2) EAPI in file extension
- Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
a) .ebuild-eapi
- ignored by current Portage
This is the solution that solves most problems. Going with something
else is just a way of doing it wrong for the sake of it.
- ferdy
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:01:40PM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:28:43 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
A big gain in the context of ebuilds and source packages. Well done.
Yes, almost as important
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:33:22AM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Here you go (this is on an old machine, so you'll get much quicker times if
you try this at home):
A big gain in the context of ebuilds and source packages. Well done.
- ferdy
pgprSLpWrpb0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:51:32PM +0100, Ranjit Singh wrote:
This is a purely stylistic issue, same as the braces with variable
expansions.
See my other posts.
Your other posts only show that this is, indeed, a personal stylistic
issue. And a pointless one, too.
- ferdy
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:39:16AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
David Leverton wrote:
2008/9/5 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Both approaches are essentially equivalent but it's a little simpler
for ebuild writer if they don't have to customize the output file name.
But is it so much
On 14 Jun 2008, at 18:03, Luca Barbato wrote:
trunk = .live
nope it would resolve as foo_pre1 - meaningless.
So your proposal is unable to handle that case, right?
- ferdy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 14 Jun 2008, at 18:23, Luca Barbato wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
nope it would resolve as foo_pre1 - meaningless.
So your proposal is unable to handle that case, right?
You are forced to put a version, that's all.
Which doesn't always make sense so we are back to 9
On 14 Jun 2008, at 19:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
With your approach, we would have to fix the version after every
4.1.x release. That sounds awful, tbh. So:
No that enforce people update the deps or at least gives one more
reason to do. Keep in mind that -, -scm
On 14 Jun 2008, at 20:02, Luca Barbato wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On 14 Jun 2008, at 19:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
With your approach, we would have to fix the version after
every 4.1.x release. That sounds awful, tbh. So:
No that enforce people update the deps
On 14 Jun 2008, at 22:18, Luca Barbato wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On 14 Jun 2008, at 20:02, Luca Barbato wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On 14 Jun 2008, at 19:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
With your approach, we would have to fix the version after
every 4.1.x
On 13 Jun 2008, at 10:43, Luca Barbato wrote:
* What's the filename for live ebuild for SVN trunk/? What about
foo-${version inside trunk}.live?
And when trunk is unversioned?
Upstream has an issue, still you know which is the version they aim.
Wrong. Your GLEP has an issue because it
On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:01, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0530
Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why do you have to be plain insulting about it? Nobody can
magically spot every single bug in any piece of code presented to
them. In fact it's
On 13 Jun 2008, at 11:16, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Then don't do it. You are doing a very bad marketing for the
pkgcore guys with your whinnings.
I'm not a pkgcore guy. If anything I'm a portage supporter. That I
accidentally host pkgcore.org doesn't mean I'm one of them.
Were you able to
On 13 Jun 2008, at 12:18, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
We're writing a spec that's somewhat like Portage, but where it
breaks Paludis, we prefer to get Portage to change it's behaviour
instead. Don't crib about this however. We could just have easily have
created a whole new spec which broke Portage
On 12 Jun 2008, at 04:16, Brian Harring wrote:
Why the exherbo/paludis/PMS folk decided to go this route to report,
I'm not quite sure aside from assuming they're just griefers.
s-exherbo/paludis/PMS-pkgcore-g and:
On 11 Jun 2008, at 13:11, Brian Harring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 03:06:17AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's
On 10 Jun 2008, at 12:30, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
picard_facepalm.jpg
I don't think any of us are completely thrilled by either proposals,
but the EAPI-in-a-separate-file does have the potential for more
flexibility, ie package-wide EAPI.
And it does keep
On 10 Jun 2008, at 13:13, Luca Barbato wrote:
but I dislike empty theories or hardly searched corner cases that
could be avoided with half of the effort necessary to get there.
Yoy mean like adopting GLEP55, right?
- ferdy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:33, Joe Peterson wrote:
Luca Barbato wrote:
Check if exists a line EAPI=*$, if does and the rest of the string
matches an understood eapi, go on sourcing, otherwise ignore/mask
it...
And placing it out-of-band (like # EAPI=...) avoids any sourcing
errors, makes
On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:46, Joe Peterson wrote:
Also, I'm not sure reading XML is a problem at all - python has good
libs for this already.
