Re: Incubator Information Terrakube

On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:16 PM alfredo españa wrote: > > Hello > > We have been working on an open source project called Terrakube that is an > open source alternative to proprietary tools like Terraform Enterprise or > Terraform Cloud. In the last couple of months we have noticed an increasing

Re: [DISCUSS] HoraeDB proposal

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:12 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > We need to know the reasons for the name change and why the company is > willing to donate the code but not the name. The possibility of having them > forking the community later is a risk the Incubator needs to know about and >

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:25 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 8:55 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > ...If you decide to distribute convenience binary artifact -- only then the > > LLVM exception > > will apply and

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:59 AM Ivan I wrote: > > If my project uses “Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions” > LLVM Exceptions being: > LLVM Exceptions to the Apache 2.0 License > As an exception, if, as a result of your compiling your source code, > portions > of this Software are

Re: [VOTE] Accept ResilientDB Into The Apache Incubator

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:10 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > > Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on ResilientDB, I would like to call a > VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of ResilientDB

Apache Incubator project. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ResilientDB[1] is a distributed blockchain framework that is > > >>> written > > >>>>>>> in C++ and integrates with Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) and > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of ResilientDB

protocol performance with the help of > existing benchmarks, such as YCSB [SoCC’10] and Diablo [EuroSys’23]. > > Stores non-volatile ledger (blockchain) in memory and for further > durability, provides APIs to store both client data and blockchain in > LevelDB and RocksDB. > > > T

Re: Looking for a Champion / Mentors for ResilientDB Blockchain Platform

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:46 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > > Sorry was away due to medical reasons. And my time to apologise as well -- past few weeks were crazy, but I'm now fully available to help with the project. > I will start this tonight Looking forward to it! Thanks, Roman.

Re: Looking for a Champion / Mentors for ResilientDB Blockchain Platform

mentors plus 2 informal mentors. > I would be delighted to help -- please count me in! Thanks, Roman. > > Best > Mohamad Sadoghi > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 2:04 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 12:55 AM Mo Sadoghi > > wrote:

Re: Looking for a Champion / Mentors for ResilientDB Blockchain Platform

On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 12:55 AM Mo Sadoghi wrote: > > Dear Apache Members, > > Hope you are safe and well. > > Over the past 6 years, we have been developing a distributed blockchain > framework, called ResilientDB , which has been > open-sourced

Re: A little incubator game

This is amazeballs! Thanks, Roman. P.S. Also "You have been incubating for 2.9004 months." LOL! On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 5:26 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > A hint: Working on the code may not attract contribitors as quickly as some > other activities. > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, 11:51 am

Re: Seeking ASF Champion for a New ASF “podling”

Hi! quick question from the peanut gallery (or somebody who maybe interested to be a mentor). I'm confused as to whether there's a GitHub repo I can take a look at to provide additional advice? Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:18 PM Kevin Ratnasekera wrote: > > Hi Hao, > > From the

Re: Are programming languages suitable for Apache?

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:22 AM Rupert Smith wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 08:08, Vladimir Sitnikov > wrote: > > > > You are right about that, and I think that ultimately could prevent it > > from > > > happening > > > > Can you elaborate? > > > > Suppose Apache Bicycle project takes the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StreamPieps to a TLP

+1 (binding) and yes -- best of luck! On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 6:13 PM Lars Francke wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 10:32 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > following the [DISCUSS] thread at [0], I'd like to call a vote to graduate > > StreamPipes to a TLP. >

Re: Apache license in source files (pekko)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:39 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I would perhaps change the headers to be the 3rd party ASF header with the > copyright line to make it clear each file is under the Apache license. What Justin said ;-) Thanks, Roman. P.S. Of course, all the new files we start

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pekko into the Apache Incubator

t; Joe Brockmeier j...@apache.org > Sean Glover s...@seanglover.com > Greg Methvin g...@methvin.net (play framework) > Nicolas Vollmar nicolas.voll...@altoo.io > PJ Fanning fannin...@yahoo.com > Daniel Schröter d...@theone.ch > Michael Kohout mwkoh...@gmail.com > jxnu-liguobin dr

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Celeborn (was: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for Datark)

At the risk of drawing the ire of the top-post police -- I have to top-post ;-) Kudos on a really cool name! Thanks, Roman. On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 6:10 PM keyong zhou wrote: > > Hi Yu, > > Yeah the name is from 《The Silmarillion》 and Celeborn is a seedling of the > tree Galathilion, which in

Re: possible interest in forming a community fork of akka

Hi PJ! Thanks for moving the discussion to this list! For completeness' sake -- let me repeat the comments I made on the legal one: On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:12 PM PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Apologies if this is not the right mailing list. If it is not, please > let me know and I'll

Rebooting Ambari PMC via board resolution

pache Ambari Project: Atri Sharma (atri) Devaraj Das (ddas) Evans Ye (evansye) Uma Maheswara Rao G (umamahesh) Roman Shaposhnik (rvs) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Roman Shaposhnik be appointed to the offi

Re: Any incubation proposal template for projects which leaving the attic.

