Re: Font size on incubator site too small?

Or default to the user's choice of font family in the browser. On 28/11/2019 06:01, Dave Fisher wrote: Reading glasses will enlarge things for many of us. I’m certainly in favor a larger font, but please keep it serifed. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 27, 2019, at 11:48 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Shut down unused/inactive incubator lists

+1 On 21/01/2019 00:11, sebb wrote: The following lists are all but inactive: announce@ Last post Jan 2008 android-interest@ Last post Mar 2011 dev@ - only general circulars jaxws-tck@ (private) Last post 2012 projects@ Last post Jul 2011 user@ - only general circulars I think they should

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

On 26/08/18 00:43, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Below is a list of podlings that have been in the incubator for more than 2 years. What can be done to encourage these projects along? Do they have missing mentors or need some other assistance? While not all podlings graduate in 2 years and may

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.16.0-incubating RC1

bcc: dev@taverna +1 (binding) Source downloaded,built (java8 - fails on java10; the podling is aware of this) and tests pass. Checksum and sigs verified DISCLIAMER, LICENSE and NOTICE present. --- The POM parent (separate release) includes other maven repos https://dl.bintray.com/

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On 04/08/17 13:09, Shane Curcuru wrote: John D. Ament wrote on 8/4/17 7:59 AM: On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:17 AM Shane Curcuru wrote: ...snip... - Other reverse domain names *really* should change to org.apache; otherwise it's just confusing. Agreed. The one caveat

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

ion or have an IPMC approved plan for renaming 2) Projects who expect that their future users outnumber current users are highly encouraged to rename packages 3) Other projects are not required to rename packages and backward compatibility is sufficient reason to not rename packages. Or sho

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On 03/08/17 15:51, Julian Hyde wrote: It rarely comes down to the IPMC or the Board dictating how a project names its java classes (does anyone recall an instance?), so it’s mainly the project’s discretion. In my opinion, where the project is on its adoption curve is an important

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On 03/08/17 05:13, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:13 PM, John D. Ament wrote: On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:54 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: Hi all, In regards

Re: Granting access to Jenkins

Done On 28/06/17 10:26, Henri Yandell wrote: Could a PMC Chair type person grant access to Jenkins for Ly please (login lxn2)? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins#Jenkins-HowdoIgetanaccount I gave it a shot, but I don't believe I have the correct permissions. Thank

Re: Is the incubator full?

On 25/08/16 07:34, Sergio Fernández wrote: > I think you may be seeing signs of self-throttling. Basically if the > new proposal > comes in and there's nobody interested in mentoring it -- well the project > won't > go in. Well, that just 1% of the work. Every body could easily volunteer for

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 (binding) Andy On 28/06/16 15:28, John D. Ament wrote: All, Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to the infra team on how to implement going forward. Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ podling.incubator.apache.org work, and have

Re: New mentors for Taverna?

Hi all, I'm one of the "semi-active mentors" of Taverna. In my case, I have a new $job, which is related to some Apache communities but not Taverna. A new job is a busy time so I'm really not able to properly support the podling at the moment. I wish I could but I also have to be realistic.

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

On 14/10/15 16:21, Ross Gardler wrote: Further to Sam's suggestion and observations below see Suggestion 0.1.8 at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorIssues2013#Suggestions (Summary: Champion => PPMC chair) I agree with the comments that champion-as-chair is a negative to the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Rya into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On 14/09/15 16:17, Adam Fuchs wrote: Thanks again for the healthy discussion on Rya. With that, I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Rya as a new incubator project. The proposal text is included below, and is posted on the wiki here:

Re: Should Apache VOTEs be in a first-come, first-serve queue?

On 14/09/15 17:26, Marko Rodriguez wrote: Hello, It appears that VOTEing in general@ is inefficient and biased. An Apache member will see a VOTE on the list and can choose whether to participate in that VOTE or not. I believe there are problems with this algorithm. The first has to do with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Parent 1-incubating-RC4 Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC4

There are 2 mentors votes for this release. Could we get a third please, or the assistence to produce a better release? Andy On 05/08/15 12:11, Ian Dunlop wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, The Apache Taverna Incubator PPMC has voted +5 to release Apache

Re: apache package naming convention

Hi, Jena graduated 2012 with old namespaces under com.hp.hpl.jena, and some under org.openjena, with an intention to change at the first major release update. As new packages came along, they went into org.apache.jena but the user facing packages remained where they were. We released Jena

Re: [GROOVY] mailing lists are ready, see you there!

how to unsubscribe, I think auto subscribing them would be OK? Cheers, Paul. On 27/03/2015 8:21 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: Signing up to Apache list means the user is making an explicit act of joining a place where code (or pointers to code) sent is granted to Apache. Implicit subscription

Re: ICLA/CCLA/SGA guidelines for GitHub or multi-entity projects was: [Groovy] Next steps...

