I think you mean to post this to the Struts USER list.
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html
Tong Shi Hong wrote:
>
> Hi:
> In many cases, there has a iterate or arraylist in the Form Bean which
> contents a bean list.
> In original functions, we have to define a bean and call get propert
Hi:
In many cases, there has a iterate or arraylist in the Form Bean which
contents a bean list.
In original functions, we have to define a bean and call get property from
form bean to receive a iterate. Then call html:options tag to assign the
collection = "var List" property = "" to disp
on 1/2/02 12:27 PM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True. However, because the vision for the project involves and would
> benefit both directly and indirectly several existing Apache projects, I
> feel it would be easier to collaborate if POI was a Jakarta project.
> The project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 1/2/02 6:34 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +if (runtime != null)
> > +depend.setAttribute("runtime", runtime.getValue());
>
> "All Java Languag
On 1/2/02 7:47 PM, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, keep me copied since I'm not currently subscribed to
> general@jakarta
>
Why not ? :)
> "Andrew C. Oliver" wrote:
>
>>> I don't see any convincing reason to bring POI to Jakarta, unless I see
>>> that
>>> you have a J
Please, keep me copied since I'm not currently subscribed to
general@jakarta
"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote:
> >I don't see any convincing reason to bring POI to Jakarta, unless I see
> >that
> >you have a Jakarta PMC member champion your cause. Stefano's
> >recommendation
> >to you isn't enough, he o
>It sounds like your project is plenty successful where it is.
True. However, because the vision for the project involves and would
benefit both directly and indirectly several existing Apache projects, I
feel it would be easier to collaborate if POI was a Jakarta project.
The project will of c
While I didn't actually write ActionServlet myself, I'll be the first to
agree that I sometimes forget to apply the standard conventions to my
own code. Java's not my first language, and sometimes I slip into legacy
coding styles without realizing it. Many of us old hands have the same
problem, an
Well Ted. the jokes on you...
Have a look at ActionServlet versus this coding standard. :))
(no offense to anyone, this is in jest)
Erik
p.s. I've given CheckStyle a try... its a tough one to live with as its
stringent, but perhaps this could be used during builds to spit out code
sta
Sam Ruby wrote:
> If some particular codebase under the Jakarta umbrella consistently chose
> to take actions which were inconsistent with the Apache mission, then I'm
> confident that the PMC would swiftly act to disolve this code base. I am
> not aware of this being done before, so it would be
Atta boy, Jon!
(This may be your politest, most professional message yet ;-)
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>
> on 1/2/02 6:34 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > +if (runtime != null)
> > +depend.setAttribute("runtime", runtime.getValue());
>
> "Al
on 1/2/02 6:34 AM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +if (runtime != null)
> +depend.setAttribute("runtime", runtime.getValue());
"All Java Language source code in the repository must be written in
conformance to the "Code Conventions for the Java Progr
on 1/2/02 6:13 AM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the repost, I realized that I'd incorrectly labeled the
> post a reply (re:) and thought some folks may have not seen it because
> of that. A quick update, POI is the #10 project on sourceforge this
> morning.
It soun
Sorry for the repost, I realized that I'd incorrectly labeled the
post a reply (re:) and thought some folks may have not seen it because
of that. A quick update, POI is the #10 project on sourceforge this
morning.
Hi,
I'm writing, at the recommendation of Stefano Mazzocchi, in hopes of
drawi
Let's all take a moment to review:
http://www.godwinslaw.com/
If some particular codebase under the Jakarta umbrella consistently chose
to take actions which were inconsistent with the Apache mission, then I'm
confident that the PMC would swiftly act to disolve this code base. I am
not aware
Ted Husted wrote:
>
> Peter, I hope you and yours are well. The Australian "Black Christmas"
> is all over the morning news here.
>
The smoke is pretty thick here right now even in the city suburbs.
Having all your windows shut up when the outside temperature is in the
mid thirties isn't f
Guys,
Let's just clarify that any proposals, even proposals to make proposals,
should go to General. The private PMC business should be reserved for
extremely sensitive matters, usually involving site security.
If we mis-post something to a private list, we should give the original
poster a cl
At 19:23 02.01.2002 +1100, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:58, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
>> At 07:39 02.01.2002 +1100, Peter Donald wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This is not something that should have been brought up on the PMC list -
>> > it should be discussed on general.
>>
>> Peter I do not need your perm
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> How about including a copy of the "LICENSE" file in the META-INF
> subdirectory of each JAR file produced by an Apache project?
+1
-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Building Java web applications with Struts.
-- Tel +1 585 737-3463.
-- Web http://w
At 18:56 01.01.2002 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500
>> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: Ju
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:58, Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> At 07:39 02.01.2002 +1100, Peter Donald wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is not something that should have been brought up on the PMC list -
> > it should be discussed on general.
>
> Peter I do not need your permission to bring up a subject on the PMC
> list
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:56, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > This simple notion -- and my putting together a Jakarta release HOWTO --
> > is why I opened this particular thread.
> >
> > The license issue is well taken. I think it would be a good practice for
> > us to include a license in all of our J
22 matches
Mail list logo
