Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org > wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Jim, I would be pleased to pass you the batton. You most certainly will > be

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Jim, I would be pleased to pass you the batton. You most certainly will be a better mentor than I could be. Le mardi 13 septembre 2016, Jim Jagielski a écrit : > If you think I would be of help as a mentor, add me too... > > Understand if we are getting to too large a number

Re: Mad signing and checksumming (Was: [VOTE] Release DeltaSpike 0.1-incubating)

On 2/8/12 11:41 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:06 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 February 2012 01:44, Niall Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating AFAIK, this is a known bug with Nexus and/or

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Syncope join the Incubator

On 2/7/12 9:41 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi all ASF mates, I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache Syncope. Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and will be closed on February 10th (Fri) at 9:00 am CET. + 1 (binding) -- Regards, Cordialement,

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope to Join the Apache Incubator

On 2/1/12 1:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: Dear Proposed Syncope mentors: Please post messages on this thread indicating your prior experience as mentors, Does mentors have to have any experience ? Is this a new policy for being a mentor on an incubator project, or something you just are

Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes

On 1/31/12 3:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: - Original Message - From: William A. Rowe Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope to Join the Apache Incubator

On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi Simo! Sounds like a really nice project. Sounds nice, yes. But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]? IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually, Syncope *could* use Shiro. I have a Q : Can't it be a bit

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope to Join the Apache Incubator

On 1/31/12 11:44 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi Simo! Sounds like a really nice project. Sounds nice, yes. But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]? IMO, Syncope

Re: [PROPOSAL] PhoneGap for Apache Incubator

On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote: Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we start the vote tomorrow. I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add another

Re: [PROPOSAL] PhoneGap for Apache Incubator

On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote: On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeiergrobme...@gmail.com wrote: Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we start the vote tomorrow. I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add another

Karma to asf-authorization-template

Same request that Alan : I'm part of the IPMC, and I don't have access to this file. Could someone grant me the needed karma ? Thanks ! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation

[X] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation [ ] (binding) -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 7/5/11 12:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Sorry to interrupt this technical discussion, but I believe that now we are ready to go for a [VOTE] ? Was thinking the same... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] Deft to join the incubator

On 7/5/11 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: [X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation (binding) -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 7/4/11 12:29 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi Mark... As they stated in Relationships with Other Apache Products that they would consider such reuse of some of Apache Mina components. But IMHO, this is not the a blocking issue to go forward with the proposal as such technical detail

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 7/4/11 6:04 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: Thanks Mark! To continue the discussion regarding if it make sense to implement such a piece, like Deft, solely on it's own: Things that justifies Deft's existence (In my very humble opinion): * The simplicity * The learning curve (e.g compared

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 7/4/11 4:36 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: Hi Mark, This is absolutely not a dumb question. Deft is not based on Apache MINA. Instead it's using raw Java NIO (without any level of indirection/abstractions). The reason for this is basically to cut down the overhead and to keep it as simple as

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 7/4/11 6:38 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote: On 4 jul 2011, at 18.31em, Mark Struberg wrote: I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a 10.000 feet point ;) It is just that such things like Filters, etc which are available for Mina already used to be very helpful for lots of projects.

Re: [VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

On 6/28/11 7:49 AM, berndf wrote: Hi everyone, this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling. +1 -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

On 6/27/11 12:37 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Deft to be an Apache Incubator project. Deft is a non-blocking, asynchronous, event driven high performance web framework running on the JVM. Here's a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki:

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding). -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

On 6/8/11 6:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: [X] +1 Accept Flume for incubation (binding) -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

On 6/6/11 6:17 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi Jim, Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-06 18.06: The reality is that IBM employees wearing their IBM hats, have made it crystal clear on the general@incubator list that IBM is going to force The Apache Foundation to take the project. How?

Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice

On 6/6/11 6:47 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote on 2011-06-06 18.40: Should The ASF made responsible for every comments made on the Internet by people who are not even remotely connected to The ASF ? no, and I didn't say that. Again, I just wanted to point out why

Re: watching the commit profile

On 5/31/11 2:57 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Is there a quick way to check the diversity of commits to a podling? I mentor one where the ratio of commits between one individual and the rest of the universe seems to be tending toward infinity, and I'd like to check before pointing this out.

Re: An idea you might call pre-incubation

On 2/11/11 5:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Let's say that I have an idea for some new open source initiative. How would I proceed? http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/ ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

[X] +1 Accept Wave for incubation -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

On 11/24/10 3:18 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:02, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:16, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I am

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

On 11/24/10 7:13 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The premise of this discussion is that running Apache projects are *permitted* to engage in real-time communications, so long as they take due care to avoid community problems of exclusion and closed decision making. Did you see Greg's e-mail? Just

Re: [ISIS] Re: Conference call

On 11/19/10 11:52 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Siegfried Goeschl siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote: ...if the ISIS developer/users/mentors/community decide to run a regular Skype meeting to meet each other electronically assuming +) that the meeting

Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL] Kitty to Enter the Incubator)

On 9/9/10 9:33 PM, James Carman wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: The formation of your community is a BIG DEAL. Not something to casually sweep under the rug. Partitioning the community between users and devs makes it very difficult to establish a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 8/17/10 8:23 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: +1 You have worked hard to get to this point, having survived the release process, two name changes, and community building exercises. You also have my +1. It was a long graduation, but at the end, the team get The Apache way large and long. Go !

