Hello,
This is the second email I am sending to you, I didn't get any reply
from Apache, if there is any problem in which I can help I will be
happy.
We are a company that develops a product named XpoLog. We use Apache
projects in our solutions.
We would like to have a link and description in y
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Koschitzky Omry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: lunes 1 de diciembre de 2003 9:32
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Vendors page
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the second email I am sending to you, I didn't get any reply
>
Please submit a patch against the vendors.xml source file:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-site/xdocs/site/vendors.xml?rev=HEAD
follow the patch guidelines described here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html
-- Dirk
Koschitzky Omry wrote:
Hello,
This is the second email I am sendin
The original intent of the vendors.xml page was:
1. Because I got sick of hearing people say "Jakarta projects are not
supported" and wanted a page to send people to during presentations.
2. So a certain unnamed committer would not feel the need to spam the lists
(because I though if he got awa
Still deliberating killing the vendors page.
I suggested killing it before, one of the vendors (sorry, can't find your
email now) replied very gracefully and I put it on the 'think about later'
queue in my head. Analysis of the current vendor page:
3GS LLC - No website at
-1
While (1) is no longer an issue (c'mon, it wasn't a real issue when the
vendor page was first created!), (2) is still true.
And the main things I disagree with is that criteria of "support" vs.
support should be committer status of one of the company employees. There
should definitely be some
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 15:58:37 -0400
(Subject: The vendors page)
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The original intent of the vendors.xml page was:
>
> 1. Because I got sick of hearing people say "Jakarta projects are not
> supported" and
Andrew C. Oliver escribió:
The original intent of the vendors.xml page was:
1. Because I got sick of hearing people say "Jakarta projects are not
supported" and wanted a page to send people to during presentations.
2. So a certain unnamed committer would not feel the need to spam the lists
(beca
On 2/07/2003 11:13 Santiago Gala wrote:
I would not say "you employ", but "just convince one jakarta commiter to
make the change". This would ensure at least some level of communication
(like sending it to the project -dev list and discussing it there, etc.)
+1 on being present on the list and d
-
> From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:37 AM
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: The vendors page
>
>
> On 2/07/2003 11:13 Santiago Gala wrote:
>
> > I would not say "you employ", but "just convinc
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 8:37 AM
>> To: Jakarta General List
>> Subject: Re: The vendors page
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
I'm tending towards the argument that if you can convince someone who has the right
access to update
the vendors.xml
page, then you deserve to be on the list.
My motivation for attempting to add Collabra to the list was with the
long-term plan of moving one of my engi
rep and your incidental goal is to be listed
on the vendors
page, start now and see results soon.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
your incidental goal
is to be listed on the vendors
page, start now and see results soon.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
have someone with talent and a decent amount of time to spend,
>> my experience is that they can
>> become a committer pretty quickly. If they are providing quality
>> mentoring and patches, it quickly
>> becomes easier to vote them in as a committer than to manually apply
>
Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
I'm not sure of the point of a Vendors page. There are so many different
types of "vendors" covering so many projects that a single page - or even a
single XML is not necessarily the right thing.
I started a database of
FWIW i think that the original arguments which lead to the creation of the
vendors page are still relevant. it's very hard for any folks here to
judge the merit (or otherwise) of companies providing support. on the
other hand, there was a definite demand from users and vendors for a
d
Ah... what's going on with this below finally??
Discussions have gone away in a dense fog??
Sincerely,
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:58:06 +0100
(Subject: Re: The vendors page)
robert burrell d
I like having a wiki page for this sort of thing - allow the community
itself to maintain such lists.
Erik
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Still deliberating killing the vendors page.
I suggested killing it before, one of the vendors (sorry, can't find
your emai
I'd suggest that we talk to the PRC about it. There are some good things
about a vendors page. Erik makes an interesting point about the Wiki, but
it would mean that we couldn't vet it for content to prevent grossly
misleading content.
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'd suggest that we talk to the PRC about it. There are some good
things
about a vendors page. Erik makes an interesting point about the Wiki,
but
it would mean that we couldn't vet it for content to prevent grossly
misleadi
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 19:20, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > I'd suggest that we talk to the PRC about it. There are some good
> > things
> > about a vendors page.
+1
anyone volunteer?
> Erik makes an
22 matches
Mail list logo
