Please ensure when adding exi

Re: Thoughts about reporting (was: Re: [RT] Community over policy...)

2012-01-16 Thread sebb
On 17 January 2012 01:06, Leo Simons wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> We may also have semantic gaps.  Leo's [RT] may be presuming that a >> podling's "board report"[sic] is merely a bureaucratic requirement. > > > Hmm :-) > > And so the threads collide... > > ...I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.7-incubating

2012-01-23 Thread sebb
On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being > versioned as 0.7-incubating. > > We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3 > binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating

2012-01-24 Thread sebb
On 23 January 2012 06:20, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Lucene.Net 2.9.4g is ready for release. > > > > This is very similar to our release at the end of November, however we have > used > generics where appropriate to give it a better feel for .Net developers. > > > > SVN Tag: > ht

Re: Creation of Gora TLP and discharge of responsibilities on Incubator PMC

2012-01-28 Thread sebb
On 27 January 2012 18:37, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Guys, > > So, the board passed the Gora TLP resolution and now I'm in the process of > helping > migrate the Gora project to its TLP status. I've created an issue here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4368 > > To track

Re: [VOTE Result] Release Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4g incubating

2012-01-28 Thread sebb
On 28 January 2012 20:53, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > This vote passes with the required 3 +1's from Sebb, Ant, and Stefan. Thank > you guys for taking the time to review and approve this release, ~Prescott> > Date: I did not vote +1. I did not vote at all. Fri, 27 Jan

Re: Q: including notice for binary release of artifacts that are brought in via Maven?

2012-01-31 Thread sebb
On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>  Great, thanks.  Using this method, I get a file layout similar to: >>  giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz >>      NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2) >>      LICENSE (without

Re: Q: including notice for binary release of artifacts that are brought in via Maven?

2012-01-31 Thread sebb
ry to make it obvious. > -jg > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >>>>  Great, thanks.  Using this method,

Re: Fwd: mentoring individuals as well as projects

2012-02-01 Thread sebb
On 1 February 2012 15:54, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:54:18PM +, Ross Gardler wrote: >> My point is that when we help guide individuals who demonstrate a >> willingness to contribute those individuals often grow in capacity. > > There was a memorable post on another ASF

Re: Reviewing a Release

2012-02-04 Thread sebb
On 4 February 2012 11:55, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi folks! > > I've quickly collected a page of things to check before casting your vote for > a staged release. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/Reviewing+a+Release > > This was done from the back of my head, thus I've may

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
As I read it, http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions only applies to files with no creative content. AFAICT this is not the case here. On 6 February 2012 15:03, Ross Gardler wrote: > Perfect - thanks Ate > > On 6 February 2012 14:54, Ate Douma wrote: >> On 02/06/2012 03:30

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 15:29, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 6 February 2012 15:20, sebb wrote: >> As I read it, http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions >> only applies to files with no creative content. >> >> AFAICT this is not the case here. > > Can

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 16:30, ant elder wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Ate Douma wrote: >> On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma  wrote: On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM,

Re: Licence headers in template files

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 19:38, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:18, Ross Gardler wrote: >> Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. >> On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, "se

Re: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating

2012-02-07 Thread sebb
On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote: > RAT report on the source distro looks good. > > None  of the artifacts (zip or jar files) seem to have the incubator > disclaimer notice. > > A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and

Re: Mad signing and checksumming (Was: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating)

2012-02-08 Thread sebb
On 8 February 2012 10:41, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating >> >> AFAIK, this is a known bu

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2012 16:32, Marcel Offermans wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 17:10 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> >>> Hi Ross, >>> >>> Sorry, I didn't see a mail from Noel, but he's already the chair. >>> If this VOTE isn't successful, then

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

2012-02-09 Thread sebb
On 9 February 2012 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > On Feb 9, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > >> On 02/09/2012 05:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

2012-02-12 Thread sebb
On 8 February 2012 13:03, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The Jena PPMC has voted to release > >  Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating > > and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for > this release. > > == Overview > > This will be the second incubator release for by Jena; it's th