On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 12:04 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > > Depending on who is involved in the project, it may not even require to go > through the incubator again. Having more details would help with this. What Justin said! Honestly, I think if we can find 3 ative ASF members to be on

Re: BlockID champion

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:39 PM Matthew Sacks wrote: > Would anyone champion BlockID once a formal specification is submitted > here? URL, plz? Thanks, Roman.

Re: Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

With my IPMC hat on (and explicitly NOT with my ASF VP Legal one on) +1 Btw I'd suggest replacing "This would expose our users and the ASF to the risk of lawsuit." with "This would expose our users and the ASF to the risk of legal actions." -- the rationale here being that C maybe as annoying and

Re: [VOTE] Distribution guidelines for platforms

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:23 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > So technically this votes passes with 2 +1 votes and a single -1 vote. A -1 > vote on procedural matters is not a veto [1], but given the small number of > votes I’m hesitant to post a result. Does anyone else want to vote? I

Re: [VOTE] Accept NLPCraft into Apache Incubator

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:54 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > Hello. > > As the discussion of NLPCraft proposal [1] has been wrapped up [2] I would > like > to call a VOTE to accept this project into the Apache Incubator. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring NLPCraft into Incubator >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Hudi (incubating) 0.5.1 RC1

+1 (binding) Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:11 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 6:27 PM leesf wrote: > > > > Dear IPMC, > > > > Apache Hudi (incubating) (pronounced Hoodie) stands for Hadoop Upserts anD > > Incrementals. Apache Hudi (incubating)

Present your project at Podling's Shark Tank in Berlin

Hi! if you happen to be at ApacheCON in Berlin and would like to promote your project -- you've got a perfect opportunity We have one slot open at Podling's Shark Tank on Wednesday, 23 October, 17:20 - 18:10 You can find more details on what Podling's Shark Tank is on this wikipage:

Podling's Shark Tank at ApacheCON Las Vegas

Hi! just wanted to let you all know that we're all set to go ahead with this year's Podling's Shark Tank at ApacheCON Las Vegas. We've got 5 amazing podlings presenting and this is going to be a LOT of fun: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/APACHECON/ACNA19PodlingSharkTank Please

Podling's Shark Tank update

Hi! with 10 days until ApacheCON in Vegas I wanted to share an update on Podling's Shark Tank: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/APACHECON/ACNA19PodlingSharkTank Feel free to ask any questions. Also, it would be great if you could help promote this via social media, etc. See you

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

; Best, > Supun.. > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:05 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > Hello Roman, > > > > The Tuweni podling is interested. I am attending ApacheCon EU and would > > like a chance to present. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Antoine >

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

IoTDB Tuweni We now have full schedule of podlings for both events and I will be following up with individuals (and individual communities) who volunteered for both. Thanks, Roman. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:45 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi Podlings! > > in less than a month

Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

Hi Podlings! in less than a month we're going to have our first ApacheCON this year -- the one in Las Vegas. In about two month there will be one more in Berlin. These are not your regular ApacheCONs -- these are 20th Anniversary of ASF ApacehCONs! In other words, these are not to be missed!

Re: New disclaimer text

Big +1! On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 4:08 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > > Agreed, this sounds like a great way to do this. As IPMC members reviewing > releases, you now have better guidelines on how to go about reviewing a > podling release. > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 17:59, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >

Re: New disclaimer text

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:52 PM Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:35 PM Alex Harui wrote: > > > Suggestion: The DISCLAIMER references a detached copy of the DISCLAIMER > > at dist.a.o/releases/incubator/project and that detached copy is the one > > that gets updated with late

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > >> > >> 1. Podlings, and PPMC members, to enjoy the legal protection of the > >> foundation when they do a re

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:59 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > > > This is correct. Provided we *do* explicitly acknowledge that special > > status of the Incubator. > > > > This acknowledgement will

Re: New disclaimer text

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:29 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > >>> wrote: >

Re: New disclaimer text

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> > >> Hi - > >> > >>> On Jul 1, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacret