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 8/18/10 12:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: snip/ I'm with Stefano there: I do contest the view that svn is the release, You can contest, but the fact is that a release is just a revision in the SVN trunk, not a package you deliver, AFAIU. I suggest that you read carefully this :

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 8/18/10 1:03 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: Yes, the name changes were difficult to deal with, ... It was very interesting that the team didn't exploded after such an unpleasant experience ! But consider that it could have been much worse : what if you have picked 'Dalvik' for the project name

Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP

On 8/18/10 1:15 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: In other word, the release *is* the SVN revision that has been voted. Bzzt. The release package may contain files not found in svn. See httpd releases for examples. That is why the document you referenced avoids discussion of svn; it's the actual

[Proposal] JPPF : a parallel processing framework for Java

by their employer, nor do they represent their employer in any activity related to JPPF. == Sponsors == Champion * Emmanuel Lecharny (elecharny at apache dot org) Nominated Mentors We are currently looking for mentors within the community. Sponsoring Entity * Apache Incubator -- Regards

Re: Review-Then-Commit

Michael Wechner wrote: Ian Boston schrieb: not least because committed mistakes demand fixing by the committer and then anyone who can fix the bug. The only downside is that occasionally trunk wont build/run and if trunk is close to production that probably matters. I think another

Re: Review-Then-Commit

Matthieu Riou wrote: Hi guys, What's the take of other mentors and the IPMC on podlings practicing RTC? I'm asking because some seem to see it as a blocker for graduation whereas I see it much more as a development methodology with little community impact and therefore no real influence on

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

+1 Greg Stein wrote: Subversion is a version control system. You probably know it well as it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software Foundation. The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software Foundation to remove the overhead of having to run its own

Re: JSecurity, Ki, Shiro project inconsistencies

Niclas Hedhman wrote: I am calling upon the Mentors (Alan, Paul, Emmanuel, I'm not anymore a mentor of this project. I step down 5 or 6 months ago. Just FYI. -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: Google Wave - anyone?

Christian Grobmeier wrote: Hi, Hi, I know my request might be a bit unusual, but is somebody here preparing an idea for implementing the Google Wave Protocol? I might want to follow, if somebody does. You may ask Bernd Fondermann about that. He has started a project called Vysper

Re: Google Wave - anyone?

Christian Grobmeier wrote: You may ask Bernd Fondermann about that. He has started a project called Vysper (http://mina.apache.org/vysper) which is a XMPP server Unfortunatly this link leads to an quite empty page. yes. Try this one (outdated):

Re: Community readiness-when does it show?

Martijn Dashorst wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:42 AM, J Aaron Farrfa...@apache.org wrote: If a community meets all the criteria, but hasn't discovered a new committer (or two) by itself, is the community ready for graduation? If not, how can we—mentors— nudge the community to focus on

Re: Community readiness-when does it show?

Scott Comer wrote: i would think that if there is someone contributing to the project that the community would recognize and add them themselves. it isn't up to the mentors to do anything except perhaps suggest they consider it if they're being really thick about it. A bit too convoluted a

Re: Apache JSecurity/Ki Project Rename - VOTE RESULT

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Les Hazlewoodlhazlew...@apache.org wrote: Apache JSecurity/Ki and extended Apache Community, The final results are in for the Apache JSecurity/Ki project rename vote. Here are the results: Apache Shiro: 16 votes Apache Aseca: 7

Re: This problem of mine

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: ...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to let this go other than nope, it's not the same. Otherwise, I feel that I need to bring up a vote to put the

Re: This problem of mine

Bernd Fondermann wrote: JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the name to Ki. But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go

Re: ** MISSING ** January Incubator Reports

Les Hazlewood wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote: JSecurity: I really don't need to go follow URLs into SVN (or tracking down e-mails as with some others) when assembling the report. Please follow the practice of putting your report in the Wiki.

Re: ** MISSING ** January Incubator Reports

Les Hazlewood wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: What is policy? I'm just trying to learn - thanks for any guidance! Just as I said : write down the report (either as a simple mail, or in SVN), and when validated by the team

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator

Ian Holsman wrote: Ian, since you are the one driving this... would you mind working with the project team on improving the proposal? ...and then consider a re-submit? at the moment we have 4 '+1's (including mine) and one -1, and another ~45 hours to go. You have my +1. Even if I

Re: [REPORTS] missing: Abdera BlueSky Buildr Droids Hama JSecurity Lokahi Olio PDFBox PhotArk Tashi VCL WSRP4J XAP

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Please add your reports at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [REPORTS] missing: Abdera BlueSky Buildr Droids Hama JSecurity Lokahi Olio PDFBox PhotArk Tashi VCL WSRP4J XAP

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Hmmm... JSecurity is still due ? I thought it was ok as soon as it provided the 4 first monthly reports It's still listed under monthly at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator

