Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-26 Thread Steffen Brumm
Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 06:34:16 schrieb Andrej Kacian: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400 > > Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see > > that both relate to the human condition. > > The fact that Adam and Eve will be fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Peter Weller
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:33:37 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200 > Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [..snip..] > > @ GWN - could you guys write about us in the next version of gwn > > please? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably what you

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-26 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400 Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If that's the case, might not "humanities" be a better name? > > E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do > see that both relate to the human condition. It's a very good question, it was posed at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:33:50AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: > > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). > notification=assignment|cc|none ? This is to answer expose's question as well, but the attribute should only indicate if the maintainer entry should be used for an

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-26 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:11:26 -0400 Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > E.g., I don't know what genealogy has to do with theology, but I do see > that both relate to the human condition. The fact that Adam and Eve will be found at the beginning of every genealogy graph. Just kidding, just kidd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-26 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:33:59AM +, Duncan wrote: > Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400: > > > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on > > May 17th. If important issues come up (whic

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-26 Thread Josh Sled
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 20:03 -0600, Steve Dibb wrote: > The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I > finally > got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the > 'theology' > herd. > > The basic description is to take care of packages relating to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Andrej Kacian
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:24:06 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for > > > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assign

[gentoo-dev] Re: Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-26 Thread Duncan
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:56:25 -0400: > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on > May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this > will obviously be delayed, but do keep

[gentoo-dev] new herd: theology

2007-04-26 Thread Steve Dibb
The idea came up a few months ago about creating a 'religion' herd. I finally got around to following through, and with robbat2's help, created the 'theology' herd. The basic description is to take care of packages relating to religion, genealogy and humanities in general. Anyone is of cour

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Dawid Węgliński wrote: As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we enlist everyone who would like to help us in creating artwor

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Steve Dibb
Dawid Węgliński wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we enli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Freitag, 27. April 2007 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 > > > attribute - for some of the packages that I maintain, I do not > > > want the bugs assigned directly to me, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread expose
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). Why not? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread expose
Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Could "contact" be named differently then? > > contact=0 in metadata.xml in this context means that the automatic > reassigning should not assign to that maintainer, but when a user looks > whom to ask specific questions from and sees contact=0 he/she will > understand he/she

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:57:59AM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > This is exactly the reason that I proposed the contact=0 attribute - for > > some of the packages that I maintain, I do not want the bugs assigned > > directly to me, but to the herd instead. While for others I _do_ want > > the dup

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Dawid Węgliński
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a): > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200 > Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject >> I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official >> webpage is under [1]. > > Hey, there is no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 15:16 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer > > > -- > > > - The herd field is not used. > > >

[gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans

2007-04-26 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, 2.6.21 was released today. Testing muchly appreciated as usual -- please file bugs and clearly mark them as 2.6.21 regressions if that is the case. There will probably be several packages unable to compile/load due to internal kernel API changes, as usual. Please make these block bug #17

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 01:18:08 +0200 Dawid Węgliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject > I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official > webpage is under [1]. Hey, there is no (fresh) artwork to see anywhere yet!?1on

[gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Artwork

2007-04-26 Thread Dawid Węgliński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there As a fresh developer i would like to introduce you all new subproject I have just started. It is Gentoo Artwork Project. Its official webpage is under [1]. Project consists of two members so far, so this is why we enlist everyone who would lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 05:46:24PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer > > -- > > - The herd field is not used. > > - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. > At leas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread expose
Daniel Drake wrote: > That aside, I like having myself in the metadata alongside the herd, to > point out that I am the primary maintainer within the herd for the > package in question. It is also useful for others so that when they have > questions about the package, they know who to approach on I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread expose
Joshua Jackson wrote: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer > >> -- > >> - The herd field is not used. > >> - The maintainer address is used as the bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Daniel Drake
Robin H. Johnson wrote: Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer -- - The herd field is not used. - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. At least for some packages I'm involved with, this will result in me deleting myself f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Joshua Jackson
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer >> -- >> - The herd field is not used. >> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. >> This is importa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer -- - The herd field is not used. - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee. This is important for all the herds that have aliases that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread expose
Dan Meltzer wrote: > Sounds good... one suggestion I have is to try and detect new ebuild > submissions and resassign them to m-w automatically as well. maybe a > checkbox "this is a new ebuild" or some other way to automatically detect > it? Why not introduce a "Case 5" which is similar to: 1. No

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Dan Meltzer
On Thursday 26 April 2007 3:40:06 pm Robin H. Johnson wrote: > So as a not-so-brief follow-up to solar's email, here is a brief > proposal on the automatic assignment stuff, incl. one spot that we might > need to add an attribute to metadata.xml. > > Assignment process, triggering: > ==

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Correction to the previous email, this replaces the old Case #1: On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:40:06PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Case 1 - Metadata contains only a herd > -- - The herd will looked up in herds.xml, and the email from herds.xml must be a vali

[gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-26 Thread Robin H. Johnson
So as a not-so-brief follow-up to solar's email, here is a brief proposal on the automatic assignment stuff, incl. one spot that we might need to add an attribute to metadata.xml. Assignment process, triggering: === Auto-assignment will be be applied/available in the fo

[gentoo-dev] Please fix your metadata.xml ASAP

2007-04-26 Thread Ned Ludd
With the loss of our recent bug-wrangler infra will probably be moving to automated system of reassignment of bugs. In order for this to happen you need to properly have your and tags listed in the metadata.xml files. Things such as maintainer "postgresql" are not valid when you are using pgsq

[gentoo-dev] Our profiles/updates handling is not smart enough

2007-04-26 Thread Petteri Räty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ grep javahelp -r /usr/portage/profiles/updates/ /usr/portage/profiles/updates/3Q-2004:move dev-java/javahelp dev-java/javahelp-bin Well nowadays Sun has put javahelp under GPL so now we have dev-java/javahelp again. The problem is that Portage now uses this old entry to renam

[gentoo-dev] Re: That time again...

2007-04-26 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > and some tweaks. Any other cool updates in the last few weeks? (it's > been 20 days since the last time I started this thread - at this > rate, we might make enough input to make Chris' job on the gwn > easier). You are declared official Project Status Rep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is bugzilla used by all developers?

2007-04-26 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:47:20AM +0200, Christian Heim wrote: > On Thursday 26 April 2007 09:21:59 Greg KH wrote: > > For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo > > kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with only a few minor > > things added (bootsplash bein

Re: [gentoo-dev] That time again...

2007-04-26 Thread Christian Hartmann
> Any other cool updates in the last few weeks? I just released another tool called app-portage/autounmask yesterday which you may find quite handy when you need to unmask packages. (Think of ~ kde/gnome.) See this thread for further information: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-555607.htm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is bugzilla used by all developers?

2007-04-26 Thread Christian Heim
On Thursday 26 April 2007 09:21:59 Greg KH wrote: > For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo > kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with only a few minor > things added (bootsplash being one such thing.) Greg, this is already filed on kernel.org's bugzilla

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is bugzilla used by all developers?

2007-04-26 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:07:33AM +0200, @4u wrote: > Hi > > I just wanted to ask if bugzilla is used by all developers, in this case > specific by kernel developers? For kernel issues, please file bugs in bugzilla.kernel.org as the gentoo kernels are almost exactly kernel.org kernels, with

[gentoo-dev] Is bugzilla used by all developers?

2007-04-26 Thread @4u
Hi I just wanted to ask if bugzilla is used by all developers, in this case specific by kernel developers? I created a bug some time ago concerning a known issue with the SCSI/libata subsystem that may result in a breaking harddrive (depending how old the harddrive already is). http://bugs.g