Re: New disclaimer text

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:28 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > > On Jul 1, 2019, at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 1:39 AM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > >> ...I put up suggested text changes for an incubator disclaimer here [1]... > > > >

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:48 AM Greg Stein wrote: > > > IMO, stop being pessimistic. Move forward with change to stop the gating, > > > and let podlings do their releases without all the IPMC burden. > > > > We want to be at “D” or “E” , we’re currently at “A” and there's a few > > steps that

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:27 PM Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:10 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >... > > > Hi, > > > > > Although not a "real" PMC, we do need to provide legal protection for > > each PPMC and distributing releases is the time that most legal > > considerations

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:07 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:03 PM Alex Harui > > wrote: > > > > > > But, IMO, the reason the question went to VP Legal is that

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 11:03 PM Alex Harui wrote: > > But, IMO, the reason the question went to VP Legal is that it doesn't really > matter what the IPMC thinks if their "business decision" will have an impact > on the "Legal Shield" and the insurance premiums that go with it. So I think >

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen wrote: > > A couple of thoughts: And a couple of thoughts on top of that. > Podlings are not permitted to call themselves "Apache Foo" because they are > not yet full Apache projects. Correct. The I way I see this thread is this: *when it comes to

Re: LGPL dependency

Lets continue this discussion on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-464 please On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 2:18 PM Matt Sicker wrote: > > WebKit dates back to KHTML, an LGPL web engine from KDE. It sounds like > it’s some WebKit specific files that are BSD licensed. I haven’t inspected >

Re: Incubation Pain Points

go back to the old place, but certainly not the ideal either. There's as much wrong about pre-incubation as it is with trying to guess whether you'd feel at home in a country by looking at travel shows on TV. Thanks, Roman. > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 17:36, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >

Re: Incubation Pain Points

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Geertjan, > > not quite sure how to read this ... what are you referring to as "new > culture". > The existing project coming to the ASF? And this project should adopt the > tradition of the ASF. > Or that the ASF should adopt the

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 8:20 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > Big +1 to the above. I would strongly suggest trying to resolve > > this first between IPMC and ASF Legal Committee > > JFYI - I’ve tried to do this before and was told (by aboard member) it was > the boards policy not the Legal

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

A few comments based on various excellent previous posts: On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 12:34 AM Hen wrote: > I don't see a need to go to the board on this :) Big +1 to the above. I would strongly suggest trying to resolve this first between IPMC and ASF Legal Committee On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 6:33 PM

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache PLC4X (incubating) as a TLP

+1 from my side. This looks like a small but very viable community to me. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks! My concern is that in the past the IPMC has graduated podlings with 5 > PMC members that fairly quickly ended up in the Attic. >

Re: A smaller IPMC

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members > think might be a way to address this? Personally, I believe that "IPMC is too large" argument is only applicable to how quickly/easily consensus can be

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:09 PM sebb wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 00:18, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Hi - > > > > > On Mar 5, 2019, at 3:55 PM, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > > > > > Hi Roman > > > > > > > > > In the discussion, I started about inviting committers to PMC when > > > graduation, shows

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache SkyWalking (incubating) as a TLP(take2)

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 12:42 PM Craig Russell wrote: > > > > > On Mar 4, 2019, at 3:12 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > >> The cookies in the moderator mails expire after a few days. > > > > This example was all done today. Numerous attempts have been made. > >> It also means that the person is

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:28 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 25/02/2019 14:15, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:35 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> > >> On 23/02/2019 06:18, Willem Jiang wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>>

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:35 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 23/02/2019 06:18, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just have a question about the Binary jars in the source release. > > According the Apache release policy, I cannot find any rule about the > > binary jars cannot be in the source

Re: [DISCUSS] Guidelines for distribution of incubating artefacts on other platforms

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 12:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This sentence is very confusing to me. If the release is "unofficial” > then it can't be subject to ASF's policy, no? > > I used the word unofficial as some of these artefacts are connivance > binaries. I and don’t want to open up

Re: [DISCUSS] Guidelines for distribution of incubating artefacts on other platforms

Great effort getting it all documented! Would really love to see this converge ASAP. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:08 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Feedback welcome. If you think anything here is not in line with the ASF > release and distribution policy please speak up. Currently it’s not

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hey Justin -- any chance you can take a look at the proposed policy for *snapshot* Docker hub artifacts I proposed up-thread? Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > AFAIK everyone releasing binary convenience to dockerhub believed they > were authorized.

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:12 PM Hen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:45 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:48 PM Dave wrote: > > > > > I totally agree with you that Docker images should be built from > official > > > sourc

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:48 PM Dave wrote: > I totally agree with you that Docker images should be built from official > source releases, unless they are clearly marked as unofficial SNAPSHOT > releases and intended for testing. I'm just repeating what I've heard over > and over again from

Re: Incubator exit interview

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 1/14/2019 1:01 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > I don’t think the “decisions should be made on-list” principle applies to > > all communication. (Otherwise why would we allow hallway conversations at > > conferences?) I’d rather that we

Apache Quickstep (incubating) is now officially retired

Hi! with the last task of: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17392 now done, I believe that Apache Quickstep (incubating) is now officially retired. Since, believe it or not, this is the first time for me to retire a podling, I'd appreciate if someone could double check. Justin, you

Re: Incubator exit interview

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:51 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > > I like this idea a lot! In fact, I like it so much that I'd really > > love to see it as an on-going feedback rather than a one-time deal. > > Were you thinking something like after 6 month, 1 year and 2 years (if > needed) in

Re: Incubator exit interview

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:15 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just wondering if it would be a good idea to ask projects a few > questions of committers/PPMC members once they leave the incubator to gauge > how we are doing and find out where there is room for improvement? It would > be

Re: December report - Mentor sign off due end of today

Justin, I see my name attached to the Sharding Sphere as a mentor, but I only agreed to help as a Champion (that's why my name wasn't listed as a Mentor on the proposal). I know we've had back-n-forth in the past on whether Champions automatically become mentors (and I happen to be in the firm

[RESULT] [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:03 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a discussion with the Quickstep community: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E > and a formal pass

Re: [VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 4:03 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > after a discussion with the Quickstep community: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E > and a formal pass

[VOTE] Retire Quickstep podling from Apache Incubator

Hi! after a discussion with the Quickstep community: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6c4998e6feaec2651511a0d461d45924847135b60aa00e084301bc59@%3Cdev.quickstep.apache.org%3E and a formal passing vote:

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 6:59 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Nov 15, 2018, at 2:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > > wrote: > > > > > > I see this as a two-level thing: > > > > a) The source release is an Act of the Foundation, it is what the > > foundation produces > > > > b) For the binaries,

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

Personally, given the amount of binary releases that are distributed off of our very own infrastructure (and I'm not even counting our namespace on things like Docker hub -- I'm just talking about the INFRA we run) I don't think that the argument "binary releases are NOT endorsed by ASF" will fly

Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing requirements for IPMC

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 1:28 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > ...I propose this: > > > > If someone has done several of the following: > > - has been involved in an incubating project from start to finish > > - has been a release

[RESULT] [VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call > a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full > proposal is available on the wiki: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S

Re: [VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call > a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full > proposal is available on the wiki: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S

Re: Champion Role is Only to Get a Podling Started

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:25 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Everyone, but especially mentors. > > I saw this email from a mentor on the Airflow dev list: [1] > > "The big list that *has* to be filled out and correct is here: > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/airflow.html >

[VOTE] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

* CHINA TELECOM Bestpay: QingYang Chen * Individuals: Sheng Wu, Hongtao Gao, Xiaoguang Ma = Sponsors = == Champion == * Roman Shaposhnik (rvs at apache dot org) == Mentors == * Craig L Russell (clr at apache dot org) * Benjamin Hindman (benh at apache dot org) * Willem Ning Jiang

Re: [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

ter Sharding-Sphere is accepted into the > > > Incubator. > > > > > > = External Dependencies = > > > > > > As all dependencies are managed using Apache Maven, none of the external > > > libraries need to be packaged in a source distribution

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pinot into Apache Incubator

Sorry for the belated reply -- was on a trip to China. Yes, I'd love to be added as a mentor. And, FWIW +1 on the proposal ;-) Thanks, Roman. On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 11:23 PM kishore g wrote: > > 72 hours have passed and the vote for accepting Pinot into Apache Incubator > has passed with: > >

Re: [Question] RE40 in Apache Maturity Model Assessment

On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:23 AM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > Hi, > > > I am doing Apache Maturity Model Assessment for SkyWalking, here is the > draft[1]. We have a question in our inside discussion[2]. > > > > RE40 > > Convenience binaries can be distributed alongside source code but they are > not

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > given that we've got only positive feedback on the DISCUSS > thread I'd like to start an official VOTE thread now. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate > Apache ServiceComb from the incub

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > given that we've got only positive feedback on the DISCUSS > thread I'd like to start an official VOTE thread now. > > Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate > Apache ServiceComb from the incub

[VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

embers of the Apache ServiceComb Project: * Aray Chenchu Sukesh * Bao Liu * Eric Lee * Jean-Baptiste Onofré * Jimin Wu * Linzhinan * Mohammad Asif Siddiqui * Qi Zhang * Roman Shaposhnik * Timothy Chen * Willem Ning Jiang * Yang Bo * Yihua Cui * Yin Xiang * Zheng Feng * zhengyangy

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Servicecomb (incubating) as a TLP

e Onofré * Jimin Wu * Linzhinan * Mohammad Asif Siddiqui * Qi Zhang * Roman Shaposhnik * Timothy Chen * Willem Ning Jiang * Yang Bo * Yihua Cui * Yin Xiang * Zheng Feng * zhengyangyong NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Willem Ning Jiang be appointed to the office of Vi

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:01 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >>... > >> In the past we typically shied away from setting deadlines for certain >> milestones in community development within podlings. This, in my v

Re: Poddlings length of time in the incubator

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > Regarding Quickstep. I am a mentor. (One mentor resigned earlier this > year, but the other mentor, Roman, is sufficiently engaged.) > > I am concerned that Quickstep is not going to graduate. They are > functioning well as an academic

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating)

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the HAWQ community > and at the IPMC level: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/67a2d52ef29cbf9e93d8050ed0193cc110a919962dd92f8436b343b7@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating)

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the HAWQ community > and at the IPMC level: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/67a2d52ef29cbf9e93d8050ed0193cc110a919962dd92f8436b343b7@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.

[VOTE] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating)

* Lili Ma * Lirong Jian * Lisa Owen * Ming Li * Mohamed Soliman * Newton Alex * Noa Horn * Oleksandr Diachenko * Paul Guo * Radar Da Lei

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating) as a TLP

gt; Radar >> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Willem Jiang >> wrote: >> >> > Just a quick question for the PMC size 45. >> > From the report, I can see there are 12 PPMC member, but the PMC size is >> > same with the Committer size. >>

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating) as a TLP

* Newton Alex * Noa Horn * Oleksandr Diachenko * Paul Guo * Radar Da Lei * Roman Shaposhnik * Ruilong Huo * Shivram Mani * Shubham Sharma

Re: Publishing Maven artifacts under third-party coordinates (was: Set up Nexus staging profile for Dubbo ...)

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > In other words, there are several ways to prove that a binary release is > WRONG but (to Greg’s point) there is no way to prove it RIGHT. That's actually a great way to put it. > As a mentor, I strongly advise against

Re: Publishing Maven artifacts under third-party coordinates (was: Set up Nexus staging profile for Dubbo ...)

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 4:17 AM, sebb wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 11:37, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Willem Jiang >>>

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > I would respectfully suggest that the PPMC guide section that describes how > to invite new committers and PPMC members is not adequate to the task. > > This is what I think is the relevant section of >

Re: Default webpages for new podlings

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:51 AM, sebb wrote: > On 17 April 2018 at 19:47, Greg Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>... >> >>> Greg - You know which project I’m thinking about - OpenOffice.org. (1) I

Re: Question about IP CLEARANCE

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Christopher wrote: > Two questions about IP CLEARANCE: > > There is a line item in the template for making sure that files are updated > to reflect ASF copyright. Must this be done before the files are actually > transferred to the receiving

Re: [DISCUSS] Absent mentors

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > I think the problem is serious. I also think that signoff rate is a better > metric in practice than it seems it would be. That problem is indeed pretty serious and also pretty chronic. As for the metric -- I really

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:24 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center > (Incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 > Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Saga (incubating) version 0.1.0

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache ServiceComb Saga (Incubating) > version 0.1.0 > > Apache ServiceComb (Incubating) Community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote Thread : >

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.3.0.0-incubating Release

+1 (binding) * checked sigs and checksums * checked licenses * checked for archive matching git tag Thanks, Roman. On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > +1 [biding] > > - signature check [ok] > - checksum check [ok] > - licenses check (RAT) [ok] > > I

Re: Write access to incubator wiki

Done! On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:58 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Hi, > > Please grant 'markt' write access to the incubator wiki. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Dr. Elephant Incubator Proposal

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > Why does Dr. Elephant make sense as a separate project instead of > contributing to Hadoop directly? > > What is the relationship between Dr. Elephant and the (now seemingly > defunct) Hadoop Vaidya? A different way to ask the

Re: [VOTE] Apache DataFu podling graduation

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to open a vote for Apache DataFu's graduation from incubator. > The > DataFu community previously voted on this back in July, 2017 and the vote > passed >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >