On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 23:35 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
> result the path full
> incubation / legal incubation is decided.
>
> So in my view the vote should be :
>
> [x] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectivel
Since there is no stated end date to this vote: Please let
it (or it's replacement) run until at least March 4th.
Oleg will be working through a mail backlog that week-end.
If this vote thread should be replaced next week, I will not
be able to re-cast my vote until the week-end of March 10/11.
On 2/24/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is
>> not
>> relevant. I still like to
>> know the opinion of others.
>
>
> If you want opinions, don't use a vote to collect them. This is a vote
> thread, not an
>>
>> Let's keep this statement your personal opinion on the fact that it is
>> not
>> relevant. I still like to
>> know the opinion of others.
>
>
> If you want opinions, don't use a vote to collect them. This is a vote
> thread, not an opinion thread. Votes within the ASF are for decision
> mak
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based
on
>> that result the path full
>> incubation / legal incubation is decided.
Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on
>> that result the path full
>> incubation / legal incubation is decided.
>>
>> So in my view the vote should be :
>>
>> [ ] Jakarta sho
On 2/23/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on
that result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we lik
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
> result the path full
> incubation / legal incubation is decided.
>
> So in my view the vote should be :
>
> [X] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
I prefer this vote to see where it should end up in Jakarta and based on that
result the path full
incubation / legal incubation is decided.
So in my view the vote should be :
[ ] Jakarta should sponsor (which effectively states we like to see the code
end up here)
[ ] Jakarta shouldn't sponsor
