Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>>> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
>>>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
>> 1. With the addition ofcpp, why
>> do we
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:58:21PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> >> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
> > 1. With the addition
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 10:03:10PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
> >> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> > Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> >
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to valid
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>> One GLEP introduces new elements 'team', 'dev' and 'proxy':
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-new_metadata_elements.html
> 1. With the addition of cpp, why
> do we still need elements?
I'd