Podling commons-rdf fits that description. It started at GitHub in the knowledge that ASF was a possible route; ALv2 from the start. (We started at GH because there are people who would join discussions more freely on GH.) It so happens, the contributors are all ASF committers. With advice

Re: [GROOVY] mailing lists are ready, see you there!

Signing up to Apache list means the user is making an explicit act of joining a place where code (or pointers to code) sent is granted to Apache. Implicit subscription muddies the waters for contributions. Andy On 26/03/15 21:55, Ted Dunning wrote: your loop is a fine solution. Just

Re: [VOTE] Accept CommonsRDF into the Apache Incubator

On 27/02/15 19:19, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: Hi general@, Over the last while a number of individuals have been putting together a proposal and gathering interest in proposing Commons RDF for acceptance into the Apache Incubator. Having worked our way through the Incubator documentation

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

John, Thank you very much for the offer of mentoring - I've added you to the list. And I've renamed the proposal as CommonRDFProposal as that seems to be naming style on the wiki. Andy On 22/02/15 20:56, John D. Ament wrote: Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out.

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

On 23/02/15 10:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hello, 2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out. - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) - Solicit support from mentors. It looks like those are the only two

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

On 22/02/15 19:52, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

...@commons.apache.org and comm...@commons.apache.org? * Sergio Fernández (wikier dot apache dot org) * Andy Seaborne (andy dot apache dot org) * Peter Ansell (ansell dot apache dot org) * Stian Soiland-Reyes (stain at apache dot org) * Reto Gmür (reto at apache dot org) Lots of Apache experience

Re: [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

On 11/02/15 08:14, Sergio Fernández wrote: On 10/02/15 21:31, Marvin Humphrey wrote: If Commons is OK with this, I imagine this is a fine plan -- good enough for entering incubation. I also think it would be OK for the project to decide it wants to become a TLP. Whether the project joins

Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework [RE-SUBMISSION]

Looks good but there is one part that wasn't clear to me. In this proposal, the TinkerPop2 repos appear in the initial source listing as well, but are not in the submission plan. Is TinkerPop2 also part of the proposal? Is there is risk in it being a burden on the project? Conversly, if it

Re: proposal: mentor re-boot

On 08/01/15 16:48, Chip Childers wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Retiring the role of Champion sounds like an idea whose time has come. We gave the Champion additional oversight responsibilities a while back -- but how many times since then has having

Re: Git write access for podlings

On 02/01/15 16:40, David Nalley wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes st...@apache.org wrote: Git allows you to commit as whoever you want - e.g. like in SMTP email, the headers are decided by the sender. SVN on the other hand will show the authenticated user in the commit

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Nov 2014 ([ppmc])

On 27/10/14 14:15, Marvin wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 November 2014, 10:30 am PST.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

To: general@incubator.apache.org This VOTE passes with 13 +1 binding votes Suresh Marru Alan D. Cabrera jan I Ralph Goers Bertrand Delacretaz Andy Seaborne Suresh Srinivas Chris Mattmann Jean-Baptiste Onofré Jake Farrel Leif Hedstrom Jean-Louis Monteiro Roman Shaposhnik and no 0's or -1's

[VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

Following the discussion earlier in the thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg45241.html I would like to call a Vote for accepting Taverna as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TavernaProposal Vote is open

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

for contributing to Taverna. Steffen Möller is employed by University of Lübeck. Julián Garrido is employed by Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía. Sponsor Champion Andy Seaborne Nominated Mentors Andy Seaborne Chris Mattmann Suresh Srinivas Suresh Marru Marlon Pierce Offers

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

[ ] +1 accept Taverna in the Incubator [ ] ±0 [ ] -1 because... +1 (binding) Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

yes - s/Lens/Taverna/ (sigh) On 16/10/14 18:27, jan i wrote: +1 binding (assuming its Taverna, and there has been a simple copy/paste error). have fun. jan I. On 16 October 2014 18:48, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: +1 - binding I assume that you mean Taverna instead of Lens.

Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

to the the mentor list on the proposal. Andy On 9/26/14, 10:18 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote: If you need a mentor, count me in. I actively contribute to Apache Airavata, and will be happy to bring our experiences from a similar journey. Infact Ross queried

Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

On 25/09/14 19:19, Suresh Marru wrote: If you need a mentor, count me in. I actively contribute to Apache Airavata, and will be happy to bring our experiences from a similar journey. Infact Ross queried on airavata lists few years ago about potential taverna move to airavata/apache(Ross

Re: Is a Software Grant Agreement always needed for IP Clearance?