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-13 Thread sebb
On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version > 1.4.1-incubating. > > We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for > additional two. > > *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** > > Dev li

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 14 February 2012 16:21, Joe Schaefer wrote: > So I realize that I don't have enough time myself > to convert the incubator site's content to markdown > even tho there are scripts to automate that process. > Instead let me offer a different idea- to keep the > existing build system but superimpo

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
ng the main site to the CMS- a simple approach >> >>> >>>  From: sebb >>> To: general@incubator.apache.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:57 AM >>> Subject: Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach >>> >

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 14 February 2012 18:09, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: sebb >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:04 PM >> Subject: Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple a

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 14 February 2012 22:47, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: Joe Schaefer >> To: sebb ; "general@incubator.apache.org" >> >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:47 PM >> Subject: Re: migrating the main sit

Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 14 February 2012 22:19, wrote: > Author: joes > Date: Tue Feb 14 22:19:04 2012 > New Revision: 1244240 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244240&view=rev > Log: > support CMS builds.  All that's left to do is to rename > site-author/ content/ and to ensure all the content in > site-pub

Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 01:30, Joe Schaefer wrote: > The documentation is in the caller script sebb. Yes, but how can one find the calling script from the build script? BTW, if the script is run at the moment, it will cause problems. > Will fix > the ant invocation. > > > > -

Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 01:49, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: sebb >> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer >> Cc: >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:40 PM >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/tru

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating (RC4)

2012-02-14 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 01:55, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Dear Incubator PMC members, > > We'd like to ask your approval to release the Hama RC4 as Apache Hama > 0.4.0-incubating. This RC4 has passed the Hama PMC vote as follows (*, > ** marks an PMC, IPMC vote) : > > +1 Thomas Jungblut * > +1 Apurv Verm

Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh

2012-02-15 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 02:18, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > > - Original Message - >> From: sebb >> To: Joe Schaefer >> Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:11 PM >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r124

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

2012-02-15 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 07:42, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho > wrote: >> Hi Roman, >> we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you >> point me to some written docs? > > AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apach

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 15:44, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:59 AM, sebb wrote: >> The first thing to do is to decide if the following directory tree can >> be junked: >> >> site-publish/projects/altrmi/ >> >> I suspect it c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hama 0.4-incubating RC6

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 20 February 2012 13:54, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi, > > I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes > the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. > > Signing KEYS: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/files/KEYS > Artifacts: htt

Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/public/trunk/build_cms.sh

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 15 February 2012 13:15, Joe Schaefer wrote: > - Original Message - > >> From: sebb >> To: Joe Schaefer >> Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org" >> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:59 AM >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1244240 - /incubator/

Re: svn commit: r1244915 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 16 February 2012 10:12, wrote: > Author: francisdb > Date: Thu Feb 16 10:12:31 2012 > New Revision: 1244915 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244915&view=rev > Log: > added redirect for empire-db > > Modified: >    incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess That won't last - you n

Re: migrating the main site to the CMS- a simple approach

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 21 February 2012 02:31, sebb wrote: > On 15 February 2012 15:44, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:59 AM, sebb wrote: >>> The first thing to do is to decide if the following directory tree can >>> be junked: >>> >&g

Re: svn commit: r1291363 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/isis.xml

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 20 February 2012 16:52, wrote: > Author: danhaywood > Date: Mon Feb 20 16:52:18 2012 > New Revision: 1291363 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291363&view=rev > Log: > Updating Isis project summary after 0.2.0-incubating release > > Modified: >    incubator/public/trunk/site-author/pr

Re: svn commit: r1291238 - in /incubator/public/trunk/site-publish: index.html projects/awf.html projects/index.html

2012-02-20 Thread sebb
On 20 February 2012 13:07, wrote: > Author: elecharny > Date: Mon Feb 20 13:07:13 2012 > New Revision: 1291238 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1291238&view=rev > Log: > Updated the site to reflect the deft->awf renaming > > Added: >    incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/awf.ht

