I'll cut your balls off.
Now, you need to right it a hundred times... Mar[ck]i
Weclome Markus
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Al
be considered before ebuilds are created, but
this may not always be the case.
2. No opinion
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 A
Any ideas?
# man webapp.eclass
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/webapps/webapp-eclass.xml
also
# man {5,8} webapp-config
The gentoo-web-user ML is now being used for webapp related
conversation.
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.or
did some rough calculations and we are porting about 29 pkgs/day.
At this rate it will take roughly 30 days to have all packages ported to
ModX.
spyderous wants it tomorrow,
HalycOn wants it when all is ported.
A (perhaps overly) simple solution is to split the difference.
In 15 days ModX
a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester |
grade to 2.1. Without somthing like this, I see a wave of
'bugs' about it.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 18:58 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> > media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> > media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
> &
media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
Looking in these ebuilds, all:
gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )
Please make global.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 40075
default recommended' release.
Because in all reality, there is a different release for each arch.
This is by no means complete, just some thoughts that might work.
cat flames > /dev/null; I'd wrather hear nothing.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 htt
d and peculiar steps in the
process. Make the tape clearly defined, and have no exceptions; everyone
plays by the same rules, no back doors.
Perhaps - more structure with easy-to-use tape - would be a better way
of phrasing it.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://
s a clearer definition of what each herd does? I am
considering writing a GLEP about this, having each herd answer three
questions periodicly (say 6mths).
- What do we want to do?
- How are we going to get there?
- How to we measure success?
and /maybe/ add a section about current devs and AT/H
x27;m wrong) is that we
need to have some form of Governance board. A board that doesn't worry
about implementation details; a board that gives a long term vision to
our project.
I am a big believer is having a common goal to unite all people who work
with an organizat
tatement acts as a beacon
on the horizon, allowing us to have a gauge against which to measure our
progress. In the process of discussing and generating this statement the
issues mentioned above, can be ironed out and/or flamed about.
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU:
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 14:32 -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
> leads me to think that it might just be New York that he is referring to.
>
> Tux
How about we wait and see what John Says. :)
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/i
aybe its high time we
> had some gentoo meet for the region.
>
> Tux
Uhh.. in this case. I don't think York == NewYork
maps.google.com | search 'York UK'
just FYI
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.n
A couple months ago, I was having trouble with my NTP server. I took me
a couple hours to fix.
During that time I sent some emails, and It seems that many people are
now receiving these emails. All is quite on the NTP front :)
Sorry for the PITA this may cause,
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EM
is is what happens anyway, but it is called FEATURES :)
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pg
27;t use PORT_LOGDIR in the first place.
People who want the information define PORT_LOGDIR and have the
information. Why add files containing duplicate information?
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
G
he 'regluar'
user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for
the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in
PORTLOG_DIR?
Later Days,
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.n
e the rsync exclude list.
>
I think the point was that the 'average' user needs to pull it as well
and has _no_ use for it.
There are already complaints about syncs taking to long.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.n
me that more things will need to 'just work' as our
user-base becomes larger and, on average, less advanced. We could amend
the desktop guide to include something like USE='meta-gnome' to the
gnome section. And similar to other meta-flags.
This may add an unnecessary level of com
| 4th.
>
> That clearly means everybody thinks Gentoo's performance is great and
> feels no need to discuss it. =)
It is discussed on gentoo-user. although many times with
less-then-practical solutions
-Lares
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://c
both.
- if use xml && use xml2; then
-einfo "You can specify only one flag of xml and xml2."
- einfo "It will be defaulted to expat (like autocheck does)."
Could we have one XML flag and an xml.eclass to determine which XML
version is installed on a p
made three weeks ago plus
> the modifications made last Tuesday"?
>
> Plus, of course, it helps to have a record of *why* changes were
> made...
>
Or IEEE ish
Original: GLEP 01
Ammended: GLEP 01.a
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.
s removed, this box will 'miss' the News Item.
May I suggest only removing news Items after all the packages in the
Display-If-(Installed|Profile) slots are no longer in the tree.
Just a lowely ATs opinion
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lar
t; A great software that would be fun to have on Gentoo is texmaker.
>
> http://www.xm1math.net/texmaker/
>
> I don't know how to help on get this ebuild on Gentoo but I can try to
> help with this one if you guys tell me how.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Herbert
s the only thing I can think of
that is inhibiting out goal.
Later Days
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.n
ructions can be found at http://thedoc";
> >
> > Trigger the message only when switching minor versions.
>
> That's going to be really really annoying for someone like me that flips
> between gcc versions all the time to test things.
New flag?
# gcc-config -q foo
-q == quiet
ju
I don't know if the contents are supposed to be the 'live' website data,
but, after scrolling down to the nice link tables at the bottom,
clicking on GLEPs, the info is outdated. Only up to GLEP 38.
Don't know if that is what you are looking for?
Later Days
--
Lares More
t Gentoo and make your own « sur mesure » system",
> > but i don't know how to translate "sur mesure" from french to english.
>
> 'custom-made' or perhaps 'home-brewed'.
>
'made-to-order'
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two drives can
> drop out without the thing dieing) with a hot-spare as well, so
> threex146GB usable.
Is RAID6 production ready?
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | L
lot of disk-space. But our setup could
> make use of a lot of fast RAM and a nice RAID (which we
> don't have at the moment).
>
> So specs are:
> - ~3GHz Xeon
> - 4-6GB of RAM
> - RAID-5 or -10 with u320 disks (for the actual data, 20GB
> would be enough for the nex
rver, not limited by time.
- Allow Devs to change this number if they feel it is necessary
- <5min access when working directly with Dev.
- number reset every (y) days.
(this means new infra, so prolly not)
Per AT Access:
Each AT upload their ssh_pub to the existing
nd emailing
ebuilds.tar's. A dedicated 'AT/HT' sync box sounds like an acceptable
solution.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pg
? I ask because IIRC it may take ~30min for
all the mirrors to sync up to the 'Latest' revision, therefore the sync
that I do _may_ be up to 60min old (worstcase). so main rotation mirror
access would be nice.
Feasable? I know not.
Later Days
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | L
hich I do not have a 'firm' opinion on.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Prefered
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40
k elsewhere for the
.g.o arguments.)
As for the ro access to CVS. I don't use it now, but if I had it I
would probably use it. IMO CVS ro access is a Chicken-egg issue,
- "you don't need it!"
- "if I had it I would use it!"
So I won't get in that war.
The
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 10:38 -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:16:06AM -0700, Lares Moreau wrote:
> > Is there a possibility to have each 'type' of staff have there own
> > subdomain. ie. @testers.g.o for at/ht
> >
>
> --
> Homer Parker
> Gentoo/AMD64 Team
> Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Strategic Lead
> Gentoo Linux Developer Relations
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester |
.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x96BA679B
> Key fingerprint = 5E1A 57A0 0FA6 939D 3258 8369 81C5 A17B 96BA 679B
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester
LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
127.0.0.1 Canada
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> * Does anyone think we should make users build spell lists from source,
> even though it can require several GBytes of RAM?
A Use flag and a warning message with a 5 second delay might be
adviseable. Some users add USE flags with out worrying about what
resources it may take.
-Lares
--
gen
Does someone who is primarily working on (for arguents sake)
Translations does not nessessarily "know what they are doing" in terms
of overall gentoo dev. My impression is that they have voting
privileges.
My feeling is that people who know about TopicA will vote on things that
relate to that T
Nevermind, torsmo is superseeded by conky.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 16:51 -0600, Lares Moreau wrote:
> I'm addding functionality to torsmo by adding support for i8k, The dell
> laptop utils. I am using existing source code from the i8kutils package
> to extend this functionalit
I'm addding functionality to torsmo by adding support for i8k, The dell
laptop utils. I am using existing source code from the i8kutils package
to extend this functionality.
Now my question is, Since I am using source code from i8kutils and
adding it to torsmo, which would be the most appropriate
What structure are you thinking about for the 'real' x86 arch?
would there be a meta-x86 and then two sub-archs?
ie.
--real_x86--+--x86--~x86
+--amd64--~amd64
where {real_x86}={x86}INTERSECT{amd64}.. ?
Lares
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 12:10 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> The recent discu
45 matches
Mail list logo