On 05/04/14 16:19, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Rob, If you developed the code during the time the ICLA and CCLA were in effect (from February 2012) I don't see a need to file additional paperwork. Craig As a matter of good practice, when is it best to use the IP Clearance process? In this

Re: Hoya Proposal

many people will read that as Jena, the city in Thuringia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena -1 On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org

Re: Hoya Proposal

On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote: ...What do people think about a project name Hyena? It's close enough, lives in the

Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

+1 On 14/12/13 14:42, Dave wrote: +1 On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote: +1 On Dec 13, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote: So it begins =) +1 Thanks for leading the effort, Marvin - Henry On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

On 17/11/13 11:17, Upayavira wrote: On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote: On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: Alex, I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release,

Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards

On 10/11/13 09:04, ant elder wrote: How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it at least three votes only one of which must be binding. That would mean there would still be the element of oversight that

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

+1 On 04/11/13 08:59, Jakob Frank wrote: Hi all, the Marmotta podling, whose goal is to provide an Open Platform for Linked Data, entered incubation in December 2012. Since then, the codebase has stabilized and two releases were published following ASF policies and guidelines. The community

Re: Shepherd assignments July 2013

On 17/07/13 06:49, Ross Gardler wrote: Ross Gardler Marmotta Looks good. Releases made, Committers brought in. Mentors appear to be watching. Recommend mentors consider graduation sooner rather than later. The mentors have. The podling is reluctant to leave the nest :-) (This mentor is

Re: Vote on personal matters: majority vote vs consensus

On 25/03/13 08:41, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: Now, you might argue that mentoring is a lot more than voting, but we could create another bottleneck in getting release votes through, requiring votes from incubator PMC members who are not

Re: [DISCUSS] Expressing priorities about release reviews

On 13/01/13 12:45, Benson Margulies wrote: ... 3. Most of the reviewing in this area is done by sebb. We're lucky to have him paying attention to this at all, because it sure seems sometimes as if no one else does. Adding all of this up, I've got a very modest proposal. Let's create a

Re: How to use an apache webpage

On 20/12/12 05:33, Joe Schaefer wrote: All webpages we host are works in progress subject to change when better consensus emerges. Please do not affix any labels to the pages describing them as drafts as that only serves to discourage others from working on them. Normative policy documents are

Re: [VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

On 29/11/12 20:51, Peter Ansell wrote: On 29 November 2012 21:28, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: == Relationships with Other Apache Projects Although current RDF/SPARQL support in LMF is build on top of OpenRDF Sesame API, Marmotta is closely related to many Apache projects

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

Andy Seaborne * Alan Cabera * Bertrand Delacretaz * Nandana Mihindukulasooriya * Dave Fisher * Alexei Fedotov Ted Dunning * Chris Mattman * Ralph Goers * Jakob Homan * Andreas Kuckartz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr

[VOTE] Accept Marmotta into the incubator

. == Sponsors = Champion Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org) = Nominated Mentors Fabian Christ (fchrist at apache dot org) Nandana Mihindukulasooriya (nandana at apache dot org) Andy Seaborne (andy at apache dot org) = Sponsoring Entity Apache Incubator PMC

Re: Retirement decision making

On 29/11/12 14:53, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ... Would you also add the three or more active PMC members requirement? What constitutes active?... IMO the bare minimum is being able to find three PMC members to vote

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Marmotta

A quick update on the Marmotta proposal. Thanks everyone for the comments. The proposal should reflect the discussions. One of the mentors is not yet formally a member of IPMC so we're waiting until we have three formal mentors before calling the proposal vote. (and still, ideally,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Marmotta

On 20/11/12 10:05, Sergio Fernández wrote: Hi, we were internally discussing that the project would benefit a lot from having a mentor outside of the core Semantic Web community. Then he/she could help us to address those issues of which are not fully aware when you work so close in a topic.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Marmotta

On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: Hi all, we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion Apache Marmotta as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken yet, so there would probably no legal issues with the name. Why Marmotta? It is Italian

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Linda

On 17/11/12 09:01, Sergio Fernández wrote: Hi Roy, we were aware of the possible conflict/confusion with the name; but since the Linda model is quite old, not really spread nowadays and completely far away of the Linked Data topic, personally I can't see a really big issue here. But of course

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Any23 from the Apache Incubator

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software, for distribution at no charge

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Any23 from the Apache Incubator