Reading XML files is easy, but it makes certain codepaths much much
slower. Not a good 'feature'.
- ferdy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 10 Jun 2008, at 15:48, Luca Barbato wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
No, it doesn't make parsing faster. Had you bothered to profile any
package manager you'd know that.
Do you have any number to share?
What number are you interested in?
- ferdy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
On 10 Jun 2008, at 16:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:38:52 +0530
Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
- it doubles the number of file reads necessary during resolution.
The first read will
On 10 Jun 2008, at 19:06, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:54:49 Richard Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 17:39, Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At this point, we should really only discuss features that all 3
package
managers have implemented.
I'm not sure
On 10 Jun 2008, at 18:39, Doug Goldstein wrote:
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Lauer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So EAPI 2 is not everything shiny, but a small iterative
improvement to
EAPI 1.
Suggest features then and let's discuss!
For reference of
On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:50, Luca Barbato wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
I'm afraid you are mixing up emails from this thread. I got
complaints about how wrongly the PMS is written, e.g. academic paper
markup vs plain text, natural language used to specify syntax
while a
grammar notation like
On 9 Jun 2008, at 14:18, Luca Barbato wrote:
The people who wrote PMS should be able to make the decision
for themselves(as they will be maintaining it) as to what language to
use.
The main point being using latex prevents people from modify it.
Your opinion.
You don't *have* to read PMS
On 8 Jun 2008, at 11:12, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I
have a few technical questions for you:
1. GLEP54
2. GLEP55
3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs
[1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0054.html
[2] -
On 8 Jun 2008, at 14:34, Alex Howells wrote:
2008/6/7 Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Except you'd rather veto the ones you don't like. Hehe... It must
suck being
you, wanting to veto people and not being able to do it :)
I trust the masses to do the sensible thing and not vote
On 7 Jun 2008, at 21:21, Alex Howells wrote:
2008/6/7 Santiago M. Mola [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ferdy, thanks for the nomination.
astinus, thanks for your support and inspiration, which almost
convinced me for running for Council.
Any time :) In which case I guess maybe Jeroen Roovers (rej /
On 5 Jun 2008, at 18:09, Ali Polatel wrote:
Łukasz Damentko yazmış:
Hi guys,
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be
open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008).
I want to nominate:
Fernando J. Pereda -- ferdy
I kindly accept my nomination
On 3 Jun 2008, at 07:52, Ferris McCormick wrote:
I think nominations are open.
I'd like to nominate:
Ingmar
ColdWind
- ferdy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
myself, honestly, I couldn't care less.
Wonder why there is almost no non-mainstream arch team people
contributing to this thread?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpOiXoZzRjqH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
an opinion, then [then, sane
people see how this approach gets silly]
- ferdy
1 - And if you do so, please share Message-IDs, it'll make a great
laugh.
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpJPPltHYsaK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be neither readahead nor
'advised'. Which is STUPIDLY slow. So adding yet another directory to
the hierarchy is quite silly.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgp2k93LGjnu1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in paludis not being able to deal with whitespace in config
files, so clearly something's up with your text-processing. Hope that's
finally fixed now.
Hahahahahahaha you just made my day. As usual, your input is close to
worthless.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED
So here you're showing that you don't know what a USE flag is?
It is good he made it crystal clear though. Nobody has to 'guess' now.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpgzm13Sp0xr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:17:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Mixing EAPIs can't work.
Why?
Because EAPIs can define colliding features.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgp90C5dzn9AZ.pgp
Description
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:17:21PM +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Mixing EAPIs can't work.
Why?
Because EAPIs can define colliding features
a dev to manually mirror the EAPI in the filename
extension provide any benefit over caching it behind the scenes (using
the Manifest file or similar mechanism)?
You are yet to show what kind of inconvenience to the users this
proposal will cause.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB
your solution is:
--- 8 ---
# EAPI has to be set differently based upon tests on PV
if [[ -z ${PV/?.?/} ]] ; then
EAPI=bar-1
elif [[ -z ${PV/?.?.?/} ]] ; then
EAPI=0
else
EAPI=1
fi
--- 8 ---
So please, no hacks.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:37:11PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Fernando J Pereda wrote:
It seems to me that this will inconvenience the users, in order to
solve a technical problem of the package manager.