Re: Incubator site modifcations question

2012-02-21 Thread sebb
On 21 February 2012 09:31, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > yesterday I tried to update the incubator web site to reflect the renaming > of the deft project to AWF. To some extent, it was successful : > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ points to AWF > > However, the main site at http:/

Re: Incubator site modifcations question

2012-02-21 Thread sebb
On 21 February 2012 13:16, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 2/21/12 2:09 PM, sebb a écrit : > >> On 21 February 2012 09:31, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> yesterday I tried to update the incubator web site to reflect the >>>

[Site] Migration to svnpubsub / CMS

2012-02-21 Thread sebb
I think the site source files and build.xml are now in good shape. The Ant build file can recreate the full output directory tree in any required directory: ant [-Ddocs.dest=target-dir] [default is site-publish] The source tree can also be overridden by using a command of the form: ant -Ddocs.

Re: svn commit: r1244915 - /incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/.htaccess

2012-02-21 Thread sebb
On 21 February 2012 03:15, sebb wrote: > On 16 February 2012 10:12,   wrote: >> Author: francisdb >> Date: Thu Feb 16 10:12:31 2012 >> New Revision: 1244915 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1244915&view=rev >> Log: >> added redirect for

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 15:50, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The Jena PPMC has voted to release > >  Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating > > and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for > this release. > > == Major changes since RC-2 > > + Distribution has it's own content for NOTIC

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 18:58, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:32 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 23 February 2012 15:50, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> The Jena PPMC has voted to release >>> >>>  Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 20:11, Damian Steer wrote: > > On 23 Feb 2012, at 18:32, sebb wrote: > >>> == Proposed dist/ area: >>> >>> The following will be added to the existing distribution area: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~andy/dist-jena-tdb

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 19:42, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > On Feb 23, 2012, at 12:13 PM, sebb wrote: > >>> >>> On the contrary, they are plenty useful to Maven. They are used by its >>> assembly plugin to allow for transitive dependencies

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 20:44, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 23/02/12 18:32, sebb wrote: > > Hi sebb, > > Thanks for the review, > > >>> == Staging repository >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-001/ >> >> Th

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-23 Thread sebb
On 23 February 2012 21:21, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:15 PM, sebb wrote: > >>> >>> Yep, I'm not an expert, but we push tar.gz and .zip distributions in OODT, >>> and >>> then we have specialized assemb

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24 February 2012 12:11, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >>> We distribute through maven but also many of our users are not >>> experienced >>> developers but students, including ones new to java. >>> >>> To make it as easy as possible for this category of user, we ship a >>> distribution which is the co

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-24 Thread sebb
On 24 February 2012 22:00, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 24/02/12 14:04, sebb wrote: >>> >>> The directory structures align: >>> >>> /download/jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating >>> /source-release/jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating >> >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

2012-02-26 Thread sebb
On 26 February 2012 15:41, Andy Seaborne wrote: > sebb, > > What I'm trying to get to at the moment is something that enables a release > of TDB and we can apply to next module. > > jena is a number of modules, we have released 3 (5 actually - 2 are the > parent POM and

Re: [VOTE] RAT Ready To Graduate As Apache Creadur Top Level Project

2012-02-26 Thread sebb
On 26 February 2012 16:03, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's > willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to > approve graduation. So, here it is :-) > > See [2] for a draft of the charter, exclud

Re: [ATTN] Incubator releases distribution area reminder!

2012-02-26 Thread sebb
On 26 February 2012 18:39, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Andy Seaborne wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:37:49 +: >> 3/ >> >> [[ >> Often symbolic links are created from the root of the project >> distribution directory to the latest version of each release. This >> allows scripts or users to easily l

Re: [ATTN] Incubator releases distribution area reminder!

2012-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27 February 2012 03:01, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > sebb wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:17:15 +: >> On 26 February 2012 18:39, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > Andy Seaborne wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 17:37:49 +: >> >> 3/ >> >> >> >> [[ &

Re: CMS! Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on incubator-site-staging

2012-03-01 Thread sebb
On 1 March 2012 14:39, Joe Schaefer wrote: > OK http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ is up. > All we need to do at this point is migrate site-author/ > to content/ and flip on svnpubsub for production. > > Any takers? OK, I'm happy to do the SVN and build.xml changes. Just to confirm what needs

Re: CMS! Re: buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on incubator-site-staging

2012-03-01 Thread sebb
On 1 March 2012 20:44, Joe Schaefer wrote: > +1, thanks sebb! [Top -posting?] > > >>____ >> From: sebb >>To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer >>Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 3:42 PM >>Subject: Re: CMS! Re: buildbot

[SITE] site-author renamed to content

2012-03-01 Thread sebb
In preparation for moving the Incubator site to svnpubsub, the SVN source for the site, i.e. site-author/, has been renamed to content/ The site Ant build and clutch still work as before. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubsc

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

2012-03-09 Thread sebb
On 9 March 2012 05:42, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 12:43:47AM +0200, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Doug Cutting >> wrote: >> > >> > > On 03/07/2012 11:31 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> > > > N

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.3.0-incubating

2012-03-12 Thread sebb
On 11 March 2012 03:10, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version > 0.3.0-incubating. > > *** Please download, test, and vote by Friday, March 16 > > Note that we are voting on the source (tag): release-0.3.0-incubating-RC0 > > Source tarball, checksu

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-26 Thread sebb
On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe wrote: > Hello Incubator IPMC, > > Please vote on whether or not to release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0. > This RC has passed our podling vote and awaits your inspection. > You can find the artifact at > http://people.apache.org/~shinichiro/apache-manifold

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0

2012-03-26 Thread sebb
On 26 March 2012 16:20, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Karl Wright wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 26 March 2012 02:38, Shinichiro Abe wrote: >>>> Hello Incubator IPMC, >>>> >>>> P

Re: Simplifying podling infra

2012-03-26 Thread sebb
On 26 March 2012 17:51, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> For projects who have settled on a permanent >> name, some things might be better.  But this >> does not make life easier for the project nor >> infra when our incubator-related infra de

Re: [all] Size of releases

2012-03-28 Thread sebb
On 28 March 2012 17:19, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > today the size of releases were discussed. If your podling release > exceeds 1 GB of (total) size, please inform infra. They probably need > to coordinate such releases to prevent problems with our mirrors. And please remember to rem

Re: Binary dependencies in source releases (Was: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.5-incubating, RC0)

2012-03-29 Thread sebb
On 29 March 2012 15:09, Marcel Offermans wrote: > On Mar 29, 2012, at 15:07 , Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jukka Zitting >> wrote: >>> ...It seems like Roy is much more categorical about this. Assuming I >>> understand his point correctly, *no* binary dependenci

Re: Multi-licensed dependencies

2012-03-29 Thread sebb
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> Personally, I agree with Roy.  Perhaps it might seem a little odd to include >> the text of e.g. the GPLv2 in one of our LICENSE files (alongside a more >> permissive license), but the key here

Re: Multi-licensed dependencies

2012-03-30 Thread sebb
On 30 March 2012 17:38, Leo Simons wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >>>> Personally, I agree with Roy.  Perhaps it might seem a little

Re: Question about downloading binaries

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
o allow svn access as part >>>> of a project's build process? >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Daniel Shahaf >>>> wrote: >>>> > 'svn patch' exists in 1.7

Re: Question about downloading binaries

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
st >> ship modified sources files and drop them into place in fetched copies >> of their releases, and build the results. >> > > I'd love to acheive closure, believe me, and there are open tickets to > this end, but until we do it I don't believe it is wise or feasible t

Re: Podling website cleanup permissions

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
On 2 April 2012 20:27, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > I'm having difficulty following through on this directive: > >  http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#transfer > >  3. Delete the podling website from /www/incubator.apache.org on > people.apache.org. > > I can't rm -rf /www/

Re: Question about downloading binaries

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
#x27;d could imagine some >>> objections based on recent email. >>> >>> In the longer term, if ManifoldCF really wants to include an "XML >>> parser with a difference", then it's certainly possible for you to >>> maintain and release a fo