On 16/08/12 14:41, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Hi Folks, We have already called and completed a community VOTE with the Any23 community and the Tika PMC and they have positively recommended Any23's graduation from the Incubator. VOTE: http://s.apache.org/fU RESULT: http://s.apache.org/VAl

Re: Clerezza status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of August2012 by BertrandDelacretaz)

On 11/08/12 12:33, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote: On 08/08/12 23:16, Jukka Zitting wrote: If the efforts to grow or reactivate the community fail, would it be a good idea to seek to join forces with some related projects like

Re: Graduation tasks : (was INFRA-4767)

sebb - thanks for the pointers. Andy On 09/05/12 01:33, sebb wrote: On 8 May 2012 23:22, Andy Seabornea...@apache.org wrote: Seeing INFRA-4767 ... Need to update the website 1) List of VPs Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at:

Graduation tasks : (was INFRA-4767)

Seeing INFRA-4767 ... Need to update the website 1) List of VPs Also, if a VP position changes, please update the web-site file at: http://www.apache.org/foundation/index.html using the CMS application, or update:

Re: May reports due in ten days

On 22/04/12 12:55, Jukka Zitting wrote: Ready to graduate: Jena, Lucene.NET, NPanday, OpenNLP Jena graduation has been approved by the board. We need to do the graduation process now ... Andy - To unsubscribe,

Re: Adding branding items to graduation requirements

P.S. Jena looks fairly good, although missing (TM) after the first use of name, and needs to tweak homepage text a little. I like their logo! Thanks for that - what are those tweaks (either email or JIRA) and we'll get them fixed. Andy

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

Result for the graduation vote for Apache Jena on general@i.a.o: +1: Bertrand Delacretaz Benson Margulies Chris Mattmann Alan Cabrera Andreas Kuckartz (non-binding) Leo Simons Jukka Zitting Matthew Franklin 0: None -1: None so we're delighted to announce that the vote has succeeded. Thanks

[IMPC] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Jena as a Top Level Project

be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Jena Project: * Andy Seaborne (andy) * Benson Marguilies (bimargulies) * Chris Dollin (chrisdollin) * Damian Steer (damian) * Dave Reynolds (der

[VOTE] Release Jena Fuseki 0.2.1-incubating

Hi, Here is a vote on a release for Jena Fuseki module, 0.2.1-incubating. This RC-2 of this release. Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... This vote will be open until: Wednesday 21/March 23:59 UTC

[VOTE] [Result] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-5)

On 04/03/12 22:19, Andy Seaborne wrote: The Jena PPMC has voted to release Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for this release. -- ... Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-5)

On 08/03/12 09:14, Paolo Castagna wrote: Thank you ant. We still need 2 more votes, right? We need one more IPMC vote. We have Benson on the project vote thread on jena-dev@i and ant from general@i. Please - one more IPMC +1! Andy

[VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-5)

The Jena PPMC has voted to release Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for this release. -- Main changes from RC-4: + Added license to scripts, and XML files. small test files don't have a license; test

Re: [VOTE] [ended] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

Currently, this vote has 2 +1 and some comments. This release vote isn't going to get the necessary 3 +1's so is being closed. We'll be back with another RC. Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

sebb, What I'm trying to get to at the moment is something that enables a release of TDB and we can apply to next module. jena is a number of modules, we have released 3 (5 actually - 2 are the parent POM and the distribution maker for the core) already; TDB is the sixth, and there are 3

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

`-- source-release `-- jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating What's the point of the subdirectory? because there are other modules with their own source-release artifact. The TDB release items will be merged into the existing directory. So why don't you do the same for the download directory?

Re: [ATTN] Incubator releases distribution area reminder!

On 24/02/12 16:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Mark Struberg wrote on Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:17:57 +: PS: txs to Daniel Shahaf for pointing me at the current docs I didn't :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

We distribute through maven but also many of our users are not experienced developers but students, including ones new to java. To make it as easy as possible for this category of user, we ship a distribution which is the collection of jars needed for use without a maven/ivy infrastructure.

[VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

The Jena PPMC has voted to release Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for this release. == Major changes since RC-2 + Distribution has it's own content for NOTICE/LICENSE files which rolls up information for the

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

On 12/02/12 12:22, sebb wrote: ... lots of useful comments ... Hi sebb, We have just posted a vote on an RC-4 - this reply is to some of the specific points you raised: Please vote on this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release of Apache Jena, module TDB 0.9.0-incubating [ ] -1 Don't

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC-4)

On 23/02/12 18:32, sebb wrote: Hi sebb, Thanks for the review, == Staging repository https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-001/ This contains zip and tar.gz binary and source archives, which should be deleted as they are not useful to Maven. There are two

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi there, We're short for votes for this release. Is there anything the podling can do, such as co-ordinate different checking undertaken, to help IPMC to vote on this release? Andy On 08/02/12 13:03, Andy Seaborne wrote: The Jena PPMC has voted to release Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0

Re: [VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi sebb, Thanks very much for the time and feedback - we'll be back when we've fixed these problems. Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[VOTE] Release jena-tdb-0.9.0-incubating (RC2)

The Jena PPMC has voted to release Apache Jena TDB 0.9.0-incubating and we would now be grateful if members of IPMC would review and vote for this release. == Overview This will be the second incubator release for by Jena; it's the first Apache release for the TDB module. Jena is

Re: Questions for projects

On 30/01/12 17:32, Jukka Zitting wrote: Jena When can I vote on your graduation? Jena's report is already signed off on the wiki: [*] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012 The project is discussing graduation. Plan: * Graduation preparation (checking, drafting the

[VOTE] Release jena-2.7.0-incubating (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following as Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache. == Overview Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop

[VOTE] Release jena-2.7.0-incubating (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following as Apache Jena version 2.7.0-incubating This will be the first incubator release for Jena at Apache. == Overview Jena is a Java framework for building Semantic Web applications. Jena provides a collection of tools and Java libraries to help to develop

Re: [VOTE] Add Any23 to the Apache Incubator

Accept Any23 into the Apache Incubator +1 (non-binding) Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Any23 to join the incubator

On 04/09/11 11:02, Michele Mostarda wrote: Hi Nick, On 4 September 2011 10:32, Nick Kewn...@apache.org wrote: On 3 Sep 2011, at 16:01, Davide Palmisano wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Any23Proposal Hmmm. Could've done with something like that a decade or so ago. It's been a

Re: [PROPOSAL] 3 month deadline on CLA item

On 02/08/11 11:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-08-02, Henri Yandell wrote: As can be seen elsewhere, I'm on a self-given mission to clean up the history of podlings by getting them to sign off on the following checklist item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jeremy Carrolljer...@topquadrant.com wrote: On 11/24/2010 3:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: But this is like if you are working in an office in front of a collegue : most of

Re: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator

On 13/11/10 02:23, Jeremy Carroll wrote: On 11/12/2010 6:05 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: CyberNeko and TagSoup both have acceptable licenses. Some people prefer TagSoup because it does not require Xerces. Have you read http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html? No I hadn't. That is very

Re: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator

On 13/11/10 13:32, Ross Gardler wrote: All, Resolving IP issues are a part of the incubation process not the acceptance process It is not necessary to delay entry into the incubator because some o these issues need to be satisfactorily resolved. The Jena developers are aware of this and

Re: [Proposal] Accept Jena into the Incubator

On 12/11/10 08:40, Nick Kew wrote: On 8 Nov 2010, at 23:36, Ross Gardler wrote: I am pleased to offer, for your consideration, the following proposal to accept Jena, a semantic web framework into the incubator. The text of the proposal is copied here for your convenience and can be found

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

On 10/11/10 23:28, Jeremy Carroll wrote: - The core API for (mutable) graphs in: http://incubator.apache.org/clerezza/mvn-site/org.apache.clerezza.rdf.core/apidocs/index.html

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

I haven't understood yet the relationship of Stanbol and Clerezza to be able to say anything about how a commons area between those two systems might work. In terms of direct dependencies, does Stanbol just directly depend on Clerezza and only indirectly on Sesame, Jena rdf2go and the OWLAPI

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

On 09/11/10 16:22, Florent Guillaume wrote: On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Andy Seaborne andy.seabo...@epimorphics.com wrote: Jeremy identified the IRI library as a potential contribution to a commons area. It is free-standing, and does not use or call any Jena RDF code - it depends only

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

On 09/11/10 16:59, Jeremy Carroll wrote: I could be accused of having gone overboard ... yes ... :-) Having changed job and looking at this from a different perspective I am less convinced by the pickiness. At least leave the picky mode there, please. It's been very helpful in working

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

On 08/11/10 18:32, Jeremy Carroll wrote: To make the commons discussion more concrete I would suggest the following items for the commons: - an IRI library - some code to do with vocabularies. - connecting to a URL and doing semweb aware content negotiation (this is typically done badly)

Re: Clerezza, Stanbol, Jena, Semantic Commons, WDYT?

On 08/11/10 17:30, Ian Dickinson wrote: Hi Donald, On 08/11/10 17:01, Donald Whytock wrote: Perhaps db.apache.org would be a better example? Should there be a semantic.apache.org? I looked around in db.apache.org and I couldn't see anything that said what the goals of that project are,