Absolutely, +1. This does indeed sound like a technical
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 07:45:44PM +, Duncan wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 18 Dec 2007
18:56:32 +0100:
And as we have now learned that EAPI strings are not limited to digits
(see ciaranm's message) and may even contain
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:07:07PM +0100, smurfd wrote:
Hi!
i have not really done any research
This is a very good moment to do so.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpTTgBfM3Ta4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to me, though.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpvD1hATiv2t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
). In the second one, you can.
That's the first thing that I can think of, there might be others.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgp0MO47jsszv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
previous message was only a
seasonal reminder of the fact that we know that he knows what his
problem is, although he is naive enough to think we are naive enough
to play with him.
So saying that a nasty hack is a nasty hack is not allowed these days?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB
think not using bash features in an environment where bash is required
is silly, instead of being an improvement) but I find interesting that
you ripped Ciaran's copyright while leaving the Prod ciaranm if you
find something it can't handle comment.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB
on the alpha profiles reverted as soon as I get to
my machine.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpWH5jgHzsRx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgppo3ZKWtso0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:59:28AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
lu - that prefers less rules and more people aware.
Couldn't agree more.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpliNQUioYQL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that this is
documented somewhere in the Developer Handbook...
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpNIXUsJJac3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 12:14:37PM +0200, cilly wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
I think that setting arbitrary guidelines that try to rule every
situation is just *plain* wrong.
Some of the packages I maintain are better removed when a new
maintenance
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:36:31AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
Some of the packages I maintain are better removed when a new
maintenance version is released. And I plan to keep it that way :)
Can you clarify this? What scenarios do you run into where it isn't
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 12:53:16PM +0200, cilly wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
Known to be buggy versions.
Of course, there are bugs in every version. Sometimes a user must be able to
choose which bug is more problematic, i.e. the bug in the newer
in the next mutt's release.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpLM06XNH1eN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that as:
There is still some people that don't like it.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpHNh2nUjSs2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to be because you have a vested interest in paludis
and paludis does not support this syntax and there happens to be no
reasonable way to support that?
Incidentally paludis *does* support it.
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpiD6XCA1LY4.pgp
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpMM3rYE1Bit.pgp
Description: PGP signature
writing such nonsense here?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpBJOIPchhLd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 08:46:35PM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote:
[snip]
Would you be kind enough to stop hijacking the thread ? You are
responsible for this last flame... just quit it please.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A
hate me, good too.
Please go back to your hacking and improve Gentoo. You just can't
'remove Ciaran from gentoo-dev', live with it, or leave Gentoo if you
don't like the way we do things now.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781
deveveloper *thought* he had checked rdeps before. Result: some
people (users here) got screwed because of misunderstanding.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpoTSmuR6fyG.pgp
Description: PGP
!
It is a good format and easy to write and parse in C, why change it ?
Just tell people to stop treating config files like bash scripts and
everything will be fine.
Or am I missing something?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781
, and then you don't
need the keywords in the first place).
No. Arch Teams manage their keywords the way _they_ want not the way YOU
or others that don't work on arch teams want.
It is actually *that* simple.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git
probably won't. I've tried to explain this at least
once in #gentoo-qa and he didn't seem to *want+ to understand it.
Maybe we aren't being clear enough...
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
and ebuild-maintainer and don't see a
problem here... so from your _vast_ experience as both an
ebuild-maintainer and arch-maintainer, what's the problem?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
can
start helping, right?
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpDeqfGu4dZh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
visual stuff like
gnome, kde, xfce and their respective mothers, for years.
So testing visual stuff remotely *is* possible.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpZgswJbGLmJ.pgp
Description: PGP
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:32:50PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
Hi guys,
We are planning to add git.eclass as presented in bug #132383 (as
attachment 96300). I also attach it here in case someone wants to
comment parts of it.
git.eclass is now in the tree
- ferdy
--
Fernando J
Hi guys,
We are planning to add git.eclass as presented in bug #132383 (as
attachment 96300). I also attach it here in case someone wants to
comment parts of it.
Please raise your concerns if you have any.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 11:58:32PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
I'd like people who use Git eclass to test it and see if any of the
'features' I introduced break things for them.
I just incorporated much of this into my version (minus some whitespace
changes
of bandwidth and disk space.
Latest version is in my public overlay[1].
- ferdy
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy/overlay/eclass/git.eclass
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpkLlwXiUe3v.pgp
Description
the good work with paludis.
-ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpuETI11d9bR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'.
I hope that clarifies the merge tracking part.
However I don't know what do you mean with 'changeset tracking'.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpeQGlULeJE4.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:54:17PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 15:21, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
The commit marked with @ is a special comit called a 'merge'.
I hope that clarifies the merge tracking part.
You just described what merging is. Svn can do that too with svn
.
A deal breaker in my opinion
That's not true at all. Not in any sane Git version.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpuShtf3rkjZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'cvs commit' and 'svn
commit' semantics. That's probably the reason you faced that problem :)
Cheers,
ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpZfPqD2Ec9B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
repositories successfully.
- ferdy
[1] git://git.freedesktop.org/~keithp/parsecvs
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpEnrmtBVaXl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
trying to clarify those issues you pointed out about Git.
I locally manage a couple of overlays with it, but nothing compared to
the portage tree.
- ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpTYXwfbk50K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:57:43PM -0500, Aron Griffis wrote:
Fernando J. Pereda wrote: [Sat Mar 25 2006, 06:18:52PM EST]
Well, I find it easier to understand than many other DVCSs out there...
In fact I don't think it is difficult to use in any way. Maybe pre-1.1
versions had some syntax
' (default and best) merge
strategy is written in python.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpjs799au2ks.pgp
Description: PGP signature
you screw your repo using normal Git commands ?
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpCufL8qSvGg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that are easier to use and less likely to cause
headaches.
Now my other mail doesn't make a lot of sense :)
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpgtULTTyX0l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 06:59:49PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
If you show a wrong code snippet please explain _why_ it is wrong in the
same email.
Ehm you mean it is not obvious that calling emerge inside an eclass
is utterly wrong ?
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer
know how they work... but I definately don't think ours suits in a
distributed SCM as Ciaran pointed out.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgp4IZvukZIby.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the issue. It's number of files.
And not only the number of files... the workflow here doesn't fit in a
distributed enviroment.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgp79Jjh6Ig20.pgp
in the tree. Another
| common problem is calling wget from inside test. Mostly this comes from
| src_test being a fairly recent feature... When some of the ebuilds in
| question were written it didn't exist.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net
to go and purge all of those, UTF-8 or not, whenever
| my brain recovers.
I hope ~ is not considered a weird character... if it is, tell me and
I'll fix all my ebuilds.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 06:38:36AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
You're masking occurs within the profile itself, not globally.
Global masking usually is for introduction of new ebuilds that need
testing and shouldn't be hit by normal arch testers (portage early
release candidates for
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 07:00:02PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
WONTFIX refers to the bug, not the attached ebuild.
And it won't be 'fixed' unless the ebuild is improved, so WONTFIX is
fine.
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
\\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be )
o o
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 11:05:43PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
Maurice van der Pot wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Bah! No I'm not, because Sven pointed out that it collides with the
bugzilla resolution. So I'm going with CHECKED instead.
Whoah! Isn't
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:39:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You want to become official.
We are official. It's not just the way things should be.
Well... you want to become staff.
In that regard, you do not get to take care of your own things anymore.
We will still recruit new
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:53:17AM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Nope; if you become staff then devrel/recruiters will be involved. You
are no exception to the rule.
Incorrect. As devrel already stated, this won't change ever. We will
be always the ones to do this.
I still don't see
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:19:34PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
I still don't see *WHY* you should be different from us. If you want to
manage your recruits then they can't be gentoo staff.
One reason could be that we are _not_ going to be called developers but staff.
Can anybody
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:01:57PM +0200, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
On 6/28/05, Jon Portnoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Developers have CVS access; take the ebuild quiz and you're a developer,
take the staff quiz (the eight-question quiz some mods apparently don't
like for whatever bizarre
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:34:11PM -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
When will this end?
DON'T KEYWORD STUFF YOU DON'T TEST ON ARCHES, SPECIALLY STUFF THAT WON'T
WORK UNTIL PORTING IS DONE.
I mean, c'mon, it's easy enough... just go to that little Mono page
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:13:11PM +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
* Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/05/11 09:36 +0900]:
Starts to smell of a cvs problem...
Two ideas to handle a check of metadata.xml:
1) repoman should run xmllint
2) the cvs-server can do it during commit (like it already
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:15:28AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Let me just diplomatically: cool :)
Agreed ! :P
--
\\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be )
o o ( FREE )
+--ooO--O--Ooo---+
|
99 matches
Mail list logo
