-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/03/2012 10:47, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 03/20/2012 11:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 20:48 +, Markos Chandras
escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:47, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I find the whole concept of www-servers herd flawed.
It's not very likely one person would be running many different servers,
and thus be able to contribute to them.
Propably why the team has no members in the first place...
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages:
www-servers/boa
www-servers/bozohttpd
www-servers/cherokee
www-servers/fnord
www-servers/lighttpd
El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:26 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages:
[...]
www-servers/bozohttpd
[...]
This is a false
On 03/21/12 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages:
www-servers/pound
www-servers/varnish
I'm a gonna take those two if no
El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:26 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages:
...
www-servers/lighttpd
This is not an orphan :)
On 03/21/2012 07:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
www-servers/thttpd
I can take care of this one
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID : D0455535
Hi,
I need some comments on following License Agreement:
http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do
QUOTE
In downloading this code you agree with the following:
I will not redistribute the software to others outside of my immediate
research group. I will suggest to other interested
On 22 March 2012 03:18, Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I need some comments on following License Agreement:
http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do
QUOTE
In downloading this code you agree with the following:
I will not redistribute the software to others outside of my
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in
other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for
use in other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be considered to be one of these
On 03/21/12 10:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for
use in other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be considered to be one of these
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:18 +0100, Justin wrote:
Hi,
I need some comments on following License Agreement:
http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do
QUOTE
In downloading this code you agree with the following:
I will not redistribute the software to others outside of my
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for
use in other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be considered to be one of these
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in
other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts.
Unless
Justin schrieb:
Hi,
I need some comments on following License Agreement:
http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do
QUOTE
In downloading this code you agree with the following:
This would maybe warrant fetch restriction or inclusion of the license
in the EULA group, as agreement
On 3/21/12 3:18 PM, Justin wrote:
http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do
Have you suggested the authors to use a more standard license? A good
article about that (and more) is
http://starplot.org/articles/physics-software-rant.html
That could also address possible interpretation
* Justin schrieb am 21.03.12 um 16:14 Uhr:
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for
use in other contexts without permission of the author.
On 03/21/12 11:14, Justin wrote:
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote:
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote:
I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for
use in other contexts without permission of the author.
Portage could be
20 matches
Mail list logo