Re: [REPORTS] missing: Abdera BlueSky Buildr Droids Hama JSecurity Lokahi Olio PDFBox PhotArk Tashi VCL WSRP4J XAP

Craig L Russell wrote: Nope, JSecurity reported from July to October 2008 and is now on three month schedule. This reminder was generated from out-of-date info. The info has been updated since then. -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round

Martijn Dashorst wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:27 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wherever the additional license files are placed, they need to be referenced from the main LICENSE file. I'm not sure where you get this from. This is the first time I hear this requirement.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

Niall Pemberton wrote: This is a slight majority (of binding votes) for accepting the proposed change, but given the clear lack of consensus and the concerns voiced about that, I unfortunately need to conclude that this issue should be tabled until better consensus is reached. If this was

Re: [VOTE] Accept VCL into Apache Incbator

[X] +1 Accept VCL into Incubator -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just so everyone understands this in context, the objection above is moot because... No, it's not. Anything that creates an impetus for a podling to get out

Re: September board reports!!!

Martijn Dashorst wrote: The following reports are still missing from [1]: Composer log4php Pig RAT River Shindig TripleSoup Hama Martijn [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2008 I have added JSecurity to the list, and I also injected the monthly report for it. Thanks. -- --

Re: Labs project promotion

Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hi all, Hi ! snip/ This move to the incubation has raised some argumentation. One reason for this expressed in [3], stating that the code is developed on ASF homeland: ...BTW, why do you need to go through incubation? All the code was developed in the ASF. It's

Re: How to count the number of the mailing list subscriber?

Hi, I think that you can get it, as soon as a moderator of a ML or a PMC member, by requesting ezlm for a list of the subscibers and counting them. Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...How to count the number of the

Re: Again: The Maven Repository

Hi Martijn, Martijn Dashorst wrote: I would therefore continue maintaining the old jsecurity code, and release those outside the incubator, just as normal business for your project. There are options. Maintaining the old repo can be tough, as the repository will be different, and make

Re: Again: The Maven Repository

Martijn Dashorst wrote: This work too. Depends on the existing user's base, I guess ? Which was in the thousands for Wicket at the time, with numerous systems in production. and it makes perfect sense to follow your way in this case. How many users does JSecurity has ? Regarding

Re: Again: The Maven Repository

Les Hazlewood wrote: I don't know the exact usage, but I'm sure it is in lower thousands - many people use our .jars directly, but probably many more use it via 3rd party plugins (Grails plugin, etc) that is built on top of JSecurity. It sounds as if waiting at the last possible second to move

[jsecurity] ML moderators

Hi, we may need some moderators for the three mailing lists. I'm ok to be one of them. Anyone else (if the list is not already set ?) Thanks ! -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Incubate JSecurity Project

+1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Relevant information can be found in: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JSecurityProposal Regards, Alan -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org - To

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project

Les Hazlewood wrote: Sure, that sounds good to me. I'll update the proposal... Then maybe JSECURITY for Jira too might be good. Not sure... Depends if we will have many sub-projects, which might be a good idea, regarding the various funtionalities. wdyt ? -- -- cordialement, regards,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project

Les Hazlewood wrote: I prefer JSEC for Jira just because that is what we use now. It has grown on me ;) If any sub projects come , then JSECSUBA, JSECSUBB, JSECSUBC, etc feel a little more digestible (at least in length) than JSECURITY-SUBA, etc. Yep. We have the same on Directory :

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On May 30, 2008, at 5:27 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there something that states that an incubating project needs to be novel or provide something that's not already provided by another library

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate JSecurity Project

James Carman wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no uniqueness requirement AFAIK. Any kind of project can be proposed even if there already exist multiple implementations of a similar technology here at the ASF and abroad. Perhaps

Re: Security restrictions

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On May 17, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm beginning to regret not slogging through all those threads about the IP checks in relation to security. Ok, I'm actually glad that

Re: JSecurity Champion Recruitment

Les Hazlewood wrote: Hi Alex, Sounds great. The JSecurity team has had an identity management server in our heads for quite a while. Indeed much of the current framework reflects flexibility that was designed into it with the intention of making an identity server an easier task. We also

Re: Size of websites in incubator.apache.org

Tony Stevenson wrote: Good day, Hi 102M/x1/www/incubator.apache.org/directory we have exited the incubator 3 years ago ... This directory can be archived or removed at will. Thanks ! -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF Graduation as TLP

+1 ! Daniel Kulp wrote: After 20 months in the incubator, 6 releases complete and 2 more on the way shortly, several new committers, and too much email traffic :-), the Apache CXF community (with support from our mentors) feels that we are ready to graduate to an official top level project at

Re: Subversion vs other source control systems

Endre Stølsvik wrote: Why should this discussion be moved into a Apache-private realm, and not just stay fully public, so that I can watch the proceedings? This is an interesting discussion. Can we please keep the Incubator ML focused ??? -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny

Re: [VOTE] Accept PDFBox for incubation

[X] +1 Accept PDFBox as a new podling A must have ! -- -- cordialement, regards, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com directory.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL