Hi,
Some further followup on this.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
2008-08-19 PhotArk
S: Zero
Jukka Zitting wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 17:20:41 +0100:
Their next status report is due in March; looking forward
to a summary then.
They're free to send an out-of-cycle report in February if they
want to...
/reminder
-
Hi...
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
What's the status of this effort?
I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
my summary (S) and subjective
Hi,
Following up on projects where my recommendation was an unconditional
Terminate.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
2008-08-19 PhotArk
S: Zero recent activity.
R: Terminate.
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
The status of Kato (in relation to Oracle's actions) is being
evaluated. Ant is helping the community.
2008-11-19 Stonehenge
S: Zero activity.
R: Terminate.
I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire or come up
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org wrote:
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire or come up with a
plan to revive the project. No mentors visible (6 listed).
We already had the vote to
Just an FYI: I have posted a status update on Etch on general@, hoping
it doesn't fall on deaf ears with all the discussions going on:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201201.mbox/%3ccab63y-dsjkbkeljkhuvkbdlmsjwvfvixo0fnxexofhq1v4m...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Martijn
On Sun,
Since this thread has come back to life, I read through it and have
one comment to add:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 20:27, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
management. The more people participate in a project and the
Hi,
What's the status of this effort?
I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project.
Please branch any followup discussion about
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
2008-01-06 RAT
S: Looking to graduate but stuck with (self-inflicted?) bureacracy.
R: Push to graduate within Q1.
Rat is stalled on trademarks
Robert
Hey Jukka,
On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
2010-02-21 SIS
S: Last activity in November
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/20.mbox/browser)
R: Retire unless activity picks up in Q1.
As a SIS mentor I'd say this is fair, but my personal gut
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
number. Far exceed that number. In fact the median age is 416 days
and the mean age is 536.
Thanks to Gavin installing the necessary prerequisites
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
number. Far exceed that number. In fact the median age is 416 days
and the
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com
wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
wrote:
Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rubys/incubator-by-age
I think there are more tools like this around... i think it makes
sense to
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I
mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I
come back from Thanks Giving : Apache PhotArk, Apache Wink.
First things first - can you
On 16/11/2011, at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
My personal perspective is
that incubation shouldn't generally take more than a year. That
doesn't mean that there won't be exceptions, and in a few rare cases,
some that go well beyond that arbitrary time limit, but the point is
that those
On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I
mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I
come back from Thanks Giving :
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
management. The more people participate in a project and the longer
they do so, the messier it becomes to track provenance and get ICLAs
from all of the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than a year:
I've been meaning to try to help out with JSPWiki for a while, but I've
not yet had the time. If
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
Reporting Schedule, and we continue to have issues. The Incubator is
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Excellent plot chart. As with most plot charts, the end result is a
Rorschach test. I'll tell you what I (personally) see in this chart:
a failure
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:48:02 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master list from which I drew the data can be found here:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master
On 16 November 2011 20:57, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master list
I have been working to get Empire-DB to graduate, and I expect to have
a vote in front of general@ quite soon.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 November 2011 20:57, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
Sam Ruby wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
Reporting Schedule, and we continue to have issues. The Incubator is almost
as big as the rest of the
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
I have been working to get Empire-DB to graduate, and I expect to have
a vote in front of general@ quite soon.
Same with Bean Validation the vote on the dev list is already done and next
steps will be taken soon. I
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
IMHO, we should categorize projects mentioned in that list from very old to
recent ones and each group of mentors get in touch with their
While I agree that it's important to confront the current inventory, I
think that the situation at hand is as much a matter of what goes into
the incubator as what comes out.
In my limited experience, size and growth are a big barrier to
graduation. If a project is chugging along exhibiting good
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
IMHO, we should categorize projects mentioned in that
39 matches
Mail list logo
