Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache Impala to TLP

+1 Tom On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Jim Apple wrote: > The graduation of Impala to a TLP has been discussed[0] on dev@impala, > voted on[1] on dev@impala, and discussed[2] on general@incubator. All > threads were open 72 hours or more, and all seem to have quiesced. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

+1 Tom On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on > accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept Spot into the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

+1 (binding) Tom On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > Hi all, > > Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry > community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate > Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to graduate the project

Re: [VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

> Everyday, Cloud Dataflow is actively used by a number of organizations and > institutions for batch and stream processing of data. We believe acceptance > will allow us to consolidate existing Dataflow-related work, grow the > Dataflow community, and deepen connections between Dataflow

Impala commit policy

The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed (http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns about CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's not a binary choice, and that it's entirely reasonable that different communities have different commit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

workflow. > We are involved with discussions that the Kudu team at Cloudera have been > having with Jake Farrell to start discussions on how Gerrit can fit into > the ASF. We know that several other ASF projects or podlings are also > interested in Gerrit. > > If the Infrastruc

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Tom On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

...@apache.org * Remy Pecqueur rpecqu...@apache.org * Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@apache.org * Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org * Daniel Weeks dwe...@apache.org * Tom White tomwh...@apache.org NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Julien Le Dem be appointed to the office of Vice

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

projects. Todd Lipcon and Tom White are committers to Apache Hadoop and multiple other related projects. Brock Noland is a Hive committer. === Homogenous Developers === The initial committers come from a number of companies and countries. Parquet has an active community of developers, and we

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Twill 0.1.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 I noticed a couple of things to fix for the next release (not blockers): * Missing license header in twill-0.1.0-incubating/checkstyle.xml * There's a file called DEPENDENCIES which looks like it is auto-generated, and is not in the tagged source, but is in the source archive. Cheers, Tom On

Re: [VOTE] Accept Twill for Incubation

(Continuuity) * Poorna Chandra (Continuuity) * Albert Shau (Continuuity) = Sponsors = == Champion == Vinod K vinodkv at apache dot org (Apache Member) == Nominated Mentors == * Arun C Murthy acmurthy at apache dot org * Tom White tomwhite at apache dot org * Patrick Hunt phunt

Re: [VOTE] Accept Storm into the Incubator

+1 Tom On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote: Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now seemingly resolved. I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling. The proposal is included below and is also at:

Re: [VOTE]: Accept Sentry in Apache Incubator

) * Sean Mackrory (sean at cloudera.com) * Shreepadma Venugopalan (shreepadma at cloudera.com) * Sravya Tirukkovalur (sravya at cloudera.com) * Tom White (tomwhite at apache.org) * Xuefu Zhang (xuefu at apache.org) == Affiliations == * Ali Rizvi (Oracle) * Arvind Prabhakar (Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Provisionr version 0.4.0-incubating, RC0

+1 verified signature and checksum, ran RAT, checked LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER, built from source. Tom On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote: This is the first release candidate for Apache Provisionr, version 0.4.0-incubating. The PPMC vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.12.0-incubating (RC1)

+1 (verified checksum and signature, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER). Tom On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Benjamin Mahler benjamin.mah...@gmail.com wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.12.0. This will be the fourth incubator

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Mesos

...@apache.org * Benjamin Mahler bmah...@apache.org * Brian McCalister bri...@apache.org * Ian Holsman i...@apache.org * Matei Alexandru Zahari ma...@apache.org * Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org * Tom White tomwh...@apache.org * Vinod Kone vinodk...@apache.org * Brenden Matthews bren

Re: [VOTE] Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator

* Matt Stephenson, Google * Everett Toews, Rackspace == Sponsors == === Champion === * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation === Mentors === * Brian McCallister, Apache Software Foundation * Tom White, Apache Software Foundation * Henning Schmiedehausen, Apache Software

Re: [VOTE] Accept Provisionr into the Apache Incubator

Shaposhnik - rvs at apache dot org * Eric Sammer - esammer at apache dot org == Sponsors == === Champion === Tom White - tomwhite at apache dot org === Nominated Mentors === * Roman Shaposhnik - rvs at apache dot org * Tom White - tomwhite at apache dot org * Mohammad Nour - mnour

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote: Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal? Yes, I'd be happy to. One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr should be a TLP on graduation, or whether it should be a module in Whirr.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Crunch 0.5.0 (incubating) RC0

+1 checked signatures and checksums, RAT report is clean, license and notice look good, builds from source. Tom On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Josh Wills jwi...@apache.org wrote: Hello, This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Crunch 0.5.0 (incubating). This

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the Incubator

org) Chris Mattmann (chris DOT a DOT mattmann AT jpl DOT nasa DOT gov) Tom White (tom DOT e DOT white AT gmail DOT com) Sponsoring Entity Incubator PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Knox Hadoop Gateway Project

This looks like an interesting and useful project. I'd like to volunteer as a mentor on it. Thanks, Tom On 11 Feb 2013 14:56, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote: Knox Gateway Proposal == Abstract == Knox Gateway is a system that provides a single point of secure access for

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Hadoop Development Tools

+1 Cheers, Tom On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hello, This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator. Cheers, Adam Berry = HDT (Hadoop Development

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator

* Tom White tomwh...@apache.org * Alejandro Abdelnurt...@apache.org * Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org * Konstantin Boudnikc...@apache.org * Stephen Chu s...@apache.org * Bruno Mahébm

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crunch (incubating) 0.3.0 Release Candidate 1

+1 Verified signature and checksums. Ran a RAT report. Checked for binary and SCM files. Read LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files - all look correct. Built from source successfully. Cheers, Tom On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Josh Wills jwi...@apache.org wrote: Hello everyone, This is a call

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

+1 Tom On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Aaron McCurry amccu...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 3.2.0-incubating (candidate 1)

+1 I checked the signature and checksums, inspected the source tag, ran a RAT report, checked the disclaimer, notice and license files. Tom On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: Dear Incubator PMCs, Oozie Incubator community has voted on the Oozie

Re: Flume Graduation (was Re: June reports in two weeks)

According to Clutch [1] the project has added 8 committers since it entered incubation. Regarding diversity, committers from over four organizations are actively involved in Flume development, which is pretty healthy. There does seem to be a need to have more diversity at the PPMC level, however,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache MRUnit from Incubator

+1 to graduate MRUnit. Cheers, Tom On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Jim Donofrio donofrio...@gmail.com wrote: We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors. Any thoughts on this vote? We released 0.9.0-incubating on Tuesday so we have completed 4 releases and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.9.0-incubating (RC5)

+1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and svn tag all look correct. Tom On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman b...@berkeley.edu wrote: Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.9.0-incubating-rc2

+1 checked checksums, signatures, license/notice/disclaimer, svn tag. Tom On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.1-incubating

+1 Verified checksums and signature, ran unit tests, checked license and notice. I also successfully ran MRUnit tests against Hadoop 1.0 and 0.23 code. Tom On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

+1 Unpacked and ran the unit tests successfully. Checksums and signature are good. RAT passes. LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER look ok. Tom On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.0-incubating (with release candidate rc1)

+1 Checked signatures/md5, ran RAT, tag looks good. Cheers, Tom On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Bilung Lee b...@apache.org wrote: This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.0-incubating. We got two IPMC votes from our dev list and are looking for a third.  

Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.5.0-incubating

+1 Signatures and checksums look good. I could successfully build from source. RAT ran cleanly. Cheers, Tom On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote: This is the first incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.5.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2

+1 I verified checksums and signature. NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER files look good. I ran RAT and the files without licenses seem to be test data. Tom On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@cloudera.com wrote: This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

+1 I verified signatures and checksums, and ran RAT. Cheers, Tom On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote: This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version 0.1.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.6.0-incubating

+1 I checked signatures and checksums, ran RAT, and started a cluster. Cheers, Tom On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote: This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.6.0-incubating and the last release as an incubator project. It fixes

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Graduation of the Whirr Podling

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote

[VOTE] Graduation of the Whirr Podling

ph...@apache.org * Tibor Kiss ti...@apache.org * Johan Oskarsson jo...@apache.org * Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org * Andrei Savu as...@apache.org * Tom Whitetomwh...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Oozie to join the Incubator

+1 Tom On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam misla...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi All, The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like to initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project. The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could

[VOTE][RESULT] Accept Bigtop for incubation

The 72 hour voting period has elapsed, and the vote has passed, with 19 +1 votes (12 binding), no -1 votes, and no 0 votes. Binding votes (IPMC members): Chris A. Mattmann Leif Hedstrom Patrick Hunt Ralph Goers Michael McCandless Robert Burrell Donkin Nigel Daley Tom White Mohammad Nour El-Din

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bigtop for incubation

+1 Tom On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: As there are no active discussions on the proposal thread, I would like to initiate a vote to accept Bigtop as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator

[VOTE] Accept Bigtop for incubation

contributed towards Hadoop or related Apache projects (Alejandro Abdelnur, Konstantin Boudnik, Eli Collins, Alan Gates, Patrick Hunt, Steve Loughran, Owen O'Malley, John Sichi, Michael Stack, Tom White) and are familiar with Apache principals and philosophy for community driven software development

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

Owen, Thanks for offering to help out. Cheers, Tom On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. Bigtop is a project

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

Alan Gates has volunteered to be a committer and mentor, so I added him to the proposal. (For some reason his email to this list didn't come through.) Thanks Alan! Tom On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

to use .rpm and .deb packages sounds really great! Cheers, -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests

Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

Steve, Thanks for signing up. Bigtop should not maintain branches or patchsets on top of upstream projects. Any bugs or compatibility problems that are found will need to be resolved in the upstream projects and then released in those projects. This makes things harder for Bigtop, but, like you,

[PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

Shaposhnik designed and implemented the system testing framework. Many of the committers to the Bigtop project have contributed towards Hadoop or related Apache projects (Alejandro Abdelnur, Eli Collins, Patrick Hunt, John Sichi, Michael Stack, Tom White) and are familiar with Apache principals

Re: [VOTE] Flume to join the Incubator.

, Cloudera  * Aaron Kimball, Odiago  * Bruce Mitchener, Independent  * Arvind Prabhakar, Cloudera  * Ahmed Radwan, Cloudera  * Henry Robinson, Cloudera  * Eric Sammer, Cloudera  * Derek Deeter, Intuit = Sponsors = == Champion ==  * Nigel Daley == Nominated Mentors ==  * Tom White

[VOTE] [RESULT] Release Whirr version 0.5.0-incubating (candidate 1)

This vote has now passed with 3 binding +1s (2 from the dev list vote), no +0's, and no -1's. The binding votes were: Stefan Seelmann, +1 Doug Cutting, +1 (on dev vote thread) Tom White, +1 (on dev vote thread) The non-binding votes (including those from the dev list vote) were as follows

[VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.5.0-incubating (candidate 1)

Please vote on the following release candidate for Apache Whirr, version 0.5.0-incubating. We already received two binding IPMC +1 votes for the PPMC release vote on whirr-dev. PPMC release vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 March 2011 22:02, Tom White tom.e.wh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote: But the main

Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.4.0-incubating

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote: But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of 3rd party products which are not mentioned in either the NOTICE file

Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.3.0-incubating

With 3 +1's (binding votes from Doug Cutting and Tom White were made on the whirr-dev vote thread) and no -1's the vote passes. I'll roll out the release. Thanks, Tom On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote: On 26/01/2011 05:30, Tom White wrote

[VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.3.0-incubating

This is the third incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.3.0-incubating. We already received one binding IPMC +1 vote for the PPMC release vote on whirr-dev, so are looking for two more. PPMC release vote thread:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Mesos Project

Thanks David. I think we can run a separate vote thread once this proposal thread has run its course. Other recent proposal threads seem to have general votes of support on them. As you say, this phase is a time to respond to any questions that are raised, attract more mentors, and so on. Cheers,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gora into the Apache Incubator

)  * Tom White (tomwhite AT apache DOT org)  Sponsoring Entity  Apache Incubator. Successful graduation can result in either being a TLP, or a subproject of  Hadoop, since most of the community is projected to overlap. ++ Chris

Re: [VOTE] Release Whirr version 0.1.0-incubating

With 3 binding +1 IPMC votes (Ant Elder, Doug Cutting, and Tom White) and no 0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. I'll proceed with the final steps of the release. Thanks to everyone who helped with the release! Tom BTW I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91 to address

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gora to enter Incubator

I posted a little earlier volunteering to be a mentor, but it looks like it may be in the moderation queue. Anyway, +1 to the proposal, and happy to help out if you still need a mentor. Cheers, Tom On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Gora to enter Incubator

+1 Sounds very interesting. I'd be happy to help out as a mentor. Cheers, Tom On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Enis Soztutar enis.soz.nu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, We would like to announce the Proposal for Gora, an ORM for Colum Stores, for the Apache Incubation. We believe that Gora can

Re: Restored missing Bluesky/Clerezza parts of this month's report

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi Noel, FYI I just fixed the report (although it said closed) at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2010 - the beginning of Clerezza report had been mistakenly deleted in revision 19. Looks like there are

Re: [VOTE] Accept Whirr for Incubation

The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s. The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure. Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation -Donald On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote

Re: [VOTE] Accept Whirr for Incubation

The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s. The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure. Thanks, Tom On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote: [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation -Donald On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote

[VOTE] Accept Whirr for Incubation

by Tom White, and have had a substantial number of contributions from members of the Hadoop community. By becoming its own project, significant contributors to Whirr would become committers, and allow the project to grow. === Community === The community interested in cloud service infrastructure

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

Patrick, That sounds great - thanks for volunteering. I've added you to the initial committer list on the proposal page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrProposal. Steve Loughran has volunteered to be a mentor; I've added his name too. I would like to send a vote on this proposal to the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

Thanks for the advice, Niclas. I've sent a mail to the PMC private list. Cheers, Tom On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: You do know any ASF member can sign up to be an incubator mentor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote: ...and pasted inline below (as is customary). The proposal looks fine to me. Like you mention your initial group of committers is a bit small which is a risk but hey, cloud is hot, go build community :) That's the plan.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

^_^ Cheers, Chris [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/oodt.html On 4/15/10 2:42 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote: I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal. Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code

[PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal. Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code (for Hadoop) is hosted as a Hadoop contrib module, but I believe it would flourish as its own project with its own community. The