Re: Question about downloading binaries

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
r behaviour is not identical.] Can you be certain that the non-standard jars will not interfere with the standard jars? > > Karl > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 2 April 2012 22:45, Karl Wright wrote: >>> I think the bigger picture here is that re

Re: Question about downloading binaries

2012-04-02 Thread sebb
On 3 April 2012 00:48, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > [dropped infrastructure@] > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 AM, sebb wrote: >> Can you be certain that the non-standard jars will not interfere with >> the standard jars? > > ManifoldCF is a standalone applicat

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating

2012-04-04 Thread sebb
On 4 April 2012 02:09, Brock Noland wrote: > This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. > > It fixes the following issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292&version=12316360 > > *** Please download, test and vote by [3 workin

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating

2012-04-04 Thread sebb
On 4 April 2012 15:33, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Brock Noland wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:33 AM, sebb wrote: >>>> The tag to be voted upon: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.9.0-incubating/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC4)

2012-04-08 Thread sebb
On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos > (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release for > Mesos in Apache, but the fifth release candidate. > > Vote thread on mesos-...@incubator.apache.org: > > ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC4)

2012-04-10 Thread sebb
On 8 April 2012 23:48, Benjamin Hindman wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thanks so much for taking a look! Responses inline. > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:22 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 7 April 2012 02:59, Benjamin Hindman wrote: >> > Please vote on releasing the fo

Re: Subscribe Apache VCL

2012-04-23 Thread sebb
On 21 April 2012 16:24, LEE CL wrote: > > > > > Hi,  i want to subscribe Apache VCL mailing list for my final year project. > for solving my problem on VCL configuration.     Lee http://lmgtfy.com/?q=apache+VCL+mailing+list - T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airavata 0.2-incubating

2012-05-01 Thread sebb
On 1 May 2012 14:54, Suresh Marru wrote: > This is the first incubator release for Apache Airavata, with the artifacts > being versioned as 0.2-incubating. > > We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we have > received 2 binding Mentors/IPMC +1 votes during the release vot

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating

2012-05-07 Thread sebb
On 7 May 2012 10:38, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > I've created a 1.0.0-RC1-incubating release, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > SVN source tag (r1333797): > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/syncope/tags/syncope-1.0.0-RC1-incubating/ There must be an Incubator DISCLAI

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating

2012-05-08 Thread sebb
On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > Hi Sebb, > you can find my replies embedded below. > > I am going to send a [CANCEL] reply to this thread, remove Nexus staging > repo and SVN tag, fix everything and start again the release process for > 1.0.0-RC1-incub

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating

2012-05-08 Thread sebb
On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Comments inline > > Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit : >> >> On 8 May 2012 09:13, Francesco Chicchiriccò  wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sebb, >>> you can find my replies embedded below. >>> >>>

Re: Graduation tasks : (was INFRA-4767)

2012-05-08 Thread sebb
On 8 May 2012 23:22, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Seeing INFRA-4767 ... > >> Need to update the website >> >> 1) List of VPs >> Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at: >> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html >> >> using the CMS application, or update: >> >> >> https

Re: [VOTE] Apache Syncope 1.0.0-RC1-incubating

2012-05-09 Thread sebb
On 9 May 2012 07:42, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 5/9/12 2:27 AM, sebb a écrit : > >> On 8 May 2012 13:06, Emmanuel Lécharny  wrote: >>> >>> Comments inline >>> >>> Le 5/8/12 11:05 AM, sebb a écrit : >>>> >>>> On 8

Users missing from incubator unix group

2012-05-09 Thread sebb
When adding users to podlings in asf-authorization-template, please remember to update the incubator unix group as well, otherwise the users can have problems with some parts of SVN or updating the site. The following were added to podlings but not the incubator group: bloodhound: hwright giraph:

Re: Users missing from incubator unix group

2012-05-09 Thread sebb
On 9 May 2012 23:39, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:48 PM, sebb wrote: >> Here is the command to fix this: >> >> modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=hwright,ssc > > Done, thanks! Thanks! > IIUC this only happens with existing Apa

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >